Duckdice.io Fake Trustpilot Reviews

[shasan]

➫ DuckyDice acted unethically? Maybe
➫ Can the OP cheat? Maybe

As DuckyDice offered to create multiple reviews it is unethical so, we can not tell it maybe. But if you think the screenshot has been manipulated then you are right.
As op has accepted the offer op did the unethical in the first phase. And as op received the payment but deleted reviews it is unethical phase 2.

[1714793481]

1714793481

[1714793481]

1714793481

[1714793481]

1714793481

[1714793481]

1714793481

[Hispo]

I'm wondering if the site will randomly chat you and asked you for a review, or they will just pick the top players and force them to review the site so they can qualify for some reward.

If there's no statement about posting only positive review then this can be a good one, so you have the choice to tell every positive and negative about that site. Trustpilot though is not reliable as many reviews there are fake and just being paid by the site, this is one of the proof.

If I had to guess, It would make sense if they made this offer to people they assume would accept.
Gamblers with relatively low accumulated wager who would find the deal to be worth their time.

There is no case in offering 5$ per review to someone who could easily wager thousands of dollars in a single day.

If that OP says is true, these are the kind of devious practices which make those review webpages an unreliable place to find references...

[Wiwo]

Who trust a third party review any ways, I don't trust their judgment since their bought and look at your own situation you were paid to make positive review about them and afterwards you were scammed of your payments.

-You should have known the risk you were taking since you offers to give bad services and duckdice representative you interacted with know how worthless your service is just the same as a spammer so why cry out for not getting paid to mislead the general public.

[shasan]

There is no case in offering 5$ per review to someone who could easily wager thousands of dollars in a single day.

I think OP has tried to reach the team and asked for a task and then they have offered such a task. Keep in mind that all the users can't do the same type of wagger and also what to do after losing all funds. There is nothing to do, no wager.

[seoincorporation]

Now you have to make a negative post in trust pilot for that site because they didn't pay you for all the positive posts you make about them on trust pilot, that's fun as hell.

Trust pilot is a good reference to know if we can trust a site, and is known that some sites pay to get a positive reputation, that's not new at all. And before blaming Duckdice for their fake trust pilot reviews you should realize that you were doing something bad too. Because you are selling the reputation for some cash and that isn't ethical at all.

[khaled0111]

...

Sorry, but this doesn't prove anything. It just shows that one of your accounts got banned. It doesn't even show the account's username.
It's also a bit weird you have thought of taking screenshots for your conversation with customer support but you didn't take screenshots proving you received a tip!
If you are sure you didn't break any of their terms then you can start an accusation thread for banning your account without a valid reason. I doubt your case will get much support, though.

[Wiwo]

There is no case in offering 5$ per review to someone who could easily wager thousands of dollars in a single day.

I think OP has tried to reach the team and asked for a task and then they have offered such a task. Keep in mind that all the users can't do the same type of wagger and also what to do after losing all funds. There is nothing to do, no wager.

The ops need to move on and learn from the incident, this is truly something that is not encouraging and this is why I always advocate against trusting reviews sites and third-party review services because there are proven 100% scams already.

-The best possible way to handle all of this is to avoid undertaking such a task since you know you are being uusedlying too the general public.

[Hispo]

There is no case in offering 5$ per review to someone who could easily wager thousands of dollars in a single day.

I think OP has tried to reach the team and asked for a task and then they have offered such a task. Keep in mind that all the users can't do the same type of wagger and also what to do after losing all funds. There is nothing to do, no wager.

Ah, okey.
That is actually more bizarre, if you ask me.  Usually when casinos want to increase their rating in review webs like those, it is expected from them start a campaign, an open one for sincere reviews, this is completely different from what OP describes.

Also, on the point about wager, that is what I tried to say, since not all gamblers have the same wager capacity, it would have made sense if they approached those likely to accept 5$ per review.

[CryptSafe]

It is not a new thing that trust pillot reviews are fake. They are never real but a paid job to paint red into green but no matter how long it takes, there is nothing hidden under the sun but one day it will pour down heavily on those who do paid review which are  just to get a huge traffic for their products.

 OP, I think you should forget about your money as you have no evidence of the post you made and also the post you deleted. You can be also called out by Bob too for breach of contract which he paid you for since he has paid you part and you have deleted the remaining with claims Bob has not fulfilled his part. At this point I will suggest you forget about it unless you want to drag yourself out but anyways thanks for revealing this to us here as we now some hidden shaddy stuffs about some casinos if they are truly what they claim they are.

[icopress]

The ops need to move on and learn from the incident, this is truly something that is not encouraging and this is why I always advocate against trusting reviews sites and third-party review services because there are proven 100% scams already.

Crypto Casinos are a rather specific niche, a niche in which there will always be dissatisfied players.

