Ratimov - prove yourserlf at least the plagiarism accusation

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

So, Ratimov, you want some drama again?

You left me a neutral but that does not mean I am not going to speak out. You are still a newborn considering the amount of time I spent in the forum since 2015. I understand this new generation does not respect their elders but that does not mean you will have some unrealistic accusations against me.

As far as I understand the reason of your neutral is the neutral I left on your profile long ago which was below:

2022-03-19 
Reference 
An absolute merit whore. His famous, "In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme"
Please double check before meriting him.

That was over one and half years ago. If I remember correctly beginning of this year, one of my resolution was to unignore you and continue healthy interaction. But somehow in another thread you were having salty mouth [I am just too lazy to find your salty mouth post]  and indirectly reminding me this neutral feedback as it's like you thought I was going to remove it as a token of my intention of having healthy conversation with you. You indeed was a plagiarist but it was in a unique way. And in my consideration it was plagiarism. Whatever I said there, is still absolutely true.

Let's get back to what you left for me just two days ago [I just noticed it as you are not in my trust list]

2023-07-06
Reference
Trust abuser. Writes false tags because of his grievances and thirst for revenge. Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow. In essence, a two-faced person who has double standards. What he condemns in others, he gladly does himself. On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked. He is also a plagiarist who managed to escape punishment because no one noticed him.

Trust abuser: I think it's not something I will judge, others will see what I do.

Writes false tags: Even if I did, your reasons were weak. Well, I will leave it to others.

Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow: Is this a personal note for yourself?

two-faced person who has double standards: I will leave it to others. Your heart and mouth is already salty to have a fair opinion.

On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked: LOL, so this is another personal note for yourself. Is this can be even be something to add in a feedback?

a plagiarist: Now, while I have no arguments with you with any of the above accusations you made against me because I understand it's coming from your salty heart, but this claim of me being a plagiarist?
You really need to bring some reference in the next 24 hours. I have a long years with this forum, eight years. If my brain cells are properly storing memories and if I have not lost a little part of the storage then I can not remember, I even ever needed plagiarism. I was not or never needed to be merit whore because I never needed merit to rank up.

If you fail to bring an evidence then know that your mother once was in my bed when I needed someone to suck my dick. She was outstanding in the job and made me so excited that I fucked her hard and made her pregnant. And you are that son of the bitch. What else I can expect when the whore only received $10

[1714506771]

1714506771

[1714506771]

1714506771

[1714506771]

1714506771

[1714506771]

1714506771

[1714506771]

1714506771

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

If you fail to bring an evidence then know that your mother once was in my bed when I needed someone to suck my dick. She was outstanding in the job and made me so excited that I fucked her hard and made her pregnant. And you are that son of the bitch. What else I can expect when the whore only received $10

You're wrong, you don't have a dick, instead of a dick you have a big hairy cunt that you've been fucked in all your life. Go fuck yourself, you piece of cocksucker.

The desire to fuck someone's moms indicates the patient has an oedipal complex. See a doctor, motherfucker.

You are creating paradox. It's better you speak with what I asked you. In case you missed to notice

If you fail to bring an evidence then know that your mother once was in my bed when I needed someone to suck my dick. She was outstanding in the job and made me so excited that I fucked her hard and made her pregnant. And you are that son of the bitch. What else I can expect when the whore only received $10

Prove that you are not a bastard.

Who else are annoyed with these inappropriate emojis LOL

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

You could not prove yourself which means you falsely accused me of plagiarism and it was not a mistake but intentional to make me look bad to others.

Update:
New feedback left. My ignore list was empty but now I have you there.

[TwitchySeal]

So, Ratimov, you want some drama again?

Was this all started when you started attacking him for posting those guides/articles, calling him a merit whore?  

Why would you think he's doing them for merit?  I don't see how merit would have any value to him considering his account status.  Sig spammer would be a more logical accusation but he obviously puts a lot of effort into putting those long posts together, and they seem to add value to the forum - especially relative to others that attempt to make posts like his, and it seems like he sites all his sources.

Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're the one out of line for attacking him as a "merit whore", and while he should of just ignored you, how about just cool it both of you?  This whole thing is stupid.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Was this all started when you started attacking him for posting those guides/articles, calling him a merit whore?

Yes, I guess we all know how he started in the forum. At that time many members were agreeing that those were plagiarism until he fixed [updated the topics] with reference links. Before it was like he copied, translated, no credit given to the source. Even in one article he was making it such a way that others were easily taking it as his own creation. 

Why would you think he's doing them for merit?

