Jr BM asking for 300 positive comment in his service thread via bounty campaign.

[Marykeller]

~

Thanks for bringing the threads to our attention @sujonali1819.

I already left a (neutral) feedback and reported the threads. Shouldn't we tag the spam accounts that post meaningless one-liners as well?

This is a first list of accounts (but, I am sure there are more):

Code:

Jr BM
Mst09
Biddutbam
Adeel_shahzad
Ahmad_pk0092
JANUS23
Makisha99
younas@76872
Brigoldonor
Arshman392
Fahmeed_siddiqui
Kashif60508
Relief33
SPARE
M__SUFYAN
Robin961219##
Cutfish28
Emmadelatim
Robicrypto
Kola10@
Khdotsh
AliRazatitok
Tauhid2035

Those that rush to give positive comments are newbies whose only focus in the forum is to promote different kinds of bounties through social media tasks. Any project owner who wants to give Jr BM bounty campaign to manage through his service thread reviews will understand that the reviews given to him are baseless and it looks like spamming review that is only done by newbies, no top rank members.

I like the fact that the thread is deleted and Jr BM has been given a neutral feedback for his unprofessional attitude as a bounty manager

[1715285707]

1715285707

[1715285707]

1715285707

[1715285707]

1715285707

[1715285707]

1715285707

[1715285707]

1715285707

[m2017]

Oh, what will happen now if lovesmayfamilis finds out about this.

lovesmayfamilis. lovesmayfamilis! I call you

Okay, joke on this topic for the last time. For today.

"Write a positive comment on our service thread" - There is nothing good in this. I would understand Jr BM's intentions if he indicated to leave comments based on personal impressions, that is, truthful ones, but here he clearly focuses on "positive" comments. Which, in fact, are paid false reviews.

For a similar community doen't leave unpunished (everything has already been said in Jr BM's trust). This is a reminder to those who want to repeat something similar.

[holydarkness]

Oh shit!
What a mess, I tried clicking on the service thread and was deleted already, I was hoping you archived it before final deletion from mode?
For a bounty manager to source for a review from participants is purely not acceptable maybe if anyone gives him or them a review it should be that they are satisfied with his job or something worth reviewing for than just imposing hunters to give them a positive review on the service thread.

OP did, fortunately. So future BM-wannabe could learn from their mistake. This one is the archived service ann thread which meant to be "reviewed", this one is the bounty thread.

Oh, what will happen now if lovesmayfamilis finds out about this.

lovesmayfamilis. lovesmayfamilis! I call you

Okay, joke on this topic for the last time. For today.
[...]

I LOLed.


Looks like the conflict ends with mod --I assume-- deleted the thread. Their TG is still flooded with fake reviews, tshough. I'm not really sure what's on Jr BM's mind by having this bounty, even the most clueless project would questions how and why did their service ann thread suddenly got a lot of praises and good testimonies in one day. I would like to think they're simply naïve, and thus will leave a neutral feedback referencing to this issue instead of a negative one.

[sokani]

Can't that be dealt through reporting?

I think so: it's not allowed to give an incentive to post. Although there have been exceptions in the form of review campaigns, in this case it's just spam. And since it's paid in altcoins, it's a giveaway that's not allowed. I've reported both topics.

He also says the campaign is escrowed, by his own team. Lol.

His/her actions is in violation of bitcointalk rules as clearly stated here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2103690.0

All accounts that commented or part took in the task risk being banned from the forum. And and I hope there will also be some sorts of

punishment for the bounty manager.

[LTU_btc]

For me it's strange, how someone can think that buying such fake reviews can be good idea. Especially when these reviews looks so fake and don't bring any credibility to manager. It actually just damage his reputation. Im wondering how much he was ready to pay for each review.

What a mess, I tried clicking on the service thread and was deleted already, I was hoping you archived it before final deletion from mode?

You can see all posts from this topic scrapped on loyce.club website https://loyce.club/archive/topics/544/5448486.html

[Adbitco]

Snip

OP did, fortunately. So future BM-wannabe could learn from their mistake. This one is the archived service ann thread which meant to be "reviewed", this one is the bounty thread.

