Only good coins are listed on top exchange?

[Xal0lex]

Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

It's all about money these days. If a coin or token makes the exchange a lot of money, it get listed without remorse. You can see why worthless "meme" coins are listed on top exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. It's not because these coins are serious long-term investments, but rather a way to make short-term profits with trading fees collected from customers. A huge win for exchanges if you ask me.

In a DEX, things are even worse because anyone can list any coin they want at an affordable price (usually an on-chain fee is paid by the user). This opens up the doors for scams and theft. At least, we're not tied to a single option. As long as there's a way to buy or sell crypto, there should be nothing to worry about. Who knows if bad coins are removed from the market, leaving us only with good ones in the long run? Just my thoughts

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

[gabbie2010]

I think that not good coin but good project which can raise good amount of fund from tokensale are listed on top exchange. Because they can manage the listing fee of top exchange. But those that cannot raise a good amount of funds are listed on low quality exchanges. So everything depends on the fund and the fund depends on the investors.

This is a big challenge for every project to get listed on top CEX, because the fees are high and it requires volume so you can stay on their platform. If the project’s goal is to stay longer then its better for them to create a more competitive platform just like the other projects where you don’t need to apply for the listing because the exchange itself will initiate your listing because of the demand on your project and you don’t need to worry about the fees anymore.

Of course the importance of volume cannot be overemphasized because after payment of huge listing fee the token or coin must be well traded on daily basis on the exchange that is why most projects are well advertised and promoted and many are solution to a problem so as to continue to gain adoption or investment for it sustainability in the long run, if not there is the tendency of the coin getting delisted from the exchange this is very common in Binance which periodically delist some coins whose trading volume had dropped and it developers are no longer promoting it.

[uneng]

Exchanges only list coins that have a good budget. Exchanges are not interested in technology, fundamental properties, utility and other functions of a coin. If a coin has liquidity, then it will be represented on all the top exchanges. Exchanges are interested in volume and liquidity, so don't be surprised if you don't see projects with unique technology or super-fast blockchain on major exchanges. No one is interested in that unless it's funded by someone, and it has no distribution among crypto influencers and opinion leaders.

It's all about money these days. If a coin or token makes the exchange a lot of money, it get listed without remorse. You can see why worthless "meme" coins are listed on top exchanges like Coinbase and Binance. It's not because these coins are serious long-term investments, but rather a way to make short-term profits with trading fees collected from customers. A huge win for exchanges if you ask me.

In a DEX, things are even worse because anyone can list any coin they want at an affordable price (usually an on-chain fee is paid by the user). This opens up the doors for scams and theft. At least, we're not tied to a single option. As long as there's a way to buy or sell crypto, there should be nothing to worry about. Who knows if bad coins are removed from the market, leaving us only with good ones in the long run? Just my thoughts

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

Investors should be very careful on this aspect, because they have nobody to protect them from such scam or poorly developed altcoins. Investors just have a false impression big exchanges are a guarantee of something, but in fact, they are listing and allowing their customers to deal with such coins and tokens because it's being profitable for them. However, exchanges don't care if an investor is going to lose money by adopting those altcoins.

That is a cons of an unregulated and decentralized market, although personally, I think it's also an opportunity for investors to evolve as individuals, responsible for their own acts and destiny.

[isaac_clarke22]

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

[Xal0lex]

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

Investors should be very careful on this aspect, because they have nobody to protect them from such scam or poorly developed altcoins. Investors just have a false impression big exchanges are a guarantee of something, but in fact, they are listing and allowing their customers to deal with such coins and tokens because it's being profitable for them. However, exchanges don't care if an investor is going to lose money by adopting those altcoins.

That is a cons of an unregulated and decentralized market, although personally, I think it's also an opportunity for investors to evolve as individuals, responsible for their own acts and destiny.

The mere presence of a major exchange is not a guarantee of reliability and attractiveness of a token for an experienced investor. This reliability manifests itself in a group of signals that form analytics and decision making about investing in the token. For example, if a token is listed on a major exchange but it does not have any major investors, this is a reason to reject the token. Delistings on major exchanges also happen, and if no one funds the token, it can be forgotten very quickly.

[Abiky]

That's exactly what this is about. Crypto trading depends only on the funds invested. The technology itself is of little interest to anyone, so we are witnessing a frenzied growth of absolutely useless and dead coins, which are of no use to anyone except trading, as they have no utilitarian function. In fact, such events have a negative impact on the industry itself, as new investors see not a developing market with the introduction of cryptocurrencies into everyday life, but a kind of big casino, where all sorts of useless funk is played and a lot of people lose money on it, and then this project steals from itself, as in the case of PEPE. After such events, what would be your opinion about the crypto market if you were a newbie?