He needed those merit whoring to rank up. And who have forgotten his topics about praising himself for every rank he achieved, every little milestones, anything that had a slight possibility to get some merits. The reputation board became boring to see he congratulating himself. At some point it was too much that I think I felt [others too] that we need a dedicated thread for celebrating achievements.

I think I had enough of these common topics like "Finally a member/full member/hero/legendary", "xday/xmonth/xyear legendary", "x is finally a member/full member/hero/legendary now", "1k/2k/3k/..../nk merit club", "one/two/three/n milestones achieved", "I am now member/full member/hero/legendary", "From beginner to member/full member/hero/legendary in x days", "Got my 1st/2nd/3rd/.../nth badge", "celebrating 1year/2years/3years/.../n years", "My/his/their contribution to the forum", "x men forum guide list" the list is way too long!

I don't see how merit would have any value to him considering his account status.  Sig spammer would be a more logical accusation but he obviously puts a lot of effort into putting those long posts together, and they seem to add value to the forum - especially relative to others that attempt to make posts like his, and it seems like he sites all his sources.

He does not need that now, I agree here. But that does not mean he was not a merit whore. He cited those sources after he was accused for plagiarism, not before that.

Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're the one out of line for attacking him as a "merit whore", and while he should of just ignored you, how about just cool it both of you?  This whole thing is stupid.

I left the tag over one and half year or two years ago. Even I wanted to shake the hand in the new year by unignoring him but he kept his salty mouth. You can read details in the last post. If he was forgetting it and wanted to shake the hand then I don't think after all these months he would go and write a feedback on my trust page. I understand it is a neutral but he indeed accused me for a lot of things. So he re-started it if you think I started it by saying merit whole long ago.

The goal of this topic is to find out where I plagiarized. I am still waiting for him to prove the accusation of plagiarism that I did. But it seems he is trying to skip it or by now we would see he was posting something that shows I plagiarized. This is proving that he is a LIAR too and it was a planned lie. A whore is a whore, no wonder he lied.

I think the title of this post is perfect now.

[PytagoraZ]

So, neutral tags are not neutral. Neutral tags are more likely to be negative. There seems to be a hype thread about neutral tags.

Sorry, not in my capacity to comment here. But I love the swearing you guys do, keep it up

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Sorry, not in my capacity to comment here. But I love the swearing you guys do, keep it up

There are some garbage in the forum. If you are not strong enough to handle them then they will destroy you.

Stay away from reputation board, stay away from criticizing them, stay away to unfold their lies, at least don't publicly dare to challenge them. If you really need to expose them then seek help from members who have strengths to speak out against them, give them information if they are interested. But don't dare to do anything against them by yourself until you have a highly influential account.

[yahoo62278]

Sorry, not in my capacity to comment here. But I love the swearing you guys do, keep it up

There are some garbage in the forum. If you are not strong enough to handle them then they will destroy you.

Stay away from reputation board, stay away from criticizing them, stay away to unfold their lies, at least don't publicly dare to challenge them. If you really need to expose them then seek help from members who have strengths to speak out against them, give them information if they are interested. But don't dare to do anything against them by yourself until you have a highly influential account.

If you guys could get along for 5 minutes this could be sorted via pm, but from what I read, getting along is not going to happen. Likely no explanations are going to happen either. Might just be best to ignore each other and save yourselves the stress?

I personally think you both should delete your feedbacks as they're unimportant. Who cares if he is a "merit whore", and without a reference link to prove you plagiarized his feedback is irrelevant. Let bygones be bygones and move on. You're both long time members and should know that this is going to lead nowhere.

[rachael9385]

Good day guys, I don't know if I am supposed to say something over here but in case I am supposed to, please guys we are all matured and we need to respect each other's no matter what, if we keep on quarreling like this, what do we expect the newbies to say? Although I am just a member rank user but what so ever be the matter, let it resolved quickly and not the other way round.
Neutral tags is not like Merit someone should be Happy to get and I don't believe that neutral tags are given for no reasons.

[Yawa2020]

Stay away from reputation board, stay away from criticizing them, stay away to unfold their lies, at least don't publicly dare to challenge them. If you really need to expose them then seek help from members who have strengths to speak out against them, give them information if they are interested. But don't dare to do anything against them by yourself until you have a highly influential account.

The hypocrisy is very clear enough for the blind to see. How issues are being treated when some members are involved is quite different from when certain individuals whom they don't like or not buying into their ideas is involved. I am force to believe that there's a team up and one must belong to one in order to do or say some things here.

So, neutral tags are not neutral. Neutral tags are more likely to be negative. There seems to be a hype thread about neutral tags.

Yeah, they pretend as if it's neutral as they claim but don't like to be given one because they know it is more like a negative. 

