JackpotInsight.com - online review guide

[CryptSafe]

I would like to join the rest of the other members here to give you a warm welcome to this platform. It is nice having you onboard. I had to do a quick check on your website and I must say you did a great work there. The UI is unique with a touch of excellence. I see you already listed some casinos already which are well known in the gambling industry.

Your announcement thread here should fully reflect what you offer and I would advise you update it to the fullest and also, I read where you offer to list casinos free of charge but I am curious to know if you just list them like that or you conduct your due diligence before listing them and if you do, can you please state the criteria you use to list casinos free of charge because there must be some standard a casino must meet before being listed unlike other review sites, they have standards too.

Lastly, seems you do not have FAQ on your website as I checked for it. It would be nice you have it so that prospective visitors could see for themselves saving you the stress of responding to numerous mails of enquiries. You can quote reply as much comment you want on one thread instead of spamming your thread with different quote replies. Your thread should be well coordinated.

I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases.  And of course, gradually build up and unify such information.  But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate.  This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
 This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.

Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.

[1715673136]

1715673136

[1715673136]

1715673136

[1715673136]

1715673136

[1715673136]

1715673136

[shasan]

It is good that you have started a project for a gambling review guide. And you want to list sites based on the review. You have mentioned contacting the gambling site but you have not mentioned whether it is free or not. And if you charge for it then how much you will take?

[pakhitheboss]

2. All listed casinos have reviews. Just click on the title, not on button

Okay, I found it and went through, felt you could have added some user experience on the review by actual users. I am not saying it is bad what I saying is that it is not convincing enough. I have another advise for you and that is why not start a small signature campaign here about your platform. In the past there we did saw such campaign by other review platforms. Think about a budget and hire a signature campaign manager.

[CasinoX]

I have another advise for you and that is why not start a small signature campaign here about your platform. In the past there we did saw such campaign by other review platforms. Think about a budget and hire a signature campaign manager.

I think it's too early for that. My site needs to grow a bit and after that, yes, I will consider acquiring a signature campaign. Thanks for this idea.

[CasinoX]

I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.

[YOSHIE]

This is  JackpotInsight.com, a little project who wants to be a fair, decent casino review guide.

I'm sure you'll get lots of reviews and online crypto casinos that you can include in your review, I saw the JackpotInsight.com review, not many casinos are listed there, yes maybe you need some time to consider the positives and negatives to digest, before registering in the JackpotInsight.com review.

We are here there are many things that you can conclude about casinos operating here, for you to consider, of course that review is not for today, maybe another time, because we here have different experiences every day playing at online casinos.

Whatever thing you want to talk about in the JackpotInsight.com review, of course you have to consider many elements and not look at one eye, you also have to review directly what happened and we here have positive and negative threads, of course you have to be wise in loading your review, for goodness sake.

Welcome to the JackpotInsight.com website.

[Slow death]

I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.

I assume you are talking about this casino: https://casino-x.com and there is more than one casino with the name of CasinoX, from what I could see there are these two: https://casinox.com and https://casinox-com.com I don't know if they are registered trademarks, but it seems to me that they are not, you also didn't need to change the entire name of the casino, you could choose to use casinoXI because as you have already created an account on this forum with your username casinoX so it was adding something after the X there in the name of your casino that would already be solved, with that you would also take advantage of using that word casino because it is a word that many people search on the internet

anyway that new name you gave your site is also very good and from what I could research there is no casino with that name. So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site

but speaking from experience, people hardly spend time reading the casino's TOS before creating an account and only after creating an account and want to withdraw and find out that the minimum withdrawal amount is very high, I don't want to mention the name of the casino , but I must say that despite being a very good casino it has a very high withdrawal amount and so I hope you put the withdrawal amounts of each casino so that people know in advance, the stake and the casino with the amount lowest withdrawal from these casinos that are on your website, I will not speak of the name of the casino with extremely high value

[CasinoX]

So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site.

In your opinion, what casinos are great to play on? I will like to know what casinos are great to play on, from your point of view.

[delfastTions]

I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases.  And of course, gradually build up and unify such information.  But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate.  This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
 This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.

Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.

However, from my experience of communicating with support, I must say that the block of standard questions and answers, the creation of which is quite laborious, if it is really informative, it really reduces the load on support staff.  But it is quite difficult to make such a section qualitatively. 
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee.  This happens to me in 80% of all support calls.  So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself.  In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.

[CryptSafe]

I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases.  And of course, gradually build up and unify such information.  But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate.  This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
 This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.

Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.

However, from my experience of communicating with support, I must say that the block of standard questions and answers, the creation of which is quite laborious, if it is really informative, it really reduces the load on support staff.  But it is quite difficult to make such a section qualitatively. 
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee.  This happens to me in 80% of all support calls.  So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself.  In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.

Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored  as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.

Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.

[Slow death]

So the problem is solved, now something I don't understand is why you haven't added all the good casinos that are on this forum to your site? I believe that it would be more advantageous to have many good casinos that are in this forum listed on your website, and another point that I noticed on your website is that you did not put the minimum withdrawal amount of each casino that is listed on your website, I saw that you put the TOS link of each casino that is listed on your site.

