Circulating supply matters to you?

[GreatArkansas]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project?
(....)

Tokenomics. Because there are more coins available for trading when there is a higher circulating supply, it can be more challenging for a cryptocurrency to experience significant price increases. The fewer coins available for trading, a cryptocurrency may be more susceptible to price increases if its circulating supply is smaller.

[cryptoknightt]

In my view so far avoiding low supply projects can be a wise choice as low supply can maximally affect the asset price and project performance.
If the project is a new project and the use case kills it then it should be a serious consideration. New projects usually have a higher risk than established projects. However, if there is confidence that the project can thrive and be well received by the market then it may be worth considering.

[adaseb]

Yes supply is the most important metric to determine how to price a token. If the supply is unlimited and you need to look at the mining rate or supply issuance rate.

For example, most don’t realize how many dogecoins there are. Not only that but the mining supply is still huge. If you understood this then you would realize that Dogecoin at $1,$5 or $10 just isn’t possible.

[LastKiss]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Well, personally I choose a project that doesn't have supply too much and not too low too, if that project has a big circulating supply I prefer to that project having a burning feature it will help to attract new investors to invest in that project, if a project has low circulating supply it should have anti dump feature cause a token that having low supply easily up and down like 100% in few hours.

[Bollexz1]

It matters to me as it gives a headlight on what the future of the project holds. If the project has a good use case with a stable fundamental behind them and the circulating supply is low, then there's a tendency that the acclaimed project would still grow. Most especially the ones that come with a small max supply.

[gaston castano]

n terms of avoiding a project with low circulating supply, it can be a wise decision in some cases. A low circulating supply can mean that a large portion of the tokens are held by the project team, investors, or other parties, which could lead to price manipulation and volatility.

[southerngentuk]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Almost every project has their own TGE release schedule and we can observe and judge the potential for return or risk in which we invest.
And I see that most tokens/coins will have a plan to lock and unlock slowly to create fairness for everyone.
Therefore, pay attention to the projects that are transparent in providing unambiguous information, because today many projects appear only to follow the trend and do not have a long-term plan, they just want to accelerate tokens to the market and earn money from investors.

[super bako]

in terms of supply this can push support to where the highest price position can be predicted. What's more, if you see a good project and a very small supply, this is very possible for a significant price. what is most important to me is the performance of the project team, because the pattern of the project going forward is only this team, the main thing is to pay attention, in my opinion

[ololajulo]

When it comes to the circulating supply, the integrity of the team matters, since they may give information that is inaccurate. An ICO handles it differently with access to information about distributed tokens and wallets holding them, as well as the purchase process. Now the team can claim they will reserve a certain amount of tokens for the team and marketing while pushing huge amounts of coins to influencers and themselves without staking and gradually dumping them.

[Xal0lex]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

In order to invest in a project, the circulating supply should contain as few coins of the main investors as possible, if we are talking about new projects. When the price is at the bottom and the circulating supply consists mainly of speculators' and public investors' coins, this is a good sign, because such projects, having a small supply grow in price very quickly.

[GreenStox]

I think from tokenomics you can see how much the token allocation is for each part, if the team holds too many tokens it's best to avoid it.
This is just my personal opinion, feel free to do whatever you think.

[Digital_Lord]

there are lots of projects the tokens supply of which are minimum but their worth is higher. So it doesn't matter that how much circulation is there but it depends on the value. Sometimes if the amount of tokens are low but if wait for the proper timing then further enhancement will occur in price. The worth of tokens also depends on utility of these tokens and also the interests of the people for these tokens. The supply does not matter because if there are large number of tokens but have less value then there will be no benefits to the participants but if the circulation is lower but value is high so it will be worthy for the participants

[Kelvinid]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

We should have not invested in projects blindly but rather put into consideration that circulating supply is a big factor that would influence the future of a particular project. We have noticed that a small circulating supply dominates the market increase than those projects that have a huge supply. Well, the thing is that even though it generates huge demand it only gives a small impact on its price. Now, if we think about long-term investment, we can't expect that our invested money will grow fast but rather expect a few increments of it.

[jossiel]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why?

Can do the both, low and high supply.

Because what matters now is the actual usage of the project and use case. That's making everyone invest into a project but there are conservative investors that have this type of condition about having low or high supply of a project.

What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Then that's so much better.

[jacafbiz]

I think the most important thing to do is to look at is the lock-up period, if a project has a low circulating supply and the remaining tokens are locked up for a year, it is a good buy because there is no one coming to dump on you, but if the project has low circulating supply but the remaining tokens enter the market daily or weekly even monthly, I won't touch it. I like tokens that have most of VCs tokens released or almost released, VCs are sharks they will dump on you but if the team dumps on you, people will protest and they will need to explain and justify their actions because they need to show they are it in for a long term

[nicolas1979]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Most people also look at the total supply of the coin before investing. Because it can affect the price increase during a bull. However, the amount of supply that is too low is also less convincing, if the coin price is low. Because it allows someone to hold half of the total coins. I'm more interesting with coins in the hundreds of millions, but I don't like coins with billions. Billions of coins seem like a joke, let alone trillions of coins.

[Lainta]

Thank you for reaching out to me. I am happy to help in any way I can. Whether you need more information or have a specific question, please feel free to ask. Your interest is greatly appreciated, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. If there is anything else I can assist you with, please do not hesitate to let me know.

[Mozzart]

I think the general circulation greatly affects the future price of the token in the project.Personally, a large number of tokens scares me off.For me it does not look promising more like the developers are trying to attract as many new users as possible due to the cheap price.

[uneng]

I think the general circulation greatly affects the future price of the token in the project.Personally, a large number of tokens scares me off.For me it does not look promising more like the developers are trying to attract as many new users as possible due to the cheap price.

Supply is one of the most important aspects when choosing a token to invest. A high supply will make this token unlikely to achieve adoption (as other investors will not show interest for it) and superior price levels, due to the continuous set of tokens being put for sale on the market. The same is valid when there are high interest rates being offered over the token.

However, there is a powerful mechanism that must be noticed, which can potentially make a high circulating supply still worthful, that is the burning thing. If the burning rates (number of tokens which are destroyed from times to times, consequently decreasing supply) are decent, it's possible this token is still a good idea on long term.

Analyze each case separately. Identify every features presented to reach the best conclusion for yourself.

[Natalim]

I choose coins for investment based on these things;
 - circulating supply
 - exchanges

Investing in the low cap is usually the most preferred by the majority knowing the fact that this will have the chance for the price to grow.
However, it did not just stop there as we also consider the exchanges where it was listed for this will also affect its trend and the interest of the investors/traders. Because not all projects that have low circulating supply become successful, some also fail due to lack of support from the developers and yes, it is listed only in not popular exchanges.