This is bad because it makes crypto extremely-centralized. Not only that, but the variety of useless coins makes the whole industry look like garbage. I guess crypto needs more time to mature before it can be taken seriously. With upcoming regulations, the number of scams and useless projects will decline. The ones that will ultimately win are centralized exchanges. That's because they hold all of the cards to move the market in their favor.

Newcomers into crypto will get "rekt" as their investments go all the way down the drain in an instant. After all, they're only thinking about getting rich quick. Who knows how the crypto market will grow 5-10 years from now? Just my opinion

[Bazzu]

Actually, I'm a bit confused about answering your question, because I don't think we can accuse such and such altcoin of being bad or good, or whether the altcoin is listed on a top exchange or not and I also often see many altcoins listed on top exchanges collapse. , for example ftx, luna and so on, so I think in this case it will be difficult for us to guess which altcoins are good and which are not good.

[danherbias07]

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

[Hanadawa]

That's Truth, because I have come across so many alt-coins in the most top cryptocurrency exchange platform at the initial time coin we pump and dump after some period of time and even get delisted in top exchange, but I still wonder such thing normally occurs, in most cases the community are strong with a very good plan in whitepepper and still get dump in the hand of investors.

It usually happens because of a good coin with a good community but it doesn't have a good foundation and usually it happens in an instant project. Investors dumping tokens they hold is common in meme coin projects. Because we all know that meme coins won't last long and investors won't hold onto them for long enough.

[Bazzu]

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

I think buying coins before they are listed on an exchange is a good thing, because you have the potential to make huge profits, and it could even potentially increase by thousands of percent for the coins we hold.

Indeed, in this case our tactics in buying
crypto has to be good, and you have to be smart in choosing coins, because in my opinion, even if a coin is already on the top exchange, it doesn't necessarily mean that the coin has good potential for the long term.

[justdimin]

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

That's the problem with most of the projects today, people do not realize that they are the ones making it so shitty. I mean if you invest into a project with a dev at the top, that means there is no decentralization, you expect centralization to make it more profitable, and then you pressure the team into making stuff that will take it higher and then you do not really end up doing anything that will make it go higher and that causes a lot of trouble.

I think it should be important to realize that we are not going to get that much return that quickly and that should not result with something that will benefit you, it will not be a good thing if you are not careful about it and you do not do it properly.

[Blitzboy]

Development and roadmap are everything, that defines a platform and its performance in the market depends on it, That is why investors should check the capability and motivation of the developers, and investors should follow the updates on the development so in case the developers dump their shares you can also dump your share too.
The worst thing is you are late in dumping your shares and you end up as bag holders, thereby losing your investments.

Well some roadmap do not get followed sometimes. Pretty sure this applies to every forms of "development" just like I encountered in my 9-5 work. I know it's not crypto related, but this goes for the planning of the team in case things go south.

Rushed decision tend to happen and it kinda degrades the whole product as a whole. This is why many investors tend to just dump the coin of the project they're invested at. The team just don't give a crap about it and worst is just abandon it.

That's the problem with most of the projects today, people do not realize that they are the ones making it so shitty. I mean if you invest into a project with a dev at the top, that means there is no decentralization, you expect centralization to make it more profitable, and then you pressure the team into making stuff that will take it higher and then you do not really end up doing anything that will make it go higher and that causes a lot of trouble.

I think it should be important to realize that we are not going to get that much return that quickly and that should not result with something that will benefit you, it will not be a good thing if you are not careful about it and you do not do it properly.

People often ignore the basic ideas of autonomy when they get into projects, because they are mostly motivated by the promise of big profits. Multiple times, I've seen how centralized control can cause choices that aren't based on facts or are harmful. The draw of quick wins can make it hard to see the project's bigger picture.

Its important to know that greedy choices made quickly can compromise the very core of a project. I agree with you completely that patience and a deep understanding of the project's goals are top priorities. Not doing so can quickly turn the excitement of possible gains into the fear of big losses.

[AakZaki]

It usually happens because of a good coin with a good community but it doesn't have a good foundation and usually it happens in an instant project. Investors dumping tokens they hold is common in meme coin projects. Because we all know that meme coins won't last long and investors won't hold onto them for long enough.

some hyped meme coins just turn into pump and dump practices, and it happens over and over again.
We can see that many meme coins today continue to appear with strange names and they have increased by hundreds of percent. Those are just manipulative whales that are behind meme coins to attract new investors to enter.
Meme coins that are good and have a strong community will naturally be listed on top exchanges because they can afford fairly expensive listing fees. Of course there will be choices besides the registration fee that can be paid. See how meme coins like PEPE, FLOKI entered the Binance exchange because of their strong community.

[kentrolla]

It's a hard mix of both money and the team behind the project as major centralized exchanges require a lot of funds to be listed in their exchange and I have seen some projects who don't have huge funding but they have impressive roadmap and scope of technology, they initially get listed on tier 2 exchanges and eventually gets listed on exchanges like gate.io, kucoin or huobi before making it to Binance.

