Does People Really Care About Decentralization?

[Latviand]

Once the people know and feel the effects of decentralization, they will support it but right now that there's few discussion that's layman friendly, I think this kind of stuff is still out of their mind. No need to worry though as the people are easily persuaded especially if they can benefit from it greatly.

[1714865954]

1714865954

[1714865954]

1714865954

[1714865954]

1714865954

[1714865954]

1714865954

[bestcoins1]

Once the people know and feel the effects of decentralization, they will support it but right now that there's few discussion that's layman friendly, I think this kind of stuff is still out of their mind. No need to worry though as the people are easily persuaded especially if they can benefit from it greatly.

Ordinary people only need specific guidance on every thing they consider new and when they begin to properly digest the advantages and disadvantages that exist in the things they consider new, they will make their own decisions in terms of using them or not because they also need to feel what are the good and bad effects after using the decentralized system that they consider new. And I don't think that's a problem because over time ordinary people will also get used to it when a decentralized system has been used by many people all over the world.

[gaston castano]

people is actually care about decentralization, but they also have to use centralized so it will be side by side in a system.
Decentralization refers to the distribution of power, decision-making, and resources away from a central authority or organization and towards individual participants or smaller groups. It is an important concept in various fields, including politics, economics, and technology.

[naikturun]

people care about decentralization but people also can't be separated from centralization, because it's needed, the central system is not completely bad, and the decentralized system is not completely good either, I mean there must be flaws in each system.

[Uruhara]

Once the people know and feel the effects of decentralization, they will support it but right now that there's few discussion that's layman friendly, I think this kind of stuff is still out of their mind. No need to worry though as the people are easily persuaded especially if they can benefit from it greatly.

Correct. If the knowledge of decentralization has reached everyone. So I'm pretty sure they will all understand and the majority will support a decentralized system. But the concern is that even today there are still many who do not realize that the system they are currently using is a centralized system. And there are still many who don't know what a centralized system and a non-centralized system are. Even today, the majority of people are not aware that they are being watched by a centralized system. and when people start to wake up to this. then everyone will start to be interested in following the decentralized system. I used to be like that. In fact, there are still very few people who know bitcoin at this time. the majority only among young people who know. so it is natural that the current bitcoin adoption that adheres to a decentralized system is still small. but I believe that in the next generation Decentralization will be most sought after. they will realize that privacy is important.

[Gallar]

It is undeniable that more people prefer to use centralized services. Because of all that, maybe because the services provided on platforms or in any field are indeed very good. That way many people become accustomed to using the service. Regarding anonymity, I think people don't really care about this, because maybe it's caused by the habits and experiences they've been through during their lifetime, most of them are used to life with an open identity. So more people are choosing openness than anonymity.

as well as accounts on existing social media such as on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and tiktok. Most of these people are all open in identity. So now everyone is used to being open in identity.

And why are so many people currently choosing centralized services, that's probably because the first service or platform that comes to the top has a centralized system, so people will automatically join in.

[nesty]

People's interest on decentralization is really not definite. It would vary depending on how interested they are in it. Some people may be very passionate and interested about the idea of decentralization and see it as a major component of a fair and just society, while others may be more skeptical of its benefits and prefer more centralized system. Whether or not people care about the decentralization it would still depend on each and every individual including their personal values and experiences, and beliefs about the role of the government and other institutions in society.

[karmamiu]

It is undeniable that more people prefer to use centralized services. Because of all that, maybe because the services provided on platforms or in any field are indeed very good. That way many people become accustomed to using the service. Regarding anonymity, I think people don't really care about this, because maybe it's caused by the habits and experiences they've been through during their lifetime, most of them are used to life with an open identity. So more people are choosing openness than anonymity.

as well as accounts on existing social media such as on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and tiktok. Most of these people are all open in identity. So now everyone is used to being open in identity.

And why are so many people currently choosing centralized services, that's probably because the first service or platform that comes to the top has a centralized system, so people will automatically join in.

