Live Sports Betting vs virtual Games Betting

[Beparanf]

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

Virtual Game is a big no for me since there’s no way to verify whether the match is fair since the game is predetermined according to program set to it while live sports betting gives you the real fun of betting since you watch it live and there’s a lot of contributing factor that can affect the result which makes it more fun.

Virtual Sports are for those gamblers that have nothing to watch or still waiting for their main sports to play. I consider it as a temporary game.

[Broadanbig]

I will choose the live bet over the virtuals because that gives me fascinating experience and indepth satisfaction. I am most moved by live actions not mere virtuals. Live action gives me a good edge over my games and teams when to know better the performance of players of your team. As a gambler obtaining information on performance is a priority so therefore one should be able to prioritise bets that gives them advantage to winning and as such virtua bet plays that role and is most likely the best to be chosen.

[Yatsan]

If it is choosing which would be more thrilling between live betting and virtual betting, then answer should be obvious. Both would cost you money if you would be picking a losing bet but atleast watching it personally would allow you to enjoy the game at least. But to some who do not have that time to go visit and watch the game of course they would find it more convenient to bet online and just watch the game virtually. Eitherway would be good especially if you’re really into sportsbetting. There are just times wherein you would still take a risky bet online more than with live sportsbetting.

[Richbased]

Virtual sports betting is typically a blind betting pattern of gambling that's how I view it to be, you don't have a clue on how to analyze the team's strength and weakness you're doing a complete guess work that's controlled by computers detecting outcomes of the virtual matches that's the reasons I scarcely play virtual sports bets.

These virtual games are being programmed by the site owners to their own advantage as they can easily manipulate the outcome of an event to their favour whereas in live betting you are seeing a physical challenge by both teams so whatever the outcome of the game is you will be convinced because it is actually real and you've watched how the game is being played so you won't have any doubt at all.

[Accardo]

In my case, I only place bets on games in which I can obtain information about the team, whether there are injured players in the team and who they are, whether the team coach is in good health or not, whether he will be present on the day of the game or not. . what were the results of the last 5 games of the two teams. how was the H2H between these two teams. When you have all this data and on the day of the game we see the squad that will play, then it becomes easier to decide who we will bet on. Now betting on games where you can't have all this data, I honestly don't see this as a good thing, on the contrary I see it as a clear way for people to lose money

It's important to analyze games and feel better about a team before staking money. But, deep down our mind, we are aware that our analysis ain't certain. Those criterion may not change the outcome of a match. Playing the best players or teams in the world, to win, doesn't define football gambling. In sports gambling we tend to win big. That's why people play games with good odd. If the lower team, as they may be called, eventually wins. People who gambled them to win would get much profits. Compared to the bettors of the high advantage team. Regarding virtual games, it's also common to lose games, like it's with real football. The difference is the time intervals. The real soccer games provides weekly interval, while the virtual game can consume a player's money everyday. Although, it's certain that a certain team would win a match, but things can change. That's why people still lose in the real event. Because it can't be predicted. The methods of predicting it is just based on probabilities. Betting companies make huge profits off these mistakes of football gamblers of going with the best analyzed team. Some weekends can be for the small teams to win. Imagine how profitable the week would be for betting companies. A lot of people would lose their money. Meaning that the betting companies are also aware of gamblers that follow analysis. They may also get prepared for such players in unique ways. Just to maximize profits. Appologies for your first surprise in e-sports, that would have felt like a warm hug that can't be forgotten. If they control the virtual game from their back end. What rumor says about betting companies controlling football teams, could be true.

[stomachgrowls]

I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

When it comes to thrill then hands down to live sports betting specially if you do really make out some bets to support your favorite team on which it would really be giving out that kind of feeling which it isnt something that you could really be able to feel when you do go virtual.Just like been said with other posters or members above then the results are already determined,whereas if we do speak about those live then it would really be that totally random on which considering that there would really be  factors that could really affect out overall outcome of a certain game on which it is really that making too unpredictable since in the first place.

