Which campaign is better? Bounty campaign or Signature campaign?

[FireDAO]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

It depends on the kind of marketing team you hire and also your target audience. Back in the day, Bounty campaigns used to a thing with both the projects and bounty campaigners mutual benefiting and then came the cheats, bots and spammers

Lately it just seems completely pointless.

On the other hand, signature campaigns (bitcoin paying) have been doing quite well in the forum. I am talking about Bitcoin projects like crypto casinos, Bitcoin Mixers, Exchanges etc. as they attract quality and high rankling users and not spammers and account farmers. If your target is outside the forum, you will have more creative to reach your audience.

[Mttewndew]

Alright, I appreciate the enthusiasm, but let's take a step back for a moment. How about focusing on building a solid foundation for your DAO before diving into marketing campaigns? I want to see a strong and sustainable infrastructure, a clear roadmap, and a talented team behind FireDAO. Without those elements, all the marketing in the world won't be able to sustain long-term success.

[bitzizzix]

In my opinion, signature campaigns are the best and make my heart flutter and also the heart of this forum, because signature campaigns are managed by the best and qualified managers. Likewise with the participants who are filled with great and qualified and most influential people in this forum, and I don't know much about campaign prizes in detail. But the truth is that some of the bounty campaigns I've been involved in have turned up nothing, and only a small percentage of them were profitable at the time.
and signature campaigns are income and work that I can do regularly for a weekly paycheck, and I think of it as work that I have to do really well. And this is just my opinion, but both of them are involved in it and what stands out the most is the signature campaign rule that we have to work well, be very careful, and also be able to improve quality.

[mu_enrico]

Which campaign is better?

Whichever will pay (more).
In recent years, people will prefer signature campaign since it usually pays on time and therefore less risk for the participant. I still remember gathering all the stakes and getting pennies at the end of the bounty campaign. A lot of my article bounty also got plagiarized and received less stake. Hence, it's not worth it from the participant's point of view.

If you are serious about your project and have the required capital, BTC paying signature campaign is the way to go.

[Xal0lex]

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

If you want to maximize the advertising of your project, then Bounty is the best, because the coverage of the audience will be much higher, due to the involvement of social networks of participants, in which they will perform tasks.

If we're talking about users, of course, it's better to use signature campaign, because the payment for posting in such a campaign is higher than in Bounty, where participants are paid with tokens of dubious value.

[Jcw188]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

It’s based on the every person,because some need of immediate money for their regular expenses.For them,I will suggest to use of the Signature campaign which paying bitcoin.Because the weekly payment will be used for the daily expenses.Even you can support your family with out job using the bitcoin paying signature campaign.But this is not the fact in Bounty campaign.Bounty campaign will pay and but they pay more dollars then the bitcoin paying signature campaign.

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Since the project is based on the altcoin,you can do the bounty which includes the signature campaign.So that your project get marketing in all the social media including Facebook,Twitter,YouTube.When you include signature campaign in bounty,you get marketing in bitcointalk forum also.

[Gozie51]

If you have what it takes to revolutionize the blockchain world as you said and other marketing height you want to achieve, first you have to look at trust. Trust in the sense that which of the two would attract high ranking members to your project. For a long time, the bounty has been flooded by scam and unfulfilled promises which has put more user off from the section and I don't know what kind of beautiful package that you will put out on the bounty section that will attract reputable users on the btc paying campaign to bounty. So the trust for bounty is in question but if you use the signature campaign, you are certain to get the best publicity that will expose your project more.

The second point to note is where do you get trusted managers in the forum? It is with the signature campaign you get that. The managers do due diligence to ensure they run projects that won't disappoint them especially when it comes to the other end of fulfilling btc payment to participants in the project.

[aioc]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

You should have set up a poll to get the real sentiment and vote of the members here, for me signature campaign is better because you can get the best marketing for your project, Bitcointalk is the most visited platform when it comes to anything and everything Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin.

By launching a signature campaign that pays with Bitcoin or any tradeable coin in the market, you can hire the best posters that will show the visibility of your project to the investing community through their signature space.

Just pick the best manager here that can pick the best poster I highly recommend Hhampuz for this type of marketing.

[Jackl87]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!
We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

In my understand a bounty campaign and a signature campaign are not really different things. A signature campaign is just a form of a bounty campaign because you can also do campaigns on twitter, facebook, telegram or wherever you want. That being said if a project is offering multiple campaigns, then the signature campaign here in this forum is usually the one that gives the highest rewards per user because telegram bounties are usually flooded with thousands of participants and on twitter it is similar.
A signature campaign is more work for the participants and should have limited spots in my opinion.
Also you would need to make sure that the bounty is really attractive to participants. Either you are offering USDT, USDC or BTC as a reward or you make sure that you own token will be worth something when the participants are getting their tokens.

[hd49728]

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Signature campaign is only in Bitcointalk. It is the best one if you want to advertise the project here by hiring best posters to work for you. Best posters will want to be paid for their works, with high pay rate. They are keen on payment methods like Bitcoin or stable coins like USDT or BUSD.

