Delisted/Inactive Coins from Exchange

[Johnyz]

When delisting a coin, I believe exchanges consider excitement and trend. They operate with specific goals in mind, such as meeting profit targets on a timely basis; if a coin already listed has little trading volume, it means that people have stopped trading the coin, which means the exchange is not benefiting from it; keeping such coins is not a good idea for business reasons, so they delist such coins and list new ones to keep their business running.

Those exchanges are strict when it comes to their policy, if you are not performing the exchange is not benefiting from you, you’ll probably get delisted and that can have a negative impact on your project. We’ve seen many projects delisted on a certain exchanges for some reason, and based on the given chart its actually rising every year, 2023 might be their biggest nightmare as many tokens/coins got delisted in some exchange.

[AmoreJaz]

As you can see there are tokens or a number of pairs from exchanges that have already been delisted or become inactive.

I'm really curious if there will be an effect of it in our current trading journey or in the market.
It's kinda showing that the more we are in a bear market year, the more pairs are being delisted.
What are your thoughts?

I think it's a good thing to segregate those tokens that wouldn't survive the bear market to those who will thrive. This isn't bad to be honest consider there has also been a lot of tokens out there that was merely listed due to paid listings and then they will be pump by whales then dump it to retail investors.

i can agree with the delisting of those worthless tokens or coins. at least, less projects that will potentially screw those naive users. because the reality is most of these low cap coins can easily manipulate the movement of their market and so pump and dump scheme is rampant on these coins or tokens. so delisting them will be one way to reduce such scheme. and that means, no more people are falling to the trap of these scammer devs.

[goinmerry]

It's kinda showing that the more we are in a bear market year, the more pairs are being delisted.
What are your thoughts?

Not a thing to worry about in the first place. It does mean that those coins can't stand the bear market. We should be grateful that at least, only those coins that established good support from the community will remain on the scene. If these coins can't handle the bear market, there is no room for them to be circulated on the crypto market.

Aside from that, it will be beneficial for newbie traders to not easily get dragged at these coins where at the end, bound to have a low volume to dead.

Good for these coins to be delisted rather than to continue flowing in the market.

[ultrloa]

As you can see there are tokens or a number of pairs from exchanges that have already been delisted or become inactive.

I'm really curious if there will be an effect of it in our current trading journey or in the market.
It's kinda showing that the more we are in a bear market year, the more pairs are being delisted.
What are your thoughts?

No it can't affect the current trading journey of some people in the market since majority of us have different pairs to trade and most of the time people are grabbing those legit pairs rather than those scam tokens. Expect that to many tokens has been delisted on the market since that are those shit token created by scam devs mainly for their scams and they don't really have plan to make it a long term so we should not get surprise for that matters since we could possibly more in future.

Also its good for that coins to get delisted since we already know immediately that which of those coins or tokens are worth to hodl and what are those things to avoid. The exchange already gives the idea to the traders that they shouldn't acquire it because they are been delisted on particular exchange since they are not performing good so for sure it can stop those traders thinking to acquire low cap coins and save up their money for total dump or abandoning coming from them.

[Rengga Jati]

I'm really curious if there will be an effect of it in our current trading journey or in the market.
It's kinda showing that the more we are in a bear market year, the more pairs are being delisted.
What are your thoughts?

Actually, this is not that surprising if you look at the number of altcoins currently. because we know how most of these altcoins can be listed on exchanges. Most altcoins usually rise drastically when they are first listed, especially for altcoins that are viral or hyped at the time. How could it not be that most of them usually find it very easy to go up and enter exchanges, but on the other hand they cannot have significant trading volume or market cap. with conditions like this Yes of course they can only survive for a short time. Until finally, if their menstruation has stopped then their fate will be the same. If there is no good and significant follow-up from the developer and his team then yes, the result will be that these altcoins will be increasingly forgotten and abandoned. Moreover, after that, other hype altcoins will emerge which will more easily replace their position. So like this, many altcoins ended up being delisted from exchanges.

[livingfree]

I think, I've read it somewhere when someone says that the entire market will be consolidated or will be left with real ones.

These delistings and number of inactive coins in the market is actually a good sign that the exchanges are becoming choosy and they're only remaining the likely good ones or mostly, the ones that are in demand.

