Help us to choose a bonus for a review campaign!

[Cantsay]

I have never participated in a review campaign for a casino before the only review campaign I took part in was that of a mixer (whirlwind.money) from my experience there I'll like to suggest something.

First, it will be best to use Bitcoin for the reward, and the payment should not be fixed. Each review should be paid based on what it contains because if you make the payment fixed everyone would want to participate which would result in them copying previous casino reviews without actually testing your casino.

TL; DR:
Pay with Bitcoin, payment should not be fixed but instead based on how detailed the review submission is (you could use suggestions to give bonuses also).

[goldkingcoiner]

HI ALL!

WE ARE THINKING TO START A REVIEW CAMPAIGN WITH JUICY REWARDS.
COMMENT ON THIS THREAD WITH A DESIRED BONUS YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.
WE WILL NEED 15 PARTICIPANTS. SPORTS AND CASINO BONUSES APPLY.
BE THE ONE WHO DETERMINE THE REWARD!

[img]https://i.postimg.cc/90MpjJX6/freebet-eur.jpg[/ig]

The reward should be bitcoins. I have recently joined a similar review campaign and they are paying bitcoins. You should do something similar. I mean you can give people some deposit bonus and similar crap but then you would force people to deposit money and nobody will do that probably. You are not going to attract any decent members that way. If you want to get quality reviews, you need to pay.

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

[Helena Yu]

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

It depends.

If the @OP give incentive for the top 10 best reviews, this will increase the possibility people will write a positive review since they only want to become top 10 reviewers. But this would be different if the @OP give incentive before the users give reviews, the users are free to criticism, write positive or bad review because they already get the money, they have nothing to lose here.

Do you think people will make a review without get paid? maybe only few users, they also wouldn't put an effort. When a gambler win some money, they're mostly silent, only few users are write 1-2 liners of positive reviews.

[FatFork]

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

Well, I must say, there are a few conflicting thoughts running through my mind on this one. On one hand, I can understand your point about incentivized reviews. It does raise concerns about transparency and the potential for manufactured or biased feedback. It's true that if people are solely motivated by bonuses, their reviews might not hold much value.

However, on the other hand, one could argue that offering incentives might encourage more people to participate and share their experiences, leading to a wider range of feedback. Additionally, it's possible that some participants genuinely appreciate the bonuses and are willing to provide honest reviews. Take for example the review campaigns that some other casinos have organized in the past. It's hard to argue that all those reviews were fake or insincere, especially when you consider that not all of them were glowing recommendations. In fact, many participants provide genuine feedback, both positive and negative, sharing their real experiences.

So before jumping to conclusions about Megapari's campaign, let's give it a fair chance and see what kind of reviews they receive. Only then can we judge the authenticity and credibility of the feedback received. People can still provide honest feedback, even if there are rewards involved.

[abel1337]

As other suggested, People want to get bitcoins as a payment for campaign instead of casino rolls/credits etc.. Paying bitcoin directly is attractable to the forum members as we can see from past review campaigns in this forum who are using bitcoin to pay their participants. I'm positive that people will review your casino with the member limit you had set. I think that 15 people can be managed easily as it is few. I don't think that you need a manager for this task as this is a small task that a marketing team of your casino can do and you can watch the participants review closely.

[pawanjain]

Thanks to all for your answers! We will prepare the campaign and release it in near future. The thread was created to collect opinions to better understand your needs and desires C:

As other have already mentioned that there's no better reward than bitcoin and I would definitely agree on that but also would like to add 2 more points.
You should consider being very selective when adding the 15 participants to your review campaign otherwise the result won't be much fruitful.
Also, you can give away those rewards in your casino site so that participants try out the casino without paying additional transaction fees.
This will benefit the site since they will get 15 users right out of the box.

[danadc]

Every casino review that is given is based on what each player has as an experience and what they like, according to what they give their opinion that should be respected, but I think that every player likes it is that they are encouraged, there is nothing It is better for a casino to have contests where they can be encouraged to participate and win without having to do anything else, that is, if a player wins, that the bonus be free without any requirement, obviously the bonus must be in bitcon and completely withdrawable, like first option and if they are looking for options so that they can give bonuses that are not things that cannot be done, for example if they make a requirement that does not exceed 1x.

[cryptofrka]

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

That's why you use campaign managers - so they can pick users that will give good feedback and create a campaign that will give good value for money.

If you go through the review campaign that Trofo and myself ran for Coinslotty, you'll see that the received feedback was concrete and totally authentic. Coinslotty changed a lot of things based on that feedback and improved as a casino because of it.

