Which campaign is better? Bounty campaign or Signature campaign?

[mdzahed134]

Bounty campaign and Signature campaign both have different significant i think, if you want to promote your project in social media especially twitter then of course i will recommend bounty campaign, although here so much spam and bot users. On the other hand, Signature is very popular in this forum, when you will launch a BTC payment signature campaign and selected quality members then your project got good promotion i think.

[Russlenat]

It depends on your budget. Actually, both types of campaigns can be good as long as they are managed well. I recommend hiring a reputable campaign manager, even if they charge a higher fee compared to typical campaign managers. This way, you can ensure great results.

In my opinion, signature campaigns that pay in Bitcoin can be very effective. You can find more active members who contribute to the forum, rather than bots who just post for the sake of earning money. To make your job easier, look for the best campaign manager available.

If you're looking for a campaign manager, I suggest posting in the services section. Typically, the best ones have lots of recommendations and feedback from forum members.

[ultrloa]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

We assume that you have budget to run this campaigns so maybe its really better if you run both of campaigns since for sure you will covered up all the areas of this forum and maximize your presence for doing that.

Also hire a reputable campaign manager to get good advice regarding on this discussion since their expertise can help you to expand your brand here.

[mu_enrico]

there are too many newbie - members there

True, I rarely (almost never) see a high-rank and well-known user still do signature bounty that's paid not in stablecoins nowadays. It's common knowledge that signature bounties, especially those that are paid in low-volume tokens are the 2nd tier promotion here.


However, I understand that bounty is a good method to distribute your token, but if the dollar value of the token is not worth it, you'll only attract low-rank or spam accounts. It goes the same for the article and social media, you'll only attract article spinners and fake follower posts.

One of the solutions for this is to hire a reputable Bounty/Campaign Manager to screen the trash work. I previously work with Hhampuz, Roycilik, and Yahoo, and they are legit.

[Doan9269]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Just from their names, the difference has already been mentioned, if you're interested in conducting a bounty campaign then you're making your payment in bounties but if you're interested in making payments in bitcoin then the best idea is on the signature campaign, you could now see that it's your choice and and preference especially the organization you will be managing under base on what they prefer to offer their campaign participants.

[nlovric]

Signature campaigns are the best option in my opinion as they offer weekly payouts at certain times. These Compaigns are limited and only allow participation by users who have accumulated sufficient Merits in the last 120 days which helps filter newbies and ensures higher quality posts. Participation in signature Compaigns requires cryptocurrency knowledge and experience allowing participants to discuss Bitcoin and other altcoins while gaining valuable information about the market. In addition a significant portion of campaign funds is often held in escrow to ensure payment security. Overall signing events provide a regular stream of income and require hard work quality and continuous skill development from participants.

[merekamo]

In my opinion, signature campaigns are the best and make my heart flutter and also the heart of this forum, because signature campaigns are managed by the best and qualified managers. Likewise with the participants who are filled with great and qualified and most influential people in this forum, and I don't know much about campaign prizes in detail. But the truth is that some of the bounty campaigns I've been involved in have turned up nothing, and only a small percentage of them were profitable at the time.
and signature campaigns are income and work that I can do regularly for a weekly paycheck, and I think of it as work that I have to do really well. And this is just my opinion, but both of them are involved in it and what stands out the most is the signature campaign rule that we have to work well, be very careful, and also be able to improve quality.

Signature campaigns only in this forum mate. Signature campaigns are indeed effective within the Bitcointalk community as managed by experienced and qualified managers. Additionally, participants in signature campaigns are often influential and knowledgeable members of the forum, which adds credibility to the campaign. If FireDAO aims to expand its reach beyond the Bitcointalk community and target a global audience, then running a bounty campaign might be more suitable. Bounty campaigns can help grow social media presence, increase engagement on platforms like Twitter, Telegram, and Facebook, and encourage the creation of content to reach a wider audience.

[Yaunfitda]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

For me, both can be utilized to be a good marketing arm for your platform, get into signature campaign first, bitcoin paying and then see how it goes for you, maybe 1-2 months.

And then shift to the bounty campaigns, regardless of what it is, twitter, signature campaign and others. This will be the second layer for your campaign. But this time, it should be longer than the bitcoin paying signature campaign and it should be big as far as the number of participants. Just get a decent manager to run it for you.

