Bidcent: A peer to peer blockchain game

[BitcoinPanther]

I checked the site and it is a who has more token will win game since both party needs to outbid each other.  The decentralized idea is cool, the pvp idea is great but the thought of only those who have more or deeper pocket will win suck.

I hope you can present more decentralized games that rely on either luck or skill and not only how deep their pocket is.  Anywho, Welcome to the forum.  It would be great if you heed some of the advice here that you create your service announcement and buy copper membership in order to publish graphical presentation in the forum.

[maydna]

The only thing that bothers me is .org because as far as I know, it is the domain for organizations. If anyone uses it for anything other than that, there will probably be a warning from the regulators. But let's hope it doesn't happen to you @OP.

The design takes a classic design that doesn't include pictures or anything else like in other casinos. Maybe you can provide more details if your thread is an ANN for your casino and my suggestion is to add more gambling games to catch people's attention. By only having one type of gambling game, it seems difficult to compete with other casinos.

[Bitinity]

Good initiative to OP to come out of a game like this, based on what I'm reading on the majority of the post this is not the kind of game that the majority of the gambling community will support, what's your motivation for on launching game like this when there's already sites like this in the past that has failed to generate support in the support.
Maybe because the majority of the gambling community is not used to this kind of game.
To generate interest why not create video tutorials so people have an idea at a first glimpse of what the site is all about and how to play it.

Even if they create video tutorials, it wont make any change imo. Also, I would not say it as a good initiative but it is a bad initiative because this game is a game that will be easily dominated by players with big bankroll. However I do not even think that players with big bankroll are interested to play this game. Sorry to say, this project gambling site will not alive for long time due to lack of interest.

[tusandii]

Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.

For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.
But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.

[piebeyb]

Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.

For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.
But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.

after all, small gamblers with small pockets won't try to play games on this site, let alone those with deep pockets, the first is a website design that may not support attracting many people even though it looks simple, but usually people are more interested in official sites and have cooler website designs, secondly there are lots of cases of losing coins when they connect wallets on sites and people will never try to connect their wallets even though they can use secondary wallets, thirdly OP said about players who have deep pockets and that alone won't bring any traffic because seems to have a large target market but with standard quality that would not be possible. 

[Wexnident]

So... it's a battle of who's richer? I hardly doubt that's something interesting. It's not based on luck or skill, it's based on how much you can slap the other party with a thick stack of money instead, and really, the only party enjoying this is the winner. At least in other gambling games, like poker, losers would still somehow enjoy even the process. This might be better in a tournament format if OP wants to continue though, I don't think it's a game for a site really, unless timeframes for people to put their money in is like in days or weeks.

Even if they create video tutorials, it wont make any change imo. Also, I would not say it as a good initiative but it is a bad initiative because this game is a game that will be easily dominated by players with big bankroll. However I do not even think that players with big bankroll are interested to play this game. Sorry to say, this project gambling site will not alive for long time due to lack of interest.

It's tutorial is basically pressing some sort of button and giving the pot the money I reckon, nothing interesting or thinking happening.

[khaled0111]

First, you should move this topic to Alternate cryptocurrencies->Announcements (Altcoins) since bitcoin is not supported.
Second, although I appreciate your efforts to create 'an on-chain game to prevent manipulation, but as other members have said, the concept of the game itself gives advantage to players who have more money and the luck factor doesn't have much effect on the results. Correct me if am wrong, but doesn't this leave room for manipulation?

[Slow death]

when I saw your game I didn't understand anything, when people create something that is aimed at customers, that something must be easy to use, and that includes being easy even for the most layman, the interface must be something very beautiful to attract people's attention, people like very beautiful things, with lots of colors and a good designer because that shows that the owner of the project put a lot of effort into creating the project to please the customers, and the method in which the owner of the project publicizes the project it's another big important factor, and you didn't do it right either, you didn't create a beautiful ann thread

after all these very important points that I mentioned, there is another important point, which are the deposit and withdrawal methods, if you create a cryptocurrency game, it is important that you put bitcoin as a deposit and withdrawal method, bitcoin is the largest cryptocurrency , you yourself are in a forum where bitcoin has the biggest community, but you come to show a site that only accepts altcoin, that doesn't make any sense, I think there's a lot missing to organize

[bdcm]

Basing up on the game concept then it would really be real battle on how deep is your pockets which means and i do agree that it is really that prone to manipulation on someone who does have that deep pocket.

Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that  they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.

It's also a battle of endurance. It says the game counter is 600 seconds, so 10 minutes for each new bid. Let's say your pockets are deep on both sides and you keep bidding, after 10 hours or so you'll both be exhausted. If one of you has an emergency at home, loses Internet connection, falls asleep, they lose. The bigger the stakes the more you'll have to lose and the more you'll be waiting for the last second to see if the opponent outbids you.
This could potentially escalate to something like a battle for a 1BTC stake where you both don't sleep for days not to give away that money, and at some point one of you gets a power outage and it's all over.

