How much longer will JollyGood take to reverse his feedback?

[dbc23]

I have been patient enough waiting for JollyGood to review the feedback on my profile but it seems the judgement is final.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5275303.msg59348568#msg59348568

Revised from negative to neutral: Clearly he types nonsense to increase post count to earn signature campaign fees.

He PREDICTED football scores and goalscorers incorrectly ONE DAY AFTER the games ended when results and goalscorers were already known.

This is an event that happened in February 2022, I created this thread October 2022 and he reversed his feedback from negative to neutral. How long will it take to remove the feedback completely. I can't be judged based on a mistake done a year ago, I need my reputation restored and the stigma of parading my profile as a shit poster discarded.

[Jawhead999]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't see @JollyGood ever remove his feedback, it will always stand, the difference is the color he use.

As I always been mentioned by most of users, neutral tag is fine since it doesn't ruin your reputation.

I don't expect he will remove his feedback, but that's just my guess.

You should consider to create your custom trust list, the only way for you to against his feedback is distrust him.

[_act_]

When a matches is over and the result has been known to everyone, you then make your own prediction. That kind of wrong prediction should not be taken lightly at all. It is even no more a prediction. It is just a neutral tag about what you did in the past.

JollyGood will decide what he is going to do, but if he leaves the tag neutral, it is not wrong. But you might be lucky because he may remove it.

[yahoo62278]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't see @JollyGood ever remove his feedback, it will always stand, the difference is the color he use.

JollyGood has removed a red tag or 2 during his tenure here.

You should consider to create your custom trust list, the only way for you to against his feedback is distrust him.

Just because the OP won't see the feedback anymore, doesn't mean it just disappears. The rest of the forum will still see the neutral. You are correct in saying the neutral doesn't mean much.


@OP you might consider just letting it go and locking this thread. The feedback is neutral and means very little. At worst it will make a manager look more deeply at your profile when you apply for a sig campaign. If you are putting effort into your posts, you have nothing to worry about.

[rby]

Revised from negative to neutral: Clearly he types nonsense to increase post count to earn signature campaign fees.

He PREDICTED football scores and goalscorers incorrectly ONE DAY AFTER the games ended when results and goalscorers were already known.

I don't know if this sounds funny or not but I had a chuckle after reading this. It seems that JG's concern was not that the OP predicted an already concluded match, what upset him the more was that the result was wrongly predicted
This is one of the many things we see in the gambling discussion mega threads, just that most of them are buried faster than they can be discovered.

he reversed his feedback from negative to neutral. How long will it take to remove the feedback completely.

That is the best I have seen JG do. And before he reverses from red to neutral, there are compelling reasons and opinions of many.

I need my reputation restored and the stigma of parading my profile as a shit poster discarded.

Your reputation is not dented and this shouldn't call for being stigmatised. If a neutral tag is stigmatising you, what will ban do to you.

I will advise you to find solution for yourself, someone had already suggested same. The trust system is decentralized. If you don't want to see the feedback, you can consider to distrust him and then give a counter feedback that looks like this Unble to forgive me after some years of pleading

Then, you have to upgrade your posting quality and if possible avoid the gambling boards and a campaign manager can hire you.

[Timelord2067]

So you bought the account in July 2021 - yes?

[dbc23]

So you bought the account in July 2021 - yes?

You have chosen to abuse the trust system what do you mean by bought account. What is your proof. You drop a feedback without a valid proof. I chose to have a break and came back in 2021 July how does that mean I bought the account

[Rikafip]

How long will it take to remove the feedback completely. I can't be judged based on a mistake done a year ago, I need my reputation restored and the stigma of parading my profile as a shit poster discarded.

I wouldn't count on him completely removing neutral anytime soon, if ever. Instead, be happy that he even changed it from negative to neutral.

I can't be judged based on a mistake done a year ago, I need my reputation restored and the stigma of parading my profile as a shit poster discarded.

Just becasue JollyGood left you that feedback doesn't automatically mean the other will perceive you as a shitposters. There are other members who received similar feedback from him and are now in some of the best paid signature campaigns which proves that if you are a good poster, that feedback won't prevent you getting into those (which is a reason why you want it removed I suspect).

[lovesmayfamilis]

So you bought the account in July 2021 - yes?

You have chosen to abuse the trust system what do you mean by bought account. What is your proof. You drop a feedback without a valid proof. I chose to have a break and came back in 2021 July how does that mean I bought the account

I can explain or suggest Timelord2067's suspicion that your account may have been bought.

Follow carefully:

You have returned to the forum after three years of absence. Your first post after waking up (I haven't looked at the archives) shows the date July 10, 2021, 6:30:15 PM



On the same day, you send 10 merits, 5 merits per post, to the account that had a connection with the account seller. Your time to read two posts, and decide to give 10 merits, did not take a minute. Do you think that you can believe in the randomness of these estimates?


https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=dbc23&to=Mistafreeze

The account itself to which the merits were sent has already been banned.

I also think that you are not the real owner of this account, but I will not leave any tags, but I can say that I do not believe you either.

[Poker Player]

As I always been mentioned by most of users, neutral tag is fine since it doesn't ruin your reputation.

A negative tag either.

However, it should be noted that some neutral tags may affect the ability to earn through signature campaigns. For example:

... do not apply if you have neutral feedback from actmyname.

In this case and drawing a parallel, JollyGood's neutral feeback could affect the OP's ability to earn through signature campaigns.

[nutildah]

So you bought the account in July 2021 - yes?

You have chosen to abuse the trust system what do you mean by bought account. What is your proof. You drop a feedback without a valid proof. I chose to have a break and came back in 2021 July how does that mean I bought the account

Its tacky for Timelord to leave a link to his own question as the reference in your neutral feedback (in lieu of proof or even evidence), but it means even less than Jollygood's feedback. You leaving him a negative in response is not the right way to go about handling it.