Great! maybe for a future reference or it the Jr BM comes with another formats of promotions,
I was weak seeing that Jr BM went ahead doing such a thing although i don't know them emparticular, but has soiled managerial principles across the forum. That notwithstanding i believe no upcoming managers would do that anymore.

What a mess, I tried clicking on the service thread and was deleted already, I was hoping you archived it before final deletion from mode?

You can see all posts from this topic scrapped on loyce.club website https://loyce.club/archive/topics/544/5448486.html

Thank you sir!

[LoyceV]

For me it's strange, how someone can think that buying such fake reviews can be good idea. Especially when these reviews looks so fake and don't bring any credibility to manager. It actually just damage his reputation.

He has no reputation, so there's nothing to damage People have been buying fake reviews everywhere, and indeed, it's usually very obvious when there's a large number of positive reviews in a short period of time, and nothing afterwards. Let's put is this way: people doing this aren't the brightest.

So, to summarize: Jr BM now has 6 Posts, 6 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 neutral tags from DT That took skill

[sujonali1819]

The man pmed me and share the topic link and ask ''what is this?''. I told him that it was not good what he did, so learn from here and be stronger next time. Later he told me about helping him withdraw the ban (he told me he was banned for 30 days). As usual, I have said him that I can not help in this case but I suggested him do a ban appeal in the Meta section. But I was surprised he was asking for the Link of the Meta section.

[coin-investor]

The man pmed me and share the topic link and ask ''what is this?''. I told him that it was not good what he did, so learn from here and be stronger next time. Later he told me about helping him withdraw the ban (he told me he was banned for 30 days). As usual, I have said him that I can not help in this case but I suggested him do a ban appeal in the Meta section. But I was surprised he was asking for the Link of the Meta section.

And he has the nerve to become a campaign manager, it's not only him there are a lot of newbies who are involved in bounty campaigns that do not know the rules all they know is the bounties section because they can make money here and ignore the other sections of Bitcointalk.
I call these members nuisance members because they do not care about the health of this forum, and they do not contribute.

[Gladitorcomeback]

I also checked this after bounty launch. Review is not bad but he made a mistake that Jr BM make it mandatory task for positive review. may i ask is someone Jr BM about this that its against the rule of this forum. I think he is not aware of it. some signature bounty also has this task but you they make it optional which is not bad.  Everyone is free to give review and can be negative also. i checked his Service Thread and new members make one line post which made his thread full of spam.

[Stalker22]

I also checked this after bounty launch. Review is not bad but he made a mistake that Jr BM make it mandatory task for positive review. may i ask is someone Jr BM about this that its against the rule of this forum. I think he is not aware of it.

Well, it seems that the reality has hit him like a ton of bricks. The moderators have already removed his thread and slapped him with a 30-day ban, as reported by sujonali1819.

some signature bounty also has this task but you they make it optional which is not bad.  Everyone is free to give review and can be negative also.

Yes, everyone is free to leave their reviews, but paying for reviews or offering other incentives to members is prohibited.

[LoyceV]

(he told me he was banned for 30 days). As usual, I have said him that I can not help in this case but I suggested him do a ban appeal in the Meta section.

There's no point in appealing a justified ban. He must have had several reports made against his posts, 75% of them got deleted, he's earned himself 7 neutral DT-tags, and it looks like he joined the forum for the wrong reasons. What he should do, is use those 30 days to read the Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ.

[KingsDen]

The man pmed me and share the topic link and ask ''what is this?''. I told him that it was not good what he did, so learn from here and be stronger next time. Later he told me about helping him withdraw the ban (he told me he was banned for 30 days). As usual, I have said him that I can not help in this case but I suggested him do a ban appeal in the Meta section. But I was surprised he was asking for the Link of the Meta section.

And he has the nerve to become a campaign manager, it's not only him there are a lot of newbies who are involved in bounty campaigns that do not know the rules all they know is the bounties section because they can make money here and ignore the other sections of Bitcointalk.
I call these members nuisance members because they do not care about the health of this forum, and they do not contribute.

