How Much Bitcoin Address with balance today?

[blue Snow]

So I am confused, How Much is Bitcoin Address with balance today?,

As I know, we can create unlimited Bitcoin addresses using a 12/24 word mnemonic seed and put the balance in multiple of addresses. But not all people spread it to another address, usually sent to the same address if want to save it. I think it's very dangerous and will be a target. everything is gone without a trace.

Another question, Is there any method to check Bitcoin address was created and filled in the balance?

[1714551478]

1714551478

[1714551478]

1714551478

[1714551478]

1714551478

[Jawhead999]

According to LoyceV's data, currently there are 48,202,139 funded Bitcoin addresses. The trend always increasing, even though on August 30, 2023 there are more funded addresses than today.

48,202,139 funded Bitcoin addresses on October 06, 2023
  22,658,198 of those start with 1
  8,587,825 of those start with 3
  15,706,982 of those start with bc1q
  1,249,131 of those start with bc1p

If you want to check the entire funded Bitcoin address, you need to download the big file in this site http://addresses.loyce.club/?C=M;O=D

[LoyceV]

usually sent to the same address if want to save it. I think it's very dangerous and will be a target. everything is gone without a trace.

The amount of funds on one address doesn't matter. A properly created cold address won't get compromised. And if you mess up, spreading your funds on different addresses doesn't help you either.

The trend always increasing, even though on August 30, 2023 there are more funded addresses than today.

When transaction fees go down, it's a good time to consolidate small inputs. Many people (and casinos) do that.

There are 23,589,958 Bitcoin addresses with at least 0.001BTC in them. For 0.01BTC, it's 12,374,540 addresses.
35,705,480 addresses have at least 0.0001BTC, and more than a million addresses hold less than 500 sats.

[SmartGold01]

There are 23,589,958 Bitcoin addresses with at least 0.001BTC in them. For 0.01BTC, it's 12,374,540 addresses.
35,705,480 addresses have at least 0.0001BTC, and more than a million addresses hold less than 500 sats.

What a break down, I never knew there is a place to know the amount of bitcoin addresses with funds inside.
Sorry to asked this too; how do you collect the data and also determined how they transacted?
From own reasoning it is very hard to detects or fetched out those addresses.

[LoyceV]

What a break down, I never knew there is a place to know the amount of bitcoin addresses with funds inside.

The blockchain is public data. Anyone can access it.

how do you collect the data and also determined how they transacted?

See: List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance. TL;DR:

Credits
Blockchair Database Dumps has a staggering amount of data, easily accessible (at 10 kB/s) with daily updates. All data presented in this topic comes from Blockchair.

[SmartGold01]

What a break down, I never knew there is a place to know the amount of bitcoin addresses with funds inside.

The blockchain is public data. Anyone can access it.

how do you collect the data and also determined how they transacted?

See: List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance. TL;DR:

Credits
Blockchair Database Dumps has a staggering amount of data, easily accessible (at 10 kB/s) with daily updates. All data presented in this topic comes from Blockchair.

Thank you for the head up..
I have never thought of this before this topic just opened my eyes to know this very thing today, truly I keep knowing new things everyday by day.

[Odohu]

What a break down, I never knew there is a place to know the amount of bitcoin addresses with funds inside.

The blockchain is public data. Anyone can access it.

how do you collect the data and also determined how they transacted?

See: List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance. TL;DR:

Credits
Blockchair Database Dumps has a staggering amount of data, easily accessible (at 10 kB/s) with daily updates. All data presented in this topic comes from Blockchair.

Thank you for the head up..
I have never thought of this before this topic just opened my eyes to know this very thing today, truly I keep knowing new things everyday by day.

When I first saw the post, I was shocked and felt it was referring to something that was not feasible. But, seeing the comments and responses actually shows the level of work that has been done in Bitcoin data management and retrieval.
I truly appreciate the inputs of many guys, and I truly encourage more innovations as that is the way to truly unlock the power and beauty of this amazing technology.

[CryptSafe]

What a break down, I never knew there is a place to know the amount of bitcoin addresses with funds inside.

The blockchain is public data. Anyone can access it.

how do you collect the data and also determined how they transacted?

