PST.NET REVIEW. IT IS A SCAM!! HOW I LOST $27,000 IN BTC. THREAD BELOW

[virasog]

We have already explained why we are obliged to check all the incoming transactions and how it is done, and we would be happy to communicate with you and your lawyer on this matter through our compliance department, as this is where we can provide most up-to-date information about the legal matters for this case. Moreover, any information from your side about how your retirement bonus became 100% high risk crypto will be most welcomed and would help much the investigation process.

Does OP need a lawyer for this case? OP just mistakenly sent his money and he even offer $1000 so you will send it back to the sender's address, there are too many explanations, I don't think OP created a fraud for him to go through this strenuous and depressing process, this will ruin your business and it will cause your bankruptcy because it's an honest mistake that you cannot correct by sending the money back.

Let's see in the coming days if OP will give us a positive update, I hope OP gets his money back, there's no fraud here, it's just an honest mistake.

I am little bit confused here. Have the PST.NET have returned the amount while keeping 591$ with them or did they scam the whole amount $27,500 

Also, OP wanted to sent 120$  , the mistake which any human can make is to put an extra zero or two zero, making it 1200 or 12000$, but how come OP did a big mistake of sending 27500$ 

If they are a scammer, they will never return this amount and believe me this amount (27500$) is not a small one and they will make every excuse in the world to keep this amount with them.

[1715239605]

1715239605

[1715239605]

1715239605

[1715239605]

1715239605

[khaled0111]

I am little bit confused here. Have the PST.NET have returned the amount while keeping 591$ with them or did they scam the whole amount $27,500 

According to OP, pst.net suspended his account and seized the whole amount which is $28k. $27.500 as a pending withdrawal and 591 in his balance.

Also, OP wanted to sent 120$  , the mistake which any human can make is to put an extra zero or two zero, making it 1200 or 12000$, but how come OP did a big mistake of sending 27500$ 

OP wasn't intending to send the money to pst.net. He mistakenly sent it to them because their address was still in his clipboard. His mistake is that he didn't double check the address before sending. But as you said: mistakes happen.

[robelneo]

If they are a scammer, they will never return this amount and believe me this amount (27500$) is not a small one and they will make every excuse in the world to keep this amount with them.

They already have an excuse, I hope OP can address whatever they asked of him and update us on their answer they are holding the funds with their so-called terms and they even involved FINTRAC but OP caught all their lies the amount is small if they are operating a big business but if the people behind this project are small time developers who are just waiting for big deposits to come in to exit then I doubt they will return it, we'll see in the coming days how PSNET will address this issue, PSNET do not have an idea how powerful this forum is they will know in the coming days if they decide to continue their business without returning OP's money.

and we would be happy to communicate with you and your lawyer on this matter through our compliance department, as this is where we can provide most up-to-date information about the legal matters for this case. Moreover, any information from your side about how your retirement bonus became 100% high risk crypto will be most welcomed and would help much the investigation process.

[PSTNET]

Hi everyone

That’s unfortunate the OP encountered all the constraints of fintech sphere whilst using our service.
However, let us answer is detail to what you claim on the website. Let us explain shortly what happened as well. We received a transaction of $27500, and the client made a withdrawal request as soon as money arrived at the account. We even received a proposal to speed up the withdrawal process for an additional reward of $1000 (as you can see on the screenshots provided). The transaction was checked by AML bot which showed 100% high risk score. We had to ask the client to undergo KYC, for which he provided the documents, yet refused to confirm the information he stated during KYC and didn’t provide anything to confirm the connection between the holder of the wallet and himself (as there was none found). No explanation on how his legitimate funds became 100% high risk crypto was provided as well. Let us clarify everything in more detail


First, AMLBOT entity is a completely different company, which we have client-customer connections only. You can check full info about their company on their website https://amlbot.com/, and you have all their legal information available at the header of the AML report. AMLbot is a trusted tool widely used (not only by us) to ensure the safety of crypto transactions, for any questions about how their system works you can address the information on their website. We must note that the AML reports like one you received are issued automatically and cannot be changed nor by us, neither by the company behind the bot itself, so there is no conspiracy to rip you off your money behind that



