I will pass KYC later is a bad idea

[Westinhome]

its something that is common and people just do it maybe because they feel they will pass it when the time comes and then when that time comes it becomes difficult. many of these websites make it mandatory to pass kyc and even for you to have access to some features. but people usually dont read the terms and condition and just in haste to sign up and make deposit. its good to ensure you pass kyc before making deposit especially if you want to stick to a particular website.

Kyc was the most important of the gambling sites,the fake or small gambling sites will allow the gambler to play without the Kyc.But the same small gambling site should ask to complete the kyc to withdrew the funds.This doesn’t mean the small gambling site is the scam one,the small gambling sites mostly concentrate to avoid of the money laundering.The small gambling sites will allow the deposit without the kyc to increase the number of players.But same will ask the kyc on the withdraw to avoid of the money laundering using the gambling sites.The gambling site will do allow of the withdraw after the kyc done by the gambler to avoid of money laundering using their site.

[coupable]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

[Weawant]

I agree it's very important to.pass KYC before even trying to make a deposit on any gambling sites or casino, if it's required, don't wait until you have won a good amount before you do your KYC as there are many negative effects regarding this one of which could be not been able to make withdrawal, especially for small sites who could be considered dubious in some cases.

Some persons wait until they have made a deposit which for dubious sites you may never pass KYC once you deposit before you try to do your KYC hence it's adviced that you make sure to follow due procedures, pass KYC before using the platform fully for gambling and other transactions. Most times our negligence to these things cause us a lot before we could know it.

Using new and small sites probably because of their bonus is very risky and Is not adviced, but what is most appropriate is using reputable sites and casino so you can be sure to be safe and be protected from scam. It's safer gambling with the known and reputable sites. They will make sure you are safe so as to protect their reputation too.

[jrrsparkles]

I don't know where some gamblers are getting their confidence from, do you know that online casinos can keep rejecting your ID after you made some high amount of money? Some people cares about winning first before passing KYC, it's cool you believe that you won't always win but the luck comes when we least expected.

Imagine winning and you find it hard to pass KYC, trapping your money on the casino for like ever.

It's not always the casinos fault, I know some are dubious but the thing is KYC verification is something you should first deal with before making your first deposit.

Online casinos can be frustrating at times, some casino won't accept your submitted document even when you haven't make any deposit on the platform yet, so always confirm your identity first.

Submit your identity and wait for approval, do not be in haste to make deposit first, because the identity you submitted without a green approval from the team can still be rejected, take your time to get the passed approval first before proceeding with gambling.

The worst part is they don't even know that the withdrawal tab will not be available until the user gets KYC verified which is kind of the user's fault technically but casinos too have some part in this play like a welcome bonus for a limited time after the signed into their service so the user more concentrate of getting that bonus without actually thinking about the withdrawal and other stuff.

Everyone needs to read the TOS of the website before depositing their money because in reality 99% of people just skip the part and only realize their mistake when its too late to do anything.

[JahriMeayer]

Obviously kyc should be done at initial statey if a gambler want to use that Casino or gambling websites for long. And of course they do so. Moreover when they try to create account on others casinos for bonus and free stake opportunities, they avoid kyc until win big amount. This is common thing. I did such thing many time. And a Reputed casinos don't need to make users trouble by applying such trick like "asking additional documents for kyc or face verification something". Such steps on taken by cheap casino websites who always try to scam user by stopping their withdrawal

[X-ray]

Obviously kyc should be done at initial statey if a gambler want to use that Casino or gambling websites for long. And of course they do so. Moreover when they try to create account on others casinos for bonus and free stake opportunities, they avoid kyc until win big amount. This is common thing. I did such thing many time. And a Reputed casinos don't need to make users trouble by applying such trick like "asking additional documents for kyc or face verification something". Such steps on taken by cheap casino websites who always try to scam user by stopping their withdrawal

There are some gambling sites which is not putting KYC as obligation for its users. As long as you were know how to deal with it and that's fine. The only problem if there have been many people were trying to play with high bet but they were unwilling to complete the KYC verification.
There have been so sufficient problems related to this thing as well. Asking KYC to the users is not something prohibited, but the government was telling the gambling operator to do that to avoid the money laundering.
You shall aware if the regulators are always monitoring it. It does not even matter where are you hiding and they will always able to find you. KYC has been ordered by most of the regulators to prevent money laandering.
It is a common thing when the government was willing to know the identity of players.

[wxa7115]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

The mentality of gamblers is somewhat unique, they expressly play a game of chance expecting to win, and yet they make no preparation at all in the case they got it.

