Signature campaign post quota

[Darker45]

Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.

[Solosanz]

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.

You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent.

[UniJoin]

Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting.

This is the key idea behind our signature campaign. When we spoke to the campaign manager, he literally insisted that this was the only approach that could bring results. After all, the posts of people who enjoy discussions are the most organic, as a result, the most readable. There are still users in our campaign who post just for the sake of the quota, but the manager assured us that after a few weeks these users will leave the campaign if no progress is seen.

Actually, this is the main idea of our dialogue with the manager.

"The signature campaign is similar to "product placement" in the sense that advertising is shown under the member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without an explicit indication. It's completely voluntary and even if it's not direct clicks it definitely subconsciously settles in the minds".

[carlfebz2]

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.

You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent.

Actually agree on this sentiment or comment on which this is indeed reality. People would always be having something to say which its not really that shocking. The only thing on which
people couldnt thrown up some negative words is into those people who had earned most merit. We know that no matter how short or 1-liner reply they would be having as long they do have that tons of
received merit then it wont really be making some issue or would be generating out those common words to be thrown up on a certain user.

This is where you could really see that there's some different treatment or impression. About post quotas then it would be entirely be depending on the campaign manager in the end of the day.
They are the ones who would be setting up those rules and terms in regarding on the campaign. Even he's just a community manager, he would really be having the full rights on how
he would really be handling it out, usually post numbers will be ranging 15-25 post per week and this is that common max post count
but there are actually who doesnt have a limit which users would be spamming out as much as they can.

[noormcs5]

What do you think the right post quota per week?


I read some campaign manager sentiment about this issue. Forcing their participants post above the minimum post requirements they set by themselves. If they want a higher post quota participants, They should increase the minimum post requirements or make the campaign rate per post without any consequences for posting low but quality post.

I'm confused on the minimum post requirements rules. I saw many users being remove on the campaign by posting within the quota.



_{Without rules we are nothing but animals. -Socrates}

There is no hard and fast rule that how many minimum posts a person should make in a week. The campaign manager can set any number of posts and usually, we see this number somewhere between 15 posts to 25 posts. However, anyone is free to make any number of posts greater than the minimum amount required by the campaigns as long as the posts are not spam and there is no post bursting etc

It is always advisable to post a few posts above the minimum requirement, as even if some of your posts are not counted or deleted, you still have enough posts to qualify for the weekly payment.

[Nwada001]

Most managers are not looking for those who are just posting because they want to get paid; they want participants who derive joy from posting.

This is the key idea behind our signature campaign. When we spoke to the campaign manager, he literally insisted that this was the only approach that could bring results. After all, the posts of people who enjoy discussions are the most organic, as a result, the most readable. There are still users in our campaign who post just for the sake of the quota, but the manager assured us that after a few weeks these users will leave the campaign if no progress is seen.

Actually, this is the main idea of our dialogue with the manager.

"The signature campaign is similar to "product placement" in the sense that advertising is shown under the member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without an explicit indication. It's completely voluntary and even if it's not direct clicks it definitely subconsciously settles in the minds".

That's nice; every manager always knows what's best for the client, and as such, they will do their best to provide quality service for their clients. This method, I also believe, increases user participation as they will want their worth to be known on the forum. By doing so, they will not just focus on creating a bunch of comments or threads with zero value and meaning, but will want to make every post unique and pleasant to readers. If this method has been working very well for you, then it's the best. I must confess my post quality today, and as of when I was still new to the forum and started participating in campaigns, I tried to engage on posts that I found interesting and not just some random threads that I knew nothing about just in the name of completing my post count for the week.

[coin-investor]

Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

[LTU_btc]

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Oh no In my early days here I've been innsimilar type of campaign like Stake - Yobit. IIRC, they allowed to make up to 20 posts per day. Don't remember how many posts per week I was making, but my record was 12 posts in one day and it already was too much for me.
And to be correct, Stake doesn't requires 100 posts per week, they just allow to make up to 100 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

If I will see that I have to push myself too much to reach required quota and that I'm posting just for quantity, then yes, probably I will get out of campaign.

[coin-investor]

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

If I will see that I have to push myself too much to reach required quota and that I'm posting just for quantity, then yes, probably I will get out of campaign.

Wow, you're too honest for telling us that I cannot blame you if you think that quality comes first before quantity, honestly, there is no exact campaign post quota, you can be in a campaign with 20 posts but you have the time and you have the motivation to posts because you love being in a discussion, in a debate or you want to contribute in a discussion, the most important thing is if you are going to post 3 or 10 posts daily it should not be spam its still quality that counts because its the one that will define you.

[KingsDen]

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.

You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent.

Solosanz you got me laughing and almost rolling on the floor. Your sentimental analysis is correct and what is happening in the stake campaign and maybe some other campaigns. In as much as money is involved, there must be variation and habitual posting which is influenced by the weekly pay that is gotten from the campaign.

Darker45, you are correct. Stake has a minimum post of 25 per week but the pay is not within the range of what a hero member or a legendary member receives per week. This is why many of them are posting upto 80 per week and above in order to hit $100 and this definitely leads to spam.