Second, about the data you see in the report itself: if the transaction has a risk level from 51% to 100%, that means that the tokens are either stolen, used in the Dark Market or the  assets are obtained by fraud and blackmail, Mixers, exchanges and services related to illegal activity (full list of 42 positions can be found in the report you posted). You were asked by our compliance officer to provide the procurement details for the wallet and transaction in question, which you said you have, however decided not to provide. We must note that you were asked three times to confirm the information by e-mail, you decided not to, and that is the only reason behind account suspension. KYC itself is a measure not to restrain the client's ability to use the service, it is a way to protect the clientele who entrust us with the significant amount of their funds from their assets being stolen. In case the client refuses to confirm the identity, the account suspension is the only way to ensure the funds remain intact.


Third, as we are a legal entity certified by FINTRAC of Canada, we’re obliged to conclude an investigation and report all the illegal assets to the FINTRAC. That is stated in our AML Policy in the LEGAL section of our website, here is the link to your reference: https://pst.net/legal/aml. What surprises us is that you and your lawyer decided to base you response on the FAQ section only, without studying our ToS fully. We have concluded our AML investigation and sent all the data to FINTRAC, as mentioned in the email you received from our compliance officer. And we will keep you posted about the investigation there, as we receive the information from our regulation entity.  We hope that meanwhile you’ll refrain from spreading the word with incomplete information about the case and cooperate with the legal entities in providing all the necessary documents. For now we had received nothing from you apart from this thread and multiple tweets and trustpilot reviews from multiple accounts. From what it seems, your first goal is not to prove the legal entities that your funds are legitimate, but to defame our service despite our willingness to cooperate on this matter. Hope that is not so


And last, we have no connection with Hancock Whitney Bank, all the information about our card providers can be found in the disclaimer at the footer of our website.  As you may know, different BIN checker services provide different information about the BINs (like our 3Ds cards shows up as Korean at some). However, as we provide cards with such BINs, we likely know well about which bank provided us with the cards, which we indicate in the disclaimer on our website. As you allegedly addressed the bank in question, we hope you receive the same information from them as well.


Hope we can resolve this issue in an amicable way!


For anyone interested in the case we must remind you that money laundering is a crime punishable by law and that we strongly advise not to do business with such high risk partners to ensure the financial safety of your own.

P.S. Virtual address is a convenient way to settle the office without extra costs for administration matters. That is a convenient way in a modern post-covid world to manage a team and we believe that our corporate office preferences should be of least concern in this matter.

[Maris Lunt]

Hi everyone

That’s unfortunate the OP encountered all the constraints of fintech sphere whilst using our service.
However, let us answer is detail to what you claim on the website. Let us explain shortly what happened as well. We received a transaction of $27500, and the client made a withdrawal request as soon as money arrived at the account. We even received a proposal to speed up the withdrawal process for an additional reward of $1000 (as you can see on the screenshots provided). The transaction was checked by AML bot which showed 100% high risk score. We had to ask the client to undergo KYC, for which he provided the documents, yet refused to confirm the information he stated during KYC and didn’t provide anything to confirm the connection between the holder of the wallet and himself (as there was none found). No explanation on how his legitimate funds became 100% high risk crypto was provided as well. Let us clarify everything in more detail


First, AMLBOT entity is a completely different company, which we have client-customer connections only. You can check full info about their company on their website https://amlbot.com/, and you have all their legal information available at the header of the AML report. AMLbot is a trusted tool widely used (not only by us) to ensure the safety of crypto transactions, for any questions about how their system works you can address the information on their website. We must note that the AML reports like one you received are issued automatically and cannot be changed nor by us, neither by the company behind the bot itself, so there is no conspiracy to rip you off your money behind that



Second, about the data you see in the report itself: if the transaction has a risk level from 51% to 100%, that means that the tokens are either stolen, used in the Dark Market or the  assets are obtained by fraud and blackmail, Mixers, exchanges and services related to illegal activity (full list of 42 positions can be found in the report you posted). You were asked by our compliance officer to provide the procurement details for the wallet and transaction in question, which you said you have, however decided not to provide. We must note that you were asked three times to confirm the information by e-mail, you decided not to, and that is the only reason behind account suspension. KYC itself is a measure not to restrain the client's ability to use the service, it is a way to protect the clientele who entrust us with the significant amount of their funds from their assets being stolen. In case the client refuses to confirm the identity, the account suspension is the only way to ensure the funds remain intact.