[TwitchySeal]

Why would you think he's doing them for merit?

He needed those merit whoring to rank up.

He doesn't need merit anymore, but he continues making these posts.

He made the posts when he needed merit.
And he continues to make them when he doesn't need merit.

Do I really need to break down the logic behind why it's stupid to call him a merit whore?

[LoyceV]

Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like you're the one out of line for attacking him as a "merit whore", and while he should of just ignored you, how about just cool it both of you?  This whole thing is stupid.

Agreed. And the foul language makes it harder to take this topic seriously.

Ratimov's "plagiarism" topics have been discussed before, and I've expressed my opinion there: he could definitely improve on the way he quotes references to make it more obvious it's taken from somewhere else. But plagiarism is handled by the Mods, and if Mods think his posts are allowed, why should users fight over it?

[Igebotz]

Sorry, not in my capacity to comment here. But I love the swearing you guys do, keep it up

There are some garbage in the forum. If you are not strong enough to handle them then they will destroy you.

The last time I answered to one of Pytagoraz's posts, I urged him to avoid the reputation board because it is the wrong place for him to begin his journey.

Your words have no weight as long as you're not a DT member; focus on something else and return when you're old enough to stand alone before you get burned.

If you guys could get along for 5 minutes this could be sorted via pm, but from what I read, getting along is not going to happen. Likely no explanations are going to happen either. Might just be best to ignore each other and save yourselves the stress?

The reputation board is the new PM; most users prefer to vent their frustrations here rather than in the PM. They would rather be noisy and invite everyone inside their business. I've been watching both of them for a long time, and I'm not sure any of them is ready to let go of their broken relationship.

I'll say it again: neutral tags should never be used as a personal note, which is exactly what both of you are doing right now.

Neutral tags is not like Merit someone should be Happy to get and I don't believe that neutral tags are given for no reasons.

You'd be shocked that more that 89% are given for no reason.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

By this definition, I meant the following few cases of using someone else's text without references:

Microsoft and Bank of America Merrill Lynch Collaborate to Transform Trade Finance Transacting With Azure Blockchain as a Service

Today at Sibos, an annual conference organized by SWIFT for the financial industry, Microsoft Corp. and Bank of America Merrill Lynch announced a collaboration on blockchain technology to fuel transformation of trade finance transacting.

As part of this collaboration, the two companies will build and test technology, create frameworks, and establish best practices for blockchain-powered exchanges between businesses and their customers and banks. Microsoft Treasury experts will serve as advisors and initial test clients, establishing the first Microsoft Azure-powered blockchain transaction between a major corporate treasury and financial institution.

“By working with Bank of America Merrill Lynch on cloud-based blockchain technology, we aim to increase efficiency and reduce risk in our own treasury operations,” said Amy Hood, executive vice president and chief financial officer at Microsoft. “Businesses across the globe – including Microsoft – are undergoing digital transformation to grow, compete, and be more agile, and we see significant potential for blockchain to drive this transformation.”

Currently, underlying trade finance processes are highly manual, time-consuming and costly. With blockchain, processes can be digitized and automated, transaction settlement times shortened, and business logic applied to related data, creating a host of potential benefits for businesses and financial institutions including: more predictable working capital, reduced counterparty risk, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced audit transparency, among other benefits.

“The potential benefits of blockchain will help drive meaningful supply chain efficiencies to the clients of both Microsoft and the bank. This project is another example of our continued commitment to introduce financial innovations for the betterment of global commerce,” said Ather Williams, head of Global Transaction Services at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.  

“We are excited to be working with Microsoft on this groundbreaking blockchain proof of concept that has the potential to help redefine, digitize, and improve how trade finance instruments are executed today,” said Percy Batliwalla, head of Global Trade and Supply Chain Finance at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.  

Microsoft Azure Blockchain as a Service was first introduced in November 2015. The global scale, hybrid cloud capabilities, extensive compliance certification portfolio, and enterprise-proven security of Azure provide businesses with confidence and choice, especially in highly regulated industries like financial services, health care and government. More than 80 percent of the world’s largest banks are Azure customers. Furthermore, more than 75 percent of the global systemically important financial institutions are using Azure, representing the highest bar for legal, compliance, security and acquisitions teams.

Development and testing of the initial application, built to optimize the standby letter of credit process, is currently in progress. The Microsoft and Bank of America Merrill Lynch teams will demonstrate the technology at Sibos in Geneva, Switzerland. Following the initial development and testing, the teams will work to refine the technology and evaluate applications to include more complex use cases and additional financial instruments.

