Anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency.

[Crypt0Gore]

It's at owners risk, anonymity isn't the only thing that casinos take away from Bitcoin owners, moving your Bitcoin from your wallet to casinos wallet makes you a centralized puppet too, but there is nothing we can do here, everyone is entitled to how they use their Bitcoin anyway even if it's the most decentralized digital currency till date, but since Bitcoin gives that freedom so its left for users to do as they like with their Bitcoin.

For KYC requirements, we have discussed this so many times on this forum already, reputable online casinos need your KYC information to keep saving their business from the centralized penalties that gave them access to keep running, it's not about stealing users data, sigh! It's boring to keep having this discussion over again.

You need to run your own casino without KYC verification first to prove that it's not needed, even those few casinos that started with no KYC requirement end up asking now because they are getting more popular and successful, they don't want to face panel.

[Docnaster]

Faster and more secure transactions: Crypto transactions are processed much faster than traditional bank transfers, and they are also more secure.
  
Anonymity: Crypto casinos allow players to remain anonymous, which is appealing to some players.
  
Wider variety of games: Crypto casinos offer a wider variety of games than traditional online casinos.
  
More generous bonuses: Crypto casinos often offer more generous bonuses than traditional online casinos.

https://indiacsr.in/what-is-a-crypto-casino-meaning-advantages-and-potential-risks-explained/

The above mentioned 3 are still advantages of the cryptocurrency casinos . We all can agree that they offer wider range of bonuses and this is understandable that they don't pay for rent and other operational charges. And also some natural disasters that affect traditional casinos do not affect cryptocurrency casinos.

You are not wrong, but there are still casinos that requires no KYC, more of them will later request there customers for KYC verification. Nearly all the crypto gambling sites of today are centralized. Although some are claiming to be web3 which you can connect your noncustodial wallet to, which are not centralized. But as for centralized gambling sites, we should not think of them as no KYC gambling sites, there are still few that require no KYC though for low amount withdrawal.

It is true that many cryptocurrency casinos are centralized and almost accepting KYC as compulsory but there are still few which are very much anonymous but the government is seriously after them.

[Yatsan]

Since this is regarding anonymity, there are still gambling platfprms which does not require KYC procedures as we all know. And technically  anonymity is still there 'coz your information would be between you and the platform alone and still not with publicity.

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Leave the casinos requiring KYC for each of their users as privacy is no longer maintained. The reason we choose their casino to play on the consideration of the anonymity provided to each player will be anonymous. If KYC has been implemented, then they have pushed away every player who wants privacy to be maintained and the next option is to look for another crypto casino that does not enforce KYC even though later every crypto casino operating in the territory of a legal country will implement KYC for reasons of obtaining licenses and so on.

Sort of. But we are free to move away as well if such thing does not fit for us. Some players are fine with it and I'm one of those gamblers. My reason? I'd rather comply with sharing some of my information to my trusted platform than to risk being scammed by other gambling sites who's compensation is to just not require KYC. I've been playing for years and fortunately, nothing bad happened with my identity. Also, it has benefits as well such as against money laundering and limitation for  people under age 18 to access this industry.

[maydna]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Leave the casinos requiring KYC for each of their users as privacy is no longer maintained. The reason we choose their casino to play on the consideration of the anonymity provided to each player will be anonymous. If KYC has been implemented, then they have pushed away every player who wants privacy to be maintained and the next option is to look for another crypto casino that does not enforce KYC even though later every crypto casino operating in the territory of a legal country will implement KYC for reasons of obtaining licenses and so on.

In the future, all casinos will ask their users to do KYC because of government interference. And when that happens, we won't be able to play gambling at crypto casinos without doing KYC. But hopefully, at that time, there will still be casinos that allow their users not to do KYC and don't make KYC an obligation that all gamblers must fulfil. And only gamblers who use the money over the limits set by the casino should do KYC. And we should be grateful that several trusted casinos still do not implement KYC on all of their members, especially members who only play gambling with small money. Hence, the casinos still allow us to play gambling at the casino.

