Terrence Crawford vs Errol Spence - July 29

[Kelvinid]

Crawford is the slight favorite, not surprising though and I think the odds although he is the favorite is still a decent one. Just bet 150 usd to win 100 usd. I would not hesitate betting on that, I'm just waiting for the betting odds to be available on the betting sites I'm using then I'll ride on.

Good odds indeed. We know the capability of Terence Crawford to win this match and might dominate Errol Spence.

As a gambler putting some money on Crawford with that odds is already worth taking. Good thing that the odds between them are not that gap. Even those who want to put money on Spence can take advantage of the odds. Spence might be looked a not-tough opponent for Crawford but he's not an underdog to consider. He's also a big thing in the Welterweight but his camp is just associated with dramas.

Still waiting for other betting options as they might give us more worthy odds to pick.

In my own point of view, I will put my money on betting on the match result which is, the fight will end up in a Decision.

I'm seeing this fight will be a closed one and either none of them will allow a knock out win. Although not sure whom I will pick for now.

Both fighters have never experienced a knockdown in their careers, if I'm not mistaken. That indicates that both are durable, so you might be right that this fight will likely end up in a decision, and the busier boxer is likely to come out on top. Based on the respective performances of both boxers in the past, I believe Crawford is more talented than Spence, as Spence does not move a lot, making him an easier target for Crawford, who, in my opinion, is the quicker boxer.

[Ziskinberg]

Crawford is the slight favorite, not surprising though and I think the odds although he is the favorite is still a decent one. Just bet 150 usd to win 100 usd. I would not hesitate betting on that, I'm just waiting for the betting odds to be available on the betting sites I'm using then I'll ride on.

Good odds indeed. We know the capability of Terence Crawford to win this match and might dominate Errol Spence.

As a gambler putting some money on Crawford with that odds is already worth taking. Good thing that the odds between them are not that gap. Even those who want to put money on Spence can take advantage of the odds. Spence might be looked a not-tough opponent for Crawford but he's not an underdog to consider. He's also a big thing in the Welterweight but his camp is just associated with dramas.

Still waiting for other betting options as they might give us more worthy odds to pick.

In my own point of view, I will put my money on betting on the match result which is, the fight will end up in a Decision.

I'm seeing this fight will be a closed one and either none of them will allow a knock out win. Although not sure whom I will pick for now.

Both fighters have never experienced a knockdown in their careers, if I'm not mistaken. That indicates that both are durable, so you might be right that this fight will likely end up in a decision, and the busier boxer is likely to come out on top. Based on the respective performances of both boxers in the past, I believe Crawford is more talented than Spence, as Spence does not move a lot, making him an easier target for Crawford, who, in my opinion, is the quicker boxer.

But it's still worth taking a shot at betting on the knockout outcome of this fight. Both fighters have a high knockout rate, as indicated by boxrec.

Crawford has 30 knockout wins in 39 fights, which is approximately a 77% knockout rate.
Spence has 22 knockout wins in 28 fights, which is approximately a 79% knockout rate.

Considering these statistics, my point is that while we believe both boxers are durable, it might be worthwhile to consider placing bets on knockout wins. You could even choose a round range with very attractive betting odds.

sources :
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/629465
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/447121

[btc_angela]

^^ And if I'm not mistaken, the odds for a knockout for either one of them are higher, so it's a good bet.

However, we all know how durable this fighters are, they haven't taste the canvass throughout their boxing career and I think it will be hard pressed to see either one of them going down in this fight. But the possibility is always there, I mean if anyone just temporarily lose their focus, the other side can take advantage of that and slip a knockout punch.

[freedomgo]

Crawford is the slight favorite, not surprising though and I think the odds although he is the favorite is still a decent one. Just bet 150 usd to win 100 usd. I would not hesitate betting on that, I'm just waiting for the betting odds to be available on the betting sites I'm using then I'll ride on.

Good odds indeed. We know the capability of Terence Crawford to win this match and might dominate Errol Spence.