Third, as we are a legal entity certified by FINTRAC of Canada, we’re obliged to conclude an investigation and report all the illegal assets to the FINTRAC. That is stated in our AML Policy in the LEGAL section of our website, here is the link to your reference: https://pst.net/legal/aml. What surprises us is that you and your lawyer decided to base you response on the FAQ section only, without studying our ToS fully. We have concluded our AML investigation and sent all the data to FINTRAC, as mentioned in the email you received from our compliance officer. And we will keep you posted about the investigation there, as we receive the information from our regulation entity.  We hope that meanwhile you’ll refrain from spreading the word with incomplete information about the case and cooperate with the legal entities in providing all the necessary documents. For now we had received nothing from you apart from this thread and multiple tweets and trustpilot reviews from multiple accounts. From what it seems, your first goal is not to prove the legal entities that your funds are legitimate, but to defame our service despite our willingness to cooperate on this matter. Hope that is not so


And last, we have no connection with Hancock Whitney Bank, all the information about our card providers can be found in the disclaimer at the footer of our website.  As you may know, different BIN checker services provide different information about the BINs (like our 3Ds cards shows up as Korean at some). However, as we provide cards with such BINs, we likely know well about which bank provided us with the cards, which we indicate in the disclaimer on our website. As you allegedly addressed the bank in question, we hope you receive the same information from them as well.


Hope we can resolve this issue in an amicable way!


For anyone interested in the case we must remind you that money laundering is a crime punishable by law and that we strongly advise not to do business with such high risk partners to ensure the financial safety of your own.

P.S. Virtual address is a convenient way to settle the office without extra costs for administration matters. That is a convenient way in a modern post-covid world to manage a team and we believe that our corporate office preferences should be of least concern in this matter.

It's intriguing that these individuals claim to have reported this transaction to FINTRAC, yet they have not provided any evidence or created a transparent environment to confirm their contact with FINTRAC regarding this transaction. I challenge you to present that proof here.

When they asked for my documents, I promptly completed their KYC process. However, they continued to ask irrelevant questions, which were unnecessary. They should have proceeded with the next step and provided my refund.



I emailed them three days ago, inquiring about the status of my refund, but I have yet to receive a response. I am now ready to supply them with the bank transfer receipt, which includes the bank statement, the receipt of USD conversion to BTC, and the transfer confirmation from my business partner's wallet to mine - "13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo". This further solidifies the legitimacy of the transfer, and therefore they have no grounds to close my account or withhold my funds.



I could upload the screenshots here, but I hesitate as it may come across as unprofessional. Thus, I am awaiting their response so I can forward the documents directly. If I do not receive any further responses, I will upload all evidence here, making it public knowledge that they are indeed scammers.

[dkbit98]

Virtual address is a convenient way to settle the office without extra costs for administration matters. That is a convenient way in a modern post-covid world to manage a team and we believe that our corporate office preferences should be of least concern in this matter.

This is a lame explanations and it has nothing to do with convenience nor with post-showid world because you probably never had any real office even before lockdown stupidity, but I would love for you to prove me wrong.
If you have nothing to hide please post your real team members name and images, since you want to comply with regulations, I am sure revealing this information is simple for you.
I can't wait to see who are the real guys behind pst.net.
  

I emailed them three days ago, inquiring about the status of my refund, but I have yet to receive a response. I am now ready to supply them with the bank transfer receipt, which includes the bank statement, the receipt of USD conversion to BTC, and the transfer confirmation from my business partner's wallet to mine

It does sound suspicious they are ignoring your email, but it was weekend and maybe they had off days in their virtual office(s)...

