The future is looking good for P2e games

[Pterosaur]

Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.



In this image above, it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.   

This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.

[royalfestus]

Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?

[Jackl87]

Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.

I am a passionate pc gamer for many years now and as a gamer i am still not really sure what to think about NFT's and play 2 earn mechanics in a game. I have not seen a good game so far, that also had NFT's and a play 2 earn concept included and to be honest i think it is also very hard to create a game, that is fun to play for people that do not want to invest into it and that is also profitable for those "players" that are playing this game to earn money.
In order to be profitable to play i think that 90% of the playersbase need to paying those 10% of the players that are earning money and therefore the game needs to be fun to play or those 90% won't stay.

[blockman]

it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.   [/i]

Let's correct this, maybe you mean about patent not patient?

This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.

Much better to just play and enjoy without thinking seriously about gains. Because if you're thinking a lot about your gains and returns, you'll be serious with it and each move you do has to have something in return which is quite bad. Games should be enjoyed and if it's a play to earn, that's just an incentive that you'll receive while having fun. But the main thing about it is to enjoy and make yourself fun with the games you play.

[JamesBorn]

Some of this game like PS2 and NFTs are created for just funs, at the end the subscribers keep develops the Apps owners. Game should share benefits to make it interesting. I don't want to play game that I will not earn. I need play and earn, funs and money.

[YOSHIE]

I don't want to play game that I will not earn. I need play and earn, funs and money.

Have you ever tried to play in the P2e play-to-earn Game....!

P2e games is currently one of the games based on the play-to-earn concept which is currently popular in the gaming world today, based on blockchain technology, which allows you to get and have the opportunity to collect or acquire crypto assets in the form of TLM tokens, Axie and ERC tokens, you can easily exchange them by connecting a wallet like Metamask for you to make BNB/usdt currency and real money.

If you know and see those who play P2e games, fact, they play to get money and the highest income after successfully completing missions in the game, you actually make real money in P2e Games play, with Axie token exchange method etc. you can generate the biggest income playing in P2e Games.

[Oceat]

I still have doubts about this idea but who knows?

Let the players/people tell what they do think about it, perhaps I should try to play too but if I'm not enjoying the game then I would probably gonna quit even if it's P2E.

This type of game is kinda getting a trend but the other gaming platform isn't doing it yet perhaps they don't like the concept or maybe they trying to blend in with what's the trend in the gaming community?

[Psynthax]

many of them are still in developing stage and we don't even know if they'd succeed, the attention has now shifted over to 2nd layer solution chain that got the flow of invesments.
it seems these crypto based games are in general already losing momentum, the development taking too long and people already forgetting it i think, since it's just not as famous.

[lobo13hf]

it seemed p2e have no future whatsoever, it's already having really low trading volume overall in various project across the chains which means that many are already uninterested in this p2e based project.
but it seems the many developers you mentioned already have strong history of developing good games so I think they might have chance of turning around the trend once again.

[ryzaadit]

P2E are being liked because make you money, but while the table has been turn. Then people are hatting, still the main problem to keep the volume trading token, mechanism burn token. So the pressure selling and buying are balance, If to much selling pressure you all know is gonna to be end like AXIE. Just take a look AXIE, from his glory day not the NFTs team can be set up 5-10$.

[DapanasFruit]

Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?

This is one big problem that is keeping the whole P2E industry on bay...and we have witnessed many platforms that soared but then they could not be able to sustain the whole thing so that right now they are withering. In fact, I lost some money in P2E and I will never ever be a part of it again no matter what. I am not sure how they can be able to make this critical balance into the future. Good luck to all players and investors hope you can all earn what you all deserve.

[ANSEL_2.0]

P2E are being liked because make you money, but while the table has been turn. Then people are hatting, still the main problem to keep the volume trading token, mechanism burn token. So the pressure selling and buying are balance, If to much selling pressure you all know is gonna to be end like AXIE. Just take a look AXIE, from his glory day not the NFTs team can be set up 5-10$.

Nothing is wrong with Axie, this project still has whopping 57 million dollars trading volume, and the market cap is still around 972 million, this is still a success in a bear market, every coins and tokens released in crypto space will always bow to the pressure of a bear market, this project still rocks #54 on coinmarketcap, I am impressed.