@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.

[Hamphser]

Basing up on the game concept then it would really be real battle on how deep is your pockets which means and i do agree that it is really that prone to manipulation on someone who does have that deep pocket.

Resetting the time to zero whenever there's a deposit then it would be a long time battle or making out that piling up the amount.Its true that this isnt the first time we do see this kind of idea on which
its true that most or all of them died along the way because they didnt really get any players on playing or making out that bet because they do really know on what are the tendencies or chances
that  they can really be manipulated and ending up on non-fair way result which we dont really like for it to happen.

It's also a battle of endurance. It says the game counter is 600 seconds, so 10 minutes for each new bid. Let's say your pockets are deep on both sides and you keep bidding, after 10 hours or so you'll both be exhausted. If one of you has an emergency at home, loses Internet connection, falls asleep, they lose. The bigger the stakes the more you'll have to lose and the more you'll be waiting for the last second to see if the opponent outbids you.
This could potentially escalate to something like a battle for a 1BTC stake where you both don't sleep for days not to give away that money, and at some point one of you gets a power outage and it's all over.

@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.

I agree on what coolcoinz had said about such matter or scenario on which the longer the game would be taking the more serious on which those bettors on each side would be on which if this one would go or

outlast for how many hours then the more serious that they shouldnt really be letting go with the rope because they do know on whats up stake in regarding on this one.Its true that once internet connection
has been cut off or the power line then it would be over.Its good that you would really be making off some revises or changes to make this not a long lasting type of game. There should be those
limitations considering that this game could really last up as much as possible because people would really be fighting for someone who do keeps on outbidding you first.

[khaled0111]

@coolcoinz You raised an interesting battle scenario where the players keep each other in battle for too long. This can be quite burdensome for some players to keep up with the battle. I will try to revise the game where battle time can be fastened. Thanks for the suggestion.

Decreasing the waiting time sounds like a good idea to prevent the above mentioned scenario from happening. However, you shouldn't decrease it too much to give players enough time to make a new bid.
While working on this, I suggest also working on improving the website's design. tbh, it's a bit hard to figure out what each butoon is supposed to do even if you fully understand the concept of the game.

[slapper]

If you're looking for anything like Stake or Duelbits, look elsewhere. It looks like a child learnt web design and ran wild with it, with no clever use of colour or other visual tricks. But hey, props for the hard work you obviously put into this. How much of a disadvantage does the house have in your "lovely" casino?

[tusandii]

Players can analyse the game results and see if there is any one with deep pockets before playing. When there are more players, this effect should be minimal as both sides should have players with deep pockets.

For players to be able to analyze the results of the game and see if anyone has deep pockets, this is pretty good in my opinion because players can adjust what to do.
But if both parties have players with deep pockets, I disagree, friends, because in a game not all players will have more money and they won't necessarily make bets with quite a lot of money even though they do have that money.
It's better for a game that can really make all the players, not just players with deep pockets, so that gamblers with only a little capital still feel comfortable and aren't afraid of losing while playing.

after all, small gamblers with small pockets won't try to play games on this site, let alone those with deep pockets, the first is a website design that may not support attracting many people even though it looks simple, but usually people are more interested in official sites and have cooler website designs, secondly there are lots of cases of losing coins when they connect wallets on sites and people will never try to connect their wallets even though they can use secondary wallets, thirdly OP said about players who have deep pockets and that alone won't bring any traffic because seems to have a large target market but with standard quality that would not be possible. 

That's right, because website design is the first thing that makes someone have a special interest in trying to access inside and see if their features are really good, and when you've seen everything and it's proven good, there will be lots of gamblers playing there, but if there aren't any in the initial marketing the interesting thing is that it is impossible for any gambler to have an interest in accessing it.
Cases of loss of some tokens when connecting wallets to casinos do happen but if the casino is good it might not hurt to try connecting a secondary wallet filled with just a small amount and see if they have an edge or not.
Regarding the depth of balances in players' wallets, I disagree because this will create a feeling of insecurity and the assumption that this site is unfair because it is like expecting players with thick wallets.

[bdcm]

Game has been revised.

Countdown is now just 5 minutes and min bid increased to 0.02.

This should minimise the probability of a long battle scenario.

[ufaiz50]

So it means if someone will join it would be a nonstop bidding. I remember playing this with my friends but I don't think there's enough greedy people who will join in a game like this one, how many people can join or participate? Also, what is the betting coin Bitcoin, Ethereum? Also I think the website need a little bit improvement as currently I don't think the UI is that attractive.

[Plaguedeath]

A poor advertisement like this one will make the site become worst for many people, I also think this casino might be one of rug pull casino because that's what happen in most of new casino. It's better to create a well prepared ANN thread, it's not hard and expensive to do, maybe you need to spend for around $100-$200. Many people will not interested with this kind ANN.