[Casdinyard]

HI ALL!

WE ARE THINKING TO START A REVIEW CAMPAIGN WITH JUICY REWARDS.
COMMENT ON THIS THREAD WITH A DESIRED BONUS YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.
WE WILL NEED 15 PARTICIPANTS. SPORTS AND CASINO BONUSES APPLY.
BE THE ONE WHO DETERMINE THE REWARD!

Bitcoin seems to be the best answer we could give you right now. There are a lot of campaigns out here paying people with bitcoins, and everyone's pretty happy that way. And since you guys are only going to accept at least 15 blokes for this task I don't think forking up an extra couple hundred dollars to finance a campaign manager is going to be necessary, as said by previous members of this thread. What you would need however, and I say this with anticipation, is an unbiased review. I've seen review campaigns be so biased to the organizers that it almost felt like there shouldn't even be a review campaign made in the first place if all the participant's gonna do is just throw admiration and praise to the project without looking at it objectively and filtering everything that a regular user may find annoying and unhelpful.

So hope things go well for you guys.

[Mate2237]

Team_MegaPari I will also advise you to reopen your signature campaign alongside with the Review Campaign. Now your review campaign will be a very big help to the signature campaign and your website. Since you need our thoughts on the bonuses, I will say you should give the to those who will register to the site without deposit, once the person registered then the person should unlock his bonuses through a simple click of some links. That will make people to visit the site more and also let it be that customers will anot abuse the bonuses your detriment.

[Bushdark]

Team_MegaPari I will also advise you to reopen your signature campaign alongside with the Review Campaign. Now your review campaign will be a very big help to the signature campaign and your website. Since you need our thoughts on the bonuses, I will say you should give the to those who will register to the site without deposit, once the person registered then the person should unlock his bonuses through a simple click of some links. That will make people to visit the site more and also let it be that customers will anot abuse the bonuses your detriment.

For me paying in Bitcoin will be cool but I don't think there is any need for us to go straight to his website and create account just to get the bonus. Since he said he is looking for a simple bonus system he will use to compliment the community based on some certain conditions he has not yet disclose then the task should be something that everyone would be very interesting in for both people that may have account there and those who will love to use his platform if he cares more about that. There are many ways to select people that would benefit from the bonus and it has to be randomly nit first come first serve.

[examplens]

You can check our recent campaign that was a great success and copy some ideas:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434945.msg61603346#msg61603346

I just wanted to look for this campaign thread to leave it here as an example. I agree here, this was one of the better review campaigns. Win-win situation, the participants received a solid reward, and tested the platform, while the owners received many useful impressions and pointed out potential shortcomings.

I guess the review campaign should primarily serve to get direct opinions from users, paying complimentary feedback often seems fake and may not always be appropriate.

[goaldigger]

You can check our recent campaign that was a great success and copy some ideas:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434945.msg61603346#msg61603346

I just wanted to look for this campaign thread to leave it here as an example. I agree here, this was one of the better review campaigns. Win-win situation, the participants received a solid reward, and tested the platform, while the owners received many useful impressions and pointed out potential shortcomings.

Having just like this can be more successful to the site and i think the site can also offer a free spins for those successful reviews to encourage more to actually try the site and give the actual review. Paying in BTC can also be a good idea so the whole thread will stay at service section where you can see most of the campaign are there. Review site should also not be limited about what to say, paying bracket can be good as well based on the quality of the review.

[acroman08]

Trofo's suggestion is the best here in the thread, it tackles those who want BTC and those who want free spins/free bets. you can also give an option for the reviewer whether they want BTC+free spins only or BTC+free bets only.

Somebody tagged me to this thread so I will add my two cents. For your purposes it seems to me best combination would be BTC + free spins on the site. BTC directly to the reviewers as their fee and targeted free spins to the specific games you want tested. Or free bets for sportsbook.

[DoublerHunter]

HI ALL!

WE ARE THINKING TO START A REVIEW CAMPAIGN WITH JUICY REWARDS.
COMMENT ON THIS THREAD WITH A DESIRED BONUS YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.
WE WILL NEED 15 PARTICIPANTS. SPORTS AND CASINO BONUSES APPLY.
BE THE ONE WHO DETERMINE THE REWARD!

