Other altcoins are created for the purpose of getting the attention of bitcoin holders and they created some coins that are way too good than bitcoins in terms of their advancement, from the fast transaction to even lower payment for transaction fees, but there is only one thing that they cannot beat bitcoin, its decentralization. they failed to do so and they cannot do such a thing because if they sat unanimously, the mass won't gonna recognize their project and they will end up getting bankrupt because no one wanted to invest in them. that's why they choose their coins to be centralized even though they cannot beat bitcoins, they are getting some investors somehow.
Bitcoin is like the 'Mona Lisa' of the cryptoverse - copycats may try their luck, but they’ll always fall short of the OG. Sure, altcoins might strut around, peacocking their flashy bells and whistles, zippy transactions, and nickel-and-dime fees. But Bitcoin’s real mojo doesn't lie in its velocity or pocket-friendliness. No siree, it's rooted in its rugged reliability and trustworthy vibes, born from its decentralized and open-source DNA.
Decentralization isn't just some fancy shmancy word; it’s the incarnation of a fiscal free-for-all. By kicking central control to the curb, Bitcoin hands the reins over to its users, a move that leaves altcoins struggling to keep up.
Now, wouldn’t it be a hoot if an altcoin could rock the decentralization gig without ditching its unique hooks? Could it seriously duke it out for Bitcoin's crown, or would the crypto tribe stay true to their first love? Grab your popcorn, folks. Only time will spill the beans.