As a gambler putting some money on Crawford with that odds is already worth taking. Good thing that the odds between them are not that gap. Even those who want to put money on Spence can take advantage of the odds. Spence might be looked a not-tough opponent for Crawford but he's not an underdog to consider. He's also a big thing in the Welterweight but his camp is just associated with dramas.

Still waiting for other betting options as they might give us more worthy odds to pick.

In my own point of view, I will put my money on betting on the match result which is, the fight will end up in a Decision.

I'm seeing this fight will be a closed one and either none of them will allow a knock out win. Although not sure whom I will pick for now.

Both fighters have never experienced a knockdown in their careers, if I'm not mistaken. That indicates that both are durable, so you might be right that this fight will likely end up in a decision, and the busier boxer is likely to come out on top. Based on the respective performances of both boxers in the past, I believe Crawford is more talented than Spence, as Spence does not move a lot, making him an easier target for Crawford, who, in my opinion, is the quicker boxer.

But it's still worth taking a shot at betting on the knockout outcome of this fight. Both fighters have a high knockout rate, as indicated by boxrec.

Crawford has 30 knockout wins in 39 fights, which is approximately a 77% knockout rate.
Spence has 22 knockout wins in 28 fights, which is approximately a 79% knockout rate.

Considering these statistics, my point is that while we believe both boxers are durable, it might be worthwhile to consider placing bets on knockout wins. You could even choose a round range with very attractive betting odds.

sources :
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/629465
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/447121

This fight is pretty much interesting because aside from the fact that we've asked for this, it is really unpredictable and it's hard to weigh which boxer really got the upper hand.
By the way, in one of my sportsbook here are the odds between Crawford vs Errol Spence Jr.

Moneyline:
Crawford - 1.83       Spence - 2.34

Win by KO/TKO/DQ:
Crawford - 3.60       Spence - 6.50

Win by Decision:
Crawford - 2.87       Spence - 3.24

So, as we can see, almost all odds are really tempting except the ML for Terence Crawford. We still got few more days to decide and weight which is which and who is who.

[cryptomaniac_xxx]

Crawford is the slight favorite, not surprising though and I think the odds although he is the favorite is still a decent one. Just bet 150 usd to win 100 usd. I would not hesitate betting on that, I'm just waiting for the betting odds to be available on the betting sites I'm using then I'll ride on.

Good odds indeed. We know the capability of Terence Crawford to win this match and might dominate Errol Spence.

As a gambler putting some money on Crawford with that odds is already worth taking. Good thing that the odds between them are not that gap. Even those who want to put money on Spence can take advantage of the odds. Spence might be looked a not-tough opponent for Crawford but he's not an underdog to consider. He's also a big thing in the Welterweight but his camp is just associated with dramas.

Still waiting for other betting options as they might give us more worthy odds to pick.

In my own point of view, I will put my money on betting on the match result which is, the fight will end up in a Decision.

I'm seeing this fight will be a closed one and either none of them will allow a knock out win. Although not sure whom I will pick for now.

Both fighters have never experienced a knockdown in their careers, if I'm not mistaken. That indicates that both are durable, so you might be right that this fight will likely end up in a decision, and the busier boxer is likely to come out on top. Based on the respective performances of both boxers in the past, I believe Crawford is more talented than Spence, as Spence does not move a lot, making him an easier target for Crawford, who, in my opinion, is the quicker boxer.

But it's still worth taking a shot at betting on the knockout outcome of this fight. Both fighters have a high knockout rate, as indicated by boxrec.

Crawford has 30 knockout wins in 39 fights, which is approximately a 77% knockout rate.
Spence has 22 knockout wins in 28 fights, which is approximately a 79% knockout rate.

Considering these statistics, my point is that while we believe both boxers are durable, it might be worthwhile to consider placing bets on knockout wins. You could even choose a round range with very attractive betting odds.

sources :
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/629465
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/447121

This fight is pretty much interesting because aside from the fact that we've asked for this, it is really unpredictable and it's hard to weigh which boxer really got the upper hand.
By the way, in one of my sportsbook here are the odds between Crawford vs Errol Spence Jr.