In your opinion, what casinos are great to play on? I will like to know what casinos are great to play on, from your point of view.

in my point of view good casinos should be casinos that have types of accounts, for example VIP accounts and offer weekly and monthly bonuses based on the vip level, because this type of bonus does not need to have requirements for people to be able to withdraw, it is a bonus calculated based on what the person has been playing and also a good casino is one that has a very low withdrawal amount. for example if a person wants to play just for fun and of course if he wins it will be very good, that person puts 10$ in the casino and wins, with that that person has 15$ and wants to continue playing but also withdraw the principal which in this case would be 10$ and I would leave the 5$ to continue playing

this could only be done in casinos with a low withdrawal amount, now what I have seen is that in some casinos the minimum withdrawal amount is 50$ and there are other casinos that even have more than 100$ as a minimum withdrawal amount and this makes people deposit money, something like 10$, then they make an odd bet of @1.60 for example, they get it right and they get 16$ and when they try to withdraw they find out that the minimum withdrawal amount is 50$, once someone sees this, all they have to do is keep playing and they lose everything, so these high withdrawal amounts don't make sense, it looks like they are a way for people to only play with high amounts and many people don't read the TOS of the casinos before creating an account, that's why I was saying that in your reviews you mention the minimum withdrawal values

about the good casinos that I said that you could add, I confess that I have only used 4 casinos until today, which are:

sportsbet.io = it was the first bookmaker I used and I never had a problem with them, without a doubt they are one of the best sites in the gambling industry, you can see their ann thread here on the forum:

🚀-Sportsbet.io-🚀 - Main sponsor of ?? ?? ??

I don't know what is the minimum withdrawal amount they charge. but I think it would be nice if you added them to your site

Stake.com = it's already listed on your site, but it was my second casino that I used and I use it now, because it has good benefits and has the lowest withdrawals I've ever seen, so without a doubt they are the best casino

Duelbits.com = I also use Duelbits, but I use it sometimes because it has a very high minimum withdrawal amount in my opinion, but in terms of reliability I must say that they are also a good casino that is worth adding to your website

Duelbits.com | Casino & Sportsbook | VIP | Instant withdrawals!|ARGENTINA & AVFC


I have not used other casinos, but I see that they are good casinos because they have been working for a few years without many problems, I am talking about these casinos:

Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑

Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

I don't know what the minimum withdrawal amounts are for these two casinos. but you can add them on your website and other casinos that are here on the forum and are good casinos

[delfastTions]

I completely agree that for the convenience of site users, it is worth making a standard block of information on frequently asked questions and answers to them in such cases.  And of course, gradually build up and unify such information.  But of course so that it doesn't get monstrously big and long and intricate.  This work will further reduce the labor costs of employees for correspondence and the same type of user responses, which, by the way, most users hate and treat them as responses from bots.
 This immediately completely spoils the image of a very good project.

Truly, if the frequently asked questions option is available, the stress on the customer care service for assistance and support would be reduced a bit because of the information contained in the FAQ option. Most visitors who are not patient enough to wait to get or hear from the customer service ends up bad mouthing them. As a result of this they would end up loosing more traffic so I'm sure OP is aware of this so OP would need much funds to sustain the project.

However, from my experience of communicating with support, I must say that the block of standard questions and answers, the creation of which is quite laborious, if it is really informative, it really reduces the load on support staff.  But it is quite difficult to make such a section qualitatively. 
In addition, the standard behavior of a player in the event of a specific question of interest to him will eventually lead to his contacting a real support employee.  This happens to me in 80% of all support calls.  So it is quite possible that we are considering a section that will only partially solve the problem of mass appeals, but it is important simply even for reasons of increasing the prestige and sophistication of the site itself.  In general, a reasonable middle ground is needed here in terms of labor costs and the effectiveness of such a section of the site.

Most cases being reported to customer care service are sometimes very necessary but I believe with the FAQ, some cases have a minimal chances of being ignored  as they are very much important to both parties as be there might be some discoveries within which will need urgent attention. Possibly might be a bug discovered buy a member or otherwise. So it is very much important customer care service is functional and running.

Most times a customer care discoveries are of good effects to the casino because what ever they report to the team would be investigated and results being presented. Thus this result helps the casino to put up with things on their own end to deliver maximum satisfaction to their clients who patronise them.
These are the reasons why a casino should not ignore or abuse the customer care service so as to be on track for good service delivery as it is the major force of the casino.

It is also worth noting that many people initially ignore the section frequently asked by casino customers of standard questions and answers, sorry because it is easier to formulate and ask a question and it just seems wrong for them to look for answers in the standard answers section.  For such people, of course, the support service should answer something very briefly and simply giving references to the standard answer to the user's question.  But at the same time, the support service employee should in no case be irritated, or, moreover, respond rudely to the client. 
This will immediately change the image of the casino to a negative one in the eyes of such a client, who, understandably, does not just ask his question out of idleness, but wants to understand the current situation.  I think that even a little training is needed for support staff in terms of a polite attitude towards any and even rather aggressive clients.

