freedom of expression

[syedakhlaque]

 Freedom of Expression  is basic right of human but most of the rulers and Government do not like criticism and truth. So they target such journalist and media which do so. If we study human history then  this fact comes out. That the truth and those who speak the truth were not tolerated. Cruelty and brutality were allowed on them. Every tactic was used to silence such people. Their hands were cut off and the true historians were imprisoned. So Today, situation is different. There is better freedom of speaking and freedom of expression. Media is very powerful and free. Every human desire the freedom of expression.

[Wiwo]

If it's your country of origin where you cannot express your freedom of speech, because you have a dictator as leader, if you don't have the resources to leave the country or for legal battles, then it's wisest to remain low key. Because if the authority decides to deal with the person, and he doesn't have a strong backing, it'll be a pity because his rights will further be trampled on. Except the person wants to be brave and face the consequences of going against the authority. Abuse of rights and privileges is to be expected in any society, some out of ignorance or in full knowledge will break the law. In cases like that the law should be judiciously applied to chastise them.

The world is full with ditectors as leaders and a lot have pushed the citizens to remain on the low key just like you mentioned,  but then also remaining low key also have it own price and that is you as a citizen will have to endure a lot of things being low key and at that you have to be ready to bear all the pains and endure every wrong doing to you as a citizen.

Can one person face the government or it bad leaders?

The answer is hard to say either yes or know because you may not be certain of what capacity to assume to be able to confront the system that be,  but if you be lucky to win then you can become a hero of your fellow citizens.

[paxmao]

What is the meaning of freedom of expression?

Freedom of expression is one of the basic human rights that allows an individual to express his ideas and beliefs freely without infringing on the rights of others or spreading false propaganda and hatred.
This right is guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 in France.
BUT
We all know that freedom of expression is very limited in third world countries, and when any statement is hostile to rulers, you put your freedom and life at risk, unlike developed countries, but we have noticed recently the lack of respect for freedom of expression by these countries
Example:
- player suspended and menaced by thier team after showing support to palestine
And the suppression of peaceful Manifestation that support Palestine
- Attacks and threats to people who do not support homosexuality.
Is this considered a suppression of freedom of expression?
Is democracy a dress for dictatorship only?

In my view, a pacific protest in support for a pacific resolution of the conflicts in Palestina - be it in support of Palestine - is absolutely acceptable. A protest in support of Palestine in which there is also support for Hamas, Hezbola or other organisations which clearly do not want any pacific resolution of conflicts is not acceptable.

Attacking people who do not support homosexuality is not acceptable -  as long as these people act pacifically and do not try to impose on others their point of view.

In other words, freedom of expression is a two way street, not an absolute.

[Synchronice]

Freedom of expression only exists if you expression doesn't cross politicians' interests. If it crosses them, then your so called freedom of expression will quickly be suppressed. But there is a difference between European countries and some islamic countries when it comes to freedom, there is a big difference but overall, they all become brutal when you act against their own political interests.

We all know that freedom of expression is very limited in third world countries, and when any statement is hostile to rulers, you put your freedom and life at risk, unlike developed countries, but we have noticed recently the lack of respect for freedom of expression by these countries
Example:
- player suspended and menaced by thier team after showing support to palestine
And the suppression of peaceful Manifestation that support Palestine
- Attacks and threats to people who do not support homosexuality.
Is this considered a suppression of freedom of expression?
Is democracy a dress for dictatorship only?

Double standards as always. If you do not support something supported by the government, they'll call you many bad things and your freedom of expression dies because as they say, you disrespect homosexuals if you don't support them but no one talks that in Christian country, homos also disrespect Christianity. Double Standards!

[Y3shot]

The truth is that in most countries they include freedom of expression as part of their law but the truth is that freedom of expression is a law that tge common people don't even practice in most countries expecially in the developing countries.  In developing countries the government intimidates the common citizens by making them not to be able to express their feelings,  they threating them of dealing with them when common citizens confront them.

[JMBitcointernational]

With the way the world is revolving things are beginig to change either to please or displease us. Most times we are forced and deprived of this our freedom of expression as a result of specific rules implemented by the government and this same set of government we choose them ourselves. All we have to do is to keep mute at some certain levels and stick to the rules given in oder to avoid the penalties of breaking any.
Sometimes we have to compromise our beliefs the way we display them outwardly and preserves the inner self expression to ourselves just to avoid certain punishments

One of the factors that characterized democratic government is fundamental human right which freedom of speech is one of them , It is an idea where an individual is free To speak his or her mind concerning a particular problem But this only happens in the developed countries .

In most developing countries freedom of speech To me is just a mere formality To fill in a vacant SPACE in the constitution because fundamental human rights are not respected , citizens are been molested for saying the truth or even when an individual comes out To advocate for freedom the Person will be arrested And detained for no just cause .most of these developing countries do not know the value of Law And as such they do not Respect the content of the constitution instead they will turn the terms of the constitution To their Favour . Most times just To purnish a poor citizen they will tag Some speeches To be hate speech in other To restrict or limit people from saying their views in a particular senario . However, i know that freedom of expression is a fundamental human rights But before you make a speech publicly please be very conscious of people around you if you are not in a developed country .

