As this conversation is public, I believe it's important for me to establish my identity and clarify my position within the Woolong Corporation. My name is David Webb, and I am the Founder of Woolong Corporation. You can find my credentials on LinkedIn at
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dwceo Furthermore, I am the Sole Trademark holder of the "Woolong" tradename, which can be confirmed through a search on the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) website at
https://www.wipo.int/reference/en/branddb If you are an Anime fan, you may find this fact impressive and significant.
I personally have been working on the Woolong Corporation project since May 19, 2019, and throughout this time, I have not realized a single penny in revenue. However, I have incurred over $300,000 in expenses. This project is a true "labor of love" for me, and I want to emphasize that any insinuation of intentional shenanigans surrounding the theft of the entire Deployer treasury and Proof of Concept liquidity of Woolong Token is both baseless and deeply resented.
I am fully committed to the success of the Woolong Corporation and ensuring its integrity.
Let me clarify the points you raised.
I apologize if my previous statements seemed contradictory, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention.
In regards to Sam being described as a 'tech professional' despite lacking experience, I understand how that may appear contradictory. What I meant to convey was that Sam was hired based on his "represented" qualifications and skills as a tech professional. However, during his time with us, it became evident that he lacked the specific experience required for successfully completing the integration of Woolong Token into our ecosystem. While he possessed the foundational knowledge and skills of a tech professional, he faced challenges in applying them effectively to our project. I hope this clarifies any confusion.
Regarding your comment about bounty hunters and projects blaming them for token dumps, I understand the concern. It is true that in some cases, projects may shift blame without taking responsibility. However, it's important to note that responsible projects take precautions to mitigate such risks. In our situation, the discovery of Sam selling the tokens raised concerns about his actions and intentions, which led to appropriate actions being taken. To clairify, we paid Sam in Fiat USD. The Woolong we transfered to him was not as compensation for his efforts but to be used to test his integration of Woolong Token into Woolong Corporation ecosystem. Sam failing to return the Woolong Tokens to us after his dismissal is the indication I was refering to rregarding his intentions.
In relation to rug pulls, I want to emphasize that our incident was not an intentional rug pull. A rug pull typically involves deliberate actions by developers to deceive and defraud investors. In our case, it was an unfortunate incident of a compromised account, leading to the loss of assets. We are deeply committed to the security of our project and the trust of our investors. We are actively implementing enhanced security measures to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. We understand that actions speak louder than words, and we are dedicated to proving our commitment through tangible actions and results.
Thank you for bringing up these concerns, and please let me know if you have any further questions or require additional clarification.