[yahoo62278]

Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

I find myself struggling at times to get 25 posts in a week actually. I try not to post in mega threads minus the NBA betting and season threads in gambling discussion boards and that's because I actually watch basketball and feel I know what I'm talking about. I talk ab out mega threads as I do not see enough new threads each week that interest me, I see a lot of people post only in mega threads to hit post quotas. I'm motivated to post but I don't want to continue to post in the same threads over and over like I see a lot of people doing.

[Darker45]

Now I can't imagine myself in campaign which would require 25-30 posts.

What if your current campaign increases the minimum post to 25 will you get out of the current campaign, now that there are so many applicants and yet few campaigns, that number doesn't matter if you are knowledgeable on the many subjects here in this forum and you are an active poster by habit, your motivation should be your habit not on numbers.

I find myself struggling at times to get 25 posts in a week actually. I try not to post in mega threads minus the NBA betting and season threads in gambling discussion boards and that's because I actually watch basketball and feel I know what I'm talking about. I talk ab out mega threads as I do not see enough new threads each week that interest me, I see a lot of people post only in mega threads to hit post quotas. I'm motivated to post but I don't want to continue to post in the same threads over and over like I see a lot of people doing.

That's why I would have preferred that gambling discussions be more specific. The NBA thread by ingiltere, for example, has been around for 8 long years. And it will stay for god knows when. For as long as there's the NBA, this mega thread would continue to grow and grow. The same goes to other sports and leagues.

The discussion is also compromised a bit because there are so many topics within the NBA, for example. There could be a number of games happening at the same time. And people are talking of different games and teams and players in a single thread. This topsy-turvy thread could be avoided if it's broken down into specifics, say, NBA Western Conference Finals: Lakers vs. Nuggets. This would result into a more focused discussion that would be closed when the series ends.

[yahoo62278]

That's why I would have preferred that gambling discussions be more specific. The NBA thread by ingiltere, for example, has been around for 8 long years. And it will stay for god knows when. For as long as there's the NBA, this mega thread would continue to grow and grow. The same goes to other sports and leagues.

The discussion is also compromised a bit because there are so many topics within the NBA, for example. There could be a number of games happening at the same time. And people are talking of different games and teams and players in a single thread. This topsy-turvy thread could be avoided if it's broken down into specifics, say, NBA Western Conference Finals: Lakers vs. Nuggets. This would result into a more focused discussion that would be closed when the series ends.

This is something you can think about for future threads. NFL season will start in a few months and I barely see any discussion on that sport. I personally think the NBA thread needs to be at the least separated year by year, but since it's going for 8 years I don't think that will change now. If someone did change, the other thread wouldn't die, it would need to be locked to keep people from posting.

[UmerIdrees]

I want to involve in your imagination. Can you imagine yourself in a  campaign that requires 100+ posts per week? Just think about stake 

Stake doesn't actually require its participants to make 100+ posts per week. The minimum post requirement to get paid is just 25, although it seems they're still paying those who make less than the required 25 posts but with a different pay rate. Also, posts beyond the minimum are paid but with a significantly low rate, less than half of the rate for the first 25 posts. And then there's also the payment limit. So you cannot just post non-stop and get paid for it.

You're correct, but I read most of users posts, they're talking about campaign participants are only posts to get paid, not writing in natural.

Let's use Stake campaign as the example, the minimum posts per week is 25 posts and they willing to pay maximum of $125 per week excluding the $35 bonus.

When someone create 25 posts, people will say this user is only posts to get paid.

When someone create 83 posts (58 gambling posts) or 95 posts (70 posts non gambling), people will say this user is only posts to get maximum extra payment.

When someone create long posts, people will say this user is trying to become a best poster to earn bonus.

People aren't happy with that, they're want to see you're really posting without get any cent.

To be honest, it is hard to satisfy everyone. As long as you are making good constrcutive posts and a few posts above the minimum requirement you are good to go. I think only stake campiagn allows you to make a lot of posts and give incentive for those posts, but then the incentive is too low for the Hero / Legendary members in that campiagn. Still i see some of the posters make very decnt posts even if they post much more than the others.

Even with a campiagn with maximum 20 posts, people can still spam with non-consructive posts. I guess we cannot say that everyone in a certain campiagn is a spammer but it varies on person to person. Yes, there is one campiagn 1xbit, where you will find the most spam posts by their participants.

[judeafante]

It goes with the habit if you're posting 30 to 40 posts a week without a banner attached to your profile then you get into a campaign that asks you to post 20 posts a week you will not think of the numbers and will prefer to continue what you love doing and have been doing, but if you're a lazy poster and suddenly you're in a 20 posts campaign, you'll struggle to keep up with the numbers.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

Even with a campiagn with maximum 20 posts, people can still spam with non-consructive posts. I guess we cannot say that everyone in a certain campiagn is a spammer but it varies on person to person. Yes, there is one campiagn 1xbit, where you will find the most spam posts by their participants.