So they make a deposit at their favorite casino without thinking about what they will do in the case they finally got lucky, and once they do they struggle to pass the KYC verification as they cannot corroborate the source of their funds or prove who they are, and then they make excuses about the casino playing dirty and not allowing them to withdraw their money when they are the ones that are at fault.

[temple]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

The mentality of gamblers is somewhat unique, they expressly play a game of chance expecting to win, and yet they make no preparation at all in the case they got it.

So they make a deposit at their favorite casino without thinking about what they will do in the case they finally got lucky, and once they do they struggle to pass the KYC verification as they cannot corroborate the source of their funds or prove who they are, and then they make excuses about the casino playing dirty and not allowing them to withdraw their money when they are the ones that are at fault.

But the source of funds thing is sometimes more complicated than it seems. It really depends what money you are using. If you are a normal employee and you are playing with a bigger sum of money relative to your monthly income, the casino can give you a hard time to accept the proof. They have all the leverage against the player and if they decide to make it as complicated as possible, you can quickly find yourself in a situation where it is hard to prove the source. You can say you saved up that money, but essentially that would be like the casino just asking whether you have a job or not. But it becomes tough when people are self-employed. Most casinos when they have a good reputation will just pay out the winnings unless the winnings are monstrous.

[coupable]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

The mentality of gamblers is somewhat unique, they expressly play a game of chance expecting to win, and yet they make no preparation at all in the case they got it.

So they make a deposit at their favorite casino without thinking about what they will do in the case they finally got lucky, and once they do they struggle to pass the KYC verification as they cannot corroborate the source of their funds or prove who they are, and then they make excuses about the casino playing dirty and not allowing them to withdraw their money when they are the ones that are at fault.

But the source of funds thing is sometimes more complicated than it seems. It really depends what money you are using. If you are a normal employee and you are playing with a bigger sum of money relative to your monthly income, the casino can give you a hard time to accept the proof. They have all the leverage against the player and if they decide to make it as complicated as possible, you can quickly find yourself in a situation where it is hard to prove the source. You can say you saved up that money, but essentially that would be like the casino just asking whether you have a job or not. But it becomes tough when people are self-employed. Most casinos when they have a good reputation will just pay out the winnings unless the winnings are monstrous.

It will be very important to predict what will happen with the casino even if you have completed the entire KYC identity verification procedure, because any casino, no matter how reliable it is, has the right to require verification again, especially when the profits are huge and the user can easily get himself into trouble due to his lack of experience. . As many members have previously pointed out in their comments, it is always advisable to:
- Choose the community’s most reliable platform because it will always be easy to communicate with support in the event of any emergency.
- Complete all KYC verification procedures before making the first deposit, whatever its value.
- If you intend to use a large amount to bet, it is better to distribute it in the form of relatively small amounts on more than one platform.

[JahriMeayer]

There are some gambling sites which is not putting KYC as obligation for its users. But there have been many people were trying to play with high bet but they were unwilling to complete the KYC verification where KYC has been ordered by most of the regulators to prevent money laundering

there are for sure and i experience such websites too. The problem is, they allow you to withdraw till a limited amount. specially its okey if amount is small but when you will try to withdraw a healthy/fair amount, then authority asking for kyc as well as additional documents in some cases. Kyc won't be asked for those player whom losses a lot money but suddenly win a fair amount. But if a person continuously win big amounts, such website make kyc hard for those users. This kind of cheap trick. If they have to follow government order to prevent money laundering, then they should clearly mention about kyc process in their website 

[Viscore]

There are some gambling sites which is not putting KYC as obligation for its users. But there have been many people were trying to play with high bet but they were unwilling to complete the KYC verification where KYC has been ordered by most of the regulators to prevent money laundering

there are for sure and i experience such websites too. The problem is, they allow you to withdraw till a limited amount. specially its okey if amount is small but when you will try to withdraw a healthy/fair amount, then authority asking for kyc as well as additional documents in some cases. Kyc won't be asked for those player whom losses a lot money but suddenly win a fair amount. But if a person continuously win big amounts, such website make kyc hard for those users. This kind of cheap trick. If they have to follow government order to prevent money laundering, then they should clearly mention about kyc process in their website 

That's the rule, I mean their rule. We just have to be aware and ready for KYC submission in case they require it. Or if we want to be safe, then we try to prevent winning big money, LOL... Seriously, we should all be aware that gambling sites nowadays could implement KYC at any time since they are regulated. So, it should not surprise us anymore. We can only expect no KYC if a gambling site is a decentralized gambling site, which I think only a few of us are patronizing.

