money before Romance

[Wiwo]

How do you see it, if we use the time of studying women and romance, and think of money and how to make money. ?

Are you saying there have not been men who balanced the both and are still happy?

I think it depends on our emotional capacity, if we can handle them it won't be a problem. Moreover, money sometimes doesn't depend on how much time you give to study how to get it just like women too that sometimes it doesn't depend on how much time you give to study them or attention you give that makes them to come. Sometimes they come no matter how much you chase them 

Really gozie you mean we can inter mingle between women and money,  I thought women use to take our time and money need our time also,  so the both can not co-exist since one depends on the other to keep it running which is the woman.

I believe women really need money to maintain them,  and at that as a man you can't give women the time and still have time to hustle for the money at the same time unless you already have a structure on ground to contain both activities.

But that is by the ways,  one thing must kill a man,  so man will always love woman and money but woman love the money more than the man,  so for the man to have the woman,  he must first of all have the money.

There is a popular saying that,  you can lose money while chasing after a woman,  but you can not lose a woman while chasing money.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

First, I don't see how the topic is very much related to politics; you are talking more about making money here, which really is about financial literacy, and it's kind of more related to economics, and that's the reason why I think that this topic is more related to the economics board.

Well, based on your topic, yeah, money answers a whole lot of things. For example, there are a whole lot of things that a poor person cannot archive, but a rich man can just archive such needs within a twinkle of an eye. This is even a reason why one must work on building better financial sources, because once you have money, you can do things and enjoy your life.

[DelskaV]

No money no love. Money is very important for any basic things to live (hygiene products, health, atletics stuff...). Money is self love and without this you don't can know the real love.

[hasitha lakshan]

You need money to live but money is not everything, but we can say it like this, don't live without money, women don't look for love, they only look for beauty and money, have you ever seen a rich/beautiful woman living with a poor boy, all this? It's a lie, we can't do anything without money nowadays, if we are truly loved, only our mother will love us.

[BADecker]

you have to study money as you study women. Better to be a big player in finance, than a big player in romance. Nobody is called honey, like a man who controls money. money is a big tool. but, without it, the world will treat you like a big fool! the best way to make sense is by making money. otherwise you are making nonsense. Even scripture says money answers all things. money is not evil. it is the love of money that is evil. money is what enables you to convert your good thoughts to good deeds.

How do you see it, if we use the time of studying women and romance, and think of money and how to make money. ?

Jabut, you will probably wind up like this guy - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5450422.0

[Ricardo11]

If you own a lot of money, women will follow you. He who has a lot of money is certainly romantic and he is a lover of women, but he is busy investing most of the time and that is what we should do, because we have to make good use of our investment time only then our future will be good.

[BADecker]

Show just enough money to make a woman feel secure about you.

Showing too much money will bring in the leeches among women.

The goal should be to find a woman for a family. When one comes along who seems to be good, date her for a year before marriage... a year to make sure she is really the one. No sex until after marriage... with any woman.

When you know that you can trust her to be there for YOU rather than your money, gradually reveal the additional moneys you might have.

[Richbased]

If the emotional relationship between you and your wife is based on money, then the family you are trying to create will disintegrate quickly. Social relationships are greater than that and are supposed to be built on better foundations. It is true that being poor will limit your social activities, including obtaining a partner, but you do not need to be rich to have one.

Well said. Money is not the basis if one can have a partner in life because romance is not only limited to rich people. Therefore, even a man is poor he can still find a romance, the one who can accept you regardless of your situation. Isn't it good that you found each other while you're not financially stable? Just shows she is not seeing you based on what you have or what you achieve.

Money is essential and a tool (no doubt) to have everything. But there are things that money can't buy and that is genuine love and happiness.

I think money shouldn't be used as a yardstick to determine the urge or love you have for a lover or partner. It is very surprising how a lot of people more especially the female gender considers people that gives them lots of cash as what qualifies a man's love for them.

Money of a truth can bring happiness to lovers or partner but it can not guarantee that the love they both have for each other is gonna last long.

In as much as money is essential in every relationship, it is also to be noted that sometimes the money may be there but that doesn't justify true love.

Most times I blame the male gender because they have benefits the major pioneer of making women feel that the amount of money a man gives them determine their love for them. Men use money as an exchange for sexual satisfaction and alot of ladies have now been with the narrative that before they get sexually attached to a man that money must be involved. A lot of men uses money to persuade women to love them but they forget to understand that the love may diminish if the money is not forth coming again.