[slapper]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Leave the casinos requiring KYC for each of their users as privacy is no longer maintained. The reason we choose their casino to play on the consideration of the anonymity provided to each player will be anonymous. If KYC has been implemented, then they have pushed away every player who wants privacy to be maintained and the next option is to look for another crypto casino that does not enforce KYC even though later every crypto casino operating in the territory of a legal country will implement KYC for reasons of obtaining licenses and so on.

In the future, all casinos will ask their users to do KYC because of government interference. And when that happens, we won't be able to play gambling at crypto casinos without doing KYC. But hopefully, at that time, there will still be casinos that allow their users not to do KYC and don't make KYC an obligation that all gamblers must fulfil. And only gamblers who use the money over the limits set by the casino should do KYC. And we should be grateful that several trusted casinos still do not implement KYC on all of their members, especially members who only play gambling with small money. Hence, the casinos still allow us to play gambling at the casino.

KYC, KYC and KYC  is the melody played in casinos. Additionally, governments are tapping their feet to the cadence. However, this is not the case for all casinos, merely a minority, though perhaps more. Consequently, it is somewhat perplexing, as if one were attempting to follow a recipe without all of the necessary ingredients

Some casinos are acceptable for low-stakes wagering. They are like, "No KYC here, pal." That is thoughtful of them. Then, however, big money players may have to perform the KYC dance, which is less cool, but still cool in a less cool manner

Consequently, where do we stand? Gambling, or not gambling, KYC? It's a bit like a jigsaw puzzle, except the pieces are made of jello and the box has no image. But fine, gamble if you want, or don't; the casinos are still there, for now

[Lanatsa]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Leave the casinos requiring KYC for each of their users as privacy is no longer maintained. The reason we choose their casino to play on the consideration of the anonymity provided to each player will be anonymous. If KYC has been implemented, then they have pushed away every player who wants privacy to be maintained and the next option is to look for another crypto casino that does not enforce KYC even though later every crypto casino operating in the territory of a legal country will implement KYC for reasons of obtaining licenses and so on.

In the future, all casinos will ask their users to do KYC because of government interference. And when that happens, we won't be able to play gambling at crypto casinos without doing KYC. But hopefully, at that time, there will still be casinos that allow their users not to do KYC and don't make KYC an obligation that all gamblers must fulfil. And only gamblers who use the money over the limits set by the casino should do KYC. And we should be grateful that several trusted casinos still do not implement KYC on all of their members, especially members who only play gambling with small money. Hence, the casinos still allow us to play gambling at the casino.

KYC, KYC and KYC  is the melody played in casinos. Additionally, governments are tapping their feet to the cadence. However, this is not the case for all casinos, merely a minority, though perhaps more. Consequently, it is somewhat perplexing, as if one were attempting to follow a recipe without all of the necessary ingredients

Some casinos are acceptable for low-stakes wagering. They are like, "No KYC here, pal." That is thoughtful of them. Then, however, big money players may have to perform the KYC dance, which is less cool, but still cool in a less cool manner

Consequently, where do we stand? Gambling, or not gambling, KYC? It's a bit like a jigsaw puzzle, except the pieces are made of jello and the box has no image. But fine, gamble if you want, or don't; the casinos are still there, for now

Whether we do like it or not then they would definitely be making out those kind of alterations when it comes into their decisions and we us users or gamblers would neither be complying or not on what they have set out. Yes, there are still a few which we could still able to play without needing those KYC but these would really be only into us small fries but on the time that you are already that making up huge deposits or big bets then this is where things becomes messy as if these platforms would really be starting on asking out those verifications yet not shocking since they are centralized platforms or regulated ones in the first place.

They might be offering those non kyc at first but it would eventually make out those changes on certain conditions.If this one doesnt suits out your taste then better not to play at all.
Sooner or later then most of them would really be going in line with government rules and conditions when it comes to these kind of approach. Its true that there are still other options that we could
deal with but in my part then i dont see myself on having a problem with this since i dont really make out huge deposits or simply not a huge amount gambler.

[poodle63]

KYC, KYC and KYC  is the melody played in casinos. Additionally, governments are tapping their feet to the cadence. However, this is not the case for all casinos, merely a minority, though perhaps more. Consequently, it is somewhat perplexing, as if one were attempting to follow a recipe without all of the necessary ingredients

KYC is not a mandatory if governement was not pushing casino to be compliant with regulation. Government was the strongest entity that exist and controlling everything.

