🔥No KYC Crypto Casinos & Sites | NoToKYC.com | 100$ BTC GIVEAWAY🎲

[delfastTions]

In general, the world of civilized countries is now so filled with all kinds of surveillance means, video cameras and, above all, digital personal identification technologies have advanced so much that probably in practice any person in such conditions of an urban agglomeration is almost constantly under surveillance.  Total surveillance has already developed so much that even a few years ago in the same SF, for example, there were mass protests against the total surveillance of people using video surveillance and the movement of people corresponding to the software processing of databases. 
Naturally, in such conditions, KYC ceases to be relevant at all, simply because as soon as you log into your computer or mobile phone, it already becomes known that it is you.  And why else is KYC needed here?  This is the side of personal identification under the KYC procedure that I’m talking about.  They are clearly outdated, it becomes unnecessary and only takes away your precious time for nonsense. 
Well, your Personal Data can also be considered simply distributed by you all over the world because it will definitely be stolen by hackers or sold by a corrupt employee of a casino, exchange, bank or any such organization.

It is very true, in fact this issue of privacy and anonymity has been uncovered for many years and in a great way when the great Edward Snowden did it and launched it to the world, where he made Obama see that he used it to basically spy, which had that program and they used it as the eye of God, then these things are true, the digital age includes videos and cameras everywhere, it is something that the world, especially the most developed countries, have, however, to Sometimes insist to the casino that they do not ask us for so many KYC requirements, because the only thing you can think of is that if this data is hacked, leaked or something like that, it could fall into the hands of criminals who can come to your house. , and if they see that a lot of money is being handled in crypto, they can intimidate you and even kill you, in certain countries this has happened and honestly it is something very serious and that danger should not be taken lightly.

There are criminals who only need to provide people's data to get to their homes, so hearing that can lead to rejection of KYC. As they say here in a saying: "Better safe than sorry", that's why there are so many players who They stopped playing in the casinos just because of the KYC, since they did not like to leave information about themselves in the casinos, in my particular case since I am not a whale or anything like that I think I would not be in danger, but in the same way a criminal It can give us a bad time and that must be avoided.

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

[1715284156]

1715284156

[1715284156]

1715284156

[1715284156]

1715284156

[1715284156]

1715284156

[1715284156]

1715284156

[1715284156]

1715284156

[LUCKMCFLY]

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

Well, you are absolutely right, what happens is that as long as the players do not let the casinos know these things, the casinos do not care about the very particular and specific cases where the Persons suffer this type of crime, authorities can claim that it was for everything except for a KYC, in the same way some users have said this in their threads regarding the KYC requirement, and this has been an issue that they want to cover by saying that with KYC they obtain much more security and have more options to recover their money in case it is subject to a possible hack, then what they say is that they will be able to recover the funds, but they do not say anything about the leaked data of people, which I believe is very important to handle.

I don't know how things are handled at the level of Europe and the most developed countries, but in the country where I live, even the "authorities" lend themselves to allowing criminals to commit this type of misdeeds, and what they are given is a slice of money. What they get so that criminals continue operating, in reality this is something that has become more dangerous, it may be that in developed countries things are seen very differently, but the focus of all this is going in that direction, for At least in South America things are a little more direct, and people may be a little better prepared to face these types of problems.

[Dunamisx]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

[Wiwo]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

One of the things that most gamblers look out for on casinos is the KYC requirements which is what determine how the casino value the privacy of they player's, and although sometimes we have to note the ability of those casino's and what are the level of their liquidity and prorefecency of service,  besides just kyc, there are other things that can forces gamblers to ditch off no kyc casinos and go after kyc casinos and one of such is the amount of available liquidity and games.

For me, I prefer to just hand over my documents for verifications if I trust the site, instead of risking my funds to  play on a casino that does not have good volumes and risk not paying out if and when I hit a jackpot, all because of no kyc.