If you want to advertise your project on more channels like Facebook, Twitter, Discord, Telegram, Linkedin, Youtube, bounties will be your best choice. In bounty, you can include a signature campaign too.

Bounties have many participants are bounty hunters, farm accounts and you can not have quality works from them. It is biggest disadvantage with bounties and your team must think about this big minus. If you hire them to work, you must pay them at the end and should not run away like "we are disappointed with your works so you won't receive any payment". It will cause something bad on your project reputation.

[sunsilk]

I have seen projects done the same thing at the same time. So if you can do that then that means maximizing the potential of your marketing and aside from that, you can also do marketing outside the forum.

The impact of signature campaign can be felt long term and if you're for the quick results then that's not for you.

But if you want bounty and you want to get into socials, then that's what you should choose but you can't avoid those spam bots that will join your bounty.

[killerfrost]

What efficiency do you expect here? The contribution and communication as well as the support of users to your project is more, I think it is not difficult to approach it in the bounty environment, but it is also necessary to put it back in the position of bountyhunters, many projects with bad behavior created to attract supporters and their failure to meet their initial promises has also turned them into enemies of the community, if your project is really strong enough then the campaigns marketing will be strongly supported by people and vice versa. Here you can also easily find BMs, they have experience managing operations and distribution in campaigns, you may need to contact them directly.

[xSkylarx]

If your target audience really is here in this forum, for me, the best is signature campaigns because there are fewer spammers and mostly high-quality posts from those who joined that campaign. It is also more successful in signature campaigns than in bounty campaigns because there are instances where a lot of low-ranking members can join, and there are also multiple accounts that joined that bounty, unlike in signature campaigns where those posts are high-quality and high ranks users here. But again, this depends on you, as most casino owners that will advertise their casino here are doing signature campaigns and not bounties.

[MAAManda]

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond?

For marketing on Bitcointalk, of course, signature campaign is the answer, I don't see bounties still being effective here. There are much better platforms out there that you can use for bounty programs, for example like Galxe or Zealy (previously Crew3).

That is an option if you are only going to make 1 program out of the 2 mainstream programs on the forum, but it would be better if you implement both programs on the forum and also continue to use the mainstream platforms out there too.

[yazher]

You can always do both if you are willing to advertise your project to both audiences because one of the indications that the project is legit is when they have a signature campaign which is paid with bitcoins or you can have the rewards both bitcoins and your coins because the participants will love to participate if they can assure some earnings. Additionally, you can also hire a trusted manager like Hhampuz to manage everything for you in terms of your signature campaign.

[deean_3one]

I prefer signature campaigns. In addition to distributing more rewards, signature campaigns can also increase knowledge about crypto through posts in threads. Also, what I like about signature campaigns is that we don't have to create post reports every week.

[o48o]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

First of all, they are both bounty campaigns. Singature campaign will give you visibility in here. If you do campaigns anywhere else, i want to suggest that don't push people retweeting, or writing their own spammy tweets about it. And spamming in the telegram is a sure way for me not to get interested. Fake onversations that are transparent ads are annoying as well.

You can just use requirements like changing a profile pic and background pic and some link to description etc. Less invasive is more appealing form of advertisement.

[isaac_clarke22]

It depends on the kind of marketing team you hire and also your target audience. Back in the day, Bounty campaigns used to a thing with both the projects and bounty campaigners mutual benefiting and then came the cheats, bots and spammers

Yeah. Back around 2017 and 2020 when I attempted to join one bounty, it was just like a hit and miss kind of stuff. You never know if your 3-month work would be worth it in the end. When ICO became like a hot topic, it was just like being visited slowly by scammers until nobody even dared to do ICO bounties anymore.

Not sure if airdrops is like considered to be "bounty campaign" since back then, they were like separate stuff but to this day, I heard that there were still some airdrops worth doing, but the risk is just getting shitcoin into your wallet.

For marketing on Bitcointalk, of course, signature campaign is the answer, I don't see bounties still being effective here. There are much better platforms out there that you can use for bounty programs, for example like Galxe or Zealy (previously Crew3).

That is an option if you are only going to make 1 program out of the 2 mainstream programs on the forum, but it would be better if you implement both programs on the forum and also continue to use the mainstream platforms out there too.

Although to be fair, the way that bounties work back then were still effective, not sure if they still do Twitter, Facebook, Reddit bounties, but with that campaign, you have plenty of audience that could open their ears and eyes for your project depending if your project is worth visiting.

[MAAManda]

Although to be fair, the way that bounties work back then were still effective, not sure if they still do Twitter, Facebook, Reddit bounties, but with that campaign, you have plenty of audience that could open their ears and eyes for your project depending if your project is worth visiting.

Have you seen the current state of the bounty program on the forum? there are too many newbie - members there, and after some time ago I checked, there are lots of accounts that are connected to one another, which means they are just taking advantage of the opportunity. I'm still in my opinion that the bounty program is no longer relevant here, it's better to use another platform. But for signature campaigns, it's still relevant and effective.