Self-moderated topics - nice feature or should it get banned?

[SeriouslyGiveaway]

Is it because 10 hours offset?

Where can I change the timezone?

Go to your Profile tab

At the left side look at Modify Profile , click on >> Look and Layout Preferences

Modify the field to your liking where it says

Code:

Time Offset:
Number of hours to +/- to make displayed time equal to your local time

You can either click the autodetect, or put 7 inside the box for utc+7

Yeah, the forum uses UTC offsets rather than actual timezones (like "America/New_York"), so you have to adjust the offset after daylight-savings changes.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1841046.msg18322816#msg18322816

[1714629580]

1714629580

[1714629580]

1714629580

[1miau]

If you will, but not on the basis of the lies being told by 1miau.

Wow, just wow! You are the one lying here, pitiful troll.  
Instead of admitting your mistakes, you are doubling down and you keep spreading your lies against me.
Really looks like hope for betterment is wasted, for your case.
You will continue to be a liar, deranged troll and abusive imbecile.

Because I'm a honest person, I've answered your reply 3 hours later: June 06, 2023, 09:10:12 PM

This is true - your two smiley faces indicate you appreciated being asked and gave responses in an open manor which contradicts your version of events:

Your projections into my replies about a thing, which was never written there, are exclusively yours.  
Nothing contradicts my description of events.
When you've PMed me, I've always tried to stay as polite as possible but you can expect that when you are constantly asking nonsense questions, at some point, my reply will be similar to the quality of the questions you are asking me.
And when you are asking me that I should review and give my personal opinion on the following trusts, you've left:


Timelord2067's left feedback on GazetaBitcoin account (untrusted because to Timelord2067 got removed from DT).

Of course I'll point out that your judgement is completely flawed and that you are a disgusting perv. What do you expect, when you submit a feedback, where you call GazetaBitcoin a "RACIST" on it's account for no reason???
Honestly, how braindead are you?
You are sending me repeatedly bullshit PM's and then are you complaining, when the 4th or 5th reply back from me due to your repeated PM's hurts your feelings?
Maybe you should stop sending unsolicited PM's to me??
But no, you are even accusing me of sending you "paranoid PM's", while you are completely making up the story because we all can see the true version: you sent me several unsolicited PM's, I've been very friendly but at some point you are getting butthurt because I disagree on your deranged viewpoints?
You are truly a deranged clown.

And you should re-read and understand my past posts here properly before making up your own, wrong version.  

As we can see in this screen shot, each person I PM'ed received an identical or near identical reply - 1miau included.  

...

As you can see I sent the same word-for-word message to the others users mentioned.  

LMAO, a PM is still unsolicited even if you are sending it to more people.
You reasoning makes no sense at all - include more people and a PM is automatically solicited - seriously?
A PM stays unsolicited, no matter how many people it is sent to. In addition I can add: mass unsolicited PM's are even more unsolicited.

While I haven't read line-for-line every thread in meta or reputation over the last couple of days, I don't recall anyone else who received these messages claiming them to be anything even remotely what you now claim them to be.

LOL, how detached from reality are you? Or are you lying so confidently that you really expect you are getting away with it?
You should have realized that basically the whole Reputation regulars disagreed on your deranged trust ratings, where you called GazetaBitcoin a RACIST for example:


Timelord2067's left feedback on GazetaBitcoin account (untrusted because to Timelord2067 got removed from DT).

Even LoyceV disagreed with how you are acting.
How obvious do you want it, that you realize how wrong you are?  

This was your reply:



Gone was the respectful response and instead the accusations against me started.  (Paradoxically you merited the initial investigation which is what prompted me to ask for your opinion in the first place))

What do you expect when you ask me if your "racist" feedback on GazetaBitcoin's account is accurate?
Of course I will call you out for that sort of abuse.
My reply was very polite by just calling it "inappropriate, wrong and / or completely misleading". A perv like you should act a bit more discreetly. [LOL, insiders know where this reference comes from  ]
But when we are at it, let me express it once more, a bit less polite but more based on facts:
Your feedback is completely baseless, it's a braindead defamation, it's disgusting and needlessly offensive for no reason but I'm not even surprised because you are a deranged and pitiful troll who's incapable of admitting he's wrong.