[stompix]

First, AMLBOT entity is a completely different company, which we have client-customer connections only. You can check full info about their company on their website https://amlbot.com/, and you have all their legal information available at the header of the AML report. AMLbot is a trusted tool widely used (not only by us) to ensure the safety of crypto transactions, for any questions about how their system works you can address the information on their website. We must note that the AML reports like one you received are issued automatically and cannot be changed nor by us, neither by the company behind the bot itself, so there is no conspiracy to rip you off your money behind that

AMLBOT is overpriced garbage that nobody is taking serious.
And I'm going to prove you how crappy that service is right here

OP deposited through tx
https://mempool.space/tx/b1fcd509833b9a6d6ce142806c1bced2780bc6acb4695ce3e8a04a227ba1ad53
From 13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo  to your adress at bc1qrv44amv8myhlug9wuxt4u23aq8jud8he4nm9h4

13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo  was funded in:
https://mempool.space/tx/215a81bd42ea6b060de813222b5fe1a2d600a3c20a13aba7a8e6214eb97b609d
‎0.94691470 BTC from bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf

bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf
is crypto.com wallet
https://glasschain.org/btc/address/bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf

Second, about the data you see in the report itself: if the transaction has a risk level from 51% to 100%, that means that the tokens are either stolen, used in the Dark Market or the  assets are obtained by fraud and blackmail, Mixers, exchanges and services related to illegal activity (full list of 42 positions can be found in the report you posted).

So crypto.com is a mixer, darknet, or an exchange with illegal activity?
Haven't you filed a police report against them since you say funds coming from them are illegal?

Hope we can resolve this issue in an amicable way!

Yup, return the money!

[Maris Lunt]

First, AMLBOT entity is a completely different company, which we have client-customer connections only. You can check full info about their company on their website https://amlbot.com/, and you have all their legal information available at the header of the AML report. AMLbot is a trusted tool widely used (not only by us) to ensure the safety of crypto transactions, for any questions about how their system works you can address the information on their website. We must note that the AML reports like one you received are issued automatically and cannot be changed nor by us, neither by the company behind the bot itself, so there is no conspiracy to rip you off your money behind that

AMLBOT is overpriced garbage that nobody is taking serious.
And I'm going to prove you how crappy that service is right here

OP deposited through tx
https://mempool.space/tx/b1fcd509833b9a6d6ce142806c1bced2780bc6acb4695ce3e8a04a227ba1ad53
From 13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo  to your adress at bc1qrv44amv8myhlug9wuxt4u23aq8jud8he4nm9h4

13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo  was funded in:
https://mempool.space/tx/215a81bd42ea6b060de813222b5fe1a2d600a3c20a13aba7a8e6214eb97b609d
‎0.94691470 BTC from bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf

bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf
is crypto.com wallet
https://glasschain.org/btc/address/bc1q7cyrfmck2ffu2ud3rn5l5a8yv6f0chkp0zpemf

Second, about the data you see in the report itself: if the transaction has a risk level from 51% to 100%, that means that the tokens are either stolen, used in the Dark Market or the  assets are obtained by fraud and blackmail, Mixers, exchanges and services related to illegal activity (full list of 42 positions can be found in the report you posted).

So crypto.com is a mixer, darknet, or an exchange with illegal activity?
Haven't you filed a police report against them since you say funds coming from them are illegal?

Hope we can resolve this issue in an amicable way!

Yup, return the money!

Your analysis is absolutely accurate since the funds indeed originated from Crypto.com, which left me utterly shocked when they attempted to justify the source as being linked to blackmail or illegal activities. These excuses are simply baseless and deceitful. I possess concrete evidence of my Bitcoin purchases, and I am prepared to make it public if I do not receive a refund from this group of individuals, which will irrefutably expose them as scammers.

To make matters worse, they resorted to paying Trustpilot and flagging my reviews to suppress the truth. It appears that they have a pattern of flagging reviews from individuals they have defrauded. Fortunately, BitcoinTalk is a renowned global forum with substantial SEO reach, allowing the whole world to discover the true nature of these individuals and their deceptive practices.