[Essential10]

Freedom of expression is indeed a fundamental human right and an essential component of a democratic society. Without it democracy cannot function properly and a fair and just society cannot be achieved. Although there may be instances where freedom of expression is abused, in a democracy, it should be responsibly preserved and restrictions and regulations should be put in place as necessary. In a democratic society, it is the duty of government and good governance to uphold and value freedom of expression. The development of a supportive and unbiased media requires input from the public and the establishment of policies and boundaries in a fair and unbiased manner. Therefore, it is essential to prioritize and protect freedom of expression in order to build and maintain a democratic society that respects freedom of thought, opinion and expression. It is a fundamental criterion for the functioning and prosperity of a democratic society.

[Miles2006]

Freedom of speech has always been the right of every citizens, everyone is allowed to express their opinion and thought towards something but now things have changed, we can't speech freely fear of the government, or what if someone is hearing.
In most countries a lot of people get killed just because of their speech against the government, against the society.
So in this case people are force to control their speech most especially the civil servants, government workers cause if they speak bad against the government they'll be sack from their job, so in my opinion the government are responsible when it comes to limitation of speech, cause when everyone keeps fearing the government then they're the issue.

[Hispo]

Freedom of speech has always been the right of every citizens, everyone is allowed to express their opinion and thought towards something but now things have changed, we can't speech freely fear of the government, or what if someone is hearing.
In most countries a lot of people get killed just because of their speech against the government, against the society.
So in this case people are force to control their speech most especially the civil servants, government workers cause if they speak bad against the government they'll be sack from their job, so in my opinion the government are responsible when it comes to limitation of speech, cause when everyone keeps fearing the government then they're the issue.

Though I do not completely share the same position as you, I can agree with you say the government or the established powers are those who are mainly responsible for the lack of free speech and responsibly for the punishments against those who want to speak freely about topics which are very sensitive to those same established powers.
One only needs to take a look at countries like Saudi Arabia or even Venezuela.
One could easily end up in prison for either saying something against the Sharia law or against the corrupt politicians from any Republic in decadence.

When those in positions of power start to censor one's speech it may be just the beginning of an escalation towards a more authoritarian way of living.

[bluebit25]

It may be that the loophole in freedom causes many ungodly men to abuse it and use this advantage to argue, I respect all those rights, but that doesn't mean they are always discussed openly. The fact that anyone can say that it is a personal right means that our obligations and responsibilities towards that right have never been easy.

Everyone wants freedom, but they don't understand that no one gives them that freedom that they themselves create, and their obligation to use and contribute to life is always not enough. I always like to be realistic and fair, anyone's thoughts can be created with ignorance, and if that thought is not limited, then chaos is obvious.

For example: If a rebel declares that he wants to destroy the earth, in some ways it is freedom of speech, but we know clearly that it is wrong, so they must be held accountable for those words.

[BADecker]

^^^ The question is, who is one accountable to? After all, maybe the accountability judges are wrong.

So, say it right out. The best basic laws are found in the Bible... particularly Old Testament Exodus and Deuteronomy... and the New Testament writings of St. Paul. And the Judge is God, Himself.

[Promocodeudo]

With the way the world is revolving things are beginig to change either to please or displease us. Most times we are forced and deprived of this our freedom of expression as a result of specific rules implemented by the government and this same set of government we choose them ourselves. All we have to do is to keep mute at some certain levels and stick to the rules given in oder to avoid the penalties of breaking any.
Sometimes we have to compromise our beliefs the way we display them outwardly and preserves the inner self expression to ourselves just to avoid certain punishments

This is what many people are facing at this time, though this has been in existence for a very long time but it is on a rise in political era where a leader decides to do whatever he or she chooses to do without seeking the opinion of any person, the freedom of speech that was common, critics that push the political office holders to perform well in office is no more wanted because they politicians wants to enslave everyone by introducing what the called hate speech, using this method to shut the mouth of people up, so that people will be afraid to air out their views because of the penalties attached, it is only in the western world where freedom of speech is been allowed to an extent but in African countries is no no, to me I think most African countries are not riped for independence, the inhumane character in African leaders is much, we really need sanitization to get it right in Africa.

[Obim34]

With the way the world is revolving things are beginig to change either to please or displease us. Most times we are forced and deprived of this our freedom of expression as a result of specific rules implemented by the government and this same set of government we choose them ourselves. All we have to do is to keep mute at some certain levels and stick to the rules given in oder to avoid the penalties of breaking any.
Sometimes we have to compromise our beliefs the way we display them outwardly and preserves the inner self expression to ourselves just to avoid certain punishments

This is what many people are facing at this time, though this has been in existence for a very long time but it is on a rise in political era where a leader decides to do whatever he or she chooses to do without seeking the opinion of any person, the freedom of speech that was common, critics that push the political office holders to perform well in office is no more wanted because they politicians wants to enslave everyone by introducing what the called hate speech, using this method to shut the mouth of people up, so that people will be afraid to air out their views because of the penalties attached, it is only in the western world where freedom of speech is been allowed to an extent but in African countries is no no, to me I think most African countries are not riped for independence, the inhumane character in African leaders is much, we really need sanitization to get it right in Africa.