Moneyline:
Crawford - 1.83       Spence - 2.34

Win by KO/TKO/DQ:
Crawford - 3.60       Spence - 6.50

Win by Decision:
Crawford - 2.87       Spence - 3.24

So, as we can see, almost all odds are really tempting except the ML for Terence Crawford. We still got few more days to decide and weight which is which and who is who.

This fight is going to happen in July so plenty of time for us to put our bet. Someone already suggested to the OP to change the date once the fight is officially set to July 29 I guess he maybe forget it.

But I do agree, everything is very juicy and I would say that even a ML for Crawford is already attractive. In order to get a good returns though, at least go for a good bet on that ML.

Of course though, we are looking for a 'bang on our buck', so maybe go for a decision or KO/TKO if you have a feeling that either will win by that route.

[bbc.reporter]

Moneyline:
Crawford - 1.83       Spence - 2.34

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

In any case, I reckon the sportsbooks might be making a mistake on these new odds. Spence is physically stronger and his skills appear to be very much equal with Crawford, I reckon. Similar to Haney vs. Loma, I change my pick again. I am on team Spence!

[Ziskinberg]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks took it down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

In any case, I reckon the sportsbooks might be making a mistake on these new odds. Spence is physically stronger and his skills appear to be very much equal with Crawford, I reckon. Similar to Haney vs. Loma, I change my pick again. I am on team Spence!

https://www.sports-king.com/fights/errol-spence-jr-terence-crawford-betting/

The fight, as mentioned, is still being worked on, but here are some preliminary odds courtesy of a major US-based sportsbook:

Errol Spence Jr., -102
Terence Crawford, -126

The old betting odds indicated that Crawford was the slight favorite, although it was a close call. Therefore, I'm not surprised by the current betting odds. If we consider their achievements as champions, it's evident that Spence has more accomplishments, as he holds more belts. However, the fans will have the final say, and many of us believe that Crawford will win. That's why the odds slightly favor him.

[tusandii]

Win by KO/TKO/DQ:
Crawford - 3.60       Spence - 6.50

Win by Decision:
Crawford - 2.87       Spence - 3.24

These two fighters will be more difficult to predict because they both have quite an epic history of fighting but Crawford still holds the advantage with the several titles he has and has more total wins by knockout than Spence so it's only natural that Odds wins by knockout for Crawford is lower.
Many boxing experts said Crawford would win the fight by knockout.

As for the victory by decision I'm not sure I can succeed because it looks like this fight will finish before the last round.
If betting I prefer to place a bet with a KO win on Crawford.

[mirakal]

Moneyline:
Crawford - 1.83       Spence - 2.34

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

In any case, I reckon the sportsbooks might be making a mistake on these new odds. Spence is physically stronger and his skills appear to be very much equal with Crawford, I reckon. Similar to Haney vs. Loma, I change my pick again. I am on team Spence!

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

[Jawhead999]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

Yeah, just take a look with the voting result, it's already clear majority of users think Crawford is better than Spence.



You're correct too, there's no way to say Spence is stronger than Crawford, just take a look from their both history, Crawford was winning easily by KO in his recent 8 fought while Spence was struggling when he fought a good boxer e.g. Shawn Porter.

Spence only win from the total belts he currently have, but people are think Crawford will win. This situation quite similar where people think Tank is better than Haney.

[btc_angela]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

Yeah, just take a look with the voting result, it's already clear majority of users think Crawford is better than Spence.



You're correct too, there's no way to say Spence is stronger than Crawford, just take a look from their both history, Crawford was winning easily by KO in his recent 8 fought while Spence was struggling when he fought a good boxer e.g. Shawn Porter.

Spence only win from the total belts he currently have, but people are think Crawford will win. This situation quite similar where people think Tank is better than Haney.

Right and I think it's an easy route for Spence too as he was given a chance to get the WBA belt from Ugas. While Spence is fighting undefeated fighters like Jose Benavidez Jr. and Egidijus Kavaliauskas.

Nevertheless, it's style that makes the fight. So really hard to compare both of their wins against Porter or even Kell Brook for that matter.