[Xal0lex]

In my opinion, signature campaigns that pay in Bitcoin can be very effective. You can find more active members who contribute to the forum, rather than bots who just post for the sake of earning money. To make your job easier, look for the best campaign manager available.

If you're looking for a campaign manager, I suggest posting in the services section. Typically, the best ones have lots of recommendations and feedback from forum members.

They can only be effective for services that work with bitcoin. If the goal is to promote a new altcoin project, then a signature campaign paid in bitcoins may not be as effective as Bounty. As an example, you can think of the altcoins that tried to be promoted through a bitcoin signature campaign. They all had extremely short durations and ended quickly, whereas Bounty campaigns can last for months.

[LogitechMouse]

It depends on the kind of marketing team you hire and also your target audience. Back in the day, Bounty campaigns used to a thing with both the projects and bounty campaigners mutual benefiting and then came the cheats, bots and spammers

Yeah. Back around 2017 and 2020 when I attempted to join one bounty, it was just like a hit and miss kind of stuff. You never know if your 3-month work would be worth it in the end. When ICO became like a hot topic, it was just like being visited slowly by scammers until nobody even dared to do ICO bounties anymore.

Base on your story, I think I'm one of the few users here that are kind of lucky at that time then.

We have different story in terms of bounty campaign back in 2017 to around 2018. Every campaign that I joined, I always get the tokens from it, and luckily I manage to sold every one of them. I only joined in a few bounty campaigns (around 5 I guess), and all 5 of them paid me the tokens, got listed in an exchange, and manage to sold all of them. That was the time where ICO are still hyped. After months of joining in a bounty campaign (paid with tokens), I stopped it already, and focused on campaigns which are paying Bitcoins.

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong with this one.

Bounty campaign is a general term consists of different types of campaign like Social media campaign, Telegram campaign, Blog campaign, and so on, and so forth. Signature campaign on the other hand, is one of the campaigns under the bounty campaign where you wear signature to advertise the project here.

Many think that signature campaign nowadays is different from bounty campaign, but back a few years ago signature campaign is one of the campaigns under bounty campaign. Now to answer your question OP, signature campaign (paid thru Bitcoins) is more effective than just bounty campaigns (different campaigns). Well, you can do trial and error. Hire a reputable manager here, try both campaigns. One where you are paying the participants with your own token, and one using Bitcoins.

[abel1337]

It depends on the kind of marketing team you hire and also your target audience. Back in the day, Bounty campaigns used to a thing with both the projects and bounty campaigners mutual benefiting and then came the cheats, bots and spammers

Yeah. Back around 2017 and 2020 when I attempted to join one bounty, it was just like a hit and miss kind of stuff. You never know if your 3-month work would be worth it in the end. When ICO became like a hot topic, it was just like being visited slowly by scammers until nobody even dared to do ICO bounties anymore.

Base on your story, I think I'm one of the few users here that are kind of lucky at that time then.

We have different story in terms of bounty campaign back in 2017 to around 2018. Every campaign that I joined, I always get the tokens from it, and luckily I manage to sold every one of them. I only joined in a few bounty campaigns (around 5 I guess), and all 5 of them paid me the tokens, got listed in an exchange, and manage to sold all of them. That was the time where ICO are still hyped. After months of joining in a bounty campaign (paid with tokens), I stopped it already, and focused on campaigns which are paying Bitcoins.

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong with this one.

Bounty campaign is a general term consists of different types of campaign like Social media campaign, Telegram campaign, Blog campaign, and so on, and so forth. Signature campaign on the other hand, is one of the campaigns under the bounty campaign where you wear signature to advertise the project here.

Many think that signature campaign nowadays is different from bounty campaign, but back a few years ago signature campaign is one of the campaigns under bounty campaign. Now to answer your question OP, signature campaign (paid thru Bitcoins) is more effective than just bounty campaigns (different campaigns). Well, you can do trial and error. Hire a reputable manager here, try both campaigns. One where you are paying the participants with your own token, and one using Bitcoins.

There are still bounty campaigns that has a signature campaign inside of it. There aren't that much but it still exist on some bounty campaign that has a manager. We can see the decline of trend from before and today, I still believe on bounty campaign that still has a signature campaign on it. Knowing that they are willing to pay extra to signature codes and to a bounty manager but if the bounty doesnt even spend anything, it would be a redflag for me.