[ScamViruS]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

If a platform is trusted and has a good reputation in the market, gamblers have no problem doing KYC in that casino, because they know that doing KYC here will not face any problem and will have a good experience in the future. Doing KYC is difficult for many gamblers as they try to prioritize their privacy. As a result those gamblers refrain from joining casinos that ask KYC and try to find another alternative as they feel it is a better option for them. Gamblers really don't care much about how the government kicks in, so they just want to be able to withdraw their winnings properly and gamble safely on that platform.

[8ombard]

Is the OP still active?

[Bitinity]

Is the OP still active?

His last online was a week ago as you can see in his profile page. If you want to get your site listed in his site, you can use the "request listing" feature which can be found on the bottom of the homepage above the 18+ logo or you can simply visit https://www.notokyc.com/request. Perhaps they will contact you by email/telegram once you submit the request since you have to put your email address and telegram on the request form.

[delfastTions]

It seems to me that often criminals can start blackmailing ordinary people who are not millionaires or cryptocurrency whales but who simply somehow provided their personal data (including their address where they live) as part of the KYC procedure at some crypto casino, and these  the data was stolen and made public on the network. 
After all, the very fact that a player has a cryptocurrency can already indicate that the person has this cryptocurrency, and the fact that he plays in a casino means that he can afford to lose this cryptocurrency.  So the criminal figures out that he can blackmail such a cryptocurrency owner.  And in the process of the crime, find out how much money his victim has. 
So it turns out that the very fact of playing in a casino using cryptocurrency and de-anonymizing the player using KYC is already a potential criminogenic factor and poses a danger to human safety.  And of course, law enforcement agencies must fight such manifestations of crime and extortion.
 And not just fight after a crime has been committed, but carry out preventive measures.
 And by the way, maintaining the anonymity of the player and the absence of public data about him on the Internet is a very high-quality type of counteraction and prevention of this type of crime.

Well, you are absolutely right, what happens is that as long as the players do not let the casinos know these things, the casinos do not care about the very particular and specific cases where the Persons suffer this type of crime, authorities can claim that it was for everything except for a KYC, in the same way some users have said this in their threads regarding the KYC requirement, and this has been an issue that they want to cover by saying that with KYC they obtain much more security and have more options to recover their money in case it is subject to a possible hack, then what they say is that they will be able to recover the funds, but they do not say anything about the leaked data of people, which I believe is very important to handle.

I don't know how things are handled at the level of Europe and the most developed countries, but in the country where I live, even the "authorities" lend themselves to allowing criminals to commit this type of misdeeds, and what they are given is a slice of money. What they get so that criminals continue operating, in reality this is something that has become more dangerous, it may be that in developed countries things are seen very differently, but the focus of all this is going in that direction, for At least in South America things are a little more direct, and people may be a little better prepared to face these types of problems.

The problem is that there is a huge difference in the fight against crime in developed countries and in all other countries of the world that are considered underdeveloped.  But at the same time, everyone forgets that more than 7 billion people live in these countries.  There are only a billion people in developed countries.  Particularly in undeveloped countries, crimes such as blackmail and extortion, and often outright robbery, are very likely when criminals find out the victim’s address and find out that he has money, such as cryptocurrency.  And the fact that such a person undergoes KYC at the casino, and then this data is stolen by hackers or corrupt employees.  And the result is simply direct attacks by bandits on ordinary people.  And accordingly, the number of such crimes is growing. 
Here are the obvious and completely ugly and harmful consequences of this damn KYC procedure. 
But for some reason, no one among legislators is in a hurry to remember this and does not like to talk about it.  And it's time to do this.  At least even on our forum.

[EarnOnVictor]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

Your concern is true and the no-KYC casinos have been the no-go area for me since the day I started gambling and I don't think I can be so tempted to register there judging by the bad reviews I read which are mostly against them. I was tempted a while ago, especially when my supporting documents for verification had expired, but in all, it was never worth it in my view so I have always avoided it. Apart from the money someone could lose due to fraud since no one can question them, it is also bad in the sense that they are not regulated, they could be laundering money, and by patronising them, it technically means that you are supporting such a bad operation.

Needless to say, they can just disappear into the thin air as some of them have done, having gotten enough money from their customers. These guys are only operating because of the under-regulation of internet activities. For this, they can do as they like without anyone questioning them or sanctioning them. So why entrust my money to the care of such a company?