In a case like this, since our opinions doesn't matter to the authority, till we experience any significant positive changes we just have to stick by the laid rules. Likely said, I don't think we practice democracy as we say we do, every action from the government are not carried out with the aim interest of the citizens instead they want a cut out of the benefits. The voices of the masses are not heard, each time anyone trys to speak his being shut up, how then can we experience a change. We just closely pray and hope in dew time things will change for good.

[nngella]

What is the meaning of freedom of expression?

Freedom of expression is one of the basic human rights that allows an individual to express his ideas and beliefs freely without infringing on the rights of others or spreading false propaganda and hatred.
This right is guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 in France.
BUT
We all know that freedom of expression is very limited in third world countries, and when any statement is hostile to rulers, you put your freedom and life at risk, unlike developed countries, but we have noticed recently the lack of respect for freedom of expression by these countries
Example:
- player suspended and menaced by thier team after showing support to palestine
And the suppression of peaceful Manifestation that support Palestine
- Attacks and threats to people who do not support homosexuality.
Is this considered a suppression of freedom of expression?
Is democracy a dress for dictatorship only?

Anyone can freely express their opinions but they must also be accountable on it.  Moreover, freedom of expression is different from fake news or propaganda spreading.  You cannot state a lie or fake news then spread it somewhere then say that it is freedom of expression.  Note that freedom of expression is bounded by the law of the country you are residing.  Historical revisionism, fake news, slander, and other things about breaking the law cannot be masked by freedom of expression.

[Y3shot]

Anyone can freely express their opinions but they must also be accountable on it.  Moreover, freedom of expression is different from fake news or propaganda spreading.  You cannot state a lie or fake news then spread it somewhere then say that it is freedom of expression.  Note that freedom of expression is bounded by the law of the country you are residing.  Historical revisionism, fake news, slander, and other things about breaking the law cannot be masked by freedom of expression.

Some People abuse the freedom of speech,  because of they have right to say whatever they feel they can just come up with anything.  We need to be very careful and not be carried away by this freedom of speech because their are somethings you say the law won't tolerate with you . Normally 8n many places goverment will tell you their is freedom of speech but their something you say , if it doesn't go well for them they will definitely come for you.

[Gormicsta]

Freedom of expression is the ability of individuals to freely share their thoughts or ideas without fear, and by doing so, it allows us to also learn and grow more in wisdom without feeling intimated, but in our society today, there is no freedom of expression again, whatever feelings we have or want to share, we keep it to ourselves to avoid problems or being beaten or killed, we think twice before saying anything or expressing our feelings because we don't have to say it again, even if we say something or express how we feel in this country, our leaders will continue to do whatever they want, so what is the point of expressing ourselves if it will not bring any positive results?

[|MINER|]

Freedom of speech exists for everyone.  Everyone can express their opinion.A man or a nation has the right to say both good and bad.And how to accept it also depends on other people and their psychology.I expressed an opinion but the person in front of me could not accept it he could freely express it.We should respect everyone's opinion.By giving importance to everyone's opinion, we can achieve world peace.Make decisions you don't like and you can express that.

[Gormicsta]

True, in certain countries, particularly in regions that are developing, the right to free speech is frequently neglected; nevertheless, consider the equilibrium between free expression and the preservation of other rights, such as the right to fairness and equality without discrimination. It's a difficult question, with no simple answer. However, I believe it is an essential matter to think about, particularly given the world's expanding interconnection. In today's international environment, we must find a method to defend everyone's rights, especially the right to free expression.
People have the right to peacefully demonstrate and express their thoughts without fear of punishment, but some argue that certain restrictions are required to preserve the rights of others.

[Natsuu]

Freedom of speech exists for everyone.  Everyone can express their opinion.A man or a nation has the right to say both good and bad.And how to accept it also depends on other people and their psychology.I expressed an opinion but the person in front of me could not accept it he could freely express it.We should respect everyone's opinion.By giving importance to everyone's opinion, we can achieve world peace.Make decisions you don't like and you can express that.

I agree, and all is just a matter of respect. Anyone are free to speak of their own, but see to it that not all people are ready to hear those nor be able to understand what you are trying to say so you may feel you are not being heard or understood.

Social media made it easy for anyone. You can easily make reels, post, or a thread of any issue that you want the masses to be aware of. Being allowed to speak is not suppressed.

It is the ability of other people to open their views is the thing that was suppressed. They are programmed to other views as bad. Most people only listen to news, or people in government position. Yet those people hide facts and truth behind their power.

[Volimack]

Freedom of expression is a fundamental right of an individual to express his opinion freely. The right to say what you want do what you want and create what you want without fear of censure by the government for expressing yourself. Rights prevent the government from persecuting you for your expression. It doesn't stop the person from resenting what you're doing. In fact it gives them the right to do so.