CryptoHF why give me some feedback

[KaosanRoad]

Hello, i am new on this forum and yes I don't post a lot, I like to sit  back and observe, it's the best way for me to use this forum.
Today when i logged in I saw I got some feedback from a user name cryptohf.

This feedback says this - Alt of a scam chain

Why did you give me this feedback? I have not scammed anyone, I don't have anything to sell or I don't want to make a trade with anyone, I also don't applie to a loan.
I was reading before I posted this how I should do, and I think this was the best way to do it, maybe better to send PM but I don't like drama.

You see here we spoke with each others: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458492.msg62524264#msg62524264
But how does that make me a scammer?

Please remove the feedback because its wrong.

[1714728625]

1714728625

[1714728625]

1714728625

[1714728625]

1714728625

[1714728625]

1714728625

[1714728625]

1714728625

[YOSHIE]

You see here we spoke with each others: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458492.msg62524264#msg62524264
But how does that make me a scammer?

Indeed you don't look cheating, but if I see your post, overall you talk a lot of 'learning', of course it's undeniable.

However, lately a lot of newbies are flooding the lending board, instead of learning about crypto, Bitcoin, exchanges, wallets and so on, lately a lot of Alt in lending threads support each other, as if they ever made a trade between them, for that I rate @CryptoHF, assuming you are someone's Alt. for that he gives you a negative belief.

My understanding, you should not interfere in the lending board, whether they are rude in conversation and so on, you should be more in the Bitcoin, Speculation, discussion section, Starters, Exchanges, services etc, so you can learn a lot there about crypto related stuff, that should be it, but you're itching to get in on the lending part.

Remember: the loan section is not for learning for beginners, unless: learning wants to cheat.

but still i dont think its a reason for giving me bad feedback and say that I am alt of something.

You can PM or show this thread.

Consider the negative belief, it's not a great idea, just a misunderstanding. you with a negative giver.

but I see Cryptohf have applied for a loan himself and he only was here for some months...

it's none of my business, the consequences and risks are on themselves.

Bottom line: What is the main purpose of the user coming here.

[KaosanRoad]

You see here we spoke with each others: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5458492.msg62524264#msg62524264
But how does that make me a scammer?

Indeed you don't look cheating, but if I see your post, overall you talk a lot of 'learning', of course it's undeniable.

However, lately a lot of newbies are flooding the lending board, instead of learning about crypto, Bitcoin, exchanges, wallets and so on, lately a lot of Alt in lending threads support each other, as if they ever made a trade between them, for that I rate @CryptoHF, assuming you are someone's Alt. for that he gives you a negative belief.

My understanding, you should not interfere in the lending board, whether they are rude in conversation and so on, you should be more in the Bitcoin, Speculation, discussion section, Starters, Exchanges, services etc, so you can learn a lot there about crypto related stuff, that should be it, but you're itching to get in on the lending part.

Remember: the loan section is not for learning for beginners, unless: learning wants to cheat.

Ok, thank you for helping me. I wont go in there anymore, but still i dont think its a reason for giving me bad feedback and say that I am alt of something.
I don't need to have a loan so I wont ask for it, but I see Cryptohf have applied for a loan himself and he only was here for some months...

[_BlackStar]

I can't find any clear reference to why CryptoHF is sending you negative tags - to me that's a questionable error. Meanwhile - negative tags posted by CryptoHFs on your profile will never appear because he is not part of DT. But it's sure to annoy you a lot though you could put it on your distrust list. [~CryptoHF].

But by the way, I also found that some DT had tagged CryptoHF's profile as one of those users who abused the trust system - so I don't think he'll ever use DT until he changes his habits.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Ok, thank you for helping me. I wont go in there anymore, but still i dont think its a reason for giving me bad feedback and say that I am alt of something.
I don't need to have a loan so I wont ask for it, but I see Cryptohf have applied for a loan himself and he only was here for some months...

I see a feedback with no reference. It's not unclear why CryptoHF left a feedback [Negative] and thinks you are an alt. When leaving a feedback especially a red one, a user must include a reference link. On the other hand, if someone is an alt then it does not mean they have to have a negative feedback unless the other account has been tagged for failing in a financial transaction.

