Circulating supply matters to you?

[Abiky]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Not sure. But I can tell you that any circulating supply above the "millions" is totally not worth it. That's if you're looking into coins that're ideal as a store of value. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dash all have an extremely-limited circulating supply. The max supply is also lower compared to other coins being traded on the market today. You can invest into them now, and obtain huge returns in the future (especially Bitcoin). I cannot say the same about Ethereum, Cardano, BNB, and the likes. These have large circulating supplies, making them useful only as digital cash.

Depending on your needs, will be the type of coin to choose. Be advised that just because a coin has a large circulating supply, doesn't mean it's destined to failure. It's all about how active the coin is in terms of development and innovation, and what use cases it provides to the world. As long as you play your cards right, you'll be able to avoid losing it all further down the road. Who knows which altcoins will be able to stand the test of time? Just my thoughts

[terencio]

A project that has a low circulating supply may not necessarily be a bad investment, but it may pose some risks, such as high volatility, low liquidity, and potential manipulation by whales or insiders. On the other hand, a project that has a high circulating supply may not necessarily be a good investment, but it may offer some benefits, such as stability, accessibility, and scalability.

[Romeotom]

It doesn’t matter if a project have good response for investors. If they have strong community support with promising development and partnership many old project then we can trust him. There are many old project who have there larger investors community so you can also check there supply lot of.

[Beparanf]

It doesn’t matter if a project have good response for investors. If they have strong community support with promising development and partnership many old project then we can trust him. There are many old project who have there larger investors community so you can also check there supply lot of.

Circulating supply always matter because price reflects based on the number of tokens dilluted on the current supply. Circulating will not matter if all the total supply is already circulating in the market. The majority of crypto projects usually unlock tokens in tranches which makes them automatically dump their token once it unlock since that’s the take profit time.

In some cases, Circulating supply won’t matter since the token has a buy back or token burn project which balance the release of new tokens mint. But most cases, Circulating supply always reflect the price of the token.

[nick_2017]

The circulating supply of a cryptocurrency is just one factor to consider when evaluating a project. While a low circulating supply may create scarcity and potentially impact the price dynamics, it should not be the sole determining factor in your investment decision.

[|MINER|]

The circulating supply of a cryptocurrency is just one factor to consider when evaluating a project. While a low circulating supply may create scarcity and potentially impact the price dynamics, it should not be the sole determining factor in your investment decision.

I can't fully agree with you on this point that circulating supply  should not be the sole of determining factor for investment decision. Becuase circulating supply is always a big factor to flow of price.
I if you want a example for that then saw the incident of Luna. Here it is easy to understand that if the investors of that coin are less i.e. the demand is less and the circulating supply increases continuously through mining then the value of that coin decreases day by day. And that is why project are make this burning option.

[SlimShadyMmp]

Low circulating supply and maybe low marketcap Is actually good for investing but also take note of the total supply of the coin The higher the number the more risk Project dumps on you when they unlock and runs away I think unlock schedule and tokenomics are important to a project

[o48o]

A project that has a low circulating supply may not necessarily be a bad investment, but it may pose some risks, such as high volatility, low liquidity, and potential manipulation by whales or insiders. On the other hand, a project that has a high circulating supply may not necessarily be a good investment, but it may offer some benefits, such as stability, accessibility, and scalability.

This is not a thing. Those issues you are talking about aren't correlating with low supply, no matter how many decimals the supply has. Neither high supply of "full coins" has anything to do with scalability or accessibility. I have no idea where people get these ideas. Should i be worried and should people be educated more on these issues. Because this is just strange way to think that i can't grasp and it's quite common but i have no idea who spreads these lies.

[Blitzboy]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Not sure. But I can tell you that any circulating supply above the "millions" is totally not worth it. That's if you're looking into coins that're ideal as a store of value. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Dash all have an extremely-limited circulating supply. The max supply is also lower compared to other coins being traded on the market today. You can invest into them now, and obtain huge returns in the future (especially Bitcoin). I cannot say the same about Ethereum, Cardano, BNB, and the likes. These have large circulating supplies, making them useful only as digital cash.

Depending on your needs, will be the type of coin to choose. Be advised that just because a coin has a large circulating supply, doesn't mean it's destined to failure. It's all about how active the coin is in terms of development and innovation, and what use cases it provides to the world. As long as you play your cards right, you'll be able to avoid losing it all further down the road. Who knows which altcoins will be able to stand the test of time? Just my thoughts

Less "supply-ism" please! But you are not entirely wrong. Because of their scarcity, digital currencies like Bitcoin and Litecoin can appear to be shining treasure chests. However, we shouldnt throw Ethereum and the others away just yet. Some of those infants are rather crafty!

Although they lack the allure of scarcity, they are developing innovations that have the blockchain community swooning. Electronic contracts? DApps? These are currently selling like hotcakes. They are more like digital genies, granting wishes left and right, than digital cash.

Oh, and lets not get too excited about Bitcoin just yet. Although it is a fan favorite, it is not the only game in town. You should monitor alternative cryptocurrencies. Perhaps one of them will shock us someday. Moreover, you know what? Bring on the crazy-sounding coin names. This helps to maintain the excitement!

[MiF]

Supply is always matters most, i have a lot of experience buying coin that has a big supply and it really turn to losses it is because the market always depend on the law of supply and demand even if the project has a good use case but it also has a big circulating supply then we cannot expect a big profit on it because the supply is big and it is normal that the price rises only few percent.