I want to see more of these delistings so that there will be lesser altcoins on the exchanges that they support. The lesser the altcoins in demand, the better IMHO.

[shinratensei_]

delisting of coin is business decision, what exchange need is massive trading volume where they could get some fee, of course thats not the only income that they have but higher trading volume means prestige for the exchange.
thats why delisting is essential for their business, its to lessen resource needed, and to eliminate coin so that their platform won't have too much coin that have low trading volume or in other words dying coin.
they then proceed to list some new coin that currently trendy for the sake of getting all those trading volume into platform.
this also the exact reason why some coin that being considered as shitcoin like those meme coin could get into popular exchange even binance and coinbase, because they bring massive trading volume.
its all comes down to whether such action is necessary for business to thrive.

[mk4]

Theres so many trash tokens out there that promised the world and delivered nothing. To b ehonest its actually quite surprising that more of them have not been delisted

It's simply because Binance (or any other exchange's) criteria for listing a token is mostly just if a token has actual trading demand. That's pretty much it. Obviously they'd only list only like 5% of what they currently have listed if they only list tokens that actually have delivered something.

[yhiaali3]

The more pairs that are removed from the list will be better for liquidity in the exchanges. Deleting inactive or almost dead pairs allows more liquidity to flow to active pairs. This is a healthy thing that most exchanges do.

This is good for improving liquidity in the exchange in general, but on the other hand it is bad for some traders stuck in these pairs, as there could be someone who bought at a high price and will be forced to get rid of the coin at a loss before deletion.

[Strongkored]

The increase in coins being delisted by exchanges is because new coins are taking their place and also because retaining them will cause the exchange to experience losses due to maintenance costs for the coin wallet. The decreasing number of shits coins on the exchange will create coins that have the potential to increase in volume trading, and I'm pretty sure what's being delisted are coins that have also been abandoned by the developer.

[DanWalker]

The increase in coins being delisted by exchanges is because new coins are taking their place and also because retaining them will cause the exchange to experience losses due to maintenance costs for the coin wallet. The decreasing number of shits coins on the exchange will create coins that have the potential to increase in volume trading, and I'm pretty sure what's being delisted are coins that have also been abandoned by the developer.

I don't think the delisting of some tokens is because the exchange is spending money on wallet maintenance costs. In my opinion, exchanges make profit from our transactions and if a token no longer has trading volume, meaning it is no longer profitable for them, there is no reason for them to keep it. Furthermore, delisting useless tokens will also ensure the reputation of the exchange. For example, if Binance does not delist tokens with no trading volume (dead), junk tokens, it will make the exchange's reputation no different from other junk exchanges.

[Husires]

Because listed/delisted depends on trading and financial activity, you pay listing fees and pump liquidity that requires fees, and when you achieve profits, you withdraw all profits, make liquidity zero, and start a new project. Therefore, you find that many projects suddenly have high liquidity, and then all liquidity disappears, and it becomes better to remove it because The presence of active trading or sufficient liquidity.
The number of currencies that are listed for profit is very large.

[libert19]

Also what happens if you add every token ever created and with even a few trades on any random DEX, the amount would be x50 ?

I dunno which dexes you specifically talk about but if it's evm based one, you can trade any token with it's contract address, even if liquidity is few dollars.


@op tokens that get delisted, only happens so because they have low trading activity. So, I don't think it would make much difference since that particular coin had already low attention in first place.

[bettercrypto]

I think it's normal for an exchange to delist inactive cryptocurrencies or coins on their platform. Perhaps when the volume requirements are no longer met in a week, they will be removed immediately.

I witnessed that on the Binance platform. They have removed many coins that no longer comply with their requirements every week. And before they list it, the Binance exchange also gives a notification to all their users here.

[Solosanz]

I think, I've read it somewhere when someone says that the entire market will be consolidated or will be left with real ones.

These delistings and number of inactive coins in the market is actually a good sign that the exchanges are becoming choosy and they're only remaining the likely good ones or mostly, the ones that are in demand.

I want to see more of these delistings so that there will be lesser altcoins on the exchanges that they support. The lesser the altcoins in demand, the better IMHO.