Original:

https://news.microsoft.com/2016/09/27/microsoft-and-bank-of-america-merrill-lynch-collaborate-to-transform-trade-finance-transacting-with-azure-blockchain-as-a-service/

Rules, Terms Conditions:
2: During this period you must make a minimum of 10 Posts per Week in order to be considered eligible.
3: Only Posts that are useful and constructive will be eligible towards the 15 Post goal. Posts that are off-topic, or simply made with the intention of raising post count will be disqualified.

Original:

Rules, Terms Conditions:
2: During this period you must make a minimum of 10 Posts per Week in order to be considered eligible.
3: Only Posts that are useful and constructive will be eligible towards the 15 Post goal. Posts that are off-topic, or simply made with the intention of raising post count will be disqualified.

Read on my tab where I only browse my internet and only reacting the proof that brought

Oh my gosh! I can not believe myself. You indeed found me plagiarizing. On the first plagiarism topic you missed to bring

[..snip..]
You could be right.

Microsoft and Bank of America Merrill Lynch Collaborate to Transform Trade Finance Transacting With Azure Blockchain as a Service[..snip..]

On the second plagiarism you missed to bring,

[...snip...]
WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO RULES, SOMEONE EXPLAIN? Sounds contradictive to me.......

Of course I feel embarrassed and ashamed of what I did. I don't want to make any excuse of it like OMG I forgot to use "quote" for whatever reason and it really looks like that that's what happened.

Trust abuser. Writes false tags because of his grievances and thirst for revenge. Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow. In essence, a two-faced person who has double standards. What he condemns in others, he gladly does himself. On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked. He is also a plagiarist who managed to escape punishment because no one noticed him.

BitcoinGirl.Club is a plagiarist who managed to escape punishment because no one noticed him - JUSTIFIED!

Well done! You did your job now I do mine. It proves that it was someone else with me at that one night stand, not your mum. And you were able to bring your DNA test result so I removed the latest neutral feedback on your trust page that I left other day.

He doesn't need merit anymore, but he continues making these posts.

He made the posts when he needed merit.
And he continues to make them when he doesn't need merit.

Do I really need to break down the logic behind why it's stupid to call him a merit whore?

Now I have generally refused to use someone else's material when creating some kind of guide, only my own research.

TwitchySeal, see what he said. It means he does not continue making these posts [posts articles and don't give credit to the source]. On the other hand, in your logic you missed some other considerations too.

The feedback was left one and half or more years ago when it was a fact, at that time he was earning all those merit by [1]making topics without giving credit to the sources [2] spamming the reputation boards with his self praised topics [3] there were many other evidences of his merit whoring. The merit whoring was obvious at that time.

1000-Day Legendary  29 merits
My contribution to the fight against low-value posts 70 merits
7k Merit Club. When is Legendary ? 5 merits
[END][GIVEAWAY]- Ratimov 2 Years on Bitcointalk - [PRIZE: 100$ in BTC] 30 merits
Ratimov - 2 Years on Bitcointalk + Giveaway !!! 44 merits
Ratimov - 1 year on Bitcointalk 28 merits
First Newbie of 2019 who received 1000 merits !!! 9 merits
My 100 days on Bitcointalk 32 merits
Hoвый иcтoчник зacлyг - Ratimov. Oбcyждeниe. 33 merits

Now let's forget, fuck Ratimov case.
Consider someone who made mistake in the past, got neutral or red feedback from one forum member. The feedback was left based on the fact at that time [old time].
After few years if the user improves, he could just write a civilized message with some evidences of his improvements and request to revise the feedback that was left. Or do you suggest him to leave a counter salty feedback with personal notes like the following

Trust abuser. Writes false tags because of his grievances and thirst for revenge. Once I told him not to spread his flood in my topic, and after that he harbored a grudge against me and began to look for any reason to hook me somehow. In essence, a two-faced person who has double standards. What he condemns in others, he gladly does himself. On the forum, he showed himself as someone who does not know how to protect his digital property, so his account was hacked. [..sniped he part that can consider technically true..]

The bold fonts, what kind of personal notes are these? JOKES?

[lovesmayfamilis]

You are still a newborn considering the amount of time I spent in the forum since 2015.

I often see the idea that if a user is on the forum long enough, then they should be respected by default. It sounds like a regular occurrence when BitcoinGirl.Club gets into an argument with any of the members. I live in a country where, from childhood, they are taught to respect old age, but I never agree that if you are old, you know more. Therefore, to say the words that you are still green and young is completely wrong because time shows that sometimes young people take the knowledge of External studies, one year for five.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

You are still a newborn considering the amount of time I spent in the forum since 2015.