What's important is now we will finally see who is really the best of this division, Crawford just a slight favorite because of his shiftiness, he can just switch stance for orthodox to south paw very quick.

[harizen]

But it's still worth taking a shot at betting on the knockout outcome of this fight. Both fighters have a high knockout rate, as indicated by boxrec.

Crawford has 30 knockout wins in 39 fights, which is approximately a 77% knockout rate.
Spence has 22 knockout wins in 28 fights, which is approximately a 79% knockout rate.

But those who fall victims at that Knock Out wins by both Terence Crawford and Errol Spence are not even within their circle.

Therefore, I can disregard that knockout rate as a part of the analysis. That percentage has nothing to do now because the fight is now between the current top boxers at the Welterweight right now and not anyone else above them. If they are about to face instead a mandatory title defense against a contender, we can however include that knockout rate in our analysis.

If this fight will end in a KO win, we don't know who will able to do that. It's like who can execute properly the right timing for that knock out punch to send either one of them on the canvass. But honestly, not expecting to see them being KO.

I will bet this fight winning in a "controversial decision". lol

[goinmerry]

But it's still worth taking a shot at betting on the knockout outcome of this fight. Both fighters have a high knockout rate, as indicated by boxrec.

While 70% is really a good knockout rate, the majority of their knockout win is not that they able to finished their respective opponent in an impressive knockout win by a single KO punch. It's different from those well-known KO-type boxers that able to finished their opponent in a single knockout punch.

Both Crawford and Spence most knockout wins are done thru having several knockout punches on the match, not by a single one. It means most of their opponents who tasted being KO by both Crawford and Spence still able to stand on their feet on that first KO punch and continue to fight until the last phase of the match.

With that kind of strength, that makes me think that either Errol Spence or Terence Crawford won't have the KO win as they are durable enough to lasts until the last round even they will experienced an exchange of KO. To make this short, both boxers can suffered a KO down but not a KO win as after being down, they will try to found ways to lasts long.

On who will have the most KO punch, will have an edge on the judges final score.

[Slow death]

the problem with betting on this type of fight in which both fighters are specialists in knockouts and that both fighters have equal chances of winning, and betting on who will win the fight becomes the same as counting on luck, because no matter how much one fighter be very resistant to take a lot of punches and stay on your feet when he fights against another fighter who specializes in knockout so he will receive very strong punches and having to take all that pressure will be difficult soon what will happen is that the first fighter who lands a punch very strong in a region of the opponent's body in which it is a vital region, so it will be the fighter who will come out of this fight as the winner

there are a few weeks left, something like 2 weeks for the fight to start but I can see it on this site:

This undisputed welterweight title clash has been pencilled in for Saturday, July 29.

source: https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/1435155/terence-crawford-v-errol-spence-jr-live-stream-date-time-ringwalks-undercard/

Will we not see another date later? lately I have seen the dates of the fights being changed with a lot of frequency. anyway, the two fighters will have more time to prepare for the fight, but I hope that another event that draws more attention doesn't happen in July and overshadow this fight, because putting a fight further away will always have a problem, it would be very well if the fight was this month, but anyway we will see the fight next month if there is no postponement

[Kemarit]

the problem with betting on this type of fight in which both fighters are specialists in knockouts and that both fighters have equal chances of winning, and betting on who will win the fight becomes the same as counting on luck, because no matter how much one fighter be very resistant to take a lot of punches and stay on your feet when he fights against another fighter who specializes in knockout so he will receive very strong punches and having to take all that pressure will be difficult soon what will happen is that the first fighter who lands a punch very strong in a region of the opponent's body in which it is a vital region, so it will be the fighter who will come out of this fight as the winner

Yeah, it paper it looks like they have equal chances, 50/50, but according to sports bookies, they have their own reasons why they put Crawford as a slight favorite. And all across sports bookies, whether fiat or crypto based it will still remain the same, maybe a slight variance, but still Crawford the favorite.

