we are missing that piece of code that will make the original bitcoin faster
It's not just about code, it's about compromise. Throughput has a cost. Those who secure the chain have to bear that cost. They have to store and relay the information contained and updated within the blockchain. Even at the present rate of throughput, this cost increases all the time. If you wish to increase throughput it subsequently means increasing the rate at which that cost increases. If you run a node, you can have a small amount of influence over what level of throughput you are prepared to support. When most nodes are prepared to support more throughput, then it can increase.
nodes dont have influence ANYMORE.. thats the point of your favoured "backward compatibility" nodes dont need or get to vote anymore. things are pushed through without node mass agreement..
you have been promoting that feature for a while. so why pretend its the opposite now
you love how core decide without consent. you have been promoting that too how devs shouldnt be told what to do or be censored from doing things they want
you know deep down its core devs that control future decisions not user nodes. they shouldnt have gained that power. but you love that they have
YOU are the guy that doesnt want more transactions but loves the idea of 1 tx having 4mb of bloat in the form of a image file
hey if you think one image file being 4mb in 1 tx is fine for the network.. then please stop crying when others want 4mb of 8000tx, which you cry by saying/suggesting its bad for the network
we are not in the era of 1999 where computers are slow and cannot cope with it.
its 2023 computers can cope with more then you pretend they can
if you truly think 4mb of genuine utility of thousands of transactions(packets of data) is bad. then how come many many other data services to clients of different serves do not have a problem.. EG online gaming. livestreaming, torrents
i do laugh how you want blocks to have 1tx of 4mb but dont want 4mb of 8000tx
users dont have the choice because the only main dev of protocol level coding is core. thus everyone is WAITING and begging for CORE to allow more transaction count, becasue any other brand trying to do it will get REKT. and core as you know have a roadmap of wanting to push people off the network into other networks(you favour) as their plan.. and as you keep saying for the last 6 years "be patient" yet all of these topics over the years made by thousands of people wanting transaction scaling on bitcoin shows its not just a minority asking for more tx count onchain
stop pretending its user decision or user fault for no upgrades.. core have become the only party offering ability to upgrade and yet they are not offering the upgrades the people want and only offering upgrades corporations want(gateway formats to lock people into other networks for middlemen rewarding of facilitating payments)