But for the ill-gotten money of some people and the so-called privacy concern of others, they would opt for it. I can't as nothing is as private as people make it seem and I have nothing to hide.

[Out of mind]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

[freedomgo]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw.

It depends on the casino, but in most casinos I've used, I was never force to submit a KYC before I was able to withdraw my money.
I think it also matter on how much you have gambled, because as for me, I'm just a typical gambler betting size is not big since gambling is just for me to enjoy.

When they are regulated, they can require their users for KYC, it could be now or later, anytime, so we should be ready with that.

When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

That's up to the casino as they are regulated and they follow some mandates from their regulaor. If at the beginning when we read the TOS that "KYC" thing is present, we should not neglict it and assume they are not requiring a KYC since they didn't require us when we started. At least be ready anytime, beacuse if you are clean, there's nothing to hide, just follow the rules and enjoy the winning.

[BitcoinVN_official]

Good afternoon from Ho Chi Minh City/Vietnam! 

Our service (launched in 2014) would be interested to list with your page; however it seems currently the contact form is broken.

(see below screenshot)

Besides offering an on- & offramp from/to Vietnamese Dong (VND) we also allow our users to swap different cryptocurrencies; generally without the need for an account creation.

Only VND deposits currently face tight restrictions due to the risk of "dirty funds" in the Vietnam banking system. 

---

[danadc]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

Those things are what I have experienced most in the casinos because they are recent, they are not old, I only trust like 3 or 4 casinos and I have complied with the KYC because it is the easiest way to do anything to be able to generate the best trust in my deposit , it is Always important that our money goes to the best casino so as not to have problems when withdrawing, for me the worst thing is that they don't tell me anything about KYC and I have to do it last when I need to withdraw my money, that's for my is the worst thing they can do

In the casinos they must say that the KYC Verification must be completed so that they can withdraw, that is the first thing to say in a casino instead of telling them to deposit and deposit, because that is what is really needed, withdrawing is the main thing for all Players.

[Pascal Parvex]

Hi. My simple gambling website is based on the Waves blockchain and is decentralized. No account is needed, you only need a Waves wallet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201877.0

[OvertimeMarkets]

Looking for crypto platforms without the KYC hassle? Check out NoToKYC.com.

Your gateway to no-KYC crypto casinos and exchanges. Simple, private, and efficient.
Whether you're a gambler or a trader, if you're looking for No KYC platforms, we've got you covered!

Our AI's Ranking Criteria:
- KYC Level: We prioritize low or No KYC platforms. Perfect for those seeking KYC-free crypto services.
- Cryptos: Platforms supporting decentralized cryptos like Bitcoin (BTC) and Monero (XMR) rank higher.
- License: Credible licenses, such as Curacao, add trustworthiness.
- Withdrawal Time: Instant withdrawals? Our AI approves!
- Accepted Cryptos: Diversity in crypto options fetches a higher rank.
 

How to get EXCLUSIVE BONUSES?

1. Visit No KYC Casinos
2. Click on the shaking gift box in the menu.
3. Follow the simple steps to earn spins.
4. Use your spins to unlock exclusive bonuses.

Best Crypto Casinos No Kyc Crypto Casinos Anonymous Crypto Casinos no deposit bonuses

Hi there, we just recently joined bitcointalk, but basically i think https://www.overtimemarkets.xyz/ fits the description you guys are looking to list on your website perfectly.
You just need an Ethereum wallet to interact with the platform, limiting or banning successful users is not possible, and no KYC of course. Another important point is that the platform is non-custodial, meaning that you dont need to deposit or withdraw funds, you interact directly with the smart contracts and nobody can stop you from claiming your winnings.

[delfastTions]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

[EarnOnVictor]

If some casino platforms don't require KYC first, I think KYC is mandatory later when it's time to withdraw. When you deposit your money in the casino and win bad then if you want to withdraw that money later it will definitely ask for your license and KYC. Most casinos tend to offer KYC because KYC is required so that they can identify users and prevent money laundering. The casinos you mentioned here might ask for KYC from the user later. Although it doesn't seem to ask for KYC during registration, players may need to do KYC when they want to withdraw money to your casino. And if there is no KYC system then later on may be shady dealing with the players to withdraw more money instead of making KYC mandatory.