[podluznyj]

Which campaign is better?

Whichever will pay (more).
In recent years, people will prefer signature campaign since it usually pays on time and therefore less risk for the participant. I still remember gathering all the stakes and getting pennies at the end of the bounty campaign. A lot of my article bounty also got plagiarized and received less stake. Hence, it's not worth it from the participant's point of view.

If you are serious about your project and have the required capital, BTC paying signature campaign is the way to go.

at the moment I only participate in the signature, since at the moment at least some money is paid for this bounty, it makes little sense to participate in the rest, since they pay a penny, it used to be possible to participate in all social bounties and you could earn well, but this is already a long time in the future, just like airdrops, today they pay very little

[Rampagoe004]

Signature campaigns remain the best in this forum. But bounty campaigns like Twitter, Facebook, Tiktok are also very good for project owners so that their projects can be promoted on social media.

Signature campaigns give bounty hunters some money. And social media campaigns also provide the opportunity for bounty hunters to participate in more than one campaign.

I think both are great campaigns for project developers or for bounty hunters.
I think the video campaign is not good. My reason is because there are many video campaigns whose results are really bad. This is just my personal view.

[Lagduf]

Just run all of campaign at once and you will not confuse to pick which campaign that will better for your project. I think that if you will never able to determine it as the campaign has their own purpose but the main thing that must be remember if you shall become a trusted developer who will be paying your participants. It's not only hit and run.

[Yatsan]

If it is to promote the project, eitherway is fine. But if it is the way to reward the participants and for the project itself, I think signature campaigns (pays in btc) would be better. One reason is what happened before. There were many bounty campaigns paying rewards in form of the project token. Profit is way bigger than with signatures, but it has something to do with long term progress of a project. The moment bounty hunters recieved their rewards, they tend to sell it immediately which causes a huge dump with the token's market value, affecting long term potential of the project.

And for participants' end, I think signature is still better in a way that it has a fixed reward in btc. Indeed bounties will give you instances of way big  rewards but there'll also be times you'd be recieving small from a 3-month work.

[albon]

Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Bounty campaigns are campaigns to promote the project on social media (Twitter, FB, Reddit, Linkedin, ..etc.) by bounty hunters, and there are many other different campaigns such as translation, content creation, Youtube Videos, and so on, and bounty hunters are paid at the end of the project’s tokens. As for signature campaigns, they are promoting the project in the forum by seasoned members here, according to rules that the signature campaign manager sets, and he must be a trusted and professional manager with a good reputation, and his account must contain positive trusts, and the participants in the signature campaign are paid in Bitcoin or any top currencies in the market, and my advice to you is if you are not ready to deal with the escrow service, as they reserve the bounty or the signature campaign tokens that will distribute at the end to the participants, do not think about launching them, and if your project is not 100% complete in development and complete in all aspects so take care of developing it first and finishing everything, before you think about promoting it through trusted bounty managers because you will usually find it difficult for them to accept your offer.

[BaeSuzy]

Signature is the best one and i think social media is a good too. Don't forget to choose the right bounty manager because it will have big impact for your bounty campaign. There so many good bounty manager in this forum, i believed irfan_pak is one of the best bounty manager in this forum.

[Godday]

I think both are great ideas. You can try to recruit heroes and senior members to join your signature campaign. And you can get junior members to participate in bounty campaigns such as social media and creator content. Both are the best choice depending on what kind of promotion is your priority.

[|MINER|]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

I think a new project needs both a signature campaign and a bounty campaign. As you can increase the social reach of your project through Bounty campaign, similarly through signature campaign you can attract the attention of various investors in this forum and gain the reputation of your project. Initially I think it would be better to have a bounce campaign to stabilize social media.  Later, signature campaign will always maintain the visibility of your project for long term. But in this case, I will have a suggestion for you to hire a well-reputed manager to promote the campaigns. From here you can hire reputed members for your required services
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5406507.0

[Jocuserious]

For now signature campaign is better because if a bounty going to successful argument then we can got some money. But you can't get money from social media campaign because there lot of participate even for social media campaign have unlimited hunter so that's why a crazy thinking. If you have participate social campaign then you can get 3-5$ something for 1-2 month bounty.