I can tell you just one thing about "God"
1 + 1 = 1 OR 3 ( Tao / Dao )
https://art.odicforcesounds.com/pages/YinYang/Dao/index.htmlThat is the simplification of the representation of what is the meaning the the Dao:"path", that is a "old Chinese knowledge".
Is what we do, is what we became, is what we create.
I am trying to create a mechanism where each one do actions in reality and those actions represent value, not only by the action it self, but by the classification of the action, which is already focused in solving problems in a rational and peaceful way, to accomplish the result.
The result is that each action will expose brand or company above or below others.
Is like a Marketing system that depends on the company it self, not an "external investment" to create the notion that the company is having a healthier attitude to the community that is exploring to obtain more economical value.
The Dream, project this system to everyone in the world, saying that even in the poor countries of this world, people could earn money in form of actions that benefit others, because was helpful in some way.
You see, for "civilian" that are in cities they already need to have that notion so the community can grow healthier. In the other hand, we feel like "gods" when we have money to make a choice.
For money everything was produced. The "Good" and the "Evil",
For "being good in the picture", the "Good" and the "Evil", was produced.
So maybe we can join both, and create the good one, since the evil one, already exist
Well, is a "moral" challenge, that in my perspective can be good to all.
Industry it self as a business.
An explosion of Marketing almost "free", ( cost paying attention to simple things and try to be fair )
Since everyone in the world can have good or evil attitudes with others, why not, we give value to those little things that represent value, but "no one" give value to them?
Sometimes I thing within myself: Is this a moral contradiction?
Can be.
The school try to guide choices. Bad choices happen, but the school is trying to educate.
Not all schools educate with practices, but with theory, and not all the teaching techniques promote "good choices", they only "punish" bad ones.
Since we can quantify and qualify every single "data" that we wish to "rate", why not "rate and educate?
This is focused in the "good" but even for the "bad" or "evil" can be good.
My intention is not to know how bad or evil each can be, but how helpful each can be, within this idea that the value is mainly in the action that was made, not so far in the value of the bitcoin.
If "random" data without meaning, can have so much value, why data with meaning should have no value at all?