Volume transaction isn't the only way to judge if the coin is real, there are many fake and useless shitcoins with high volume transaction, you can check in the top 10 coins in CMC or Coingecko, most of them are shitcoins.

Someone can create a new coin and fund it with big amount of money to pump the coin, after many investors are interested to invest in their project, they can abandon the project and run away with investors money.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Volume transaction isn't the only way to judge if the coin is real, there are many fake and useless shitcoins with high volume transaction, you can check in the top 10 coins in CMC or Coingecko, most of them are shitcoins.

Someone can create a new coin and fund it with big amount of money to pump the coin, after many investors are interested to invest in their project, they can abandon the project and run away with investors money.

I don't agree that a coin is real or not real. If it was created, deployed by developers, it is real. The rest is only it is a quality coin or zero-value coin with no use case, no utility and no one minds to own it.

Trading volume reflects demand in the community and if no trading volume, it means nobody has demand on that coin. Hence, no demand, no price, no value and it will be die even developers don't want to abandon that project. In reality, developers usually abandon their own projects before those projects die. They proactively left their projects when they see no future ahead or they smell that a trend for their projects already gone.

[Quidat]

Volume transaction isn't the only way to judge if the coin is real, there are many fake and useless shitcoins with high volume transaction, you can check in the top 10 coins in CMC or Coingecko, most of them are shitcoins.

Someone can create a new coin and fund it with big amount of money to pump the coin, after many investors are interested to invest in their project, they can abandon the project and run away with investors money.

I don't agree that a coin is real or not real. If it was created, deployed by developers, it is real. The rest is only it is a quality coin or zero-value coin with no use case, no utility and no one minds to own it.

Trading volume reflects demand in the community and if no trading volume, it means nobody has demand on that coin. Hence, no demand, no price, no value and it will be die even developers don't want to abandon that project. In reality, developers usually abandon their own projects before those projects die. They proactively left their projects when they see no future ahead or they smell that a trend for their projects already gone.

This is why it would be always important that you should really know on what are the things that needs to check on which i would really be always liking to spot or check their WP and their roadmap.
Of course you wont really be just that easily on reading it up if ever its available but also you should really be needing to assess whether its realistic or not because there are really that those kind of utility which it is really that totally unrealistic and something that delusional and this is why you should really be that wise and on assessing whether its worth or not. Dont make yourself that getting hyped
or having that kind of FOMO.

Exchangers would normally be delisting those coins which arent generating liquidity on which means that if ever they cant really be able to benefit because of fees then it would really be that
understandable that they would really removing into those projects/coins and would be freeing it up on something new. Exchangers are businesses on which it would
really be just that normal that they would really be giving priority into those projects or coins that could give huge liquidity which we know that this is
where they do make money, so its just a normal act to be done by them.

[AakZaki]

When the volume decreases and no one trades on the coin anymore, this is what will happen, the coin will be delisted and become a useless trash coin. Some may be delisted due to security concerns or problematic coins.
As the years go by, new projects continue to emerge and old coins that were only created for hype are finally abandoned. 2023 will be a year where the number of delistings will increase, this indicates that more projects will appear in 2023

[jeraldskie11]

Investors today are different; they do not simply put their money into any cryptocurrency. They will select the appropriate coin after conducting a enough research on this project. They learned a lot from what happened in 2021, when many investors lost money due to the excitement even though the idea was not reasonable. We know that the main reason for delisting coins is a lack of trades or volume; it is projected that more coins will be delisted during the bear market, which begins in 2023.

[GiftedMAN]

As you can see there are tokens or a number of pairs from exchanges that have already been delisted or become inactive.

I'm really curious if there will be an effect of it in our current trading journey or in the market.
It's kinda showing that the more we are in a bear market year, the more pairs are being delisted.
What are your thoughts?

In the near future, many if the altcoins that are not performing well in the market might get delisted with time, and  this a good reason why we need to be very careful how we buy and invest in altcoins. I know some persons always have the mentality of buy for a longer time frame but it does not work like that again since there are new coins that are getting listed on exchange on interval basis. We need to equip ourselves with information about the altcoins we are holding or else we might be surprised that the coin do not get the kind of liquidity and momentum it used to get before.