But I continue to believe, and the experience of other players clearly confirms that sudden KYC in the event of withdrawal of money that you won in any casino is now an almost inevitable process and the inevitable course of development of the gaming industry. 
And now, increasingly, the exploitation of the marketing slogan “No KYC” is turning into a farce and a false promise.  I think that legislators are everywhere attacking cryptocurrency and such a characteristic feature of cryptocurrency as the anonymity of payments.  And many casinos in their jurisdictions simply cannot afford to operate normally and legally if they do not introduce this KYC procedure.
 This is all sad simply because millions of gamblers would prefer to remain completely anonymous, and the realities of the gambling industry provide fewer and fewer opportunities for this. 
So now everyone should probably be skeptical and distrustful when someone supposedly guarantees “No KYC”.

It is high time those guys perish the idea of anonymity, there shouldn't be a thing like that as long as you are a human being and are dealing with financial transactions. If anyone wants to be anonymous, the forest is there, go there, after all, you will not be a threat to the civilised society since you are living in the bush. But if you must live in civilized environment, then you must be accounted for, there must be the link between you and what you do. In all good sense, if you are not the kind that is illegal in activities, you have nothing to worry about, even as no one is revealing your details like many feared. Who even cares about that in most cases?

We all must know and acknowledge that regulation is a must unless there is no crime in the world where everyone is trusted to be sane and do the right thing. Is that what we experience in our societies? Certainly not. The more you allow anonymity, the more the evil doers use the opportunity to perpetrate their evil, and I do not think that is the society we all want to build.

However, many casinos are only hiding under the regulation to cheat their customers, some of the acclaimed no-KYC casinos would later ask for it when the customer is such that is good at his games and also withdraws frequently or wanting to withdraw a huge amount of money. That's just cheating and not about being answerable to any regulation. But if a KYC casino asks you for the KYC, it is their right since they are not a no-KYC casino, it may only take time, they will ask. Only that the odd times they ask at times could make it suspicious, nevertheless, they are still within their right.

[Mr. Magkaisa]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

[avp2306]

Before it has always always been that the gamblers oftentimes try to avoid some of these gambling casinos that have KYC problems because they know it may hard them to scale through, now gamblers are no more on the look on that, instead they focuses on the nature of the games and services provided, the platforms to be enjoyed and they also don't mind if the government regulations works against such or since they are not affected as a gambler, the gambling platforms have to soughted that our with the regulatory authorities and government.

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

I understand why people got afraid on submitting their KYC details since there's so many negative possibilities could happen to them if there's a sudden leakage of private data's on the platform you are using and you might encounter a problem like stolen identity issues or other related to frauds or scamming activity that's why to many people are still been skeptical to submit their information even if they know the platform they are using is reputable.

But we understand that this is common requirements now on casino or even on every crypto platforms we are using so the least thing we can do is to choose those most reputable among them all so we can minimize the risk to get a potential issue in future.

[panjul07]

           -   Sometimes I don't understand why other gamblers seem so afraid to pass their KYC, and in the first place, if they read the Terms and Conditions of a casino platform, they will immediately see if it is my KYC or not.

Because some gamblers cares about their privacy and this is the reason why they do not want to deal with KYC especially for gambling purpose.
Not about afraid or not IMO but more about privacy preferences and I believe it may change later.
We all know that there was no KYC at all in this crypto world, not online gambling but also when it comes to exchange service.
Regulation changed later when most online services where money is involved need to deal with KYC, that's why people's preferences are also changed due to their needs.

And if, for example, a casino does not have KYC as long as you do not reach their total wagered requirements, you will be able to withdraw what you have won on the platform unless you have reached the limits; there are other casinos like that.

Although there are some casinos that has KYC rules based on wagering/deposit/withdrawal limit but in fact casino can ask it anytime even if you have not reach the limit so dont rely on such limit but always be ready to be asked for KYC anytime.