🖤😏

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Ah I see! The OP has been inactive for almost five years and only recently got a new negative. I missed that fact.

Good for you.

so I cannot say whether he has changed or not.

No one knows but people change when time pass. Holding into the past is not natural.

So these DT1 members included her on their trust list? Hope this data is up to date.

I think you got those people who he trust but I don't think there will be much change. JollyGood only add people who added him. He is one of a prime example of backscratchers. I will bring you a link shortly.

[examplens]

Whether you reply here or not, in both cases it's your reputations on the line, I just want to know some of your opinions.😉

Why would anyone explain their trust list to you?
When we are talking about the JG case, you are not the first to ask that question, so most of the users on this list have already left their direct or indirect explanations. If you are really curious, try to research.

If I may ask, suchmoon is also on my trust list. I saw some of his red tags on your trust page. Can you direct me to the link to the discussion you opened because of that negative feedback?
I would have to look at such a discussion in addition to this one in order to make a proper judgment.

So as you now see I have really changed, this is called learning from past mistakes. 🤣

We have yet to see changes in you, your praise of yourself does not mean much. However, from this discussion, we can see your habits from the past, which are not very promising.

[decodx]

We have 2 scenarios,
1- I trust you, you trust me and we are friends, if you see me keep doing something wrong, would you abandon me and break up our friendship or keep being my friend no matter what?

I don't trust you.

2- we trust each other and have a professional relationship, I keep doing things wrong, you tell me over and over but I don't listen, will you keep trusting me or end our relationship?

I still don't trust you.

More specifically I want to know where do you draw a red line, if you tell JG for example that you don't agree with what he is doing and consider his actions unjustified (would he care about your opinion?) If not then why do you keep him around? Because he has done so much good to wash his wrong doings clean and on top of that he is a friend?

But the thing is, I don't think he (and other DTs who left you a neutral/negative tags) are wrong. At least not in your case. That doesn't make him my "friend".

I'm not worried about my "income from a signature campaign" God has always provided for me from unimaginable places/ sources. I just can't stand injustice, bullying, tyranny and mockery, I don't like it when people think I'm an idiot, so as long as I'm allowed to post here, I will stay the same even so with improving my moral standards.

I don't believe you're an idiot. In fact, I think you're quite intelligent, above average even. And, unless you are breaking the forum rules, you should be allowed to post wherever you want.
But I still don't trust you.

Please stop trying to justify/ rationalize each other's motives/ actions. It's a simple yes or no, whether doing X is wrong or right, no body needs to vouch for me, btw I'm not addressing anyone in particular. These are general questions, of course you "don't have" to answer.

I'm not trying to justify or rationalize my actions. You invited me to respond here.

[digaran]

 I don't think he (and other DTs who left you a neutral/negative tags) are wrong. At least not in your case. That doesn't make him my "friend".

For the lack of any other analogy which could fit best here, I will have no choice other than using this analogy to deliver my point.

So in your opinion, if someone does something bad, goes to prison do his time and is then released free after lets say 5 years, now he is walking in a park talking with his friends, should a "police officer" seeing this person puts handcuffs on him and take him back to prison for the same "crime" he already did time for?

Interesting mindset, and this is why a decentralized trust system turns into a joke. Everyone will follow their own sets of rules.


Well, this is the same with bitcoin and all  the garbage forks, theymos' version/vision of trust system could be considered the original idea/bitcoin, the rest will change the rules and do whatever they want.


Let me simulate a conversation with an imaginary random member:

- well I think it depends digiran, if that criminal shows signs of violent behaviour and shows no signs of "change" means they haven't learned their lesson, so yes any police officer should arrest him on sight. digiran nobody trusts you here, go away.

- digaran : Alright, I think I ended up in  one of the UK's court houses. 😅 I hope you never read my post about UK's judges.

Edit: I have already said enough, I said what was needed, read this post and tell the answers to yourself. I already know what they are gonna be. I just wanted others to see you for what you are "most trustworthy members of bitcointalk"

And lastly:

"In the name of God, the passionate and the merciful"

"Many are the Jinns and men we have made for Hell: They have hearts wherewith they understand not, eyes wherewith they see not, and ears wherewith they hear not. They are like cattle,- nay more misguided: for they are heedless (of warning)."

Holy Qura'n, 7:179.


"Whomever Allah guides is rightly guided, and whomever He leads astray—you will never for find them any guardians besides Him. On the Day of Resurrection, We shall muster them [scrambling] on their faces, blind, dumb, and deaf. Their refuge shall be hell. Whenever it subsides, We shall intensify the blaze for them"


17:97.