To obtain sufficient financing, the rule is simple, reduce your expenses to a minimum and obtain a positive income that covers those expenses, and therefore you must, at an early age (for example, from 10 years), start achieving these leaders, which is that you have a positive income equal to your expenses at least so that your job is achieved You luxury and increase your positive income.
As for positive income, it is any income that does not require your personal presence, such as real estate or land rent, shares, intellectual property returns, and other income.
Reducing your spending is the essence of the crisis, and it is something that will not happen as you get older and your responsibilities increase, especially if you decide to get married and have children.
Is it the same with passive income? 'coz that is how I view it; earning profit without consuming most of your time or not being active as the word suggests. But I do agree with this, some people just happened to misinterpret finances. If you cannot fill the part of having huge salary then atleast do something to reduce your expenses. I view this as earning $20 bucks per day and spending only $5 versus earning $50 but spending $45. But ofcourse if you have both high income and low expenses that would be better problem only is that, not all people have that kind of privilege or opportunity. Engaging with investments on the other hand will be a huge leap but things won't be easy and simple for sure. Not all people 'win' in a particular way, you just have to find what would lead you to such path.