CryptoHF himself is a lower rank member and I doubt he have a good understanding of trust feedback system. I will request him to revise the feedback and not to act too harsh in situations.

[holydarkness]

I am actually more impressed at how you noticed the negative feedback, given that CryptoHFs is not on DT, thus his feedback doesn't show by default. But that thing aside, my post here is more to CryptoHFs than to you.

CryptoHFs, I take a peek at your feedbacks. Now, I am not going to put a screenshot or a quote of it here as, if I do so, it'll permanently leave a history of your sent feedback, and I am not trying to be patronizing as well, but by this occasion presented to us, I'd like to extend a suggestion for you to really read what Loyce's suggested on the correct use of the Trust system as well as perhaps reading yahoo's recent question about candy.

For Loyce's thread, as it is intended for beginners, the summary can be found on the first post, so I think reading it is quite enough. For Yahoo's though, I'd suggest you to give it a thorough read, chew them 32 times, digest them slowly, and give your own summary based on it as the outcome of the entire length of the discussion is quite mixed. Both of them are a nice read, and I am really really really [can't emphasize this enough] strongly suggesting you to get acquainted with them prior to your next sent feedback.

Again, I am not trying to patronize you, and I am not sure your insight of the DTs or --if I may be blunt-- your agenda on being one of them... well, us, but the road you currently take is one of the fastest way to meet Tilde, one of the Trust Sisters. This is not a threat, this is a friendly warning nudging you to understand how things supposed to work. I really hope you heed my suggestion.

[CryptoHFs]

I do like the well organized attack the last few days but it won't work.

[examplens]

I see a feedback with no reference. It's not unclear why CryptoHF left a feedback [Negative] and thinks you are an alt. When leaving a feedback especially a red one, a user must include a reference link.

A negative tag without a reference is absolutely unacceptable.
Now he left some more meaningless feedback, like some revenge on Stalker22 

Stalker22

2023-07-23

Literally a baby who's crying on everything as his mother didn't breastfeed him well which is his own problem.

[KaosanRoad]

I do like the well organized attack the last few days but it won't work.

I have not attacked you, again I would like you to remove the feedback you left me. Thank you.
If others also complain about your behavior maybe you should change behavior? I don't ask you to give me money or anything.. just to remove the feedback you left.

but if you don't want to do it, it's ok but atleast put some link inside the complain with proof because i dont mind now people have learned me about how this dt things work, so a feedback from you is not important anymore.

but anyway you should listen to the people that been here longer then us (because they obviously know how it works here better then you and me) and I don't see that anyone have attacked you here, people just trying to help you and teach you how this forum works. Don't missunderstand things and mix them up.


thanks for other replies also. i start to like this place more and more

[JollyGood]

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

Having said that, if you look at the feedback history of CryptoHF you will see that he is relatively new here. His account was created around 4 months ago and with his low quality of posting, he has not contributed to the community in a positive manner.

If you take a look at the feedback for the CryptoHF account, it has been tagged by several members as it deserves. The feedback he has left for members demonstrates he cannot be taken seriously and for that being one of the reasons, I will tag his account with appropriate feedback too.

Hello, i am new on this forum and yes I don't post a lot, I like to sit  back and observe, it's the best way for me to use this forum.
Today when i logged in I saw I got some feedback from a user name cryptohf.

[CryptoHFs]

I do like the well organized attack the last few days but it won't work.

I have not attacked you, again I would like you to remove the feedback you left me. Thank you.
If others also complain about your behavior maybe you should change behavior? I don't ask you to give me money or anything.. just to remove the feedback you left.

but if you don't want to do it, it's ok but atleast put some link inside the complain with proof because i dont mind now people have learned me about how this dt things work, so a feedback from you is not important anymore.

but anyway you should listen to the people that been here longer then us (because they obviously know how it works here better then you and me) and I don't see that anyone have attacked you here, people just trying to help you and teach you how this forum works. Don't missunderstand things and mix them up.


thanks for other replies also. i start to like this place more and more

I mean it would have been easier for you to create a new account as yours are almost empty but I will remove it just make sure we don't meet again

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

Having said that, if you look at the feedback history of CryptoHF you will see that he is relatively new here. His account was created around 4 months ago and with his low quality of posting, he has not contributed to the community in a positive manner. If you take a look at the feedback for the CryptoHF account, it has been tagged by several members as it deserves. The feedback he has left for members demonstrates he cannot be taken seriously and for that being one of the reasons, I will tag his account with appropriate feedback too.