[Findingnemo]

There are some gambling sites which is not putting KYC as obligation for its users. But there have been many people were trying to play with high bet but they were unwilling to complete the KYC verification where KYC has been ordered by most of the regulators to prevent money laundering

there are for sure and i experience such websites too. The problem is, they allow you to withdraw till a limited amount. specially its okey if amount is small but when you will try to withdraw a healthy/fair amount, then authority asking for kyc as well as additional documents in some cases. Kyc won't be asked for those player whom losses a lot money but suddenly win a fair amount. But if a person continuously win big amounts, such website make kyc hard for those users. This kind of cheap trick. If they have to follow government order to prevent money laundering, then they should clearly mention about kyc process in their website 

If I am not wrong the security system of casinos will not trigger withdrawals based on the winnings of a player in most cases, it happens when user deposit and withdraw without wagering or wagering with the least risk as possible because it seems obvious that the user is not really intended for gambling but trying to deposit and withdraw which looks like laundering, in that case, further details maybe needed from the casino even if you already KYC verified there.

[Taskford]

There are some gambling sites which is not putting KYC as obligation for its users. But there have been many people were trying to play with high bet but they were unwilling to complete the KYC verification where KYC has been ordered by most of the regulators to prevent money laundering

there are for sure and i experience such websites too. The problem is, they allow you to withdraw till a limited amount. specially its okey if amount is small but when you will try to withdraw a healthy/fair amount, then authority asking for kyc as well as additional documents in some cases. Kyc won't be asked for those player whom losses a lot money but suddenly win a fair amount. But if a person continuously win big amounts, such website make kyc hard for those users. This kind of cheap trick. If they have to follow government order to prevent money laundering, then they should clearly mention about kyc process in their website 

That's the rule, I mean their rule. We just have to be aware and ready for KYC submission in case they require it. Or if we want to be safe, then we try to prevent winning big money, LOL... Seriously, we should all be aware that gambling sites nowadays could implement KYC at any time since they are regulated. So, it should not surprise us anymore. We can only expect no KYC if a gambling site is a decentralized gambling site, which I think only a few of us are patronizing.

If we didn't read the TOS then provably with that we are not aware of those implementation that might occur to us so before doing anything else on a casino we should read the information posted so we will be aware about the necessary thing that might ask to us in future. And also for this new age of cryptocurrency adoption and most of the platform has been regulated we should not surprised about been ask to do KYC procedure in a casino or on any other else so that we can easily accept that we need to do that for the sake of complying the requirements and can use all the feature of the casino. If we can't afford to do this then maybe its the best time for a gambler to quit since nothing will happen to them if they insist and continue to gamble since their funds will provably lock then the casino will ask them to do that before they can withdraw their funds.

[Blitzboy]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

The mentality of gamblers is somewhat unique, they expressly play a game of chance expecting to win, and yet they make no preparation at all in the case they got it.

So they make a deposit at their favorite casino without thinking about what they will do in the case they finally got lucky, and once they do they struggle to pass the KYC verification as they cannot corroborate the source of their funds or prove who they are, and then they make excuses about the casino playing dirty and not allowing them to withdraw their money when they are the ones that are at fault.

But the source of funds thing is sometimes more complicated than it seems. It really depends what money you are using. If you are a normal employee and you are playing with a bigger sum of money relative to your monthly income, the casino can give you a hard time to accept the proof. They have all the leverage against the player and if they decide to make it as complicated as possible, you can quickly find yourself in a situation where it is hard to prove the source. You can say you saved up that money, but essentially that would be like the casino just asking whether you have a job or not. But it becomes tough when people are self-employed. Most casinos when they have a good reputation will just pay out the winnings unless the winnings are monstrous.

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

[coupable]

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

I disagree with you on this point: I do not see it as the role of any gambling platform or any other service site to verify the sources of users’ funds, and it is not equipped for this. This means that even if it was able to obtain confirmations about the source of the funds, does it have sufficient capabilities to verify this evidence? Especially since the platform's users are from different regions around the world.
It is more correct for the platform, when it doubts one of its users’ balances, to update the account holder’s non-personal data in order to hand it over to the authorities in case they ask for it one day. Or in other cases, you report these suspicions to the authorities.

[lionheart78]

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

I disagree with you on this point: I do not see it as the role of any gambling platform or any other service site to verify the sources of users’ funds, and it is not equipped for this. This means that even if it was able to obtain confirmations about the source of the funds, does it have sufficient capabilities to verify this evidence? Especially since the platform's users are from different regions around the world.
It is more correct for the platform, when it doubts one of its users’ balances, to update the account holder’s non-personal data in order to hand it over to the authorities in case they ask for it one day. Or in other cases, you report these suspicions to the authorities.