[btc78]

I will be for money , Romance can be taken when you have lot of money.

but you cannot find money  even how many Romance you have.

[Samlucky O]

Definitely money before Romans. If you are a lover of women, it is inportant you focus on money than women. Women are always there to bring you down although not all. what most of them need is for you to spend all you have, but don't want to add any value to your life. A man that want to succeed, should totally avoid women in other to achieve your dreams. Majority of men that succeeded, achieved it by avoiding women. There is a saying that "honey is money" if you don't have money your wife can't even treat you as she used to when you got married newly, talk more of girlfriend.

[Tanzila420]

No romance before money because first of all need money than thinking romance.

[boyptc]

Money, women and romance are three different things. Why is it like we're materializing women into like this and it's always about money and women?

Honestly, I have seen women that are for the money of the guy and those that are pure in heart and don't really are in the riches of the guy.

But reality, when they go along together, it is going to be one of the reasons for their fight. Not going to that point yet, as start and courtship, it really impresses women when you've got a lot of it and you're financially free.

[rodskee]

No romance before money because first of all need money than thinking romance.

But we can also have them the same ? marrying a Rich Man/woman will bring you both , you will have money and
 of course combined with Honey .I know it is hard  to find one but there are others that luckily marrying a millionaire and yes they end up
 getting those 2 together.while I am not agreed in taking advantage of people's weakness but i know for a fact that sometimes Love conquers
 all and yes two different status in life that making their way to happy married life.because love knows NO BOUNDARIES .

Money, women and romance are three different things. Why is it like we're materializing women into like this and it's always about money and women?

You have a point there mate , and yes never materialized women because they are not an object.

[boyptc]

Money, women and romance are three different things. Why is it like we're materializing women into like this and it's always about money and women?

You have a point there mate , and yes never materialized women because they are not an object.

I know that in these modern days, many guys always objectify as if they're easily bought and compared.

But let's just be the better person and men and let's not be like those people because, if you have a mother which is for sure and you won't be born on this world without her.

A girl sibling and other women relatives, then you understand what I am saying.

[kotajikikox]

How do you see it, if we use the time of studying women and romance, and think of money and how to make money. ?

If you have Money surely you will have Honey , even what kind of person you are even if you have the ugliest face , for sure you will be the most handsome of them all when you have million in your pocket .
that how Money makes the world go round now so expect more women will line up in your front when there is a lot of money involved.
so expect that mate and yes you are correct in Money Making first before Honey making , Romance is just there but money can get away if you do not keep it holding.

[bitnote]

Gaining knowledge should be the priority, and money will naturally follow. With knowledge, it becomes easier to identify and steer clear of individuals who are only after money in a relationship.

[jrrsparkles]

"No money No honey"

True love, made for each other is just bullshit in the current era, you will end up dying alone if you are stuck with your mediocre lifestyle.

Women love the man who is successful and this world sees who makes money as a successful man.

[Suzume]

Money is honey. In my opinion without money men is nothing in front of his family and love. Because in our society people respect a person with his money. At the stage love say nothing is needed if you stay when time spend love again says you are nothing without money. So, earn money a lot love family romance everything come their own.

[Sanugarid]

you have to study money as you study women. Better to be a big player in finance, than a big player in romance. Nobody is called honey, like a man who controls money. money is a big tool. but, without it, the world will treat you like a big fool! the best way to make sense is by making money. otherwise you are making nonsense. Even scripture says money answers all things. money is not evil. it is the love of money that is evil. money is what enables you to convert your good thoughts to good deeds.

How do you see it, if we use the time of studying women and romance, and think of money and how to make money. ?

You really need money before entering into a relationship because the person you marry will be miserable if you don't have money and you will be a burden to her.
"the world will treat you like a big fool! if you don't have money" this is true, people you know will laugh at you, so money is really important.

There are also things that money cannot buy even if it is invincible and that is the love of a person. There are many people there who are rich but not happy because they know in themselves that they are only after money.

[Jinx9975]

Balance and moderation tend to be healthiest. Focus early on education, skills, responsible saving, and advancing professionally to a baseline level able to support yourself and ideally a family someday. But also make space for dating, falling in love, adventures with partners, and the joy & growth such romances can catalyze.

The ambition shouldn't be needing money before feeling able to open your heart to someone else. But responsible maturity would say don't neglect all financial common sense either. With some wisdom, both money and romance can harmoniously fit into a well-lived life without forcing an either/or choice.