[woez]

Supply is always matters most, i have a lot of experience buying coin that has a big supply and it really turn to losses it is because the market always depend on the law of supply and demand even if the project has a good use case but it also has a big circulating supply then we cannot expect a big profit on it because the supply is big and it is normal that the price rises only few percent.

It makes sense, if the supply is low but if the demand is high, the price will automatically increase, especially since the coin has superior features that will be used by various products later as an alternative payment other than dollars/fiat. usually there is also a burning moment to reduce the amount of supply if I'm not mistaken for coins/tokens that have long term prospects and concepts.

[FrozenBit]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Of course, any project with unclear tokenmics should be avoided, I have also experienced many investments with low quality projects with easily generated and exaggerated contracts on channels. through and then the dump from dev. I had a lot of technical problems when I started, so the element of observing and evaluating the quality of the project from the beginning to avoid encountering useless things, in the past I also witnessed a lot of projects with The team is quite good, but the token sale and deployment process causes the project to die down over time. Nowadays there are many issues as well as factors to evaluate a project and the circulation factor of a crypto project, usually I quite like projects that have a large amount of tokens for the early community, but also increased to less than 20% of total supply.

[JunkieMiner]

Those projects which have the most circulating supply can give a positive outcomes as compared to those projects who didn't have that much of the circulating supply and second thing, the project all criteria depending upon their work to the internet society. If they are giving any beneficial aspects to the users surely that will be joined.

[Rampagoe004]

What is the fair percentage of a total max supply that are in circulation that can make you invest in a project? It is fine to avoid a project that has low circulating supply? Why? What about if the project is a brand new project and the use case is killing it?

Yes! I would prefer to avoid projects that have a low supply circulation and a high supply maximum. If a crypto project still has a small circulating supply and has a large supply max, there is a possibility that the project will become a scam or the price will stagnate.

[DeathAngel]

You will find that coins with a lower circulating supply tend to do quite well. Obviously a coin needs to have top devs & a good level of trust all around it.

I definitely prefer to buy low supply coins over seemingly infinite supply coins.

Something that is more scarce usually does better than something with a large supply although there are exceptions.

[fuguebtc]

You will find that coins with a lower circulating supply tend to do quite well. Obviously a coin needs to have top devs & a good level of trust all around it.

I definitely prefer to buy low supply coins over seemingly infinite supply coins.

Something that is more scarce usually does better than something with a large supply although there are exceptions.

That's not necessarily true because creating a coin with a finite supply is not so difficult. The price of a coin depends on many factors, and in which demand is the main factor, if the coin supply is limited, but the demand is not high, its value will never increase. Conversely, even if a coin has an infinite supply but a very high demand for it, its value will still increase over time. The best example is ETH, ETH has an infinite supply, and its value is increasing daily. In short, supply is not what determines the value of a coin.

[Yamifoud]

You will find that coins with a lower circulating supply tend to do quite well. Obviously a coin needs to have top devs & a good level of trust all around it.

I definitely prefer to buy low supply coins over seemingly infinite supply coins.

Something that is more scarce usually does better than something with a large supply although there are exceptions.

That's not necessarily true because creating a coin with a finite supply is not so difficult. The price of a coin depends on many factors, and in which demand is the main factor, if the coin supply is limited, but the demand is not high, its value will never increase. Conversely, even if a coin has an infinite supply but a very high demand for it, its value will still increase over time. The best example is ETH, ETH has an infinite supply, and its value is increasing daily. In short, supply is not what determines the value of a coin.

There are many factors, right and one factor that affects the price is also the potentiality of the project. Well, we can say that supply matters also because as we can see, many projects that have a huge circulating supply never grow fast. ETH is different from other projects which is why I can't compare this to others as it was special and considered the king of altcoins. But if we are talking about the others that have an infinite supply, I wasn't seeing them grow, they only just pump during the bull season.

[waONE]

Of course supply circulation is very important for analyzing an altcoin,
because from supply circulation we can know what the appropriate price is for the coin,
it takes a lot of learning to understand it, but if you manage to learn about supply circulation,
technical analysis and fundamental analysis then you will succeed to reach a good level.

[Abiky]

The circulating supply of a cryptocurrency is just one factor to consider when evaluating a project. While a low circulating supply may create scarcity and potentially impact the price dynamics, it should not be the sole determining factor in your investment decision.

Exactly. I've seen coins with an extremely-limited supply becoming a failure due to low interest/demand from investors. They're virtually out of the radar, due to poor marketing/promotion efforts from the developer team. A good example of this is 42 Coin (42). Garlicoin is in the same path as the aforementioned cryptocurrency. A pity because these coins would've been a great alternative to Bitcoin and Litecoin. At least, in terms of using it as a store of value.

Remember, "not all that glitters is Gold". You'd need to do your own research to help determine which coins are worth it and which ones are not. As long as you don't go crazy putting all of your life savings into crypto, nothing should stop you from becoming financially-independent in the future. Act responsibly and avoid the hype just to be safe. Just my two sats

[wtsimis]

Circulating supply is an important issue in the cryptocurrency world. A project circulating supply represents the total number of coins or tokens available on the market and actively circulated among investors. This directly affects the value and market capitalization of cryptocurrencies. We know that low supply creates scarcity in the market which causes the price to rise and more supply can lower the value of the token meaning demand decreases. Investors often consider supply trends when evaluating a cryptocurrency growth potential and determining its attractiveness as an investment. However, other factors such as the project underlying technology, use cases and overall market conditions should be analyzed and then invested in instead of relying solely on the advertised supply.