I think casino has ways to verify the document submitted by their player.  If not, they hire third party services that specialized on KYC documents.  Remember,  almost everyone is just a call away.  Source of funds can easily verify through calls, a person does not need to go abroad in order to call someone.

'
About KYC submission, I think a player can set it aside when he is not  yet convince to play on a casino or when he is just trying to test the service of a casino.  And when the time comes that he is ready to put large amount of funds, then I believe that that would be the time to do KYC.

[coupable]

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

I disagree with you on this point: I do not see it as the role of any gambling platform or any other service site to verify the sources of users’ funds, and it is not equipped for this. This means that even if it was able to obtain confirmations about the source of the funds, does it have sufficient capabilities to verify this evidence? Especially since the platform's users are from different regions around the world.
It is more correct for the platform, when it doubts one of its users’ balances, to update the account holder’s non-personal data in order to hand it over to the authorities in case they ask for it one day. Or in other cases, you report these suspicions to the authorities.

I think casino has ways to verify the document submitted by their player.  If not, they hire third party services that specialized on KYC documents.  Remember,  almost everyone is just a call away.  Source of funds can easily verify through calls, a person does not need to go abroad in order to call someone.

The limits of the powers of the platform or the competent third party company must stop at the limit of verifying identification documents and not exceed it to include searching the sources of deposits, regardless of the type of suspicion.
The platform has the right to seek not to make itself a tool for money laundering, but this must be done in communication with the authorities and not unilaterally.
At the same time, tightening procedures should not be done randomly, because this will adversely affect the reputation of the platform. Instead of taking all measures to gain the trust of the authorities, the platform finds itself losing customers who are tired of repeated identity verification procedures.

[Assface16678]

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

I disagree with you on this point: I do not see it as the role of any gambling platform or any other service site to verify the sources of users’ funds, and it is not equipped for this. This means that even if it was able to obtain confirmations about the source of the funds, does it have sufficient capabilities to verify this evidence? Especially since the platform's users are from different regions around the world.
It is more correct for the platform, when it doubts one of its users’ balances, to update the account holder’s non-personal data in order to hand it over to the authorities in case they ask for it one day. Or in other cases, you report these suspicions to the authorities.

I think casino has ways to verify the document submitted by their player.  If not, they hire third party services that specialized on KYC documents.  Remember,  almost everyone is just a call away.  Source of funds can easily verify through calls, a person does not need to go abroad in order to call someone.

The limits of the powers of the platform or the competent third party company must stop at the limit of verifying identification documents and not exceed it to include searching the sources of deposits, regardless of the type of suspicion.
The platform has the right to seek not to make itself a tool for money laundering, but this must be done in communication with the authorities and not unilaterally.
At the same time, tightening procedures should not be done randomly, because this will adversely affect the reputation of the platform. Instead of taking all measures to gain the trust of the authorities, the platform finds itself losing customers who are tired of repeated identity verification procedures.

True, KYC is an indicator that the online casino is legal. Why? because there is a law requiring the online casino to conduct KYC on their customers, and it's for the casino's safety and also for the customer's money. Yes,  one of the events that the government wants to avoid is money laundering. Many powerful people tend to use this kind of platform to hide their assets, which sometimes come from unknown sources and could be in illegal activities.

I don't understand those people who are hesitant to do KYC, maybe because they have been brainwashed by what they see on the internet, and that's the reason they are hesitant to do KYC. It is important for the customer of the online casino to read first, especially if the platform will require you to undergo KYC before you can withdraw your money. That is common sense; how could a platform know where they are going to send the money without the information or address of the wallet?

[coupable]

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

I disagree with you on this point: I do not see it as the role of any gambling platform or any other service site to verify the sources of users’ funds, and it is not equipped for this. This means that even if it was able to obtain confirmations about the source of the funds, does it have sufficient capabilities to verify this evidence? Especially since the platform's users are from different regions around the world.
It is more correct for the platform, when it doubts one of its users’ balances, to update the account holder’s non-personal data in order to hand it over to the authorities in case they ask for it one day. Or in other cases, you report these suspicions to the authorities.

I think casino has ways to verify the document submitted by their player.  If not, they hire third party services that specialized on KYC documents.  Remember,  almost everyone is just a call away.  Source of funds can easily verify through calls, a person does not need to go abroad in order to call someone.