Some dissatisfied users manage to put pressure on the casino and some don't. I am sure that this cycle will not stop considering that over the years the forum has seen so many false accusations that you can make a whole statistical thread out of this shit. I'm talking about a thread along the lines of the one that lists all the signature campaigns that have ever run, or the one that lists the threads "who is Satoshi really?".

[decodx]

As i mentioned earlier i am banned from site and cant log in to my account after i told them i will post it on social media,

here is video proof a guy asked for.

Hmm, that's tough. It still doesn't prove anything. Maybe you could try to gather more evidence to support your claim? Something that would be harder to manipulate or fake. That way, you could have more credibility and people might be more likely to believe you.

Did they contact you and offer to pay a fee for the review, or did you suggest it to them? Where is the proof that they tipped you for your fake reviews?

[FinneysTrueVision]

The way you misspelled the words "message" and "received" are dead giveaways that you faked the conversation in these screenshots. "massege" and "recived" are not common misspellings of these words. For two different people to make the same uncommon mistakes is clear evidence that you are just trying to scam.

[Cantsay]

As i mentioned earlier i am banned from site and cant log in to my account after i told them i will post it on social media,

here is video proof a guy asked for.

https://imgur.com/a/2PQKKNU

You know you could provide videos as evidence right from the beginning why didn't you just screen record all the proofs in Op? Rather than providing some evidence that looked like something that was edited or tempered with.
To me this feels like Karma, you tried making fake reviews for them (according to you) which will eventually attract new customer and in the end they refused to pay you fro your fake reviews (still according to you) and now you want to create a scam accusation thread for not getting paid for fake reviews.
The more I think about it the funnier the seems to me, Op I think you've learned a lesson here (if your claim turn out to be true though).

[rodskee]

they have deleted my account and i cant login to the account now to post that masseges and tips i recived from Bob, i  know i did wrong to post positive fake reviews. i hope no one will lose becouse of my reviews.

why instead of posting again , you did not quote what the team posted above you? they are pointing directly on you being cheater so best to depend yourself from that , and about your reviews? there are tons of reviews in each site but we can easily determine which is fake and which are genuine .
specially nowadays that there are more and more people entering bitcointalk to validate the legitimacy of each site as there are so many crypto gamblers here.
but hope that you can provide more proofs and legit before throwing stone against Duckdice.

[philivrobin]

As i mentioned earlier i am banned from site and cant log in to my account after i told them i will post it on social media,

here is video proof a guy asked for.

https://imgur.com/a/2PQKKNU

You know you could provide videos as evidence right from the beginning why didn't you just screen record all the proofs in Op? Rather than providing some evidence that looked like something that was edited or tempered with.
To me this feels like Karma, you tried making fake reviews for them (according to you) which will eventually attract new customer and in the end they refused to pay you fro your fake reviews (still according to you) and now you want to create a scam accusation thread for not getting paid for fake reviews.
The more I think about it the funnier the seems to me, Op I think you've learned a lesson here (if your claim turn out to be true though).

I told you i am banned from duckdice.io now and i can't ogin to the site to make video of the chat where bob promised me $5 for each review  positive review i post, as you can a pop up appear on the video indicating Acces to the site.

[Kirito89]

The way you misspelled the words "message" and "received" are dead giveaways that you faked the conversation in these screenshots. "massege" and "recived" are not common misspellings of these words. For two different people to make the same uncommon mistakes is clear evidence that you are just trying to scam.

This !!!!


I will re-iterate,  We have never offered anyone $ to post any  positive reviews about us,  NEVER.

OP is simply trying to throw dirt at a wall hoping it sticks, he's done it before on bitcointalk, he's gona do it again in the future, he constantly tries this every few months, with a new story, and as each attempt of his that he's done until now, he will follow up with an email towards us stating " want the negative pressure from bitcointalk to go away ?  Pay me  xxx$ ".

I told you i am banned from duckdice.io now and i can't ogin to the site to make video of the chat where bob promised me $5 for each review  positive review i post, as you can a pop up appear on the video indicating Acces to the site.

Hey again  crewchellenge, igumama, greatnino or I suppose philivrobin what u go by this time,  tell you what tell me from which username you're banned on right now ( We banned about 50 usernames of yours), the one where you can post your evidence from, and I'll proceed in unbaning that one so you can produce the "evidence", which of course doesn't exist.

