I'm with ETF on this, the table looks more like comparing between apples and oranges right now. Some of the parts that say "no" for something like bitcoin core should say "not applicable" such as the entire hardware or payment method (to buy) section which proves it is comparing apples and oranges.
I decided to put all in the same table, so you can compare the different options you have to have a bitcoin node. The "-" in the cells indicate when the item is not applicable.
Also I quickly looked at bitcoin core column and a couple don't seem to be right. For example year should be 2008-2009 since it is the continuation of the original software released by Satoshi. Also in the "BACKUP / RESTORE" section, if you mean BIP39 or mnemonic it should be clarified before saying no, otherwise bitcoin core supports creating a backup and restoring the wallet from it.
I know that the original software wasn't named Bitcoin Core, but I think is valid to use 2009 as the launch date. I fixed that. Regarding the backup/restore, I mean "Support to backup / restore all the node configuration" not related to BIP39. I added contextual info on the category to clarify that. Thanks for the feedback.
P.S. Why did you choose Parmanode as the only alternative full node in the list? It is brand new (~6 months old) and very unpopular.
No answer for that. I try to always add the more popular nodes, wallets and seed backups solutions to the website. But is difficult to include all of them, that's why I open sourced the metadata.