The limits of the powers of the platform or the competent third party company must stop at the limit of verifying identification documents and not exceed it to include searching the sources of deposits, regardless of the type of suspicion.
The platform has the right to seek not to make itself a tool for money laundering, but this must be done in communication with the authorities and not unilaterally.
At the same time, tightening procedures should not be done randomly, because this will adversely affect the reputation of the platform. Instead of taking all measures to gain the trust of the authorities, the platform finds itself losing customers who are tired of repeated identity verification procedures.

True, KYC is an indicator that the online casino is legal. Why? because there is a law requiring the online casino to conduct KYC on their customers, and it's for the casino's safety and also for the customer's money. Yes,  one of the events that the government wants to avoid is money laundering. Many powerful people tend to use this kind of platform to hide their assets, which sometimes come from unknown sources and could be in illegal activities.

To be fair, it must be noted that some platforms exploit KYC enforcement procedures to hinder withdrawals, especially if they are large amounts. If the user has completed these procedures, why are they imposed on him again without clear suspicions? Also, the user does not know anything about his private data, whether the platform shares it with a third party or not. Often these additional measures are not specified in the TOS and users are later surprised that their balances have been frozen or their accounts have been completely frozen.

[LUCKMCFLY]

It can be said that it is naive to make deposits on any central platform before verifying the possibilities of imposing identity verification procedures and completing them, even if this is not necessary upon registration. When we register for the first time, we do not know anything about the procedures in place on that platform, and therefore all precautions must be taken to ensure that no disruption occurs during withdrawal operations. In general, casinos also require a first deposit as a procedure to verify the account, so the rest of the identity verification procedures must be completed before that.

The mentality of gamblers is somewhat unique, they expressly play a game of chance expecting to win, and yet they make no preparation at all in the case they got it.

So they make a deposit at their favorite casino without thinking about what they will do in the case they finally got lucky, and once they do they struggle to pass the KYC verification as they cannot corroborate the source of their funds or prove who they are, and then they make excuses about the casino playing dirty and not allowing them to withdraw their money when they are the ones that are at fault.

But the source of funds thing is sometimes more complicated than it seems. It really depends what money you are using. If you are a normal employee and you are playing with a bigger sum of money relative to your monthly income, the casino can give you a hard time to accept the proof. They have all the leverage against the player and if they decide to make it as complicated as possible, you can quickly find yourself in a situation where it is hard to prove the source. You can say you saved up that money, but essentially that would be like the casino just asking whether you have a job or not. But it becomes tough when people are self-employed. Most casinos when they have a good reputation will just pay out the winnings unless the winnings are monstrous.

It can be tricky to follow the rules of a casino when you are self-employed and making money. Casinos are very careful because they care about their image and compliance. You need to show that you didnt get your stake from shady sources if you want to keep your job. The catch, though, is this: what if casinos took a broader view of verifying funds? Think about a situation where a player's past income, spending, and even tax returns are important. While it is intrusive, could it not make the process easier, especially for people who work for themselves? Its true that privacy issues are important, but if being open is the key to winning, might it be worth the risk? Casinos already have to balance following the rules and making sure customers are happy. Why not change the way they check people out to match the complexity of today's pay sources? At the heart of every bet is the thrill of the unknown, so shouldnt everyone have the same chance to get to the table?

?What I think about all this is that when we are in a casino, the mentality of entering and looking for profits as we should, can no longer be done, because the first thing to do is to investigate the casino very well to see As is the issue with withdrawals, that is good to see first in the thread Ann, which is the fastest way to look for possible problems, solutions and if withdrawals with KYC are very complicated, then in view of this it can be understand that to do something like this you also have to make it clear that you have to study very well if the KYC are immediately accepted or they start to bother you a lot, if they start demanding a lot, that's already something to not make deposits, at least for now. My opinion is, because there are casinos that don't have as much trouble with that, you can do other types of things for it, so in this order of ideas the casinos should be more transparent, saying instead of "deposit" they should say, "Comply with your KYC so you can safely withdraw your money."

But I think no casino will do it, because obviously when it comes to getting more community or something they are able to sweeten everyone with their good bonuses or something like that, first of all you have to verify what really matters, which is about the money, because it is what really matters, in addition I have seen a large number of complaints made by users who are not satisfied with many casinos and their way of seeing things regarding this, that is why we will always make emphasis on looking for things as they are, apart from the fact that KYC is a process that should not exist in Crypto, and yet there are users who defend it, and I don't know why, it's time to do it, but in terms of acquiescing it, in my opinion and a very personal position I do with the casinos that I really trust, even though I know that the time will come when there will no longer be a need for this, because people will seek their privacy so much that they will stop Using the casinos.