It's a sad thing as we see some shitty projects getting listed on Binance just because of money and sell their tokens , then delisted after a while due to unethical practices and those who believed in Binance and it's listing are the ones who suffer.

[Heulahee]

I have seen many top-class exchanges that require a huge fee for listing a coin, and due to this, if some projects have a great or positive sight can't push them to that exchange to the exchange fee, and thus they listed on low exchange and loose their community, their holders and volume as well.

[Hypnosis00]

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

Where it was listed is a very important matter to consider because that will also affect the future of the project and possible ROI.
I have had an experience before where I bought some coins during their pre-sale period as they were promised to get listed in reputable exchanges, so I jumped and took the opportunity but unfortunately, that was a broken promise and made a lot of investors lose their money. But now, I realize that was a big mistake, I'd rather be buying coins that are already in the exchange whether it was on the top or not for at least we have the chance to sell them if needed.

[ultrloa]

It should be the other way around. Invest before they get listed because that's when a sell-off will happen. Whales are wise, once they know the coin they bought is listed in an exchange that can handle an enormous amount of withdrawal, they will go for it and sell everything they got which will lead to the value of the coin going down. I've seen this many times happened before and I know it is still happening now.
What we can do is do it before they can. This is why monitoring every movement of the coin we invested in is crucial especially if they are not listed yet. It will be dumped so hard if we take a long time to sell it, we are either in ROI or worse in the dust.

Where it was listed is a very important matter to consider because that will also affect the future of the project and possible ROI.
I have had an experience before where I bought some coins during their pre-sale period as they were promised to get listed in reputable exchanges, so I jumped and took the opportunity but unfortunately, that was a broken promise and made a lot of investors lose their money. But now, I realize that was a big mistake, I'd rather be buying coins that are already in the exchange whether it was on the top or not for at least we have the chance to sell them if needed.

But we cannot call automatically that they are good because their coins has been listed on reputable exchange since anything could happen especially we cannot control the minds of the devs so trade with proper caution is always we need to do so that we can be aware of possible outcome and can assure that we are always ready to trade it then take profit if anything good or bad happen for that coin. Expect that broken promises made because that's how dev attract their investor so you need to be more smart than them to avoid getting frustrated about things not being followed by them.

[serjent05]

I think that not good coin but good project which can raise good amount of fund from tokensale are listed on top exchange. Because they can manage the listing fee of top exchange. But those that cannot raise a good amount of funds are listed on low quality exchanges. So everything depends on the fund and the fund depends on the investors.

This is a big challenge for every project to get listed on top CEX, because the fees are high and it requires volume so you can stay on their platform. If the project’s goal is to stay longer then its better for them to create a more competitive platform just like the other projects where you don’t need to apply for the listing because the exchange itself will initiate your listing because of the demand on your project and you don’t need to worry about the fees anymore.

Of course the importance of volume cannot be overemphasized because after payment of huge listing fee the token or coin must be well traded on daily basis on the exchange that is why most projects are well advertised and promoted and many are solution to a problem so as to continue to gain adoption or investment for it sustainability in the long run, if not there is the tendency of the coin getting delisted from the exchange this is very common in Binance which periodically delist some coins whose trading volume had dropped and it developers are no longer promoting it.

With the volume requirement, I still think that wash trading is still active in the exchanges.  Like how come coins that have no use case or any apps can have a huge volume?  Unless the project team is wash-trading them, yes?  Those who are trading fairly are often delisted since they are not able to meet certain requirements while those who are doing undertricks are still listed since they always meet the required volume.  So I think not because a certain coins or token stays in top exchanges, their volume is organic.

[Bitcoinpoly]

Anyways the market is really volatile so we can’t really predict the outcome most times but what we all need to know is that Big exchanges won’t ruin their reputation just because of getting huge fee from bad projects that will eventually rug pull. Check exchanges like Binance, Bitget and see how much processes projects pass before they can even list it into their innovation zone, the process placed check and monitor how good the project is before they can accept to list it unlike exchanges who doesn’t do a proper scrutiny and check on a project before listing it.

[Godday]

I have had an experience before where I bought some coins during their pre-sale period as they were promised to get listed in reputable exchanges, so I jumped and took the opportunity but unfortunately, that was a broken promise and made a lot of investors lose their money. But now, I realize that was a big mistake, I'd rather be buying coins that are already in the exchange whether it was on the top or not for at least we have the chance to sell them if needed.

I have also had the same experience. So the important point here is that all project development teams will definitely make ambitious promises to attract investor interest. My advice is NEVER BELIEVE those promises. If you are tempted by the high price when it is listed, please buy it at the pre-sale but don't spend all your money on it. I think $100 is enough if you are sure about the project (you are sure because you have done the research not because of their promises).