Please address this message ! And provide the username that's banned and doesn't allow you to produce the evidence, I'm here to help so I'll help you "prove" if what you're claiming is true or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edit: Would like to add, since I just had another glance on OP's doctored screenshot,  without addressing the obvious spelling errors that "Sukh"'s made in OP screenshot ( Sukh is fluent in written english and obviously our live support agents would double check twice before making such spelling errors in a few word sentences),  I have also noticed that in OP's  screenshot,  apparently our live agent calls bobstone "bobston", which coincidentally is the same way OP has misspelled bobstone's name in every instance.



foto anoniem

First screenshot is one I took from the live support tool where OP comes trying to talk to "bobston",  second screenshot is the altered screenshot from OP, where our live support agent calls bobstone "bobston" also, which clearly show that OP didn't even bother to check his gramar while "inspect element" altering the screenshot.

Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.

[Cantsay]

As i mentioned earlier i am banned from site and cant log in to my account after i told them i will post it on social media,

here is video proof a guy asked for.

https://imgur.com/a/2PQKKNU

You know you could provide videos as evidence right from the beginning why didn't you just screen record all the proofs in Op? Rather than providing some evidence that looked like something that was edited or tempered with.
To me this feels like Karma, you tried making fake reviews for them (according to you) which will eventually attract new customer and in the end they refused to pay you fro your fake reviews (still according to you) and now you want to create a scam accusation thread for not getting paid for fake reviews.
The more I think about it the funnier the seems to me, Op I think you've learned a lesson here (if your claim turn out to be true though).

I told you i am banned from duckdice.io now and i can't ogin to the site to make video of the chat where bob promised me $5 for each review  positive review i post, as you can a pop up appear on the video indicating Acces to the site.

I think duckdice.io representative here on bitcointalk has just given you the opportunity to regain your banned account, and if truly you're not trying to blackmail them or trying to ruin their reputation here on bitcointalk I don't see any reason why you would refuse to provide the username me for one really want to see how this goes.
Let's wait and see your response to their (duckdice.io) message if you're going to chicken out or you're going to come forward with the account you're claiming was banned.

@Kirito89 if eventually he comes up with the username, please make sure you restrict the withdrawal of the account until he provides the proof, because I feel he's looking for a way to open his banned account so that he can access the funds in it so to prevent being fooled just restrict withdrawal and see what happens. 

[slapper]

Hearing about your run-in with Duckdice.io mod Bob gets me riled up and let down. It's a bummer to see some online casinos pulling sneaky moves like that to pump up their image. Reviews from others can be handy, but they can also be sketchy and untrustworthy. What you went through shows why I only trust the community and forums for my online gambling scoop.

It's just plain wrong for a mod to ask for phony reviews and then bail on their promises. That's a total trust and ethics no-no. I hope you can snag your cash back and move past this whole mess. So, let's stay sharp and question online reviews. Let's lean on the community and our own adventures to make smart choices. And let's make sure online casinos play fair and stick to the rules.

[Learn Bitcoin]

~Snip~

If I am not wrong, are you talking about richardo3o and his alts? I found this was claimed that duckdice has offered him $5 for each Trust pilot 5-star review. Here is the archived post https://ninjastic.space/post/59081569. This guy wrote 88 posts in this forum 85 of them about duckdice. Surprisingly he deleted all his posts after he get the lossback or cashback.

I don't believe a casino will offer $5 for the Trust Pilot review. If they do, they won't mess up with the payment. Because they know it's unethical and if they mess up with the payment. They may expose them to the public. So, Why would a casino pay for reviews and later deny to pay while they know they will get exposed? It was a Good try OP. You fooled everyone. Happy April Fools

[decodx]

The way you misspelled the words "message" and "received" are dead giveaways that you faked the conversation in these screenshots. "massege" and "recived" are not common misspellings of these words. For two different people to make the same uncommon mistakes is clear evidence that you are just trying to scam.

Great job on the research! I also examined his screenshots closely, but I didn't catch those spelling errors.

To verify this, I searched through the forum posts for misspellings, and it turns out that he made the same spelling errors with his alternate accounts. It's clear that the mistakes were not just a one-time occurrence.

<...>
3:support send me another massege and told me that they have my old KYC documents and they will cross match it with my recent documents 'which they don't have but they just lied' i said sure

<...>
better you send an massege to the email i associated with the account so you can find it that no one is using that email as i am sure, i am all ready for KYC video call or anything that can make you asure, why i wll give you my documents for other person account KYC am i that idiot?

what do you mean by strong evidence? i brought here in which we can see moderator massege and admins massege. thought i have another proof of support told me that we dont deal with such cases.

https://ninjastic.space/post/58993705

they have deleted my account and i cant login to the account now to post that masseges and tips i recived from Bob, i  know i did wrong to post positive fake reviews. i hope no one will lose becouse of my reviews.

i swer i didnt recived yet any email from them, how is this even possible

Based on the evidence, I believe that we have sufficient proof to conclude that Duckdice is in the right in this case. It's evident that all these accounts belong to the same scammer who is trying to deceive and mislead the community.