Discussion: Who is going to fill the gap of Chipmixer by the end of year 2023?

[hugeblack]

Before Chipmixer, there was BITMIXER.IO, which was more popular than Chipmixer, but suddenly they decided to stop, and suddenly Chipmixer appeared.
Most of those here may not have seen those days but that Mixer was very popular.
Therefore, the issue of replacing Chipmixer is a matter of time, but the problem lies in the government's behavior. Will they worry voluntarily or will they be siezed?
Will they continue to advertise in the forum, or will mixer campaigns be banned?

Hi all!
Despite the huge profit we earn, we are closing our activity. Let me explain why.

I'm bitcoin enthusiast since 2011. When we started this service I was convinced that any Bitcoin user has a natural right to privacy. I was totally wrong. Now I grasped that Bitcoin is transparent non-anonymous system by design. Blockchain is a great open book. I believe that Bitcoin will have a great future without dark market transactions. You may use Dash or Zerocoin if you want to buy some weed. Not Bitcoin.

I hope our decision will help to make Bitcoin ecosystem more clean and transparent. I hope our competitors will hear our message and will close their services too. Very soon this kind of activity will be considered as illegal in most of countries.

Cheers,
Bitmixer.IO

[Lucius]

It doesn't seem to me that any of the mixers will be able to reach the popularity that CM had, not only because of their business policy (no mandatory fee and chip service), but also because of their generosity when it came to the signature campaign with the undeniable fact that they had the best business model in that regard (max number of posts and campaign conditions).

But whoever imposes himself as number one in this business will surely end up the same as CM, because the hunters have caught their prey and they smell blood, the hunt continues.

[yhiaali3]

Yes, there is a clear race in the forum to fill the gap left by Chipmixer. I see that closing Chipmixer has corrected the market situation because, in my opinion, it is not good for any company to take over the entire market, because this is a kind of centralization that we all hate.

Now there is Sinbad, Coinomize, Yo!Mix, whirlwind all good mixers that can get a lot of market share, it would be better to divide the market among several mixers and not one mixer.

The high payout and the duration of the campaign on the forum will play a big role in determining which blender will get the lion's share of the market.

[jossiel]

I think the faith of mixers in the future is being foreseen after one popular mixer in the past which was bitmixer.io was also held by the authorities.

It's overwhelming to see the other mixers come into the game when they've for surely seen the news that the toughest competitor is out.

I guess that this is good that there have been new sets of competition for mixers because this will push all of them to the best that they can aside from the fact that whoever stays longer with their marketing budgets and campaigns will be more recognized.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Question remains, who is going to win it?

From my perspective, companies which will manage their activity wisely have most chances to survive on the market. Meaning those which will not make useless and inefficient expenses and which will be also resilient.

It would be nice to know who have how much btc in reserve. At least Foxpup can do a math if he wants his own mixer  

I have no idea why OP mentioned Foxpup here. Why would Foxpup need a mixer? Besides, that "he" is totally wrong. Recently she offered undeniable evidence for her gender, so where is that "he" coming from?

[T3PR00T]

I have no idea why OP mentioned Foxpup here.

Not everyone needs to know everything

[ajiz138]

Yes, there is a clear race in the forum to fill the gap left by Chipmixer. I see that closing Chipmixer has corrected the market situation because, in my opinion, it is not good for any company to take over the entire market, because this is a kind of centralization that we all hate.

Now there is Sinbad, Coinomize, Yo!Mix, whirlwind all good mixers that can get a lot of market share, it would be better to divide the market among several mixers and not one mixer.

The high payout and the duration of the campaign on the forum will play a big role in determining which blender will get the lion's share of the market.

All mixer companies want to be the best and they do it in forums as marketing to continue to be introduced but this is indeed undeniable if one of them wants to dominate the market that Chipmixer has left behind, I think mixers are active now and some of them will offset and none of the highest to dominate the market basically they do simultaneously in the forums for the purpose of attracting its customers.

More than 5+ mixers are now active with the aim of advertising signature campaigns and with various payments but it's possible that if one or all of these 5+ mixers can last longer in their signature campaigns then of course it means they have managed to dominate the market simultaneously.