Will we not see another date later? lately I have seen the dates of the fights being changed with a lot of frequency. anyway, the two fighters will have more time to prepare for the fight, but I hope that another event that draws more attention doesn't happen in July and overshadow this fight, because putting a fight further away will always have a problem, it would be very well if the fight was this month, but anyway we will see the fight next month if there is no postponement

Hopefully not, for now this is 99% going to happen, unless either one of them got injured in their training, or become sick or will have a accident or worst, involved in a domestic dispute.

Just a couple of reasons why the fight will be postponed. But crossing fingers, we can just hope that everything will be fine so that we can witnessed already one of the best fight for this year.

[freedomgo]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

Yeah, just take a look with the voting result, it's already clear majority of users think Crawford is better than Spence.



You're correct too, there's no way to say Spence is stronger than Crawford, just take a look from their both history, Crawford was winning easily by KO in his recent 8 fought while Spence was struggling when he fought a good boxer e.g. Shawn Porter.

Spence only win from the total belts he currently have, but people are think Crawford will win. This situation quite similar where people think Tank is better than Haney.

Right and I think it's an easy route for Spence too as he was given a chance to get the WBA belt from Ugas. While Spence is fighting undefeated fighters like Jose Benavidez Jr. and Egidijus Kavaliauskas.

Nevertheless, it's style that makes the fight. So really hard to compare both of their wins against Porter or even Kell Brook for that matter.

What's important is now we will finally see who is really the best of this division, Crawford just a slight favorite because of his shiftiness, he can just switch stance for orthodox to south paw very quick.

It is understandable why people are rooting for Errol Spence Jr. and that is because he simply got 3 belts compared to Crawford who only got 1. But for us here who follows their story and watched almost all of their fights, we can somehow say that we pretty much know the real score between these two and it is already evident enough to see because the bookies are listing Crawford as a favorite.
There is just no way that the bookies will make a dumb assessment and to have a mistake on their published odds especially in this kind of big fight that has been waited by many.

[Jating]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

Yeah, just take a look with the voting result, it's already clear majority of users think Crawford is better than Spence.



You're correct too, there's no way to say Spence is stronger than Crawford, just take a look from their both history, Crawford was winning easily by KO in his recent 8 fought while Spence was struggling when he fought a good boxer e.g. Shawn Porter.

Spence only win from the total belts he currently have, but people are think Crawford will win. This situation quite similar where people think Tank is better than Haney.

Right and I think it's an easy route for Spence too as he was given a chance to get the WBA belt from Ugas. While Spence is fighting undefeated fighters like Jose Benavidez Jr. and Egidijus Kavaliauskas.

Nevertheless, it's style that makes the fight. So really hard to compare both of their wins against Porter or even Kell Brook for that matter.

What's important is now we will finally see who is really the best of this division, Crawford just a slight favorite because of his shiftiness, he can just switch stance for orthodox to south paw very quick.

It is understandable why people are rooting for Errol Spence Jr. and that is because he simply got 3 belts compared to Crawford who only got 1. But for us here who follows their story and watched almost all of their fights, we can somehow say that we pretty much know the real score between these two and it is already evident enough to see because the bookies are listing Crawford as a favorite.
There is just no way that the bookies will make a dumb assessment and to have a mistake on their published odds especially in this kind of big fight that has been waited by many.

And I think every sport bookies rely on the Las Vegas odds maker, so that there will be a uniform odds across everyone here. Yes, it seems though that even if Spence Jr has 3 belts, it didn't hold any weight for the odds maker, still they think that the kind of welterweight is Bud Crawford that's why he is the favorite. And I will agree with them putting him at a slight favorite and it will really give Spence a motivation here to show that they are wrong. I've seen though that Crawford is more on the media now, having interviews with different host in podcast, so the marketing for this fight has started. Yet to see Spence though, but we can see images of him in the gym already.

[mirakal]

Does anyone remember the old odds before the sportsbooks have taken them down? I remember it was close, however, Terence Crawford was the underdog. I also remember that much of the people were on Errol Spence except for maybe @Boafeng and 1 or 2 other people. I too was also on Crawford.