Some casinos are acceptable for low-stakes wagering. They are like, "No KYC here, pal." That is thoughtful of them. Then, however, big money players may have to perform the KYC dance, which is less cool, but still cool in a less cool manner

Small money rarely related to the money laundering while the big amounts potentially related to the money laundering. There's nothing wrong in implementing KYC to comply with the regulation. I do understand KYC is not a cool thing for you.

[QueenVera]

I was reading and I saw something that I would have agreed with before, but not anymore because of how much things have changed in the crypto gambling.

Faster and more secure transactions: Crypto transactions are processed much faster than traditional bank transfers, and they are also more secure.
   
Anonymity: Crypto casinos allow players to remain anonymous, which is appealing to some players.
   
Wider variety of games: Crypto casinos offer a wider variety of games than traditional online casinos.
   
More generous bonuses: Crypto casinos often offer more generous bonuses than traditional online casinos.

https://indiacsr.in/what-is-a-crypto-casino-meaning-advantages-and-potential-risks-explained/

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Am i wrong to think that this information on the internet needs to be updated.

To my own understanding i think the implementations of the kyc system is the cause of this is a compulsory process required by most platform to provide a safe and secured space thereby requesting for some documents of their customers, before now the profiles of customers have been annoynimous making it easier for people to carry out fradulent activities and go free without any trace, their are people who violate the policies of a platform that deserved punishment like jail term but wasn't possible due to annoynimity but currently the cryptocasino through the help of blockchain technology have made it safer and easier to track down culprits and serve them justice.
 However there are still some casino that has not adopted this syestem due to the fear of losing numerous customers but i think with time they'll have to option but to adopt it due to the pressure that would be mounted on them by the government to carry out the implementation of the KYC or risk losing their businesses

[Kakmakr]

You need to look closely into the "jump start" phase of most of these NO KYC casinos that are entering the gambling scene. They will enter the market with big promises of "NO KYC" requirements, but as soon as they reach their target for users, they forget those promises and they start asking for KYC verification.

They know it will eventually happen, when they grow big enough to attract the attention of the regulators, but they still use that tactic. Just go back to all the "BIG" Crypto currency casinos that started out with "NO KYC" requirements and see where they are now. (Freebitco.in being one of them)  

[Outhue]

There is no real decentralized online gambling platform, many people do not understand that once your Bitcoin leaves your wallet and is sent out to any online casino it's not more secured, every casinos are centralized and even if one doesn't ask you for KYC verification it still doesn't make such gambling platform decentralized.

I think NO KYC requirements from new online casinos are a strategy of finding many customers as soon as possible, they know it will attract some gamblers who don't like passing KYC for some reasons, but once they grow better and becoming more popular they will give out bad news that they have no choice but to compulsory KYC verifications.

If you are using a NO KYC casino right now, enjoy it while it last but I can promise you that things aren't going to stay the same for long.

[benalexis12]

It seems that only a few casinos in the crypto space are implementing no KYC. Since most of them are gamblers, they accept to pass KYC to casinos when withdrawing money won in gambling. That means most gamblers now accept kyc in short, right?
Itp I also just noticed and it is happening in the reality today in this field industry, and probably because of the issues that we are hearing about that the money can't be released and to be able to withdraw you have to pass a kyc which appears that there is no privacy in reality. .

[lienfaye]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Am i wrong to think that this information on the internet needs to be updated.

You're not wrong because that's really true. If the casino is regulated by the Government, sooner or later they will ask kyc to their gamblers. So those casinos claiming their site has "No Kyc" is just using it to attract many gamblers to play on their site. But after some time, as a centralized casino they still need to verify the identity of their gamblers as part of compliance to the regulation.

Though there's still casinos existing as decentralized, majority are now licensed. So if you play on these sites expect that they will ask kyc at anytime especially if you're a whale gambler.

[piebeyb]

There is no real decentralized online gambling platform, many people do not understand that once your Bitcoin leaves your wallet and is sent out to any online casino it's not more secured, every casinos are centralized and even if one doesn't ask you for KYC verification it still doesn't make such gambling platform decentralized.

