" Unfortunately I do not have any concrete evidence but I have a strong suspicion that this user is an alt of elmanchez (u=2553198) and ps34 (u=2751022). If dealing with this user, I suggest you trust him no more than you would the other two. If in doubt, use escrow. DireWolfM14 "
THIS IS THE REASON FOR THIS TOPIC.
It's sad that people handle out feedback like that ~
What is truly sad is that both of you little bitches are complaining about the neutral feedback on your profiles, while at the same time, you are leaving retaliatory feedback and thus abusing the trust system yourselves.
Really? This for a neutral tag? You can get mad all you want, OP, but a neutral tag like that is not abusing the trust system. In general a neutral tag is not, unless it is clearly negative in spirit but neutral in color, something like "CYBER_COWBOY is a fucking scammer, don't deal with him." That could be a case of trust abuse if it is not supported by anything other than opinion.
This topic is created because he called me an alt of PS34 and another account, without ref link, any proof or anything. So Yes he did abuse the trust system, and its not the first time and def not the last either.
What I did was to ref to this topic and said he trust abused, witch he did. Then he deleted it and replace it with a new feedback, after that I deleted my feedback.
I am not a clown that feel that I need to post on another peoples walls that I don't have anything to do with, that's a behavior of a nerd in my opinion.
Next time you open your mouths, read the whole topic so you won't look like fools, or you think it's totally normal and OK to accuse accounts to belong to each other when they don't with zero proof?
Shouldn't the accuser create some kind of topic with proofs and then use that as a REF link?
It's sad that people handle out feedback like that, I think it's only hurting the forums reputation and make it harder for it to grow in general.
It's been that way for years in case you haven't noticed. It's just that you're now on the receiving end of some feedback you don't agree with. And I'm not clear on this: were you asking for all of those documents in your lending thread (the income statement, etc.)? I looked at your terms and didn't see anything like that and don't know if you'd made changes or not. Hopefully you weren't, because despite you stating adamantly that your intention wouldn't be to use that information to scam anyone, no one can read your mind. A scammer and an honest lender would both say the same thing, so who's to say?
Of course I did not, and I would never ask anyone for any documents. NEVER.
(Why he don't just ask the people who applied?!)First am I an alt of Ps34 and after that I stealing KYC. 🤡
The only thing I do is to offer non-collateral loans, and so far everyone that tried it are happy.
Congratulations @dire your first thread full of angst and navel gazing.
Your reply are really worried, you think this is completely normal. by the way the feedback you left me is wrong.
I did not created this topic for the reason your saying, its because I was accused of being and alt of PS34.
You really doing all you can to be as far away from that DT list you can. I mean 70+ people distrust you.
Feedback from you means nothing absolutely nothing for anyone.
A question, why do you feel that you must lie so much on daily basis? Are you ok?