It's because aside from most people are already accustomed to such system, people also find it too annoying to deal on their own finances only adding to their problems like they needed to think were they will put that money to be secure enough or if they should spend it into something valuable and many more things to think about. As the banks existed solely to hold their money, it is already a load lifted off of their chests and they can focus on other things such as working to add more money while the banks are "promising" like interest rates annually.

Also, although I agree with you that people seems too lazy to rely on their own capabilities in regards of financial management, some also won't choose things that they think it is risky when they knew that their are other option they can choosw in which they can play it safe.

[slapper]

It is undeniable that more people prefer to use centralized services. Because of all that, maybe because the services provided on platforms or in any field are indeed very good. That way many people become accustomed to using the service. Regarding anonymity, I think people don't really care about this, because maybe it's caused by the habits and experiences they've been through during their lifetime, most of them are used to life with an open identity. So more people are choosing openness than anonymity.

as well as accounts on existing social media such as on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and tiktok. Most of these people are all open in identity. So now everyone is used to being open in identity.

And why are so many people currently choosing centralized services, that's probably because the first service or platform that comes to the top has a centralized system, so people will automatically join in.

It's because aside from most people are already accustomed to such system, people also find it too annoying to deal on their own finances only adding to their problems like they needed to think were they will put that money to be secure enough or if they should spend it into something valuable and many more things to think about. As the banks existed solely to hold their money, it is already a load lifted off of their chests and they can focus on other things such as working to add more money while the banks are "promising" like interest rates annually.

Also, although I agree with you that people seems too lazy to rely on their own capabilities in regards of financial management, some also won't choose things that they think it is risky when they knew that their are other option they can choosw in which they can play it safe.

Confession time: I'm on the fence here. Centralized services? I get it. They offer smooth sailing and seamless experiences. Why wrestle with finances when life's adventures beckon? However, depending on these centralized behemoths? Long-term peril, folks. If they stumble or fall prey to cyber pirates, will people be marooned, bereft of funds and data? The golden mean? Harmonize convenience with fortification. Aim for systems both user-friendly and impervious, granting access to all while shielding them like a clandestine vault.

[Blowon]

I think more and more they are losing their decentralized features like many exchange platforms that require KYC to use it even though we know that decentralization runs entirely by the system and doesn't need it. but they don't care about the decentralized nature of it but it is a rule made by the government in their country for the safety of their investors. even so there is still a similar uniswap which symbolizes it is a decentralized platform therefore we can still remain anonymous even when transacting it just requires a little higher gas fees.

[Marvell1]

It is undeniable that more people prefer to use centralized services. Because of all that, maybe because the services provided on platforms or in any field are indeed very good. That way many people become accustomed to using the service. Regarding anonymity, I think people don't really care about this, because maybe it's caused by the habits and experiences they've been through during their lifetime, most of them are used to life with an open identity. So more people are choosing openness than anonymity.

as well as accounts on existing social media such as on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and tiktok. Most of these people are all open in identity. So now everyone is used to being open in identity.

And why are so many people currently choosing centralized services, that's probably because the first service or platform that comes to the top has a centralized system, so people will automatically join in.

It's because aside from most people are already accustomed to such system, people also find it too annoying to deal on their own finances only adding to their problems like they needed to think were they will put that money to be secure enough or if they should spend it into something valuable and many more things to think about. As the banks existed solely to hold their money, it is already a load lifted off of their chests and they can focus on other things such as working to add more money while the banks are "promising" like interest rates annually.

Also, although I agree with you that people seems too lazy to rely on their own capabilities in regards of financial management, some also won't choose things that they think it is risky when they knew that their are other option they can choosw in which they can play it safe.

I think it's mostly a habit because these centralized systems have been around for hundreds of years, and it has also served us for hundreds of years. While the concept of decentralization or anonymity has only been noticed in recent years since bitcoin was created. So it is very difficult for everyone to change and move to decentralization in a short time.

And I also agree with you on one more thing, self-preservation of assets is considered a burden, and they won't have time to do other things, so they will find a place where they feel safe enough to deposit money, and that's the bank.
Overall, banks are created and exist because of human need, so as long as people still have old habits and thoughts, the centralized system will still rule our world.