[crzy]

P2E is still young, they made a good introduction into this market during the pandemic and I'm sure they will rise again.
There will always a huge competition in the market, if you choose to be left behind then its your fault but a good project will always work behind and do better day by day. I'm still expecting for Axis to rise again and made a comeback, probably a new technology can help P2E to grow again, bull market can also help.

[SUPERSAIAN]

P2E are being liked because make you money, but while the table has been turn. Then people are hatting, still the main problem to keep the volume trading token, mechanism burn token. So the pressure selling and buying are balance, If to much selling pressure you all know is gonna to be end like AXIE. Just take a look AXIE, from his glory day not the NFTs team can be set up 5-10$.

There is no play-to-win game that can establish this balance yet. First of all, they should love the game, game creators and distributed NFTs should be limited. Buying and selling should be analyzed very well and there should be a balance in between. In this way, the system can be more successful.

The NFT I have should be able to be used in another game in the same universe. When this happens, ecosystems and customers will grow even more. He still has time, we saw a small attempt at the time of the pandemic. They still do not invest large sums of money. At the moment, they are more development-oriented, game companies or they do not release what they have.

[rhodelmabanal]

I know that play to earn games will have a good future, many people specially the students are now playing play to earn games it will surely have a good future i believe that many play to earn games will come, because crypto is having a huge adoption every now and then and crypto makes play to earn game more simple specially in cashing in cashing out the money you win.

[bittraffic]

If only there are exciting games that can work on cheap smartphones, I would probably be playing often off those games. It's risky to install those games on the phone because it may also compromise the other crypto wallets.

Gaming companies will need to adapt to the new trends otherwise they will be left behind. Sony has to also evolve, and probably create thier blockchain games as well. If DOTA will be on the blockchain, I guess they will need tokens too.

[VRExpress]

If only there are exciting games that can work on cheap smartphones, I would probably be playing often off those games. It's risky to install those games on the phone because it may also compromise the other crypto wallets.

Gaming companies will need to adapt to the new trends otherwise they will be left behind. Sony has to also evolve, and probably create thier blockchain games as well. If DOTA will be on the blockchain, I guess they will need tokens too.

Are you sure you are looking the right places? Because there are many play to earn games that's running on smartphones, there are some that are less graphically demanding too, you can try to look into Games For a Living (GFAL), this is a new gaming project and it's capable to challenge GALA games, the team are from EA games and other popular game developers still very new, and they have two games up and running, one is Elemental Raiders, it can run on phones.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/games-for-a-living/

[Pterosaur]

Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?

You are right, many play to earn games do lack quality, but that's because it's a blockchain game where both qualified game developers and non qualified game developers are free to build, if it was Sony at work here they won't hire less experienced builders, they always go after the best, but things will turn around very soon.

[Jating]

Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.

I am a passionate pc gamer for many years now and as a gamer i am still not really sure what to think about NFT's and play 2 earn mechanics in a game. I have not seen a good game so far, that also had NFT's and a play 2 earn concept included and to be honest i think it is also very hard to create a game, that is fun to play for people that do not want to invest into it and that is also profitable for those "players" that are playing this game to earn money.
In order to be profitable to play i think that 90% of the playersbase need to paying those 10% of the players that are earning money and therefore the game needs to be fun to play or those 90% won't stay.

Yes, compare to pc games, P2E are way off, quality is not that good, mechanics. But let's see, if big names in the gaming industry will focus to at least developed their won P2E with the whole metaverse concept then who knows.

But for now, there's none, even Facebook who has been building a metaverse can't do it, how can the others do with just small budget.

So I don't see it being as big in the gaming industry, it will still be based on how much money players and the developers are going to earn, simply as that.

[Hypnosis00]

Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?

You are right, many play to earn games do lack quality, but that's because it's a blockchain game where both qualified game developers and non qualified game developers are free to build, if it was Sony at work here they won't hire less experienced builders, they always go after the best, but things will turn around very soon.

Then let us wait to come out and finish their development. Yes, it was really interesting a known company like Sony brings such changes in the crypto world and offers P2E which I see really gains the attention of gamers. I believe their capability as builders will have positive results which is what we wanted to happen unlike the past set of P2E which just collapse after the season due to a lack of development and team support. But as this Sony enters blockchain tech, we can really expect more from this.