Jr BM was totally in a haste. I was thinking he should be an experienced old user coming up with a new account for management services.
Asking for 300 users to drop positive remarks in his thread could also be achieved in another way that will not victimise him.
How about if he uses the Royse777 term by saying something like this "You are also encouraged to drop comments on my thread and say what you feel about my services "
If the statement was made this way, it would be nice and I don't think that anyone would go make bad reviews even when he hasn't scammed anyone yet.
Experience is what is needed here in the forum.

[bullrun2024bro]

So, to summarize: Jr BM now has 6 Posts, 6 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 neutral tags from DT That took skill

FYP: Jr BM now has 6 2 Posts, 6 2 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 7 neutral tags from DT.

Let's see if he can make a 0 Post 0 Activity 0 Merit 7 Trust score.  

[Erumo]

That bounty manage would better start a 1k raffle instead of that stupid bounty campaign. Would have got more attention and reputation here, then that shit like "good manager" from newbies

[reagansimms]

So, to summarize: Jr BM now has 6 Posts, 6 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 neutral tags from DT That took skill

FYP: Jr BM now has 6 2 Posts, 6 2 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 7 neutral tags from DT.

Let's see if he can make a 0 Post 0 Activity 0 Merit 7 Trust score.  

A reputation that is always avoided by other users on forums, 7 neutral tags from DT earned by inviting massive spam on forums, I think he deserves it. Regarding the remaining 2 posts and 2 activities still standard at least for a while, he left the forum five days ago (13 April 2023).
Looks like it will continue to survive, maybe the 7 Trust neutral score will continue to grow. 

[smyslov]

So, to summarize: Jr BM now has 6 Posts, 6 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 neutral tags from DT That took skill

FYP: Jr BM now has 6 2 Posts, 6 2 Activity, 0 Merit, and 6 7 neutral tags from DT.

Let's see if he can make a 0 Post 0 Activity 0 Merit 7 Trust score.  

He cannot delete his thread in the bounty section so it will stay at 2 posts and 2 activities but he can edit his thread obviously this guy did not check the forum rules he study the structure of how to run a bounty campaign but unfortunately, he is not aware of the forum rules about spam, he is busted for his status as bounty manager I'm sure he will not proceed to be on this account but he will learn, and will just create a new account.

[yahoo62278]

That bounty manage would better start a 1k raffle instead of that stupid bounty campaign. Would have got more attention and reputation here, then that shit like "good manager" from newbies

Unfortunately this should be a lesson to other aspiring managers. You don't just wake up 1 day and decide that you are now a bounty manager. You have to research and know what's proper and what's not.

It also shows companies who they shouldn't hire. Managers who don't know the rules will likely not know or care if the people in their bounties are following the rules. They likely probably won't even check.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

I don't think this is as bad as expected since some people buy reviews and trust pilot, their ratings and numbers to their desired height, in OP case, i think he's only requesting for comment and not mandating it before getting paid by his participants, but if what he's demanding as well goes against the bounty campaign or signature campaign rules laid by the forum, then I subtle reminder could be forwarded to him maybe he's not aware or has forgotten.

[holydarkness]

I don't think this is as bad as expected since some people buy reviews and trust pilot, their ratings and numbers to their desired height, in OP case, i think he's only requesting for comment and not mandating it before getting paid by his participants, but if what he's demanding as well goes against the bounty campaign or signature campaign rules laid by the forum, then I subtle reminder could be forwarded to him maybe he's not aware or has forgotten.

I don't think you've read the thread carefully, or even the opening post. It's there on the image attached by OP, literally the top most of the thread, the thread started with the image. I'm not sure how you missed it. He was demanding it, mandating it.

As for the subtle reminder because maybe he's not aware or has forgotten, tell me this: will you trust a bounty manager that doesn't know the most basic rule of the forum? Or, if you're a company hiring him, then the question is: will you trust a manager who caught red handed buying fake reviews?