[aioc]

To make matters worse, they resorted to paying Trustpilot and flagging my reviews to suppress the truth. It appears that they have a pattern of flagging reviews from individuals they have defrauded. Fortunately, BitcoinTalk is a renowned global forum with substantial SEO reach, allowing the whole world to discover the true nature of these individuals and their deceptive practices.

That's not going to work here if they flag your review on Trustpilot even though it's valid that they are hiding something, you can change the review or follow up a review if the client is satisfied with how they resolved the issue, it's better to create a flag its not good that you show a willingness to resolve the issue but they keep giving a lot of excuses they want to settle the issue in an amicable way, but what's keeping them from returning the funds since OP shows a willingness to provide everything.
They have to reach out to you and resolve it in the fastest possible way, holding funds obtained legally is not good.

[Maris Lunt]

Hi everyone

That’s unfortunate the OP encountered all the constraints of fintech sphere whilst using our service.
However, let us answer is detail to what you claim on the website. Let us explain shortly what happened as well. We received a transaction of $27500, and the client made a withdrawal request as soon as money arrived at the account. We even received a proposal to speed up the withdrawal process for an additional reward of $1000 (as you can see on the screenshots provided). The transaction was checked by AML bot which showed 100% high risk score. We had to ask the client to undergo KYC, for which he provided the documents, yet refused to confirm the information he stated during KYC and didn’t provide anything to confirm the connection between the holder of the wallet and himself (as there was none found). No explanation on how his legitimate funds became 100% high risk crypto was provided as well. Let us clarify everything in more detail


First, AMLBOT entity is a completely different company, which we have client-customer connections only. You can check full info about their company on their website https://amlbot.com/, and you have all their legal information available at the header of the AML report. AMLbot is a trusted tool widely used (not only by us) to ensure the safety of crypto transactions, for any questions about how their system works you can address the information on their website. We must note that the AML reports like one you received are issued automatically and cannot be changed nor by us, neither by the company behind the bot itself, so there is no conspiracy to rip you off your money behind that



Second, about the data you see in the report itself: if the transaction has a risk level from 51% to 100%, that means that the tokens are either stolen, used in the Dark Market or the  assets are obtained by fraud and blackmail, Mixers, exchanges and services related to illegal activity (full list of 42 positions can be found in the report you posted). You were asked by our compliance officer to provide the procurement details for the wallet and transaction in question, which you said you have, however decided not to provide. We must note that you were asked three times to confirm the information by e-mail, you decided not to, and that is the only reason behind account suspension. KYC itself is a measure not to restrain the client's ability to use the service, it is a way to protect the clientele who entrust us with the significant amount of their funds from their assets being stolen. In case the client refuses to confirm the identity, the account suspension is the only way to ensure the funds remain intact.


Third, as we are a legal entity certified by FINTRAC of Canada, we’re obliged to conclude an investigation and report all the illegal assets to the FINTRAC. That is stated in our AML Policy in the LEGAL section of our website, here is the link to your reference: https://pst.net/legal/aml. What surprises us is that you and your lawyer decided to base you response on the FAQ section only, without studying our ToS fully. We have concluded our AML investigation and sent all the data to FINTRAC, as mentioned in the email you received from our compliance officer. And we will keep you posted about the investigation there, as we receive the information from our regulation entity.  We hope that meanwhile you’ll refrain from spreading the word with incomplete information about the case and cooperate with the legal entities in providing all the necessary documents. For now we had received nothing from you apart from this thread and multiple tweets and trustpilot reviews from multiple accounts. From what it seems, your first goal is not to prove the legal entities that your funds are legitimate, but to defame our service despite our willingness to cooperate on this matter. Hope that is not so


And last, we have no connection with Hancock Whitney Bank, all the information about our card providers can be found in the disclaimer at the footer of our website.  As you may know, different BIN checker services provide different information about the BINs (like our 3Ds cards shows up as Korean at some). However, as we provide cards with such BINs, we likely know well about which bank provided us with the cards, which we indicate in the disclaimer on our website. As you allegedly addressed the bank in question, we hope you receive the same information from them as well.


Hope we can resolve this issue in an amicable way!


For anyone interested in the case we must remind you that money laundering is a crime punishable by law and that we strongly advise not to do business with such high risk partners to ensure the financial safety of your own.

