Is it painless to control a multitude???

[Black susano]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

[Framelover]

It is true that true that political leaders and leaders in general have their own individual problems just like everyone else, but it’s also important to know that regardless of the problems or challenges they face, they willingly chose their roles and responsibilities. They signed up for it, especially political leaders. Yes, leadership comes with its difficulties and expectations but it’s still a voluntary thing and they must accept the accountability that accompanies them. also, as much as we know that leaders also have their individual cross to carry, we shouldn't forget that there are major benefits they stand to gain by the virtue of the position in which they assume.
Nevertheless, GOOD Leaders are great people yes, they also feel pain, and I beleive anyone leading deligently, nature has its way of catering for them.

[KiaKia]

If leadership is not comfortable for political leaders why are they rushing to the sit to get elected? Leadership should be something that people rejects and ignore because of the responsibility they will put themselves into but that's not the case I guess.

There is a greater burden for leaders but that's only if they are going there to do something for the country anyway, most of them politicians are aiming for that higher sit for their selfish reasons and gains (MONEY), let's not forget the allowance these leaders are getting per month.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Is it painless to control a multitude???

First, move this thread to Politics and society, then you can have a betterment discussion. In my knowledge, humans are not easily controlled because everyone would want to exercise their rights and freedom the way it suits them, which could be against another right or harm them. So, leaders are also putting in their efforts and trying to do their best, which they feel could satisfy the interests of their citizens.


Cheers 🥂, Dr.Bitcoin_Strange 👺👺

[BIT-BENDER]

Apart from the royalties where the throne is passed on to the next in link. A democratic government is contested for. It's one that no one has an automatic claim to except for dictators.

In a civilized country when you want to run for any office you make your Intentions clear. With your party election and then start campaign for the election properly all this are steps and process that was not forced on you. You saw your self fit for the role and you went for it but unfortunately it wasn't you expectations. I believe you just have to deal with it.

[Bananington]

There is always some form of pain to endure when dealing with people, mostly when they are more than one. Leadership is a a responsibility that can even even oversea four person in a group.

There is pain trust me. The noise of how best it should be never ceases. The envy, the backbiting all adds up, but the person who is in control is mostly known for the calm, focus and attention to duty that is directed toward the common goal. The sacrifice is there and it is always noted by the followers covertly.

The true leader in the multitude will always bear more brunt than the multitude who stump down the gate.
 

[Fiatless]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

Your illustration about leadership only happens in an ideal situation. Leadership is a call to service and not to oppress or enrich. A good leader will always sacrifice for his followers to have a good life. When a leader is appointed he is supposed to be sober because of the enormous responsibility placed on him as the leader. But I am sorry because selfless leaders have become scarce globally.

Currently, most leaders don't care about the masses because their target is to loot the treasury of the country. The struggle for political power currently is not based on the willingness to serve but on a preplanned plot to enrich themselves and impoverish the masses. In some advanced nations, the level of stealing in government is not as widespread as what happens in developing nations.
 
It is also true that money alone will not bring joy or fulfillment but everybody needs money to survive in this current society. We need money to take care of our basic needs. These corrupt leaders might not have all that makes them happy but they have also stolen resources that would have made people comfortable.

[Husires]

There are several types of leadership, some of them tend to lead by force or coercion, and they depend on forcing others to submit to you. This type of leadership is based on frightening the people and they will obey you, but soon you will end up facing the people in the form of demonstrations or armed disobedience.Leadership that comes with cooperation and consultation is better, and in which everyone can favor the leader if he erred.

[famososMuertos]

I don't know if your context tries to express that all politicians are corrupt, but happy and that they achieve their goals based on their leadership capacity, well there is nothing new there, it happens and unfortunately it will continue to happen.

The positive thing is that there are few political leaders in the plane of evil, but generally they only have empathy, a quality of the leader, but it does not mean that they are leaders.

The solution is complex, but all that remains is the ability to not elect them, it is easy to write it, these false leaders are re-elected over and over again.

[Adbitco]

This is where we looks at the qualities of a good leader when it comes of controlling his people and public he must be focused and strick, the ability for you to comfort yourself and compose in the public makes you an elderly person and a true leader.
As leader they are not that they are all comfortable with the condition they found themselves but they most no make it noticeable to others irrespective of predicaments they always maintained their statusquo  and reputation and dignity.

[batang_bitcoin]

Two reasons why these leaders are always running during the elections;

1. They have a genuine heart to serve their people.
2. Just some intention if ever they win, they have a personal interest that will be easier to fulfill on that position.

Well, we're all grown ups and we do know that some of these leaders are up for their personal interests. I am not ignoring those genuine leaders that has their genuine heart ready to help their people, these are the type of leaders that are not heartless. I do see some points that there's this genuine leader but because of the people that are surrounding him, he's being taken away to the heart of service and change their route into serving a few for the benefit of himself and those that have pulled him away to the people.

