old news, nothing new, someone necro-bumped this topic from ages ago
but for clarity..
the guy that lost his keys, has no legal bases to win. so nothing will come of it..
why? well lets explain:
when disposing of trash the guy lost rights to the property.
now it sits in landfill, meaning its now on the land owners property, in their possession.. meaning now the hard drive is property of the land owner(council)
the council has trespass policy set up which protects them from just allowing any unauthorised people onto the property.
he has no bases to be allowed on the landfill site
the guy knows this. he knows he wont get his trash(keys) back.. so last year wanted to get rich from suing, not from getting the keys..
but he would have lost the case too, which even before/without court proceeding is a 2nd financial loss of paying his own legal costs for a unwinnable venture in court and other costs over years of his pursuits
...and if it went to court it will cost him legal costs of having to pay the councils legal costs due to losing.. so that would have been a third loss.. should it have gone to court
regret is a big thing. but he should have spent the last 10 years doing all he could to find other ways to get rich
EG
when he lost his hard drive and he seen the price hit the 2nd ATH in 2013.. his regret then was he didnt have the 8k coin to sell at the 2013 peak
(8k*$1.2k=$9.6m(£7.6m)) he regretted not being a £7.6m millionaire
however instead of then funding £##k in land surveyors, IT/AI experts and legal advice and such to try getting the keys. he could have invested £58k* to buy 170btc in 2014's market correction (after his realisation of his mistake) which would get him to £7.6m today($9.6m) which would have brought him back to his regret win lose price
*yep buying 170k in 2014 would have been ~$400 each = $68k(£58k), which is probably cheaper than what he has spent on surveys and legal costs back then
..
but lets say he did take them to court in regards to the 'sue for hundreds of million to bankrupt council'
any good lawyer would subtly take notes when questioning him about his regret moments.
where he would admit his regret was due to noticing the second ATH (2013 of $1.2k(£946)) on the news and then selling obviously after the ATH
so lets call it back down to $400/btc by the time he put coins into a CEX after the ATH
which the council lawyers would then use as evidence that his plan and unrealised profit/claim of loss would have been only £2.6m($3.2m) not the hundreds of millions, not the $9m/$7m peak... because council lawyers would then recite his regret that he couldnt sell just after the 2013ATH price(his realisation moment) so that would have been the cut-off level of any settlement.. but he would have still lost the case and not get a settlement..
they would not need/have to offer, or propose paying £2.6m.. but any valid claim(which he hasnt got) would have been capped at under <£3m by the guys own admissions
so the council would not be worrying about going bankrupt
EDIT: responding to below
...
You said nothing with your giant mess. Please never post again.
you waste your time on a puzzle you cant solve. trying to find a key you cant find...(your post history)
hmm sounds familiar to this story
i would have snidely said go play with the puzzle.. but honestly.. dont waste another breath on it, learn from your mistakes
have a nice day.