But we don't know whether later there will be the same case or it will still persist, of course we hope that all will be well.

[BenCodie]

In my opinion, ChipMixer gave a very good outline as to how to create a similar concept and I have expressed in another post that I don't doubt that it could be replicated if someone wanted to do that...The initial amount in the mixing pool does not need to be extravagant, ChipMixer held over 1900 BTC that was amassed over many years by many users and the same would probably occur over the years for another platform taking the same approach. I don't think that's the main issue of success. I believe that the main issue is the risk of handling the infrastructure required to be able to run an app like this while keeping peace of mind that it can all run smoothly without interruption or seizure. Can the hole of ChipMixer be filled? Probably, yes. Will it be filled? That all depends on who has the money and the confidence to do so. I doubt there is anyone out there at this point.

Before Chipmixer, there was BITMIXER.IO, which was more popular than Chipmixer, but suddenly they decided to stop, and suddenly Chipmixer appeared.

The same sort of thing has happened with the appearance of Whirlwind after the closure of ChipMixer. I wonder if this is the market filling the gap quickly or if its not a coincidence considering that a similar thing happened when BitMixer closed and ChipMixer appeared.

[KingsDen]

The same sort of thing has happened with the appearance of Whirlwind after the closure of ChipMixer. I wonder if this is the market filling the gap quickly or if its not a coincidence considering that a similar thing happened when BitMixer closed and ChipMixer appeared.

The sudden appearance of Whirlwind makes it somewhat suspicious. The mixer that will last longer is the one that has some chipmixer team behind it. This is just a product of my imagination and it is possible since mixer doesn't require any kind of legal registration. Who will know the team behind the project?
There's time and season for everything and this time around is for mixers and they will reign for a certain period of time since their best who monopolised the market is no longer there

[buwaytress]

Trust, really. It's the only thing. One way you can build with reputation and longevity. CM did perhaps get accelerated recognition -- really smart actually, by simply aligning itself with reputable members and campaign managers.

But I think people overlook that they introduced an innovation that hadn't been thought of in years.

6 years later and no mixer's come up with something new (feel free to prove me wrong, I would love to know).

[examplens]

6 years later and no mixer's come up with something new (feel free to prove me wrong, I would love to know).

It's still unbelievable to me that Chipmixer was so dominant, so everyone else had an almost negligible share in this market. At least judging by the signature campaigns.
You are right when you say that trust is the most important segment here, and that requires more than a minimum of a year of almost flawless work.

When we talk about the implementation of something new, it seems that we are quite far from there, even with the method that the [banned mixer] service offers.

[T3PR00T]

6 years later and no mixer's come up with something new (feel free to prove me wrong, I would love to know).

Chipmixer never required to pay a fees.
After one confirmation you can withdraw your chip and without worrying about your mix can be discovered.

Idea that established 6 years ago is still fresh but unfortunately no other mixer was able to adopt this idea.

[buwaytress]

^^ The no-fee (or PWYW model as I recall it being referenced) was fresh, but the way they broke the time-chronology of coins with various denominated non-input-linked chips was rather what I thought was the thing that really broke the mould. If you recall they came out of the ashes of the then-dominant mixer and every rival since still stuck to the old model (output = combination of input - fee).

[smyslov]

Trust, really. It's the only thing. One way you can build with reputation and longevity. CM did perhaps get accelerated recognition -- really smart actually, by simply aligning itself with reputable members and campaign managers.

With how they brand themselves here in Bitcointalk they could have gone promoting their platform here for a very long time, their signature campaign is every poster's aspirations here in Bitcoin, if you're part of the campaign you are considered part of the elite.

But I think people overlook that they introduced an innovation that hadn't been thought of in years.

That innovation will stay and have been will be adopted by other mixing platforms there will be more coming soon the
the gap is up for grabs

6 years later and no mixer's come up with something new (feel free to prove me wrong, I would love to know).

Maybe with all the new mixing coming up one of them will come out with a new innovation to break the competition in their favor.