[KingsDen]

I don't know if your context tries to express that all politicians are corrupt, but happy and that they achieve their goals based on their leadership capacity, well there is nothing new there, it happens and unfortunately it will continue to happen.

It is just confusing because the title of the thread is 100% different from what the OP is talking about in the body.i had always thought that naming a post is not a big problem. I have read once where someone was explaining tips to title your post, I thought it wasn't needed because title of a post should come naturally. Little did I know that it will still be an issue to dome people.

[Mahanton]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

Corruption isnt something that we could really be able to remove out in todays society or simply speaking about the reality on which to those who had been sitting into those positions would really be having the power and rules on which they could really be able to take advantage if they do really wanted and this is where it starts on misused taxes and other correlated things which in regards to money of people. If it wasnt been applied on the right place then for sure it would really be that applied into their pocket, which it is indeed the reality.  I do rather prefer on seeing a leader whose really be that being silent but when it comes to changes and
things that had been done on the country or a certain city or whatsoever did really make out that notable progress on which this is what we do really like to have and not into those people who do really
just simply spamming out those sweet words and promises on what are the things that they would really be planning to do. This is why its always recommended that we should really vote for the right people.

[Ucy]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

It should be abit easy for them as they are controlled, or they are always told what to do like animals in zoo... then they pretend to be in charge when speaking to the media and others. ... It's more like being a conveyor belt for a pre-planned work in a system. The one who planned the work is in the dark watching the activities of his salves/leaders. The moment the leaders start doing things on their own it becomes really difficult and dangerous for them. The system typically fights back without mercy.

[CarnagexD]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

And there you can find the difference between Politics and Leadership. As an old quote says, great power comes with great responsibility. Then and only then being a leader of a country has power over the government, military, and system. This requires a great deal of responsibility to keep the country's sustainability of needs, economy, and peace.

Of course, power towards other nations and connections to other organizations are necessary for being a leader of a country but only secondary. What is needed for a leader is integrity. However it is not enough, because even the leader is true to his responsibilities, corruption occurs on their subordinates, lawmakers, and cabinet members.

[hugeblack]

The state of institutions is what makes the leader an ordinary individual and an employee in the state whose work ends with the end of his term of office and then returns to practice his normal life and normal occupations. The absence of a state of institutions separated by powers protected by the constitution is what makes corruption widespread in the state and enables the authority of the army, the mafia or armed militias.

the leader must take care of the existence of healthy institutions and opposition, otherwise he will suffer from fear and anxiety about the possibility that someone will seize power by force.

[slapper]

Your insights lay bare the immense strains and duties carried by leaders, particularly in politics. This burden, often concealed behind public images, frequently results in the ethical dilemmas plaguing modern politics.

You've raised an intriguing point about corruption. While it's generally linked with greed, it can be seen as an offshoot of the colossal pressures intrinsic to leadership. Amid an atmosphere where tangible results denote success, leaders may resort to unscrupulous means to fulfill their roles.

Your metaphor of "closing our eyes to see this little thing" is a striking paradox embodying this intricate issue. It hints that we must delve deeper, past the headlines, to truly grasp the hardships of leadership. As closing our eyes heightens other senses, distancing ourselves from political drama might offer a sharper understanding of the challenges leaders confront.

[Fortify]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

Maybe it's a bit telling that studies have shown a disproportionate amount of people in leadership positions have psychopathic tendencies, whether they have them to start with or simply end up with them after reaching these positions, who knows. It is definitely stressful being at the top of the chain because lots of people rely on you in many cases, whether in business or when running the country. However they often receive rather outsized rewards for being in this position so maybe don't be feeling too guilty towards them. Power can be a dangerous thing for some people as well, as it can be very corrupting when it is unmonitored or enforcement of boundaries is lacking.

[Unbunplease]

I will use the government sector as an example whenever I see a leader I do believe that it is not comfortable for him all the time, you may  always see him smile in public but the hardships he is encountering can be destructive, taking about our leaders in the country most of the moments thing may go hard on them but they still take uptheire responsibility as a superintendent of thatcountryy to protect and provide for them, let me use my self as an illustration when I was younger I thought that when someone is been chosen as a head
 thatmeansn he is wealthy and riches and powerful and will live a life of no suffering in his generation  but it was more than that, one can have this material thing but still not have it all, most of the time this word is a called corruption
Closing our eyes for us to see this little thing.

The problem is that the leader is not autonomous in his decisions. Often decisions are made instead of him, and he is only a "scapegoat" who takes responsibility. It should be understood that if you go against the system, the leader can always be replaced by a double. Is he worth envying? I think not.

[Raceonsucced]

They think that governing the country is easy, so many people want to be elected. When they are elected they realize that being a leader is not an easy thing. Besides having to think, a leader must know how the conditions and feelings of his people. It's not easy to manage a lot of people, because everyone has different characteristics, some are bad, some are good. Some agree with the government, some don't. Leaders must have a high sense of responsibility.