Which campaign is better? Bounty campaign or Signature campaign?

[wtsimis]

Marketing is the main mantra of any business. Every project is driven towards this goal of promotion. But my opinion is that although there are different types of marketing, signature campaigns are the heart of the forum today. Especially in signature promotion the forum is filled with many experienced and influential people. Bounty campaigns don't make much profit but currently signature campaigns are a source of income. There are many types of cheating in Bounty. The right reward for hard work is through signature campaigns that pay participants directly in dollars or BTC.

[vv181]

Without citing your project marketing priority or urgency, everyone is hardly able to suggest the one that suits your needs. Except, you don't know anything at all about it and rather want to see how the community decides. Though, it is still a ridiculous decision. Here is the thing, generally, to create buzz on social media, bounty campaigns are better due to their characteristics. In regard signature campaign, it might spark some discussion here but surely a limited one.

For a detailed plan or well-thought and reasoned explanation, you better reach out to a prominent campaign manager. Especially the one who already manages various campaigns with a diverse sector of project. They should have know and be able to suggest which one truly satisfies your current/future plan or roadmap.

[Fuso.hp]

Comparing bounty campaign and signature campaign, signature campaign is definitely ahead and signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign. A bounty campaign can be managed by any member but managing a signature campaign requires a lot of skills which not everyone has. Then most of the bounty projects are scams while most of the signature campaigns are successful. Anyone can work in bounty campaign but if you want to work in signature campaign you can't work till certain rank up. if you consider the overall aspect signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign.

[Romeotom]

In bounty campaign have section signature and social campaign ok so you can participate anyone which you can do. Although now very low rewards bounty still progress so many hunter working in social campaign so if you gonna participate signature then you can received a comfortably money.

[mindrust]

Sig camps all the way. Bounty campaigns can be good too but usually they aren’t. In the past some people got rich from the bounty campaigns but that was during the ICO bubble and everything was going up. Sig camps on the other hand provide a steady income. You don’t get any surprises with them. Bounties are like lottery tickets. If you somehow find the right one it will mie you rich but most of the time you will be working for free.

[serjent05]

Comparing bounty campaign and signature campaign, signature campaign is definitely ahead and signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign. A bounty campaign can be managed by any member but managing a signature campaign requires a lot of skills which not everyone has. Then most of the bounty projects are scams while most of the signature campaigns are successful. Anyone can work in bounty campaign but if you want to work in signature campaign you can't work till certain rank up. if you consider the overall aspect signature campaign is much better than bounty campaign.

In terms of exposure, since @OP is looking for a service that can give them more exposure, I think the bounty campaign has a better reach than the signature campaign.  A bounty campaign is the composition of different marketing approaches such as a Telegram campaign, signature campaign, YT video campaign, translations, and more.  Even though most of the bounty campaign is plagued by a spammer, there are also quality posters joining the bounty campaign.

[Ngemmeng]

when talking about marketing in this forum of course I will choose a signature campaign because signature campaigns are only used for marketing in this forum. but if you want it to be more effective, you should also add social media campaigns such as Facebook and Twitter so that your marketing will be wider and your project will become more widely known.

[JeffBrad12]

bounty is when you need all rounded exposure, but signature is all about credibility of your projects.
there has been many platform offering bounty tasks for some project like galxe but honestly these bounties are just good to give your project presence in the social media but does it make your project interesting
in term of being looked as some kind of reliable project in which everyone gonna trust? hardly.
since many of bounty followers are usually just some farmed social media accounts I don't think anyone gonna take your project seriously.
at best they'd consider the project just like some other random project out there.

[Jating]

I will also says signature campaigns, based on what this community is all about, that's why this community become one of the well-known as it started this whole signature campaign first that pays in bitcoin and then later it evolved in bounty paying campaigns which is in token.

And historically, there are bounty that didn't end well, becoming a scam, and so the project failed miserably and then participants complaining about the rewards and so there are scam accusations on a bounty campaign. So for me it's better to go for signature campaign first and then measure how effective it is.

[smile1218]

Both bounty and signature campaigns can be effective ways to promote a project or product, but they have different advantages and drawbacks. Bounty campaigns typically involve a wider range of tasks such as social media promotion, content creation and bug reporting. This can help to generate more engagement and awareness for the project, as well as identify potential issues. However it can also be more difficult to manage and track the various tasks and submissions. Signature campaigns on the other hand, focus on promoting project through forum signatures and other online forums. This can be more targeted and easier to manage, but may not generate as much engagement or awareness. Ultimately the choice between a bounty or signature campaign will depend on the specific goals and needs of the project, as well as the resources available for managing and promoting the campaign. A combination of both approaches may also be effective in certain cases.