^You won't encounter any problem if the reward is BTC because that is not against the forum rule, if you can see on the guidelines, there is no altcoins giveaways. I have participated in a campaign like this before, the casino owner send BTC worth $10 plus a free spin, the good thing is you can able to withdraw the money without any wage requirements and it is your choice if you want to gamble or withdraw the BTC.
Well, good luck with your campaign, you can count me in either.

[smyslov]

Team_MegaPari I will also advise you to reopen your signature campaign alongside with the Review Campaign. Now your review campaign will be a very big help to the signature campaign and your website. Since you need our thoughts on the bonuses, I will say you should give the to those who will register to the site without deposit, once the person registered then the person should unlock his bonuses through a simple click of some links. That will make people to visit the site more and also let it be that customers will anot abuse the bonuses your detriment.

Yes, they are doing good in their signature campaign for branding, reviews are good but signature still has a big impact on branding which is why top online casinos prefer to have a long-term campaign here for continuous presence and branding, and about reviews, its obvious people want to get paid with Bitcoin but like all the other comments it should be open reviews with pen feedbacks not only positive.

[darkangel11]

I agree that the bonus should be in bitcoin, but I'd accept a casino credit as well, provided that there's no wager requirement on that bonus.

I have participated in a review campaign and it was done in the following way.
I had to make an account and post the name in the thread as application. The account was credited with x amount of money with a wager requirement. After the review was submitted, I was given additional money to my casino account and could withdraw that with whatever I had left from the previous one.

First, you have to hire a manager who can provide the best advice so that the review campaign that you are doing can have an impact on the development of your casino.

It's not a must. A review campaign pays just once, it's not a continuous service like a signature campaign. Someone from the casino can manage that.
Also, this casino had a campaign on the forum so there was a manager working with them. You don't have to tell them what to do, they seem to know it already.

[paxmao]

I would have to say that ratings and reviews should not be incentivized in the first place.

That seems incredibly intransparent and the review will not really be worth much. If anything this is just Megapari asking for a manufactured, inauthentic review from their own gambling community.  Of course they will only give a positive review, not only because those people want a bonus for their account but also because they are already biased in favor of the casino.

That's really a bit disappointing. I am not sure if I would want to trust such a casino after this.

Well, I must say, there are a few conflicting thoughts running through my mind on this one. On one hand, I can understand your point about incentivized reviews. It does raise concerns about transparency and the potential for manufactured or biased feedback. It's true that if people are solely motivated by bonuses, their reviews might not hold much value.

However, on the other hand, one could argue that offering incentives might encourage more people to participate and share their experiences, leading to a wider range of feedback. Additionally, it's possible that some participants genuinely appreciate the bonuses and are willing to provide honest reviews. Take for example the review campaigns that some other casinos have organized in the past. It's hard to argue that all those reviews were fake or insincere, especially when you consider that not all of them were glowing recommendations. In fact, many participants provide genuine feedback, both positive and negative, sharing their real experiences.

So before jumping to conclusions about Megapari's campaign, let's give it a fair chance and see what kind of reviews they receive. Only then can we judge the authenticity and credibility of the feedback received. People can still provide honest feedback, even if there are rewards involved.

When researching a platform, it's wise to consider a range of factors beyond just reviews, such as the platform's licensing and regulation, reputation in the industry, security measures, customer support, and overall user experience, so if the site wants to pay or incentivise reviews they are only covering a part of the many requirements that users tend to have when choosing who to play with.

[ralle14]

The others already gave the best answer (BTC), and i'd agree with them since that's what i've been paid for in the last two review campaigns that i've participated in, but only if you can shell out the necessary budget. Other forms of reward would be fine too (free spins or free bets), but their value needs to be higher or just enough for the minimum withdrawal because they're not easy to convert into cash prizes regardless of the wager requirement. I'll look forward to your review campaign since I already have an account on your casino but haven't used it yet.

[Reatim]

HI ALL!

WE ARE THINKING TO START A REVIEW CAMPAIGN WITH JUICY REWARDS.
COMMENT ON THIS THREAD WITH A DESIRED BONUS YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION.
WE WILL NEED 15 PARTICIPANTS. SPORTS AND CASINO BONUSES APPLY.
BE THE ONE WHO DETERMINE THE REWARD!

Nothing best you can offer and accept from Bitcointalk forum members for the reviews you wanted than "BITCOIN" .

You can find every reviews conducted by New and even Old site that tries to advertise here here in service section  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0

for example here Review Campaign

but if you wanted to save some bucks then maybe a Free spins or free bets will be enough ? but it is better if you can give an actual amount directly to our wallets.

count me in for this review guys and Goodluck .