Failed to submit review and also did not refund the payment.

[examplens]

I dont even oppose the flag except
the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

Do you really come here to complain about inaccurate feedback because of "+"?
At the same time, I didn't see that you gave any plan for paying off the debt.

Thanks for the Judgement I wish you guys were this engaged or enthusiastic back when I was  ... well that.

Are you being sarcastic here or what?

[1715251870]

1715251870

[1715251870]

1715251870

[hugeblack]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

I searched in the comments of the trust and found that I was the only one who used the wording of 0.003+. the + sign after the number indicates that there is an additional task that was supposed to be done for that amount.

In general, I reviewed the response before editing, and this line was not present, so I think that you are trying to find a moral justification for your scam. I just hope you remember that money doesn't grow on trees and give back money, trust can be earned and it will generate more money instead of quick 0.003 BTC.

[holydarkness]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+

(a single character ... this reminded me of that time when I first engaged in a convo with Royse)

I searched in the comments of the trust and found that I was the only one who used the wording of 0.003+. the + sign after the number indicates that there is an additional task that was supposed to be done for that amount.

In general, I reviewed the response before editing, and this line was not present, so I think that you are trying to find a moral justification for your scam. I just hope you remember that money doesn't grow on trees and give back money, trust can be earned and it will generate more money instead of quick 0.003 BTC.

Umm... a bit correction, if I may? No, you're not alone. Royse also leave a feedback with 0.003+

[Adbitco]

I was just wondering why would a Sr. Member will scam a 90-100$ amount  

This account may have an army of alt accounts, or this account may have been sold/hacked^[1]. I am not good at finding alt accounts, but if a topic was created about it, we may find an alt account in one of the active campaigns and be able to recover your money.

I have tagged jamyr red and I support the flag. At least if he has no time for the review, he can send the money back. To send bitcoin from a wallet takes just little time.

I'm not going to delete it and will change it into natural trust it if it gets resolved but I do remember coming across this account username somewhere.

Flag supported

[1]

7/2/2020 6:47:24 PM   password reset via email
7/25/2020 9:08:58 AM   password reset via email
12/30/2020 10:58:34 AM   password reset via secret question
12/30/2020 10:58:48 AM   password reset via secret question

I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.

[Gladitorcomeback]

the trust reference feedback was inaccurate.
It says 0.003+  

Royse has explained you and i hope you have no words after that but still if you are unhappy with plus sign then don't worry, you just pay 0.003 Btc to which you scammed and i will pay + from your side. are you agree now?

If you are real owner of this account then still you have 37$ in your wallet and you should pay back because you are excusing that you have no fund..

current Fund in your wallets:
0x84c5ad0de7c8327109f79a98a3ddced8879bf15e : 37$ worth of Eth

used this address in 2020 for [BOUNTY] Emporium.Finance bounty.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5291652.msg55704033#msg55704033

I think lovesmayfamilis and some others are the proper person who may look into that account to find out if there is alt because receiving payment without completing task is something very bad especially when the said user couldn't meet up with the review why not he refund his or her money as clearly stated. Lastly for a user to be comfortably relaxed without making moved to refunds show that there are lots of Alt maybe he has sacrifice to lose the account without thinking twice.

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

[Ultegra134]

What makes it a lot more difficult than it already is, is that $78 is almost 1/4(sometimes even more than 1/4) of the total average monthly salary here in the Philippines.

If I'd be given the opportunity to earn a week's worth of salary in a short amount of time, I'd take it!
I don't get it: if 0.003 Bitcoin is worth so much you can't even pay it back, wasting the opportunity to earn it is just stupid.

Certainly, even though I'm not situated in a third-world country as others mentioned, $80 for a job that would require me to work for 2-3 hours at most is a bargain. I didn't make that amount of money in two days when I was working, let alone now that I'm practically unemployed. The accused had a simple job that he agreed to do, and assuming that he didn't have the time, he should have turned down the offer and returned the money immediately. It's astonishing that such opportunities do not come often on the forum; I myself hadn't noticed it, because if I did, I'd be willing to participate. On top of that, a successful review would open up more opportunities in the future; how can someone not see this?

And I don't understand—is the accused being ironic now? What is this reply, "Bye for now"? I don't get it; is he implying that he's not going to return the money after apologizing in the first place? I'm not against charging interest, since that's how a loan would act, but in the meantime, it's of outmost importance for even the starting 0.003 BTC to be returned.

[light_warrior]

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.

jamyr
piso456

Proof

So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.

3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK

The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.

1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

This other address is a blockchain.info address.

[ Archive ]

Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---

---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----

[ Archive ]

[Ultegra134]

Yes this is right choice and all big scam buster (Lovemyfamilis, Nutildah and light_warrior) could easily expose but problem is that without strong evidence no one can be mark alt of this Jamyr.

At least one alt this jamyr has. I think that's pretty strong evidence that these two accounts are connected.

jamyr
piso456

Proof

So now I found out that staking an address here, is one of the important things member should do.

3KspKgdjq8wqH2ia173EhboRHugk436gjK

The above address is my main address, it is a coins.ph wallet.

1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

This other address is a blockchain.info address.

[ Archive ]

Address:
1JAMYRoaPiqK4PStwMpKyWH3S5x6DvHRM

---Message:
This is jamyr, I have locked myself out of bitcointalk. Please help me unlock it.
end Message---

---signature:
G7RhyE1X3c6x/tJGB+gSWBl+tlst+jrDKpBCjuh6SGmNNV5IwV4f4KzE+UaSJJ4zuTZQg3TqGalj2uorKIJcEfc=
end signature----

[ Archive ]

The account does belong to user Jamyr; however, in the thread you quoted, I'm understanding that he's trying to recover his account, which for some reason he has lost access to. Moreover, this alt account hasn't been used since November 2022, but it seems that the two accounts were used simultaneously at some point. It's intriguing that the alt account was created two months after the account named "Jamyr", so I wouldn't rule out the possibility of him purchasing the account after some time. However, there's no evidence to back up such a statement.