I can see you're upset but the thing is you probably did buy this account, or acquire it in some other way, because the person who owned it before you had a completely different style of writing, and they were writing because they enjoyed posting, not because they were merely slogging through the requirements of their sig campaign.

So you're gonna tell us you posted this?

Is it just me or has the quality of discussion and even grammatical coherence of posts gone down almost as logarithmyically as bitcoin went up last year?  I've been off the board for a little while and coming back it feels like it's completely different, I gleaned a MASSIVE amount of knowledge hear in the past years and now all I see is google translates of boiler plate statements.

Granted those translations have always been here, just seems like that's ALL there is these days.

Cmon bro, that's not you.

What's worse is you appear to have a bunch of accounts on this forum, and one of them is even in DT2:



The address of coco23 shows up first because you only wrote "R" for reserve, meaning he didn't copy the address from you. And that account only used it once whereas yours used it a bunch of times.

I'm not tagging you but I am excluding you and coco23.

[Lucius]

This is the situation when someone complains about having negative or neutral feedback, and then something much worse happens to them - someone finds proof that the account was bought or that it is part of an alt farm in which at least one account has been permanently banned. Now, instead of that irrelevant tag, the OP has much more to worry about, especially if someone digs up hard evidence and paints him in red.

[lovesmayfamilis]

What's worse is you appear to have a bunch of accounts on this forum

Thanks, nutildah . I lost where and when I wrote about this user. But he knew for sure that something was wrong with him.
In addition, about the conversation that this account may also belong to the Zilon account. In addition to the previously found matches for the Bitcoin address, you can also see the total transactions with the BSC wallet.

Your bsc wallet address: 0xdcC16B174d4abF05f6F95CC1616BB15153AAc026

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=0xf1e6c4972335Ad5e28187a3e6247cC18a085bB93


Therefore, to say that the dbc23 account is clean as water would be stupid, OP.

[Timelord2067]

So you bought the account in July 2021 - yes?

You have chosen to abuse the trust system what do you mean by bought account. What is your proof. You drop a feedback without a valid proof. I chose to have a break and came back in 2021 July how does that mean I bought the account

Yeh - speaking of abusing the Trust system:

dbc23

2023-05-14

Reference

you are simply abusing the trust system. How will you claim an account was bought when you have no claims.

Code:

~dbc23
~coco23
~Zilon

I'll leave it for @JollyGood to slap the first negative on your BOUGHT account.

[examplens]

Why is Jollygood being talked about as some kind of machine, bot?  I am still convinced that behind that account is a real person with some beliefs of his own.

You have chosen to abuse the trust system what do you mean by bought account. What is your proof. You drop a feedback without a valid proof. I chose to have a break and came back in 2021 July how does that mean I bought the account

OP, I believe you have already been told many times, a neutral tag is not that influential for your participation in the forum. That's why this drama that you started for the second time is a bit unclear to me.
Also, you obviously don't understand the use of the trust system, you left a negative tag on Timelord2067 as a form of revenge, because of his feedback on your trust page.

However, what presented nutildah and lovesmayfamilis, say that Jollygood's neutral feedback will be the least of your problems here.

[Timelord2067]

6/28/2021 12:23:43 AM    woke up -     dbc23
6/30/2021 2:16:39 PM    password changed -   Zilon

Source bpip.org

Also, you obviously don't understand the use of the trust system, you left a negative tag on Timelord2067 as a form of revenge, because of his feedback on your trust page.

However, what presented nutildah and lovesmayfamilis, say that Jollygood's neutral feedback will be the least of your problems here.

This is true - Zilon is in the Rollbit signature campaign which @Hhampuz is the campaign manager of.

https://loyce.club/trust/2023-05-13_Sat_05.07h/2862749.html

Trust list for: Zilon (Trust: neutral) (412 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2023-05-13_Sat_05.07h)
Back to index

Zilon Trusts these users' judgement:
1. The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +29 / =3 / -0) (5275 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Hhampuz (Trust: +128 / =3 / -0) (4637 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. CryptopreneurBrainboss (Trust: +18 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 3280 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. icopress (Trust: +29 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (16) 4727 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Ratimov (Trust: +18 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (12) 9966 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Zilon Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

Zilon's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~Zilon's judgement is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Sucking up to all the campaign managers perhaps??

[Poker Player]

Later on I'll come back and take a good look at the thread and links to decide if I take an aggressive approach on this issue. But if I understand it correctly, we have pretty clear indications that the OP has not only bought the account, but has other accounts that have been red trusted previously, or have committed plagiarism, no?

[Timelord2067]

Now this is interesting:

Thanks for the installment. I have received it, thank you.

I had to make another installment of $60 today because i am having a heavy bill to clear in the future. I will be making my final and one time payment in two weeks time which is $50 . Please bear with me with the mode of payment i adopted i am trying to keep up with our agreement so i don't disappoint you.

TX hash: https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/61e3c1178b210af842edeca5fad22b719985a7ad7a29485ce8b878e8440bcf8c

I am confirming that I have received that fund. Now the new repayment amount should be 50$ and repayment should be made on or before the due date to TFDsiykiaAB8GeoZxVFz8MM2P4Ed9cYrfN

Note the time Zilon posted their request for an extension...

49 minutes after the OP started this thread...

[lovesmayfamilis]

Note the time Zilon posted their request for an extension...

49 minutes after the OP started this thread...

How many coincidences today.

[Timelord2067]

How many coincidences today.

Three or four Signature campaigns have just opened up spaces, so dbc23 was probably angling to join one of them this week to either clear their debts, or just double dip payments from campaign managers.