I often see the idea that if a user is on the forum long enough, then they should be respected by default. It sounds like a regular occurrence when BitcoinGirl.Club gets into an argument with any of the members. I live in a country where, from childhood, they are taught to respect old age, but I never agree that if you are old, you know more. Therefore, to say the words that you are still green and young is completely wrong because time shows that sometimes young people take the knowledge of External studies, one year for five.

Please don't take the wrong side of it. I bring it when I see a disrespectful member joined the forum few years ago and starts throwing salts to older members who are in the forum for long years.

If your discussion is about knowledge, constructive discussions, logical civilized arguments then you will be respected even if it's your first posts on the forum. 

[JollyGood]

If you fail to bring an evidence then know that your mother once was in my bed when I needed someone to suck my dick. She was outstanding in the job and made me so excited that I fucked her hard and made her pregnant. And you are that son of the bitch. What else I can expect when the whore only received $10

You're wrong, you don't have a dick, instead of a dick you have a big hairy cunt that you've been fucked in all your life. Go fuck yourself, you piece of cocksucker.

The desire to fuck someone's moms indicates the patient has an oedipal complex. See a doctor, motherfucker.

You are much better than this Ratimov, you do not need to resort to profanities. You have contributed immensely to the forum and your contributions are documented for all to see.

The OP is a vindictive attention-seeker who does not deserve your time therefore add him to your ignore list. Only read his posts when others quote them and only if they catch your eye because that is what he deserves. Anyway you will not be missing much by not reading his posts. This forum does not need individuals such as the OP who base the majority of their tenure here on drama and politics and continue trying to make themselves relevant (as though they have some sort of authority when in reality they have none) but it does need quality contributors such as yourself.

He uses every opportunity against me to either create threads or makes posts asking members to distrust me. I have received some disgusting words and attitude from the OP but I have never retaliated with profanities. He is on my ignore list where he belongs along with several others. He is someone who cannot contribute positively to the forum in literally any capacity, unfortunately that is the low calibre of person you are dealing with. Having said that, keeping in mind all that previous trolling and pathetic behaviour the OP conducted towards me (with his fellow trolls), I did not resort to profanities and you should not do that too.

Ratimov, you are better than that therefore do not lower yourself to his level of being in the gutter. The OP can only dream of contributing to the forum in the positive and helpful ways that you have. Just ignore him and move forward in your forum journey.

[mikeywith]

By looking at the feedback you left on each other's profiles, none of them have any real value IMO, BitcoinGirl.Club can't prove that Ratimov posted all those topics just for merit (I personally don't think he did it for the sole purpose of merit), on the other hand, Raitmov accusation against BitcoinGirl for plagiarism is weak, all I see is "misuse" of citation or lack thereof, without the intention of  "plagiarism".

Furthermore, even if those were legit feedback, they serve no purpose now.

It's pretty obvious that the two of you have hit a wall and going back to being "normal" or "friends" is just not going to happen, then you two should at least be "respectful enemies" by doing this:

My suggestion is to remove all these neutral tags from each other and close this thread so as not to continue this unnecessary drama. After that, just ignore each other.

Sounds like a perfect plan to me.

[Igebotz]

In general, there is always an opportunity to reach an agreement, and not to show your stubbornness to the very end, even if this does not bring any results.

My suggestion is to remove all these neutral tags from each other and close this thread so as not to continue this unnecessary drama. After that, just ignore each other.

I think this will be the most optimal, reasonable and correct decision for everyone. Personally, all these conflicts and their discussion are not interesting to me at all.

I'm waiting for a response from the OP regarding my proposal.

Why don't you start by removing your tags off his profile, as you initiated the idea while waiting for the OP's opinion? I'm sure he'd like to put a stop to this drama as well.

Both of you have contributed to the forum in some capacity, and neither of you is better than the other.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

[I am just too lazy to find your salty mouth post] 

Please tell me you're not starting to adopt my habits, because I've posted "I'm too lazy right now to...." so many times that if I had a nickel for every time I wrote it I could buy a Tesla.

And I'm not trying to stoke the flames of drama here, but I have to tell you that the little devil that lives on my shoulder is giggling in delight that there is some here.  And that's not a knock against Ratimov, because although I don't remember those plagiarism details I'm pretty sure he was acquitted of them by the community and the mods a long time ago. 

I've got nothing against either one of you, in fact.  I just enjoy the show.

instead of a dick you have a big hairy cunt that you've been fucked in all your life. Go fuck yourself, you piece of cocksucker.

The desire to fuck someone's moms indicates the patient has an oedipal complex. See a doctor, motherfucker.

TMAN, is that you?