Correction: that post is talking about that the article is likely made with the purpose to promote this platform, as all signs point to it. I am not claiming or pointing out that they are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer.
You discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that are clearly scams.
The blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities. It is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person.
[...]
The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September, 2023.
You claimed, "The business has 180 days to be registered. It was registered in September 2023," but this topic predates the registration of the business by several months, so essentially, you admit that you did not have a license or any similar authorization when you started these suspicious-looking websites, support212.
Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange".
I believe you misunderstood this part. He said the business has 180 days to be registered, it means his govt allows up to 180 days for a project to legalize themselves since they go public. And thus, them being registered in September 2023 still within this 180 days window.
However... That's a completely different story if they've been launched since 2018 as their website claimed and only registered on September 2023.
Got you, yes. All in all, it seems suspicious, and the statements of support212 somehow contradict themselves sometimes.
___
"I do not make false claims, and if you believe otherwise, prove me wrong, as the thread is filled with evidence that demonstrates your inaccuracies, "support212".
Even other BitcoinTalk users, such as "holydarkness", have discovered that your websites are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer scam phishing websites, which can be seen here: "
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459004.msg62524556#msg62524556"."
OP provide proof that I have an affiliation with the other mixers. A blog is not evidence. This is a baseless claim. You cannot prove this as it does not exist. This is your evidence against me?
The proof lies in the linked reply: the malicious writer of the suspended Medium blog posts actively promoted fraudulent scam websites, including crypto mixer phishing sites, alongside "MyCoinChange" in their blog posts, revealing evident malicious intent and a connection between the fraudulent writer and you, which you confirmed, as can be seen below in this reply.
"This is, in fact, another falsehood because user "albon" exposed that these profile pictures belonged to normal private individuals, as proven here:"
Yes, I said I believe they were stock photos. Once I came to this forum and saw that it was not they were removed.
This is not true, you wrote that:
I figured that they were stock photos which are right to use.
"Support212 claims that I am "blocking exchanges illegally", which is another lie as I am unable to block anything, so please provide proof that I have blocked your "exchanges illegally", as you have stated."
You have blocked MyCoinChange with your work colleague AlexHerman1 on Github. You have violated the Code of conduct of
https://metamask.ioMetamask's Github Code of Conduct:
"I've gone through your Code Of Conduct, under the Enforcement Responsibilities it says "Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation decisions when appropriate."
"We have not received a legitimate reason why the websites are being harassed it contradicts your pledge "We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community."I did not block anything and do not have access to MetaMask codes, nor do I have a GitHub account; you are making false claims, so if you are going to make such accusations, provide evidence or they are simply false and baseless accusations again.
"as I have reported scams on this platform with evidence and indicators"
Where is a customer that has been scammed? Where is the malicious code on the platform? Which claims have you made besides pictures and text on the platform? Completely baseless claims to consider MyCoinChange a scam. I hope this is not your full time job, your terrible at it and on a power trip.
Not every person is aware of these forums or knows how and where to report online crypto scams; additionally, many fraudsters flag reviews on reviewing platforms or block comments on social media channels to conceal negative experiences from people. The thread contains ample evidence and indicators, which can be read from my original post on page 1 down to this point. Moreover, I have real-life responsibilities and a busy schedule like everyone else; therefore, this is not a power trip, but rather a genuine attempt to caution others about the malicious and suspicious indicators surrounding "MyCoinChange" based on the information I have shared here.
Support212, you created some videos with AI and are using them as evidence for what exactly? This is highly unprofessional and lacks any logical sense.
I'm glad you liked it. We will make higher quality videos with time. I'll be sure to leave in in this forum and tag you in it. Unprofessional? Now, that's comedy. This entire thread is unprofessional, not how business and changes happen.
You did not answer the question; instead, you badmouthed this thread in an attempt to tactfully avoid giving answers to questions regarding "MyCoinChange" and what should serve as evidence for AI-generated videos.
Additionally, you mention "PR" from your website, which essentially holds no significance as it can be purchased with money, so using this as proof of legitimacy is also malicious, from my perspective.
You admitted that the ChangeNow PR was legitimate. Did you change your mind? Calling changenow.io illegitimate now? Careful OP, you're walking on thin ice
"ChangeNow.io" is a legitimate website, but I did not even mention this anywhere before as you wrote, "You admitted that the ChangeNow PR was legitimate.".
Additionally, you are once again accusing me of something I never did before, and regarding the other PRs you linked, why did you write that they show legitimacy even if they can be bought with money?
I have no association with any of the accounts in the linked GitHub link; this is not my case there.
Before making accusations and claiming things, please provide evidence as we have done against you and "MyCoinChange", as there is proof to back up the claims against the malicious website "MyCoinChange".
Where is your proof of fraud and phishing domain? I've checked through the code, no viruses or malicious code, no customer who has come forward for 6 months that has been frauded:
https://imgur.com/Fnp0Mho This thread is filled with evidence and indicators that "MyCoinChange" has acted maliciously and fraudulently in the past; one just needs to read through it and refrain from gaslighting others by claiming there is nothing malicious or that everything is fine. The code doesn't necessarily need to contain a "virus" or "malicious" code, as often a well-designed website can deceive people into unknowingly sending their hard-earned cryptocurrency to such suspicious platforms.
Correction: that post is talking about that the article is likely made with the purpose to promote this platform, as all signs point to it. I am not claiming or pointing out that they are somehow associated with fake crypto mixer.
holydarkness has arrived at the right conclusion. It was a promotion blog done by someone whos no longer with the company. I dont understand how you concluded association through this post.
Holydarkness discovered the writing on the Medium blog, which promoted several fake crypto mixer phishing websites that were clearly scams, and the blog posts of the banned writer also mentioned "MyCoinChange", another indication of fraudulent activities; thus, it is highly likely that the writer who advertised these phishing scam websites is either connected to "support212" or could even be the same person.
Now, you claim that the banned Medium writer were originally associated with your company, indicating that you had clear association with fraudulent individuals who were active in crypto cybercrime, as they promoted your website "MyCoinChange" on the same "promotion blog" while they worked with you.
I believe you misunderstood this part. He said the business has 180 days to be registered, it means his govt allows up to 180 days for a project to legalize themselves since they go public. And thus, them being registered in September 2023 still within this 180 days window.
This is correct. The website has to be registered within 180 days of inception. Which it was. Misunderstood again. I wonder how many business you have condemned with your "investigations"
I pass the torch to you and wait for these claims:
Who has been phished? Give me real victims
Who has been frauded of money? I need real people, hash and Tx's
Neither of these two claims exists and are baseless OP
Who has been phished? I don't know, as I don't have access to your victims or any information regarding the number of victims affected by the "MyCoinChange" scam. It's worth noting that fraudsters often flag reviews and seek to delete negative content that could undermine their ongoing cryptocurrency scam, and not everyone is aware of platforms like this to report such incidents. Nevertheless, the most impactful action I can take is to expose the malicious and fraudulent activities associated with "MyCoinChange," as demonstrated here.
___
The account "@wilfredgrimes" on Medium even had a "MyCoinChange" Linktree link in their bio, which could potentially be your account too, especially considering your demonstrated disregard for "identity stretching".
Additionally, all the articles are recent and no older than a month, suggesting the possibility of using AI to generate fabricated content against legitimate organizations and companies like BitcoinTalk and MetaMask, with the aim of defaming them for exposing or blocking "MyCoinChange" because of the clearly malicious activities associated with the platform.
Once again, you fail to provide any substantial proof and instead resort to attempting to manipulate people through social engineering, which is quite outrageous.
