So I got a free laptop and am looking to setup a linux os for a node .

[philipma1957]

yeah this is an Asus i7 3rd gen with 8gb ram. Cost = zero. I grabbed the 2tb ssd for about $85 usd including the tax. Which is really cheap price for a 2tb sata ssd.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07YD5F561?

I just woke up I will go check and see how much it loaded.

It was at 13% with 400,000 block to go went I went to sleep at 1am it is now 9 am.

Now at 70% with 138,000 blocks left.

I will be teaching myself and my wife to run this as I am a bit disgusted with the direct apple os is

heading to.

[LoyceV]

I grabbed the 2tb ssd for about $85 usd including the tax. Which is really cheap price for a 2tb sata ssd.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07YD5F561?

For what it's worth: there's a huge difference in SSDs. This BX500 for instance:

Crucial’s BX500 provides up to 540/500 MB/s of sequential read/write throughput, but that can drop to an average of just 100 MB/s during a sustained workload.

I found out the hard way how sneaky drive manufacturers are nowadays, after I bought a 2 TB HDD that drops to kilobytes per second when filling the last 20%. With this SSD it's not that bad, and for your purpose you'll probably never notice it, but it is something to keep in mind. I now only buy disks that can sustain their performance until they're full.

I will be teaching myself and my wife to run this as I am a bit disgusted with the direct apple os is

I've never liked Apple, and I don't like Windows, so I've been using Linux for a long time. I love it, and can only recommend to get used to using the command line (and vi). I still prefer the console for most file operations, it's faster and much more powerful than the GUI.

[philipma1957]

I grabbed the 2tb ssd for about $85 usd including the tax. Which is really cheap price for a 2tb sata ssd.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07YD5F561?

For what it's worth: there's a huge difference in SSDs. This BX500 for instance:

Crucial’s BX500 provides up to 540/500 MB/s of sequential read/write throughput, but that can drop to an average of just 100 MB/s during a sustained workload.

I found out the hard way how sneaky drive manufacturers are nowadays, after I bought a 2 TB HDD that drops to kilobytes per second when filling the last 20%. With this SSD it's not that bad, and for your purpose you'll probably never notice it, but it is something to keep in mind. I now only buy disks that can sustain their performance until they're full.

I will be teaching myself and my wife to run this as I am a bit disgusted with the direct apple os is

I've never liked Apple, and I don't like Windows, so I've been using Linux for a long time. I love it, and can only recommend to get used to using the command line (and vi). I still prefer the console for most file operations, it's faster and much more powerful than the GUI.

What would be your preferred  sata ssd and your preferred pcie ssd.

Now that prices are decent I buy 2tb and 4tb when I buy.

This 'free laptop'  now cost me 85 bucks due to buying the 2tb micron/crucial ssd.

[LoyceV]

What would be your preferred  sata ssd and your preferred pcie ssd.

I bought a Samsung 870 EVO Sata SSD a couple of months back. 1 TB for just under €60. My old laptop doesn't have a more modern slot, and one of the reasons I haven't replaced the laptop is that I like having 2 drives in there. Most new laptops are too small for that.

Now that prices are decent I buy 2tb and 4tb when I buy.

I went from 64 GB to 256 to 1 TB. Next one will be 4 TB indeed, but it'll take years before I really need it.

I've had the Crucial MX500 too. It performs better than the BX500.

Comparing the 870 EVO vs BX500: the main difference is in "Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO. +786%". But like I said: you probably won't notice it in most applications. My main reason to skip the cheaper drives was the realisation that replacing a drive takes many hours and isn't worth the effort to save a small amount of money.

[NotATether]

What would be your preferred  sata ssd and your preferred pcie ssd.

I bought a Samsung 870 EVO Sata SSD a couple of months back. 1 TB for just under €60. My old laptop doesn't have a more modern slot, and one of the reasons I haven't replaced the laptop is that I like having 2 drives in there. Most new laptops are too small for that.

90% of laptop users will never make use of their dual drives so there is nothing to really miss here. If for whatever reason you feel an additional hard disk (not just more disk space) is required, feel free to buy any of the external SSDs that have reasonable performance. And have acceptable failure rates as well - i.e. no Sandisk SSDs.

[LoyceV]

90% of laptop users will never make use of their dual drives so there is nothing to really miss here.

My current laptop has a second disk in the bay of it's DVD burner, but most newer laptops are too thin for DVD drives so that doesn't work anymore.

If for whatever reason you feel an additional hard disk (not just more disk space) is required, feel free to buy any of the external SSDs that have reasonable performance. And have acceptable failure rates as well - i.e. no Sandisk SSDs.

I don't want to rely on a permanent USB connection, it's far too easy to get disconnected.

[philipma1957]

What would be your preferred  sata ssd and your preferred pcie ssd.

I bought a Samsung 870 EVO Sata SSD a couple of months back. 1 TB for just under €60. My old laptop doesn't have a more modern slot, and one of the reasons I haven't replaced the laptop is that I like having 2 drives in there. Most new laptops are too small for that.

90% of laptop users will never make use of their dual drives so there is nothing to really miss here. If for whatever reason you feel an additional hard disk (not just more disk space) is required, feel free to buy any of the external SSDs that have reasonable performance. And have acceptable failure rates as well - i.e. no Sandisk SSDs.

yeah sandisk and western digital fail all the time. (same ssd btw)

Since this laptop was free and old I went cheap got the 85 bucks for 2tb crucial.

I7 3rd gen is snappy.

I guess I should put bitcointalk on it and practice linux mint more that way.

I have so many fucking windows pc's and  Macs
I normally use windows pc's to mine gpus'

and Macs to create content.

But with Mac altering my favorite feature (easy clone and boot externally) I do not want to use them.

So back to the least used (for me ) os.

[af_newbie]

Ahhh, the linux distro wars bitciontalk style.

IMO debian and unbutu and the projects based on them such as mint are the most supported though the community with a lot of places to look for help.
CentOS and it's forks tend to be more stable (not always but tend to be)
And FreeBSD is a royal pain in the ass, but once you get it up it's rock solid and secure.

But, for something like this. If you install one and it does not work for you, just move to the next. You don't have to live with any particular distro if it's not working the way you want it to.

-Dave

+1

But it is not as bad as it was 15-20 years ago. I recently installed it on my laptop, without too many issues.

Can run as a workstation (Xfce/Plasma, native Firefox/Chromium, Office, and 40k+ native apps or
WINE, Linux compatibility. etc). Or run it as a firewall, router, mail server etc.

PF on it just blows IPTables out of water. pkg installer is awesome.

If you want, you can slim it down, compile for your particular hardware.

I am really impressed by how much it has improved. I am switching all my machines to freeBSD.

PS. I am done playing with blocking/patching Windows, or deciding which Linux distro is the 'best'.

FreeBSD is the best, end of story.