Only good coins are listed on top exchange?

[Jocuserious]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

[1714659136]

1714659136

[1714659136]

1714659136

[1714659136]

1714659136

[jossiel]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

That's right that listing fee in good exchanges requires hefty sum of money.

But, there are partnerships that these projects can enjoy with these exchanges if ever they'll offer it to them and they oblige. Or, if the exchange sees them as a good and potential coin.

By that, they can flee with the fee but AFAIK, they need to give an amount of share of the token that they're working on.

[Yatsan]

To answer your question, it is a no. Partnership to a platform will be required in order to list a token. Therefore  it is safe to say that not all good tokens will automatically be listed on exchanges. Maybe popularity of the project, paid partnership, or is it just those/that exchanges are choosing to list a token because they saw something from it which is more likely having relation to a token or project's popularity and demand from its investors.Exchanges won't mind picking the best ones but rather only those which have a volume will be listed to most of the exchanger platform. At the least, listing to a known exchanger, would benefit the token or management behind it as well.

[cryptoaddictchie]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

Maybe its true. Theres a fee but there are projects that are listed for free and exchange can gain advantage on this due to their indemand capability to have huge volume. Meaning there are lots of people that trading that coins and big exchanges favor that, see most airdrops projects that get listed surely they are free of fee.

[Wexnident]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

Not really no? Most new coins, as long as they pay enough (and probably pass some number of requirements that the exchanges will set, just to filter out really, really bad ones) can get listed in an exchange. You wouldn't see shit coins popping out otherwise. It's also kind of hard to determine what "good" means in the first place, if it was price then how? It's new. If it's the volume of trading, then again, the same answer, it's new. So you can only rely on what they can show, which is the project details and white paper, which align to imo, the requirements that exchanges set as, well, "required".

I reckon exchanges just accept new coins to take money, then just delist them if they fail to pass a certain mark, as you've said.

[KingsDen]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

The caption is a click bait and I fell for it. I was curious why someone will give such an advice to people. When I was a newbie , and had thought that once it is listed in an old exchange, that everything will be OK with the project. Little did I know that it was all about money and fees and business and not members

[Bitcoin_Arena]

OP, for your information, not all coins are listed for a fee. Exchanges including Binance sometimes list certain coins because of the hype and high trading volume so that they can gain from the trading fees, so it's a win-win situation until a coin turns into a scam.

Other times, coins are listed through community voting contests.

[crwth]

I think it's not just about the money, there's going to be background checks for it as well. Imagine just paying the 50BTC listing fee (IIRC that's the amount for Binance? Correct me if I'm wrong), that's a significant amount now and you need to really check if you have the budget for that. That''s going to be troublesome if you just paid it and you have no benefit completely.

It's not just poor development that get delisted, but probably low volume on that specific exchange.

[GreatArkansas]

(....)
There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

True and we often experience this during a bear market.
One of the benefits of a bear market is this, clearing the market, all scam or poor development projects are being cleaned off the market.
We must also learn that not all the new coins that being listed on top exchanges are not mean they are good already.

[Husires]

Listing and delisting cryptocurrencies is an activity that needs to be monitored by a regulatory body, otherwise it will turn into a door to corruption, as exchanges can blackmail developers by removing it or forcing them to pay more money. Developers may exploit it by withdrawing liquidity, creating a fake pump and reaping more profits. Both developers and the platform may agree to manipulate the price. Especially if the currency is listed on a limited number of platforms or arbitrage between several platforms is difficult.

We cannot consider it as a criterion for investment, but it can be said that the currency that is listed in a few exchanges is a scam and at best a bad investment that should be avoided.

[Saisher]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

[Wysi]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

It's true that some cryptocurrency exchanges charge significant fees for listing new tokens or coins. Investors should not base their decisions solely on the exchange a cryptocurrency is listed on. Instead, they should conduct thorough research into the project itself. Also, It's Important for investors to diversify their cryptocurrency portfolios to manage risk.

Projects that lack consistent development updates, fail to meet milestones, or demonstrate a lack of transparency can lose investor confidence and may eventually face delisting from exchanges.