1miau: Please apologize for having misled everyone who is reading this and admit you are misleading in what you are saying about me.  

I don't need to apologize for anything because your accusations against me are straight out lies. You are the one who's at fault for sending me your unsolicited PMs, for you repeated lies, unjustified feedbacks on various accounts due to your recent trust abuse and now you are even doubling down on your misbehaviour.
Everyone can see that now, due to you publishing private information, one-sidedly and that's an anti-privacy offense as well. I might leave you another feedback for this abuse because doubling down on your lies shows, you have not learnt anything, neither you are willing to improve and now, you are even one-sidedly publishing PM's, which is a serious offense because people answering your PM's are of risk to get their privacy seriously violated.  
That's a really big abuse.

June 06, 2023, 06:10:35 AM was when you (Timelord2067) started to write me an unsolicited PM, where you asked me a question about a DT flag. YOU started to spam me with unsolicited PM's!

What 1miau hasn't anticipated is that I sent the *exact* same PM simultaneously to @babo, @yahoo62278, @actmyname, @JollyGood, @DireWolfM14 and @1miau - I surprised no one picked up on the *exact* time of their PM from me corresponded to the one 1miau now dramatizes.

LOL, you just admitted that you've sent mass unsolicited PM's to all of the above members?
Thanks for exposing yourself that you are the one here, who's guilty of what you've accused me of:

I'll place you on ignore so you don't send me more of your paranoid PM's

You are the one, who's sending mass unsolicited PM's to forum members.  
Hopefully you'll get reported for this because you truly deserve to get banned.  


In addition, you should stop littering my topic with off-topic lies!
And learn to quote properly!
You are througout disrespectful by typing such illiterate off-topic spam in my topic, in addition to your repeated lies against me + publishing private messages.
Shame, shame!


tl;dr
Adding

Code:

~Timelord2067

to our trust lists is a good idea.  

[Pmalek]

I am all for self-moderated threads. In fact, I would go as far as to suggest forum users to self-moderate more of their threads if they don't mind the extra work (if it even comes to that).

It's an instant turn-off for spammers who will stay away if they know what self-moderated means. My guess is that most of them know. They tend to learn these things quickly but somehow can't learn how to become normal and valuable members of the forum. It's a great way to quickly delete off-topic replies or silent those that use your threads only to advertise their services or some website.

Certain boards and situations are big no-go. The reputation and scam accusation boards, for example. But even if self-moderated, our beloved scrappers will pick up the changes. I don't like seeing someone open a discussion about another person and self-moderating such a thread, or worse, preventing the accused person from replying.

[GazetaBitcoin]

What 1miau hasn't anticipated is that I sent the *exact* same PM simultaneously to @babo, @yahoo62278, @actmyname, @JollyGood, @DireWolfM14 and @1miau - I surprised no one picked up on the *exact* time of their PM from me corresponded to the one 1miau now dramatizes.

Probably @babo, @yahoo62278, @actmyname, @JollyGood, @DireWolfM14 and @FatFork also did not anticipate that their private communication will be exposed to public. This only shows, once more, what a scumbag TimeLord is. Only someone with very low morals would do something like that! Such gestures should only encourage more and more people to distrust this troll, with his both accounts.

~Timelord2067
and
~Timelord2o67

[Volgastallion]

Certain boards and situations are big no-go. The reputation and scam accusation boards, for example. But even if self-moderated, our beloved scrappers will pick up the changes. I don't like seeing someone open a discussion about another person and self-moderating such a thread, or worse, preventing the accused person from replying.

Yes indeed, its a common thing like in basic law, its called the right to defense. Imagine only to not have the chance to count your part or we having to read and follow two threads for the same thing  .

About the other part, yes i think more users need to get involved about self moderate topics so we can see less spam and mega threads where they always said the same and are in a loop of the same response and nobody reads anything.

[Stalker22]

I have nothing against self-moderated topics on the forum, as long as the topic is clearly marked as such, and the rules of conduct are clearly stated. Self-moderated topics can significantly improve forum moderation and the fight against spammers. For example, when we report a post as off-topic spam, I imagine that the moderators have to spend a good amount of time deciding whether the report is justified and whether they should delete such a post. Self-moderated topics solve this problem, because in this case the decision rests with the creator of the topic.