Can this be effective against the increasing numbers of gamblers?

[Bananington]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

[goldkingcoiner]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I think the keyword here will be "front" of their match day shirts. There is nothing about the back or side of the shirt. I am sure that the sponsers will find a work-around or a loophole of sorts to smear their logos on. Reducing promotions of ANYTHING is a good thing for players because we as the viewers, came to watch the players and watch them play. We did not pay for tickets to watch advertisements 24/7. But as I said, its unrealistic that there will be no more gambling or other advertisements, they will just find different ways to show them.

[rhomelmabini]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I think not, they're just removing the sponsorship on their t-shirt but gamblers know that gambling will still exist even if they removed it. I think it has possible effects on other sports too. This might have an effect on the short term but not likely to reduce some good amount of gamblers.

[ryzaadit]

Not gonna affect people.

People still gonna gamble, especially in "Football" which generated the most revenue on gambling. As you can see, even in the World Cup on QATAR with most religions countries.

Gambling revenue comparing 2018 world cup has just increase 13% without any betting sponsor.

[Fortify]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

It might make these companies less visible to the younger generations, many people look up to these footballers are their heroes and icons, when they scan their shirt and see a gambling site they might think that it's perfectly normal. Let's face it though, 99.99% of people who use these sites are likely to lose their whole deposit in the long run and you've just got to hope that they do not deposit every penny they own trying to scrape back to breakeven. It will help, but the fact that the animated boards around the side of pitches are still allowed - I'm not sure how successful it'll be. Those boards are potentially much more eye catching and are still highly visible on TV screens.

[Casdinyard]

Meh, there will still be ways for organizations to promote gambling. They're literally just removing the right to put them up on player's shirt until the said specified time. It's like putting your son on a no-phone ground after you find out he's been using the blender to mince frogs. But going back, yeah players will still be able to promote gambling sites in other ways, and even if they don't nothing's really stopping a dedicated gambler to play his favorite sports betting match. So it's a matter of futility really if you'll ask me. But whatever, whether they crackdown on sports gambling the industry will remain, they may even settle to another game or organization if ever, there's nothing that effectively stops sports betting from ever reaching its target audience really.

[Hispo]

It would not have much on an impact in the amount of concurrent gamblers in our society, this is rather a measure which comes out a sense of duty or morality. It has much to do with the personal religion of each one of us and how the teams decide to manage their sponsorships and partners.

If we talk about advertisement, there are hundreds of other ways which could be used for casinos to reach the public and appeal to them, to be honest.

[Mahanton]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

There's no way we could be able to say that it was effective or something until the league finishes or over because we know that even those companies or platforms arent been shown or put up into their shirts but still
it cant be told that people wont really be that able to gamble.Yes, it might lessen out since it cant really be seen if we do speak about ads.Companies or gambling platforms plans whether they would really
switching into other sports then its their choice to make because we know that there's no point on spending up if you cant really be able to be exposed on particular huge events.
Increasing number of gamblers is inevitable.

[Viscore]

Not gonna affect people.

People still gonna gamble, especially in "Football" which generated the most revenue on gambling. As you can see, even in the World Cup on QATAR with most religions countries.

Gambling revenue comparing 2018 world cup has just increase 13% without any betting sponsor.

I also think this will not create any difference in gambling. People will continue to gamble because they were used to it most particularly for football as it’s gaining a lot of popularity and demand from all gamblers all over the world. So with or without betting sponsor, gambling will still be a big hit for football as most of the audience too are probably fond in gambling.

[Oshosondy]

Gambling sites that are advertising through matchs on the football player jerseys are wrong. It is very wrong because kids and under 18s are watching the matches. The best places for such advertisments should be where adults are the ones capable most of visiting, such as this site, Bitcointalk.

It is said that gambling ads would be removed from the front of players shirt, maybe this would mean another thing in a way they can advertise it through another method, but such ads are not good. The gambling sites should come to forums, like Bitcointalk for advertising, not where kids will be watching them.

[coin-investor]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

The club can still have it based on the excerpt from the article.

It has previously been reported that clubs will still be permitted to use gambling companies for sleeve sponsorship deals as a compromise.

The gambling company sponsoring Premier League is not only the only way to promote their platform and will not reduce the number of gamblers, gamblers will continue to gamble and those who are inclined to gamble will find their way to the gambling platform.
As long as there are totally no restrictions on promoting gambling platforms, gambling companies can find a way to sponsor other events, they have the money and some events need sponsors.

[Oasisman]

Can this be effective against the increasing numbers of gamblers?

This can affect the gambling companies more than it affects the number of gamblers. People would still gamble in their favourite gambling websites, but nobody's gonna see about the new gambling websites if they can't advertise it where majority of their target market are gathered in one attendance.
Well, this is such a noble act for these clubs ignoring the fact that this could reduce their advertising income lol.
There's no denial, gambling online is very popular now -so i don't think anything could control it unless the government will impose a strict regulations in gambling.

[DoublerHunter]

Not gonna affect people.