P.S. Virtual address is a convenient way to settle the office without extra costs for administration matters. That is a convenient way in a modern post-covid world to manage a team and we believe that our corporate office preferences should be of least concern in this matter.

It's intriguing that these individuals claim to have reported this transaction to FINTRAC, yet they have not provided any evidence or created a transparent environment to confirm their contact with FINTRAC regarding this transaction. I challenge you to present that proof here.

When they asked for my documents, I promptly completed their KYC process. However, they continued to ask irrelevant questions, which were unnecessary. They should have proceeded with the next step and provided my refund.



I emailed them three days ago, inquiring about the status of my refund, but I have yet to receive a response. I am now ready to supply them with the bank transfer receipt, which includes the bank statement, the receipt of USD conversion to BTC, and the transfer confirmation from my business partner's wallet to mine - "13oLHMtTujmYBVsKJEgY4nzxKiWSB4qEWo". This further solidifies the legitimacy of the transfer, and therefore they have no grounds to close my account or withhold my funds.



I could upload the screenshots here, but I hesitate as it may come across as unprofessional. Thus, I am awaiting their response so I can forward the documents directly. If I do not receive any further responses, I will upload all evidence here, making it public knowledge that they are indeed scammers.

I wanted to give you all an update. It's been a whole day since I last emailed them, and they haven't replied. Today also makes it two weeks since they took my money, and despite the ultimatum they set to pay me, I haven't received any money back. It's clear for everyone to see that they are scammers!


They deleted another of my review today.


These are reviews from other people they scammed.

[Maris Lunt]

Just an Update. It has been 3 days and there is no response from PST.NET! Terrible scam.

[dkbit98]

Your analysis is absolutely accurate since the funds indeed originated from Crypto.com, which left me utterly shocked when they attempted to justify the source as being linked to blackmail or illegal activities. These excuses are simply baseless and deceitful. I possess concrete evidence of my Bitcoin purchases, and I am prepared to make it public if I do not receive a refund from this group of individuals, which will irrefutably expose them as scammers.

To make matters worse, they resorted to paying Trustpilot and flagging my reviews to suppress the truth. It appears that they have a pattern of flagging reviews from individuals they have defrauded. Fortunately, BitcoinTalk is a renowned global forum with substantial SEO reach, allowing the whole world to discover the true nature of these individuals and their deceptive practices.

After seeing latest address/transaction investigation research posted by stompix I am not 100% sure they are scamming liars who stole your coins.
There is still time for them to return money and unlock your account in next few days, and I am still waiting to see real images from their team.

I hope everything works out in the end, but meanwhile please go ahead and create a flag (second or third option) against PST.net and I will support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=3548015

[Maris Lunt]

Your analysis is absolutely accurate since the funds indeed originated from Crypto.com, which left me utterly shocked when they attempted to justify the source as being linked to blackmail or illegal activities. These excuses are simply baseless and deceitful. I possess concrete evidence of my Bitcoin purchases, and I am prepared to make it public if I do not receive a refund from this group of individuals, which will irrefutably expose them as scammers.

To make matters worse, they resorted to paying Trustpilot and flagging my reviews to suppress the truth. It appears that they have a pattern of flagging reviews from individuals they have defrauded. Fortunately, BitcoinTalk is a renowned global forum with substantial SEO reach, allowing the whole world to discover the true nature of these individuals and their deceptive practices.

After seeing latest address/transaction investigation research posted by stompix I am not 100% sure they are scamming liars who stole your coins.
There is still time for them to return money and unlock your account in next few days, and I am still waiting to see real images from their team.

I hope everything works out in the end, but meanwhile please go ahead and create a flag (second or third option) against PST.net and I will support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=3548015

I keep getting an error message.

[robelneo]

Your analysis is absolutely accurate since the funds indeed originated from Crypto.com, which left me utterly shocked when they attempted to justify the source as being linked to blackmail or illegal activities. These excuses are simply baseless and deceitful. I possess concrete evidence of my Bitcoin purchases, and I am prepared to make it public if I do not receive a refund from this group of individuals, which will irrefutably expose them as scammers.