[gurunanakji777]

Delisting occurs periodically on major exchanges when certain coins fail to meet the exchange's established criteria, resulting in their removal. However, being listed on a top exchange doesn't assure the success of a project it could falter significantly post-listing. Therefore, we shouldn't assume that being on a top exchange guarantees success. Additionally, I've observed numerous instances where coins are listed for free on major exchanges due to substantial market hype and demand. Even exchanges prioritize their own benefits, regardless of whether they are top-tier exchanges or not.

[fzkto]

Delisting occurs periodically on major exchanges when certain coins fail to meet the exchange's established criteria, resulting in their removal. However, being listed on a top exchange doesn't assure the success of a project it could falter significantly post-listing. Therefore, we shouldn't assume that being on a top exchange guarantees success. Additionally, I've observed numerous instances where coins are listed for free on major exchanges due to substantial market hype and demand. Even exchanges prioritize their own benefits, regardless of whether they are top-tier exchanges or not.

Yes, it is. Listing on a top exchange never guarantees that a project will not turn out to be a scam. Among the latest such projects are terra and ust. No one would have thought that such a big scam would happen. Or for example, in 2017 there was such a project bittorrent, which at that time was traded on all the top exchanges.

[Apocollapse]

Nope, there are only few good coins, while the rest which is 99% are actually bad coins.

Top exchanges only list a coin that has a big traffic, popular, has trading volume, and not privacy oriented. Monero is a good coin, but since it's a privacy coin, many centralized exchange delisted this coin.

A high liquidity and popular coin isn't always a good coin, take a look with FTX token, UST, LUNA etc.

[VFalcon]

Community, stability of the project token and innovations are the basis for the development of the project. TFS token shows very good development, I think they have a good perspective, considering that they already show good results

[khiholangkang]

Nope, there are only few good coins, while the rest which is 99% are actually bad coins.

Top exchanges only list a coin that has a big traffic, popular, has trading volume, and not privacy oriented. Monero is a good coin, but since it's a privacy coin, many centralized exchange delisted this coin.

A high liquidity and popular coin isn't always a good coin, take a look with FTX token, UST, LUNA etc.

The average coin is good in my opinion but it only lasts for a while there are some networks formed that have high potential but they are slow to adapt so the technology lags behind other competitors so the coin is a coin that has no value today, regarding FTX and Luna, in my opinion, is good if you look at the coins, but the development and management were not good, causing the destruction of the coin project itself, as well as the coins on the exchange, but it's true that exchanges only take advantage of the volume of traffic to make a profit, good coins are subjective it's up to one to see the value in the project itself, twbut no coin is as good and strong as bitcoin.

[X-ray]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.

It's actually wrong. If you were talking about low tier exchange site and you do need money to be listed there but the different method when it comes to the major exchange sites. The major exchange site has very strict requirement to be completed first before you will able to list your token there.

Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

People just need waiting for the hype to go first. It's caused by people can be trapped by hype.
I often saw people were thinking if the price of token can go even higher after the pump and this totally wrong.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

True, some were also being scam tokens caused by the dev was just rugpulling its investors. Exchange site is always monitoring the developments from the projects.

[Cadaver20]

I think that not good coin but good project which can raise good amount of fund from tokensale are listed on top exchange. Because they can manage the listing fee of top exchange. But those that cannot raise a good amount of funds are listed on low quality exchanges. So everything depends on the fund and the fund depends on the investors.

[wheelz1200]

No way
The listing fees of the best exchanges are huge, so any project can be listed for money and it is not the best coin for that.
Moreover one should not rush to invest after seeing the listing on a good exchange because the development of the project will be more dependent on an investor.

There are many coins that get delisted from good exchanges because their volume decreases and investors decrease, the main reason being poor development progress.

I don't know why anyone would buy something based on what exchange its on because you are right.  With the right amount of money most of these exchanges will list your coin.  Even if they don't pay theor way it means nothing, there could be many nefarious reasons for this.  Who knows insiders at the exchange could have a bag they want to pump.  Either way don't go by what exchanges it's on.