Uquid SCAM. Owes me tokens I had in uquid.com

[alani123]

There was no such email.

Ok, I dig further, this time their medium. As it turns out, the main problem was, indeed, the "ICO" withdrawal. There was an article prior to the one mentioned above, here, that implied that the deadline was not just for ICO token, it was for every token in their system.



As you can see, the announcement we previously discussed was intended for every token holders, not exclusively for ICO token holders.

This is a 2017 article and clearly states that it's about the ICO.
IN fact, UQC tokens inside uquid.com remained usable for a few years past the ICO.

I do tend to believe their support staff that replied to me however that they lost or at least mishandled account data, because even though I was registered in their platform they ceased cominications after a certain point while the platform remained active. Uquid went through a period of little to no activity, but still once they came back the token was there and the platform re-emerged with it. That shouldn't be an excuse to mix deposited money with the rest of the platform's funds.

[holydarkness]

Ok, I dig further, this time their medium. As it turns out, the main problem was, indeed, the "ICO" withdrawal. There was an article prior to the one mentioned above, here, that implied that the deadline was not just for ICO token, it was for every token in their system.

[image snip]

As you can see, the announcement we previously discussed was intended for every token holders, not exclusively for ICO token holders.

This is a 2017 article and clearly states that it's about the ICO.
IN fact, UQC tokens inside uquid.com remained usable for a few years past the ICO.

I do tend to believe their support staff that replied to me however that they lost or at least mishandled account data, because even though I was registered in their platform they ceased cominications after a certain point while the platform remained active. Uquid went through a period of little to no activity, but still once they came back the token was there and the platform re-emerged with it. That shouldn't be an excuse to mix deposited money with the rest of the platform's funds.

Is that a fact or are you guessing? Can you perhaps provide a screenshot or any backing evidence to prove that the token are still operational for few years after the ICO [and the deadline to withdraw token, as they announced].

[alani123]

Ok, I dig further, this time their medium. As it turns out, the main problem was, indeed, the "ICO" withdrawal. There was an article prior to the one mentioned above, here, that implied that the deadline was not just for ICO token, it was for every token in their system.

[image snip]

As you can see, the announcement we previously discussed was intended for every token holders, not exclusively for ICO token holders.

This is a 2017 article and clearly states that it's about the ICO.
IN fact, UQC tokens inside uquid.com remained usable for a few years past the ICO.

I do tend to believe their support staff that replied to me however that they lost or at least mishandled account data, because even though I was registered in their platform they ceased cominications after a certain point while the platform remained active. Uquid went through a period of little to no activity, but still once they came back the token was there and the platform re-emerged with it. That shouldn't be an excuse to mix deposited money with the rest of the platform's funds.

Is that a fact or are you guessing? Can you perhaps provide a screenshot or any backing evidence to prove that the token are still operational for few years after the ICO [and the deadline to withdraw token, as they announced].

Can YOU tell me why you think that the image you provided refers to coin OTHER the the ICO when it explicitly mentions ICO coins and was posted at the period of the ICO ending?
You provided this, if you have a different interpretation you should be able to tell me too. I'm only second guessing as to why you're making this assumption to be honest.
Personally I feel like I've already provided enough evidence that the commission I received was received outside of the ICO as it had the same format as normal commissions on their platform.

[holydarkness]

Is that a fact or are you guessing? Can you perhaps provide a screenshot or any backing evidence to prove that the token are still operational for few years after the ICO [and the deadline to withdraw token, as they announced].

Can YOU tell me why you think that the image you provided refers to coin OTHER the the ICO when it explicitly mentions ICO coins and was posted at the period of the ICO ending?
You provided this, if you have a different interpretation you should be able to tell me too. I'm only second guessing as to why you're making this assumption to be honest.
Personally I feel like I've already provided enough evidence that the commission I received was received outside of the ICO as it had the same format as normal commissions on their platform.

Because that's a known practice for a token offering? They allocate some funds for marketing etc., for the time being of the ICO, the number were just "number" on their platform, be it token earned from marketing, private sale, ICO sale, etc. Once the ICO concluded, every token will be minted. To mint this, you'll need to withdraw from the platform. Every unclaimed and unsold token will be burned.

Not sure if this project applied the same principle, but all signs point to that direction, at least from what I intepret from their announcement.

[alani123]

Is that a fact or are you guessing? Can you perhaps provide a screenshot or any backing evidence to prove that the token are still operational for few years after the ICO [and the deadline to withdraw token, as they announced].

Can YOU tell me why you think that the image you provided refers to coin OTHER the the ICO when it explicitly mentions ICO coins and was posted at the period of the ICO ending?
You provided this, if you have a different interpretation you should be able to tell me too. I'm only second guessing as to why you're making this assumption to be honest.
Personally I feel like I've already provided enough evidence that the commission I received was received outside of the ICO as it had the same format as normal commissions on their platform.

Because that's a known practice for a token offering? They allocate some funds for marketing etc., for the time being of the ICO, the number were just "number" on their platform, be it token earned from marketing, private sale, ICO sale, etc. Once the ICO concluded, every token will be minted. To mint this, you'll need to withdraw from the platform. Every unclaimed and unsold token will be burned.

Not sure if this project applied the same principle, but all signs point to that direction, at least from what I intepret from their announcement.

Again, the ICO dashboard of Uquid closed based on the post you also shared.
Comission funds were distributed directly into uquid.com accounts, independent of the ICO dashboard, and were used along with USD, EUR and a variety of cryptos for their services in user accounts.
I already demonstrated that my UQC was deposited in the same manner as a USD payment.