See: List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance. TL;DR:

Credits
Blockchair Database Dumps has a staggering amount of data, easily accessible (at 10 kB/s) with daily updates. All data presented in this topic comes from Blockchair.

It is nice to have seen this topic here. Blockchain is  indeed a public data unlike the centralized system where computations  are done secretly and results brought out manually for people to see and in some cases there are discrepancies in the figures which contradicts the reality.

I am hopefully waiting to see innovations that can be able to take cognizance of flagged wallet addresses.

[LoyceV]

flagged wallet addresses.

I've flagged them all. You're welcome.

Reading tip: [Blacklist] of unreliable, 'taint proclaiming' Bitcoin services / exchanges.

[blue Snow]

Thanks for the public data,

another question is, do we know those address does not have an owner?, I mean the owner has lost the key and can't access the address anymore?.

According to LoyceV's data, currently there are 48,202,139 funded Bitcoin addresses. The trend always increasing, even though on August 30, 2023 there are more funded addresses than today.

Damn, 48 million addresses are too much, and surprise always increases every day which makes a positive trend for us (holder).

usually sent to the same address if want to save it. I think it's very dangerous and will be a target. everything is gone without a trace.

The amount of funds on one address doesn't matter. A properly created cold address won't get compromised. And if you mess up, spreading your funds on different addresses doesn't help you either.

I often hear that we shouldn't save on one address for safety. But, I think it's useless too if spreading it to many addresses but still using the same word mnemonic seed on 1 wallet.

[dansus021]

another question is, do we know those address does not have an owner?, I mean the owner has lost the key and can't access the address anymore?.

In my opinion.
I don't think this is possible since we don't know the owner of each address we probably connected one address to another address as happened on Hot Wallet in Centralized Exchange but for personal wallets, it is hard to know it.

I often hear that we shouldn't save on one address for safety. But, I think it's useless too if spreading it to many addresses but still using the same word mnemonic seed on 1 wallet.

I think when you have too many addresses with different mnemonics will confuse you when try to move the money  . However, In my cases, I use a bunch of different addresses sometimes with different private keys for Airdrop purposes  . cold wallet only needs one

[MusaMohamed]

Blockchair.com's address balance filter.

I use blockchair.com explorer with the filter above for finding addresses with balance from 1 satoshi and more.
Results as of writing is:
There are 49,118,892 addresses with their balance more from 0.00000001 BTC or 1 satoshi and above.

Number of Bitcoin active addresses is lower a lot.
https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/bitcoin-active-addresses/

Some more information about addresses and Bitcoin wealth distribution from Bitinfocharts.com

Wealth Distribution
Top 10/100/1,000/10,000 addesses   5.77% / 14.60% / 32.75% / 55.36% Total

Addresses richer than
1/100/1,000/10,000 USD   40,770,282 / 17,012,296 / 7,305,571 / 2,071,887

Active Addresses last 24h
(Number of unique (from or to) addresses per day)   784,296

[Helena Yu]

Number of Bitcoin active addresses is lower a lot.
https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/bitcoin-active-addresses/

It's make sense because most of people are use Bitcoin for long term investment. I'm not denying there are also many people actively trade Bitcoin, but they do that in centralized exchanges and even though they're active, it has no relation with address since trading is associated to internal system, not blockchain. If they withdraw their coins to other non custodial wallet or other sites, then it will make the address become active.

[pooya87]

another question is, do we know those address does not have an owner?, I mean the owner has lost the key and can't access the address anymore?.

People have always been speculating about these things but because there is a certain anonymity about Bitcoin and the addresses, we can never know who a certain address belongs to and whether they still have access to the keys!

[hugeblack]

Damn, 48 million addresses are too much, and surprise always increases every day which makes a positive trend for us (holder).

I do not know if there is any benefit to this data, but it gives us a general view of the amount of adoption, which does not seem great. The number of 48 million addresses may indicate one way or another because the number of users is in the process of 10 million to 100 million, and the number may be less than that. You need to remove the active addresses, which are usually for platforms or services, and you will find an approximate number of the total number of users.

[LoyceV]

The number of 48 million addresses may indicate one way or another because the number of users is in the process of 10 million to 100 million

How can you call someone who doesn't own a funded Bitcoin address a Bitcoin user? I know many people keep their coins on exchanges, but I'd argue those are speculators, not users.