Hello, i am new on this forum and yes I don't post a lot, I like to sit  back and observe, it's the best way for me to use this forum.
Today when i logged in I saw I got some feedback from a user name cryptohf.

Tag it I don't really care, you guys worship the tags here like the forum is you life  

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

I haven't delved into OP's history, but somehow I believe you.  It's been my experience that a lot of so-called newbies aren't actually new to the forum but alt accounts created for one purpose or another, and usually they're going to deny it.

Looks like the feedback in question was removed.  Honestly, I'm not sure how OP even noticed it unless he habitually checks his trust page.  It wouldn't have shown up red since CryptoHFs isn't on DT, and OP doesn't have any other feedback...so I'm not sure why he'd even be looking for it unless he was given a heads-up.

Tag it I don't really care, you guys worship the tags here like the forum is you life 

Yeah well, the forum does mean a lot to many members here (myself included) and if there weren't people trying to mop up all the shit, it would stink worse than it already does.  Y'all take care, now.

BitcoinGirl.Club, one thing I like you is, you always fight for justice, you are an ACTIVIST in the forum, the matter what people like you. You don't like oppression, I believe you are from the non-conformist school of thought, keep it up. Better days are coming. Yes as you said, CryptoHF as a new comer in the forum has not really understand how to use the trust system so he or she misused the feedback, so it is good to call his attention to know if it was a mistake or he knew it and did it knowingly.

Sort of off-topic, but I regret giving you all the merits I did.  I'd like to say I was high out of my mind at the time, but that wasn't it.  Ugh.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I do like the well organized attack the last few days but it won't work.

Maybe you should just listen to what some members are advising you, and this could avoid more of such situations from escalating in the future. Proper use of the trust system starts with you.

If that's how you behave with the tags before you even become a DT member now imagine what you would do if you were on DT? I guess newbies would be so terrified of this place.

[DireWolfM14]

I just read this thread, and I want the last 7 minute of my life back.  

[CryptoHFs]

I do like the well organized attack the last few days but it won't work.

Maybe you should just listen to what some members are advising you, and this could avoid more of such situations from escalating in the future. Proper use of the trust system starts with you.

If that's how you behave with the tags before you even become a DT member now imagine what you would do if you were on DT? I guess newbies would be so terrified of this place.

I don't want to be a DT.. also I got bored from the forum.. just here to participate in Sinbad price prediction every month..  have no other desire for the forum itself.

I just read this thread, and I want the last 7 minute of my life back.  

[Stalker22]

I see a feedback with no reference. It's not unclear why CryptoHF left a feedback [Negative] and thinks you are an alt. When leaving a feedback especially a red one, a user must include a reference link.

A negative tag without a reference is absolutely unacceptable.
Now he left some more meaningless feedback, like some revenge on Stalker22 

Stalker22

2023-07-23

Literally a baby who's crying on everything as his mother didn't breastfeed him well which is his own problem.

Yeah, that tag on my profile is actually a revised negative one that he left as retaliation to my neutral feedback. I am unsure if CryptoHF is really ignorant about using the trust system or actually an alt of some senior member who wants to stir some shit on the Reputation board but doesn't have the balls to expose his main account.

Anyway, I see that he is already distrusted by several DT1 members (including you), so there is no fear that he will become DT anytime soon. I figured it was best to ignore him for the time being. 

[CryptoHFs]

I see a feedback with no reference. It's not unclear why CryptoHF left a feedback [Negative] and thinks you are an alt. When leaving a feedback especially a red one, a user must include a reference link.

A negative tag without a reference is absolutely unacceptable.
Now he left some more meaningless feedback, like some revenge on Stalker22 

Stalker22

2023-07-23

Literally a baby who's crying on everything as his mother didn't breastfeed him well which is his own problem.

Yeah, that tag on my profile is actually a revised negative one that he left as retaliation to my neutral feedback. I am unsure if CryptoHF is really ignorant about using the trust system or actually an alt of some senior member who wants to stir some shit on the Reputation board but doesn't have the balls to expose his main account.