[wiss19]

2. All listed casinos have reviews. Just click on the title, not on button

Okay, I found it and went through, felt you could have added some user experience on the review by actual users. I am not saying it is bad what I saying is that it is not convincing enough. I have another advise for you and that is why not start a small signature campaign here about your platform. In the past there we did saw such campaign by other review platforms. Think about a budget and hire a signature campaign manager.

That's great if they add that so that other users can post what they think about the casino but it might be better if there is way to know that those users are real and are not part of the casino. I only don't know if which you are referring to when you say it wasn't convincing? Did you read some unpleasant reviews despite of you thinking that the casino is a good one?

Well, not all are the same so some may still dislike it. So far I only saw a few gambling review site who avail a campaign in the forum but it was usually the casino is the one who does that. It was still up to them if they will follow your advice and the footsteps of other gambling review sites.

[Wiwo]

I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.

If you don't intend to keep the thread any longer, you can as well lock the thread and thereafter report the thread to moderators for possible deletion but until then, locking the thread will be the best possible option open to you right now since you already stated that you already moved the site to another domain since there is name conflicting with another review platform.

Expecting to see you lock the thread any moment if that is what you have concluded to do.

[o48o]

I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.

And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?

[Johnyz]

I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.

And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?

That’s really confusing especially if the rating doesn’t show how many gamblers review that site.
We actually need more a reputable review site that give fair rate about the casinos but having this issue, i think many will hesitant. Anyway, i hope this site will grow more and have some updates too, try to list more good site as much as possible and get the real reviews from the player itself.

[Hamphser]

I am confused about the rating system. Users can rate it but do those affect the rating in the site or what? BitStarz has 9.5 and zero user reviews.

And how new this site is? It looks good but as there are only 5 casinos and all of them have nearly five stars, it's pointless so far, as everyone needs to know about the bad sites, and maybe some transparency on who does the ranking. Do you take requests what sites should be added or are you already too overloaded with the amount of sites. Also do you want compensation from the casino before releasing the review?

That’s really confusing especially if the rating doesn’t show how many gamblers review that site.
We actually need more a reputable review site that give fair rate about the casinos but having this issue, i think many will hesitant. Anyway, i hope this site will grow more and have some updates too, try to list more good site as much as possible and get the real reviews from the player itself.

Also its not really that well polished and there are some errors in text.
Ex. BitStrarz Casino Highlights
https://jackpotinsight.com/bitstarz-casino-review/

Rating system is indeed confusing and you could really be able to see those stars but not really be able to see Zero reviews which you would really be making out those questions on your mind on how its possible?

In speaking about review sites then there's nothing could beat out;
BTCGOSU
Cryptogamblingbro

This is where should these new review sites should be looking on how a review site should really look like and give out some ideas on how
they would be able to build theirs or else they wont really be getting that much attention.

[khaled0111]

I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.

There is no need to create a new topic. All you have to do is to edit the content of OP. By the way, I see no need for the: "Formely CasinoX" since the link redirects to the new domain!
There are many review websites out here and the competition in this field is very tough. To stand out from your competitors, you need to add as many casinos as you can (you reviewed only five which is not enough). In your reviews, you need to talk about your personal experience and not just some info from casinos' ToS.
Good luck with your project.

[AmoreJaz]

I just found out there is an online casino named Casino-X. I don't want to create confusion, so, from today, I've moved all content to a new domain: https://JackpotInsight.com . Not sure if is ok to keep this thread, if not, maybe an admin can delete it and I will start a fresh one.

There is no need to create a new topic. All you have to do is to edit the content of OP. By the way, I see no need for the: "Formely CasinoX" since the link redirects to the new domain!
There are many review websites out here and the competition in this field is very tough. To stand out from your competitors, you need to add as many casinos as you can (you reviewed only five which is not enough). In your reviews, you need to talk about your personal experience and not just some info from casinos' ToS.
Good luck with your project.

he's still working on the reviews, which is understandable because he is a new player on this field. in time, you will gain patrons so long you are giving honest feedback. and you need to keep updated also with new features and perks offered by the site. there are so many gamblers outside this forum, so he can always attract a player, should always give a valuable insight so players will keep tab on your site.

[CasinoX]

Rating system is indeed confusing and you could really be able to see those stars but not really be able to see Zero reviews which you would really be making out those questions on your mind on how its possible?

Yeah, the review system is a little bit confusing. All published reviews have an initial score, based on editor experience. If there is no external user review, this rating will be shown.

he's still working on the reviews, which is understandable because he is a new player on this field. in time, you will gain patrons so long you are giving honest feedback. and you need to keep updated also with new features and perks offered by the site. there are so many gamblers outside this forum, so he can always attract a player, should always give a valuable insight so players will keep tab on your site.

Yes, this is true. it's work in progress. I cannot put more than one review on each week, because I need and I want to have only decent casinos listed.