People still gonna gamble, especially in "Football" which generated the most revenue on gambling. As you can see, even in the World Cup on QATAR with most religions countries.

Gambling revenue comparing 2018 world cup has just increase 13% without any betting sponsor.

I also think this will not create any difference in gambling. People will continue to gamble because they were used to it most particularly for football as it’s gaining a lot of popularity and demand from all gamblers all over the world. So with or without betting sponsor, gambling will still be a big hit for football as most of the audience too are probably fond in gambling.

^Definitely right and I agree with you all.
Based on my knowledge other sports may not be as receptive to gambling sponsors or may have different regulations around sponsorship, so it is unclear if other sports will follow the Premier League's lead. But I think it will depend on how those sports view the issue and the impact that gambling sponsorship has on their brand and reputation. However, it is unclear news and it could be the impact of removing gambling sponsors from matchday shirts is difficult to predict.

[masulum]

Advertising for all businesses is not limited to football jerseys, there are many ways that gambling providers can advertise. Content creators, influencers, online ads, offline ads and so on. So, even though they can't advertise on football club jerseys, gambling providers can still develop their business through other marketing. In fact, online ads have the opportunity to find prospects for gamblers who are right on target.

This is one of gambling strategy data you can read (based on 2021 study)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349634808_Gambling_Marketing_Strategies_and_the_Internet_What_Do_We_Know_A_Systematic_Review

[serjent05]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think?

It will lessen the exposure of gambling platforms but I do not think that it will have an effect to the gambling industries.  Even though the banners of the gambling platform is removed from the front of the athletes matchday shirts, there is no regulation preventing them to put it on the back or on the short of the athlete.  Even if they completely remove these banners from the outfit of players, they still have banners everywhere in the stadium.  So at the end, it won't have an effect at all.

Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

Gambling platforms will always try to promote their platform so it is obvious that they will try to approach other sports.  About the outfit of players, if it became a regulation then others will follow, else, it would be waste if a team lost sponsorship so I think other team will think hardly about following it.

[Falconer]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I don't think it will affect people directly, meaning gambling will continue but indirectly it will reduce the number of gamblers. The interest in gambling is not because these teams have gambling sponsors on their shirts, but the interest in gambling is very clear due to other factors such as entertainment or something like that.

Even without sponsors, gamblers will still gamble on a particular site according to their wishes. But there's chance England could can reduce the growth rate of gamblers after going without sponsors on some teams' shirts.

[ultrloa]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

Nope its not, people will gamble even if they would not see those adds on their shirts since as long as they can see a opportunity to place a bet on their favorite team and there's a platform exist where they can do that they continue to gamble. And besides there are so many ways gambling sites advertise so for sure they could reach up to more bigger audiences and can influence people to gamble especially when crucial games coming on the league.

[TimeTeller]

I don't think it will affect people directly, meaning gambling will continue but indirectly it will reduce the number of gamblers. The interest in gambling is not because these teams have gambling sponsors on their shirts, but the interest in gambling is very clear due to other factors such as entertainment or something like that.

Even without sponsors, gamblers will still gamble on a particular site according to their wishes. But there's chance England could can reduce the growth rate of gamblers after going without sponsors on some teams' shirts.

Gamblers will always be gamblers. But such move may reduce potential gamblers.
Because some hard core fans will only gamble if they see their idols to be promoting a specific site or company.
But if you have the interest in gambling, you will always find a way how to gamble, even not promoted by prominent athletes.
Remember, it is only one avenue how a gambling site is being promoted, there are other marketing options to promote a site.

[Finestream]

The Premier League have confirmed clubs have voluntarily agreed to remove gambling sponsors from the front of their matchday shirts from the start of the 2025/26 season.

This is a move to try to reduce promotion of gambling in the premier league with it's increasing audience, do you think it can successfully reduce the number of people who gamble? What do you think? Will these gambling platforms not just move to other sports, do you think other sports that wear their sponsors name in England will adopt this new development in the premier league?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/premier-league-clubs-to-remove-gambling-sponsors-from-front-of-shirts/ar-AA19Ogeu

I think not, they're just removing the sponsorship on their t-shirt but gamblers know that gambling will still exist even if they removed it. I think it has possible effects on other sports too. This might have an effect on the short term but not likely to reduce some good amount of gamblers.

I don’t see it will affect gamblers at all. What the team did is only to remove gambling sponsorship in their shirts but it has nothing to do with the gamblers in the long run. Besides, football is where most gamblers bet, and for sure it will always continue as long as their favorite football team still exists. Maybe this is just a little misinterpretation I guess.

[Vaskiy]

This doesn't make any big impact. These are just self consoling plans from the gambling platforms. Throughout the match the light boards around the ground runs different advertisement. Most of the sponsor ads can be seen on the light boards. So, in one way or the other the sponsor ads were visible to the audience.

Very few follow the ads whereas the majority have got their schedule with sports betting. They just gamble on those specific matches. For this reason the audience never look upon the ads and the prime focus will be on the teams and the players.