[BitHeir]

I will also says signature campaigns, based on what this community is all about, that's why this community become one of the well-known as it started this whole signature campaign first that pays in bitcoin and then later it evolved in bounty paying campaigns which is in token.

And historically, there are bounty that didn't end well, becoming a scam, and so the project failed miserably and then participants complaining about the rewards and so there are scam accusations on a bounty campaign. So for me it's better to go for signature campaign first and then measure how effective it is.

Bounties are more in quantity than signature campaigns. If I can not join signature campaigns because I am a newbie, can not meet criteria from signature campaigns, I can choose bounties as my alternative jobs.

I don't think it is bad choice for a newbie but I will consider your advice more. I don't want to join bounties and waste my time and end it with nothing.

[dhruvfire]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

Both are good. What is better depends on your interests and your skills. Good luck.

[Woodie]

It's all depends on the projects budget  and your preference...

And from my experience, over the years have seen bounties pay way over what a signature on average would pay on average because bounty manager negotiated for a good deal and limited the number of entrants to make everybody's time worthwhile ,  but these days it seems a little different because of the nature of how how these bounties have no cap, bounty coins aren't pushed on big exchanges and the list goes on..

But ultimately if you want certainty in pay signatures are the best, but if you prefer a bit of a 50/50 gamble of getting paid peanuts or a potential of catching  a gem then bounties should be your go to place, otherwise it's all about preference.

[waONE]

The bounty campaign and the signature campaign are the same, there is no difference because they are part of the bounty program,
the only difference is the percentage of prizes, it's just that for possible bounties on twitter, facebook and tiktok the prizes can be small because many people participate,
if you want to earn a lot on bounties Your campaign must write articles, YouTube, or signatures.

[@sriyan]

We are a bunch of ambitious folks on a mission to revolutionize the blockchain world. Our goal is to create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) that empowers individuals and organizations like never before. Together, we'll shape the future of blockchain technology!

We're planning a series of marketing activities, and we want your input on bounty campaigns and signature campaigns. Which one gets your heart racing? Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

I think the better one is the signature campaign and it will target the real users. When it comes to bounty campaigns, anyone who can create multiple accounts can participate. So this is not good for the project long run.

Advantages of Signature campaigns :

1. Target the real users
2. It will remove the bot types users

Advantages of Bounty campaigns :

1. Higher number of users can participate
2. More popularity of the project

[coin-investor]

Which of these two campaigns do you think will work like magic for FireDAO within the Bitcointalk community and beyond? We trust your expertise, and we want our marketing efforts to align with your preferences and expectations.

If only within the Bitcointalk community then the signature campaign is better than the bounty campaign because you can attract the best poster here in the Bitcointalk community, but if its a crowdfunding you should extend your campaign to popular social media like Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, and Instagram and search engine campaign like posting in popular article sharing sites like Medium
Just avoid shilling marketing where people are interacting to give false testimony about a project, this is not going to work and will give a bad reputation to the project.

[ahoenk]

in 2017 bitcointalk signature campaign is on its top performance, many investor looking in to our signature to define where to put their money. but so many scam project or failed project. now it is still useful for link building for your project because bitcointalk is the oldest forum for crypto related. and this is why i am still and still reading new reference from here.

[Xal0lex]

I think the better one is the signature campaign and it will target the real users. When it comes to bounty campaigns, anyone who can create multiple accounts can participate. So this is not good for the project long run.

This is where all sorts of problems lie when choosing a specific solution. If we choose a signature campaign, we minimize the use of bots, but we reduce the spread of the project, the number of participants involved and increase the budget. Large-scale campaigns are very expensive. If we choose a bounty, we increase the risk of bots, but the budget decreases and the spread of the project increases. The golden mean is extremely difficult to find, especially if you have limited resources for the campaign.

[abel1337]

in 2017 bitcointalk signature campaign is on its top performance, many investor looking in to our signature to define where to put their money. but so many scam project or failed project. now it is still useful for link building for your project because bitcointalk is the oldest forum for crypto related. and this is why i am still and still reading new reference from here.

I believe that it's the bounty campaign who is prominent at that time since every projects at that time has gotten its value rising after being listed on an exchange. Bounty campaign slowly degraded after it enters the bear market where more and more project has become a scam and bounty participants lose their will do join knowing that they can't gain something from it. Signature campaign is average at that time but big gainers comes from bounty campaign as far as I remember because I joined some bounties.

[TheSpiral]

both bounty and signature has own value. as mentioned by others too I will also say that with signature compaign we will see quality poster because competition is high and only few spots available. this is the reason everyone will work on his post to be selected in signature compaign.

bounty will open the door for spammer and cheaters (multiple accounts). The only benefit is for non English speaker can  do various social task to make money and also project can get shilling by paying less. If proper rules make for bounty then I think bounty could also good