To make matters worse, they resorted to paying Trustpilot and flagging my reviews to suppress the truth. It appears that they have a pattern of flagging reviews from individuals they have defrauded. Fortunately, BitcoinTalk is a renowned global forum with substantial SEO reach, allowing the whole world to discover the true nature of these individuals and their deceptive practices.

After seeing latest address/transaction investigation research posted by stompix I am not 100% sure they are scamming liars who stole your coins.
There is still time for them to return money and unlock your account in next few days, and I am still waiting to see real images from their team.

I hope everything works out in the end, but meanwhile please go ahead and create a flag (second or third option) against PST.net and I will support it:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=3548015

I keep getting an error message.

If what you mean is the link to a topic that you can use to create a flag use this topic link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5461922.0

You have to brace yourself it seems with all the pieces of evidence here, their insistence on their TOS and delaying there's a possibility that they will keep your money and create more lies to justify their action.

This will be a big warning to people not to use their service and it will only be taken down if they return the money.

[dkbit98]

I keep getting an error message.

Reason for this error is because you didn't enter correct link of this thread and fill the empty field in flag form.
Link of this topic is used to help people find more information when they click on flag against pst.net profile, and it would redirect them here.
Are there any news and updates regarding your situation?

[Maris Lunt]

I keep getting an error message.

Reason for this error is because you didn't enter correct link of this thread and fill the empty field in flag form.
Link of this topic is used to help people find more information when they click on flag against pst.net profile, and it would redirect them here.
Are there any news and updates regarding your situation?

It's been eight days, and I haven't received any response to my emails. Ever since I informed them that I'll be providing a bank statement showing how the BTC was purchased, along with screenshots depicting the transfer from crypto.com to my wallet. It seems they might be maintaining their stance that they are scammers.

[bitbollo]

...

@Maris Lunt
since you're talking about a decent sum, at this point, the only way to expedite the receipt of these funds is to file a lawsuit through a third party or by using your own attorney.
don't wait any longer, just evaluate the next steps.

[robelneo]

...

@Maris Lunt
since you're talking about a decent sum, at this point, the only way to expedite the receipt of these funds is to file a lawsuit through a third party or by using your own attorney.
don't wait any longer, just evaluate the next steps.

I support that, we may never see him here in Bitcointalk again, they underestimate the power of Bitcointalk as a reference on the internet they are going to lose potential clients, you can file a lawsuit you can ask to recover your funds and if possible you can ask for damages and attorney fees, ask your attorney if all of these are possible.
Name:   PSTNET
Date Registered:   April 14, 2023, 02:15:21 PM
Last Active:   August 08, 2023, 04:44:24 PM

[Maris Lunt]

...

@Maris Lunt
since you're talking about a decent sum, at this point, the only way to expedite the receipt of these funds is to file a lawsuit through a third party or by using your own attorney.
don't wait any longer, just evaluate the next steps.

I support that, we may never see him here in Bitcointalk again, they underestimate the power of Bitcointalk as a reference on the internet they are going to lose potential clients, you can file a lawsuit you can ask to recover your funds and if possible you can ask for damages and attorney fees, ask your attorney if all of these are possible.
Name:   PSTNET
Date Registered:   April 14, 2023, 02:15:21 PM
Last Active:   August 08, 2023, 04:44:24 PM

I am in the process of initiating a lawsuit against them, but I am concerned that there might not be real individuals involved, as it appears they are all concealing themselves in Russia.

[robelneo]

I am in the process of initiating a lawsuit against them, but I am concerned that there might not be real individuals involved, as it appears they are all concealing themselves in Russia.

You can also include in your action reporting to their domain registrar and host
they are hosted on GoDaddy.
https://www.whois.com/whois/pst.net

Domain:pst.net
Registrar:GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered On:2000-02-27
Expires On:2029-02-27
Updated On:2023-04-10

And you can file an abuse report here, just be ready with all your evidence and reports
https://gcd.com/legal/abuse/

Checking the Trust Summary for PSTNET you have not yet created a flag so you proceed to create and I'm sure many will support the flag.