I think NO KYC requirements from new online casinos are a strategy of finding many customers as soon as possible, they know it will attract some gamblers who don't like passing KYC for some reasons, but once they grow better and becoming more popular they will give out bad news that they have no choice but to compulsory KYC verifications.

If you are using a NO KYC casino right now, enjoy it while it last but I can promise you that things aren't going to stay the same for long.

yes in fact a lot of decentralized sites released free sites without KYC, they didn't really last long most of them disappeared and went bankrupt out of the business eventually because not everyone nowadays feels safe with casinos that don't have licenses let alone KYC regulations, although many oppose KYC for undermining anonymity in crypto gambling.

The new casino marketing strategy is always like that to attract people who hate the KYC regulations that exist in crypto casinos nowadays, but not many play and register there, because I often see them creating ANN threads on this forum and finally they leave, after all why worry about KYC many big sites don't require KYC for bets of hundreds to thousands of dollars as long as they don't play foul and try to break casino restrictions. just that

[peter0425]

I was reading and I saw something that I would have agreed with before, but not anymore because of how much things have changed in the crypto gambling.

Faster and more secure transactions: Crypto transactions are processed much faster than traditional bank transfers, and they are also more secure.
  
Anonymity: Crypto casinos allow players to remain anonymous, which is appealing to some players.
  
Wider variety of games: Crypto casinos offer a wider variety of games than traditional online casinos.
  
More generous bonuses: Crypto casinos often offer more generous bonuses than traditional online casinos.

https://indiacsr.in/what-is-a-crypto-casino-meaning-advantages-and-potential-risks-explained/

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Am i wrong to think that this information on the internet needs to be updated.

of course you are correct mate , nowadays majority of casinos are asking for KYC and I think that is compliance to the countries restrictions and laws that brings them no choice to implement.
but also there are some casino that maintain their "NO KYC"  rules and that savor other gamblers that wanted to maintain their anonymity .
but why not comply and maintain anonymous when you can gamble safer and enjoying in those who asks KYC?
I'm not saying that all KYC requiring sites are legit but at least  we have proven already that there are more legit that we have been seeing in bitcointalk that asks the Know Your Client rules.

[yudi09]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Leave the casinos requiring KYC for each of their users as privacy is no longer maintained. The reason we choose their casino to play on the consideration of the anonymity provided to each player will be anonymous. If KYC has been implemented, then they have pushed away every player who wants privacy to be maintained and the next option is to look for another crypto casino that does not enforce KYC even though later every crypto casino operating in the territory of a legal country will implement KYC for reasons of obtaining licenses and so on.

Sort of. But we are free to move away as well if such thing does not fit for us. Some players are fine with it and I'm one of those gamblers. My reason? I'd rather comply with sharing some of my information to my trusted platform than to risk being scammed by other gambling sites who's compensation is to just not require KYC.

It's up to the player's personal decision to stick with casinos that change anonymity or look for other casinos that don't require KYC on players.
The purpose behind implementing KYC in a casino is not always negative. But every player feels it's natural to be careful with the identity they give out. I admit that by imposing KYC on players there is a positive side that will be obtained when players have problems withdrawing money and other problems that occur. I think there are players who are comfortable with that.
We are also aware that there will come a time when every casino will enforce KYC for the purpose of obtaining a license. That's the final choice that the company is forced to make.

I've been playing for years and fortunately, nothing bad happened with my identity. Also, it has benefits as well such as against money laundering and limitation for  people under age 18 to access this industry.

Hope everything will be fine.
We and all the players who play in casinos like that hope to be far from the risk of bad impacts.

[Haunebu]

You are partially right in this case op. Most crypto gambling sites these days are enforcing KYC in some way or another due to regulatory pressure, but there are still a couple of sites out there that don't request any form of KYC.

This is why it is still possible to gamble anonymously though it's gotten a lot harder when compared to before.

