[FREE RAFFLE] - Wallet Keep Key! The number of slots is limited!

[UniJoin]

We had several questions that we wanted to get reasonable answers to and after consulting with some users, we decided to arrange a raffle and thereby get answers. This giveaway was created with the support of icopress, he helped make this template for us and explained how it works. Thank you!

Summary:

- Pick a slot and describe what qualities the best bitcoin mixer should have?
- You can take two slots if you have already used UniJoin.
- We reserve the right to ignore any participant for any reason.
- Once a block is chosen, the last symbol of the hash will determine the winner.

0 - shasan
1 - dimonstration
2 - cygan
3 - 2stout
4 - Remsjack
5 - av8rjeff
6 - BTCOVERFIATS
7 - MoparMiningLLC
8 - Rizzrack
9 - Ratimov
a - Mbitr
b - bestcoin_59
c - Kryptowerk
d - GazetaBitcoin
e - shasan
f - krogoth

Prize information

- Free shipping!
- Wallet Keep Key - NEW with plastic intact (never opened/original seal)

[1714817591]

1714817591

[1714817591]

1714817591

[1714817591]

1714817591

[1714817591]

1714817591

[shasan]

Reserved spot 0 and e
I will post details later

[dimonstration]

I choose “1”

The feature of not saving our transaction information to the website after mixing that might exposed in the event that website got seize. This incident happened on popular mixer before which many user transaction info including balance on their mixing wallet got seize since website stored users details.

I use unijoin before but I can’t provide proof because I don't screenshot my transaction and I mix last year.

[Kryptowerk]

Nice to see another raffle for a quality HW wallet.

c - Kryptowerk

There are a few important qualities to a good mixer. The obvious ones include anonymity of user-data.
However I'd say one of the maybe overlooked ones is ease-of-use and adoption.
Ideally you can easily access the mixer within a wallet with just a few clicks. This increases the number of mixed BTC - if everyone would use a mixer, all coins would be equal again. Ofc this would also need low fees - which would be possible of volume is high enough.
Just my 2 sats. Thanks.

[MoparMiningLLC]

7 please - thanks!

[MrsMopar]

d - MrsMopar thank you! 

[2stout]

3- 2stout

Thx!

[BTCOVERFIATS]

6 please

For a good mixer you need one quality. Anonymity of user-data and that's it. As long as you have that you're good to go

[UniJoin]

At the moment we have approved 3 slots. Please note that we expect a constructive response. And also the fact that the answer to the question is a prerequisite for submitting an application.

[krogoth]

F please krog
  Friendly...ease of use and of course anonymous

[cygan]

2 - cygan

in any case, the mixer service as well as the support should always be available and always answer questions for the whole community. furthermore, all personal data should always be deleted after each process.
thanks for the raffle

[bestcoin_59]

b - bestcoin_59

A bitcoinmixer should be easy to use, and offer a high level of privacy.

[Mbitr]

a - Mbitr

It’s got to be anonymity and trust

[Rizzrack]

E - Rizzrack

- to have a Tor option
- no registration required
- is not hosted in countries that are crazy with "cracking down on money lauderers, for the good of the people". See the us treasury vs tornado cash, dutch fido vs the tornado cash dev etc.
- put client privacy & anonymity first !
- does not have ridiculous fees

[BTCOVERFIATS]

6 please

For a good mixer you need one quality. Anonymity of user-data and that's it. As long as you have that you're good to go

To build off this a good mixer also needs to have a high amount of users using the mixing service to allow for a solid coinjoin. Having a threshold for a minimum amount of users, let's say 50 per conjoin helps with anonymity.

Also it must have TOR capabilities as well as the option to mix multiple values of BTC at a time. For example mixing 1 BTC, 0.5 BTC, or 0.1 BTC at a time is a must.

[av8rjeff]

5 - av8rjeff

I don't have much to add that other's haven't already mentions (anonymity, tor, focus on high volume coupled with low fees, etc), so I'm going to approach this in a different way.  If I was developing a new product (in this case a mixing service), I would study the competition and list their strengths and weaknesses as posted or commented on by their users in reviews or reddit or where ever.  Easy enough to keep or mimic the pros but addressing and correcting the weaknesses would be my focus.  It's easy to say "low fees" but creating enough volume to make a viable business model...that might be tough.  IDK.  

Do any mixing services use a Liquidity Provider (LP) model, where users can stake bitcoin to help increase liquidity in return for a share of the revenue?  Problem there of course is trust, ala Celsius and others.  If you could build a mixing service where we could provide liquidity and earn yield, while retaining control of our coins/keys (so non-custodial), that would truly be something.  Actually...DASH already did that years ago with their Masternodes, which allowed for PrivateSend (mixing service) and InstantSend (instant transactions).  Man...I loved DASH.  I hope it can rise from the ashes some day.

[GazetaBitcoin]

D - GazetaBitcoin

I'd say that credibility / trustworthyness is a must. The people running the mixer should do their best for eearning users' trust.

Then a flawless functionality is also needed. All options offered by the website should work as designed. This will cerrainly please users.

Last, but not least: fast and reliable support team. Users always complain or have questions. Someone should always be there for them. And this also helps in earning credibility.

Note: I chose "d" since the earlier user which chose "d" had the post rejected.

[UniJoin]

At the moment we have approved 9 slots.

Please note that we expect a reasonable comprehensive response. The answer to the question is a prerequisite for submitting an application.

0 -
1 - dimonstration
2 - cygan
3 -
4 - 
5 - av8rjeff
6 - BTCOVERFIATS
7 -
8 - 
9 - Ratimov
a -
b -
c - Kryptowerk
d - GazetaBitcoin
e - Rizzrack
f - krogoth

[Remsjack]

4 - Remsjack

Trustworthyness is the most important thing imo + it should be reliable and also have a good ux

[UniJoin]

Now we are full. This is our first giveaway and I hope we did everything right (and also included some users who did not meet the conditions).

The winner will be determined by block number 803670

0 - shasan
1 - dimonstration
2 - cygan
3 - 2stout
4 - Remsjack
5 - av8rjeff
6 - BTCOVERFIATS
7 - MoparMiningLLC
8 - Rizzrack
9 - Ratimov
a - Mbitr
b - bestcoin_59
c - Kryptowerk
d - GazetaBitcoin
e - shasan
f - krogoth