Anyway, I see that he is already distrusted by several DT1 members (including you), so there is no fear that he will become DT anytime soon. I figured it was best to ignore him for the time being. 

How do you see that distrust list, I don't even know, lol. Yes  CryptoHFs is an alt of a senior member. Can you guess who?

[JollyGood]

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

I haven't delved into OP's history, but somehow I believe you.  It's been my experience that a lot of so-called newbies aren't actually new to the forum but alt accounts created for one purpose or another, and usually they're going to deny it.

Pharmy I mean Scepty  

The problem quite often is that many newbies happen to be accounts created for farming purposes and no matter what facade they try to display, sooner or later many of them end up give themselves away. The manner in which the OP is writing throughout the history is somewhat ridiculous when demonstrates someone deliberately writing well below their real capability as far as the English language is concerned.

Looks like the feedback in question was removed.  Honestly, I'm not sure how OP even noticed it unless he habitually checks his trust page.  It wouldn't have shown up red since CryptoHFs isn't on DT, and OP doesn't have any other feedback...so I'm not sure why he'd even be looking for it unless he was given a heads-up.

I do not think he was told about it, he found it. As you rightly stated, what was he doing checking feedback when newbies do not really know much about it. Also, simply by the way he is writing it seems it is designed to come across as a novice non-English speaker but he failed to fool.

Check grammar here when he posted for merits but must have was disappointed as received zero especially after the good grammar applied with a few deliberate mistakes. Compare it to the way he wrote the OP.

Tag it I don't really care, you guys worship the tags here like the forum is you life  

Yeah well, the forum does mean a lot to many members here (myself included) and if there weren't people trying to mop up all the shit, it would stink worse than it already does.  Y'all take care, now.

You probably do not know the situation but I think the puppeteer controlling the CryptoHFs account probably gave up on it because of two significant occurrences. First, his account was tagged as someone who would not ask for a loan in future and second he put a spotlight on himself by posting nonsense in the Reputation and Lending boards.

[CryptoHFs]

I have had a brief look at to your account history and from what I see it does not look as though this is your first account. Feel free to add further responses on that view.

I haven't delved into OP's history, but somehow I believe you.  It's been my experience that a lot of so-called newbies aren't actually new to the forum but alt accounts created for one purpose or another, and usually they're going to deny it.

Pharmy I mean Scepty  

The problem quite often is that many newbies happen to be accounts created for farming purposes and no matter what facade they try to display, sooner or later many of them end up give themselves away. The manner in which the OP is writing throughout the history is somewhat ridiculous when demonstrates someone deliberately writing well below their real capability as far as the English language is concerned.

Looks like the feedback in question was removed.  Honestly, I'm not sure how OP even noticed it unless he habitually checks his trust page.  It wouldn't have shown up red since CryptoHFs isn't on DT, and OP doesn't have any other feedback...so I'm not sure why he'd even be looking for it unless he was given a heads-up.

I do not think he was told about it, he found it. As you rightly stated, what was he doing checking feedback when newbies do not really know much about it. Also, simply by the way he is writing it seems it is designed to come across as a novice non-English speaker but

Tag it I don't really care, you guys worship the tags here like the forum is you life  

Yeah well, the forum does mean a lot to many members here (myself included) and if there weren't people trying to mop up all the shit, it would stink worse than it already does.  Y'all take care, now.

You probably do not not the situation but I think the puppeteer controlling the CryptoHFs account probably gave up on it because of two significant occurrences. First, his account was tagged as someone who would not ask for a loan in future and second he put a spotlight on himself by posting nonsense in the Reputation and Lending boards.

That is true. But I gave up on it once I joined the whirlwind fight. I know since then that this account will be ruined but I choose to stand beside that guy.. since that thing I knew I started building enemies with cryptohfs.

[holydarkness]

How do you see that distrust list, I don't even know, lol. Yes  CryptoHFs is an alt of a senior member. Can you guess who?

Just because you asked, trust and distrust list are well documented by Loyce and open for public for anyone interested. Here's yours for the most recent week as per when this post is made: https://loyce.club/trust/2023-07-22_Sat_05.07h/3540644.html