Hhampuz noticed that in his campaign and went on a rapid removal of those that haven't been constructive in their posting in the past weeks. It doesn't matter what the weekly quota is, people will always look for a way to do less work to get paid the same. In 1xbit campaign, we still have decent posters that only joined that campaign because they had no other chance of joining other campaigns as their accounts has been red trusted. While we have those that changed to spammers immediately they got accepted into the campaign.

They did that because (1) their account has no value anymore and because they understand that the campaign manager doesn't care for the quality of the post and that's why having quality managers managing campaigns on the forum is very vital. I have noticed both campaigns and managers shape they way people post when they're enrolled in that campaign. We have some high paying and quality campaigns on the forum, when you observe the participants of the campaign write you'll see the difference between their write ups and that of those in average paying campaign. To retain their slots you see them put more efforts in their write ups.

[avp2306]

Even with a campiagn with maximum 20 posts, people can still spam with non-consructive posts. I guess we cannot say that everyone in a certain campiagn is a spammer but it varies on person to person. Yes, there is one campiagn 1xbit, where you will find the most spam posts by their participants.

Hhampuz noticed that in his campaign and went on a rapid removal of those that haven't been constructive in their posting in the past weeks. It doesn't matter what the weekly quota is, people will always look for a way to do less work to get paid the same. In 1xbit campaign, we still have decent posters that only joined that campaign because they had no other chance of joining other campaigns as their accounts has been red trusted. While we have those that changed to spammers immediately they got accepted into the campaign.

They did that because (1) their account has no value anymore and because they understand that the campaign manager doesn't care for the quality of the post and that's why having quality managers managing campaigns on the forum is very vital. I have noticed both campaigns and managers shape they way people post when they're enrolled in that campaign. We have some high paying and quality campaigns on the forum, when you observe the participants of the campaign write you'll see the difference between their write ups and that of those in average paying campaign. To retain their slots you see them put more efforts in their write ups.

Expected to see like that on a campaign where the manager doesn't have any intention to create quality campaign since there main intention is to spam the forum and make their signature visible on any section of this forum.

1xbit joiners doesn't afraid to do that since they  don't lose anything since there reputation is ruined already. So the only thing we can do about that case is to report the post if we see it as spam so that moderators can notice and delete those post.

[aioc]

Expected to see like that on a campaign where the manager doesn't have any intention to create quality campaign since there main intention is to spam the forum and make their signature visible on any section of this forum.

1xbit joiners doesn't afraid to do that since they  don't lose anything since there reputation is ruined already. So the only thing we can do about that case is to report the post if we see it as spam so that moderators can notice and delete those post.

1xbit if you check their spreadsheet cannot get reputable and prominent posters because no prominent posters would like to associate themselves with scammers, so many 1xbit are spammers, and many of them become active for 1xbit but when there's no 1xbit campaign they are inactive, 1xbit participants' accounts are disposable, although their rewards is very tempted but their campaign is seasonal.
Going back to the signature campaign quota for very active posters numbers do not matter he'll just post not to meet requirements but he based it on the discussion that he can take part in, and with many new topics popping up he can always hit the quota or even exceed the required number.

[virasog]

Expected to see like that on a campaign where the manager doesn't have any intention to create quality campaign since there main intention is to spam the forum and make their signature visible on any section of this forum.

1xbit joiners doesn't afraid to do that since they  don't lose anything since there reputation is ruined already. So the only thing we can do about that case is to report the post if we see it as spam so that moderators can notice and delete those post.

1xbit if you check their spreadsheet cannot get reputable and prominent posters because no prominent posters would like to associate themselves with scammers, so many 1xbit are spammers, and many of them become active for 1xbit but when there's no 1xbit campaign they are inactive, 1xbit participants' accounts are disposable, although their rewards is very tempted but their campaign is seasonal.
Going back to the signature campaign quota for very active posters numbers do not matter he'll just post not to meet requirements but he based it on the discussion that he can take part in, and with many new topics popping up he can always hit the quota or even exceed the required number.

Well, if you compare all the campaigns, you will find that the participants of 1xbit are mostly spammers and also they do not care about their posting habits neither they want to improve them because they know that they won't be accepted in any other campaign, so why make the effort to make constructive posts.

It goes with the habit if you're posting 30 to 40 posts a week without a banner attached to your profile then you get into a campaign that asks you to post 20 posts a week you will not think of the numbers and will prefer to continue what you love doing and have been doing, but if you're a lazy poster and suddenly you're in a 20 posts campaign, you'll struggle to keep up with the numbers.

Making 20 posts a week is a fair requirement and anyone who is active on the forum can easily make these number of posts. If anyone cannot even make 20 post a week, then I am afraid he should not be in a signature campaign, as the campaign requires active members and not the ones who feel burden making the posts.

[GxSTxV]

What do you think the right post quota per week?

There are currently several campaigns ongoing right now, and personally i don't see any problem with them in any way. The rules are clear and easy to follow for any regular poster who has good content and avoids spamming or copying. Add to that many of the signature managers themselves participate in other campaigns.

Simply if you dislike the rules of a particular campaign you have other options. If you cant meet the minimum required number of posts per week for that campaign, you can find another one that doesnt have such a requirement and still receive regular payment per post. What truly matters is the quality of your post. In my humble opinion your topic serves no purpose here.