[maydna]

~snip~

KYC, KYC and KYC  is the melody played in casinos. Additionally, governments are tapping their feet to the cadence. However, this is not the case for all casinos, merely a minority, though perhaps more. Consequently, it is somewhat perplexing, as if one were attempting to follow a recipe without all of the necessary ingredients

Some casinos are acceptable for low-stakes wagering. They are like, "No KYC here, pal." That is thoughtful of them. Then, however, big money players may have to perform the KYC dance, which is less cool, but still cool in a less cool manner

Consequently, where do we stand? Gambling, or not gambling, KYC? It's a bit like a jigsaw puzzle, except the pieces are made of jello and the box has no image. But fine, gamble if you want, or don't; the casinos are still there, for now

Yes, KYC will become a must for every gambler playing in crypto casinos, and we have to accept it even if we don't like it. The current situation has changed, and with the government's intervention, we, as crypto gamblers, cannot do much. We can only follow the rules of the casino, and if we can't accept them, we can look for other crypto casinos.

But we still have crypto casinos allowing us to gamble with small stakes and deposits. And so that we don't get asked to do KYC by the casino, we have to keep the bet small because if we use big bets or deposit big money, there is a possibility that we will be asked to do KYC. But that's up to each person.

[Rabata]

Because of KYC verification which is now done by most crypto casino to know the people who gamble on their casino, I think anonymity is no longer a benefit of gambling with cryptocurrency in crypto casino.

Earlier gambling platforms did not require KYC. As a result, a gambler could easily keep him anonymous and gamble. But those benefits are slowly shrinking. Most of the gambling platforms now require KYC. Be sure to complete KYC on all sites that are reliable. Moreover, casino platforms emphasize on doing KYC directly. As a result, if someone is unwilling to do KYC, he may face a big problem at any time. I think your words have enough logic in that respect. There are still some casino platforms that do not require KYC. But in the future, those platforms may compel to do KYC.

[Blitzboy]

~snip~

KYC, KYC and KYC  is the melody played in casinos. Additionally, governments are tapping their feet to the cadence. However, this is not the case for all casinos, merely a minority, though perhaps more. Consequently, it is somewhat perplexing, as if one were attempting to follow a recipe without all of the necessary ingredients

Some casinos are acceptable for low-stakes wagering. They are like, "No KYC here, pal." That is thoughtful of them. Then, however, big money players may have to perform the KYC dance, which is less cool, but still cool in a less cool manner

Consequently, where do we stand? Gambling, or not gambling, KYC? It's a bit like a jigsaw puzzle, except the pieces are made of jello and the box has no image. But fine, gamble if you want, or don't; the casinos are still there, for now

Yes, KYC will become a must for every gambler playing in crypto casinos, and we have to accept it even if we don't like it. The current situation has changed, and with the government's intervention, we, as crypto gamblers, cannot do much. We can only follow the rules of the casino, and if we can't accept them, we can look for other crypto casinos.

But we still have crypto casinos allowing us to gamble with small stakes and deposits. And so that we don't get asked to do KYC by the casino, we have to keep the bet small because if we use big bets or deposit big money, there is a possibility that we will be asked to do KYC. But that's up to each person.

It is similar to a requirement, something that we must complete. As you stated, the entire KYC requirement is now a necessity that cannot be avoided. However, I must add that the entire concept of placing small bets to evade KYC is similar to avoiding something that already exists. However, it is similar to averting in a manner that does not completely avoid it. KYC is coming, and it may not matter whether you make modest or large wagers in the end. I say this not to discourage you, but to encourage you to recognize that KYC is a requirement that we must embrace. It resembles a must that is even more essential than other musts.

[Docnaster]

You are partially right in this case op. Most crypto gambling sites these days are enforcing KYC in some way or another due to regulatory pressure, but there are still a couple of sites out there that don't request any form of KYC.

This is why it is still possible to gamble anonymously though it's gotten a lot harder when compared to before.

Almost all the crypto gambling companies are accepting KYC. It is difficult to see a truly non kyf casino.
Many people get scammed in the process of searching for a non kyc gambling.
Gradually everyone is buying into the KYC ideology apart from highly privacy people.
It is not only in the hands of the gambling companies to determine if they will go for kyf or not, but is also determined by the governments who licenced them to operate with certain conditions.