This is what makes things more interesting and exciting because even us here in the forum are divided very well, I guess the majority (assuming) are going with Crawford and some are into Spence Jr. as well. While it's true that their power appears to be equal but I certainly don't agree with Spence being the stronger, physically. I mean, what would be the basis of that? I think it's already fair to agree that their prowess are close which leaves most fans unable to choose what camp should they go into.

Yeah, just take a look with the voting result, it's already clear majority of users think Crawford is better than Spence.



You're correct too, there's no way to say Spence is stronger than Crawford, just take a look from their both history, Crawford was winning easily by KO in his recent 8 fought while Spence was struggling when he fought a good boxer e.g. Shawn Porter.

Spence only win from the total belts he currently have, but people are think Crawford will win. This situation quite similar where people think Tank is better than Haney.

Right and I think it's an easy route for Spence too as he was given a chance to get the WBA belt from Ugas. While Spence is fighting undefeated fighters like Jose Benavidez Jr. and Egidijus Kavaliauskas.

Nevertheless, it's style that makes the fight. So really hard to compare both of their wins against Porter or even Kell Brook for that matter.

What's important is now we will finally see who is really the best of this division, Crawford just a slight favorite because of his shiftiness, he can just switch stance for orthodox to south paw very quick.

It is understandable why people are rooting for Errol Spence Jr. and that is because he simply got 3 belts compared to Crawford who only got 1. But for us here who follows their story and watched almost all of their fights, we can somehow say that we pretty much know the real score between these two and it is already evident enough to see because the bookies are listing Crawford as a favorite.
There is just no way that the bookies will make a dumb assessment and to have a mistake on their published odds especially in this kind of big fight that has been waited by many.

And I think every sport bookies rely on the Las Vegas odds maker, so that there will be a uniform odds across everyone here. Yes, it seems though that even if Spence Jr has 3 belts, it didn't hold any weight for the odds maker, still they think that the kind of welterweight is Bud Crawford that's why he is the favorite. And I will agree with them putting him at a slight favorite and it will really give Spence a motivation here to show that they are wrong. I've seen though that Crawford is more on the media now, having interviews with different host in podcast, so the marketing for this fight has started. Yet to see Spence though, but we can see images of him in the gym already.

I'm not surprised that Spence is staying out in the limelight for now after all the controversial issues he's been into and it is just reasonable in his part to keep some safe distance because having some interviews and showing his face in the public will literally not make his image good nor will have any benefit in his part or to his camp.

It's Crawford's time now because he got the public's attention after being a victim for a sudden canceled deal after all the months he wasted in which point he became inactive for more than a year already because of that. Thus, making some appearance is also their way to market their fight.

[Yaunfitda]

^^Good analysis, but still though, Spence should defend himself as his public image was affected by the negotiations earlier and everyone thinks he is the reason stalling this fight. Nevertheless, the fight is going to happen now, and nothing has change, from the said date of June, Crawford is already the favorite and now that this is finalized, bookies remain as it is.

And maybe Spence might be quiet as his training is already in full swing now. Most likely, they might have been reviewing the tapes and this coach/trainer fighting some loopholes. And the same with Crawford, although as we have said, he is going to the public more often and having interviews.

[btc_angela]

^^Good analysis, but still though, Spence should defend himself as his public image was affected by the negotiations earlier and everyone thinks he is the reason stalling this fight. Nevertheless, the fight is going to happen now, and nothing has change, from the said date of June, Crawford is already the favorite and now that this is finalized, bookies remain as it is.

And maybe Spence might be quiet as his training is already in full swing now. Most likely, they might have been reviewing the tapes and this coach/trainer fighting some loopholes. And the same with Crawford, although as we have said, he is going to the public more often and having interviews.

Beating Crawford will be the best defense for Spence as he was publicly trialed and found guilty as the one who doesn't want to fight Crawford in the beginning. But since he has signed already, then this is his chance.

And if I'm not mistaken, he is not keen on going to the public and make interviews as he has said in the past that he is shy or that is simply he just want to be private. Even after his accident, his mouth is still shut and doesn't want to talk about that in public.