Dont know if there would really be some recognizable numbers who do love on betting on virtual on which as far as i do understand and in comparison then it would
be understandable that there would be lots who would be preferring on betting on live on which results or outcomes would really be totally random and cant be known.
Also its always been entertaining to watch it live rather than into those predetermined kind of bets.

[darkangel11]

I never understood virtual betting. Why would you bet on matches that aren't real, just calculated by algorithm? If you want that, you can simply play dice - fast and easy and at least you know what you're betting on. With virtual games it feels like you should know why you lost your money, but really you don't.
Live events are real, there's nothing better. Let's say you bet on boxing - you know why the player lost. You saw him making mistakes, getting outpunched, bleeding. You know you lost the money because the fighter really lost the match and it's on his record forever.
I also like watching these events and feeling the adrenaline of the last round coming or the last minute of the game. It's great especially when you know you're winning and there's so little time left before it confirms.

[Alpha Marine]

Just so I'm clear, when you say live sports betting you mean betting on a sports game that is already on right? Like the game is live? If that's what you mean then I prefer virtual betting.

Not that virtual betting is ultimately better, but in live betting, the odds are usually smaller. If the odds are big then it's very difficult for that option to play. For instance, betting on a football team that is already losing 2-0 to win looks more difficult to happen. I know there are many options to play but you have to be watching the game to make the right bets.
While virtual better can make you lose more money, it's better if you're lucky.
If I gamble and I've not won in virtual betting after 3 straight bets, I end it for that period.
Virtual betting needs much more discipline or you could empty your account.

[mvdheuvel1983]

In-play bet is what does it for me. With in play bets you get to learn about the team and players well. Which helps to build some skills and analytical abilities that is transferrable to other in-play games. It even makes you to be current with the football. Virtual games is total a waste of a money and time of course. There is real still being built here. This is what most of those gambling addicts struggle to quit.

[goinmerry]

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

End up depending on how far you know how to play both the usual sports betting and virtual games. If you don't know the other one, of course, you will select the other as your own preference.  If a bettor knows how that game works, both will be entertaining and amusing to them.

Since I'm not a fan of virtual game betting, therefore my preference will be the usual sports betting.

It's just that I have been doing sports betting for a long now compared to virtual games betting that I rarely touched, simple as that.

[Sandra_hakeem]

I won't even try virtual gaming since I've got full conviction about it... It's totally programmed and controlled by the casinos - atleast in way that's fairly profitable to 'em ... I sometimes also think that makes them to be renewing an update on everyday games or so .. cus anyone could easily follow-up the result series..
I prefer sports as livegames over there are played by humans and are likely not to get manipulated.. atleast the major league games are not .. I'm aware alot of minority Leagus do so though.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

[goaldigger]

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

This is actually depends on the situation, I do live betting if I was not able to place a bet before the game start and also do the virtual games betting since its also entertaining. I prefer both and have no specific preference with regards to this. Having your knowledge about this two can be a big help for you when it comes to decision making. Betting can be more fun if you are betting with your favorite sports, just make sure to stay responsible.

[Westinhome]

I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

The Live sports bet will be the desired option by the most of the gambler,Because it had more accurate results based on our sports knowledge.The reason for the gambler to choose the sports bet was easy to bet in the game by the sports knowledge.This game can be used as the passive income for the gambler based on the knowledge of the gambler in the certain sports.This sports bet was not suitable for the gambler with less sports knowledge or no sports knowledge in the desired game.The patience was most important thing in the gambling and specially for the sports bet.Because the player game can be changed on the particular day.

[CryptoHeadlineNews]

I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

None of these two is ever an easy kind of game to play, but for me, I always most times play live games more than virtual bets which is controlled by an algorithm, making virtual game betting not an easy kind of betting for anyone to go for since it's outcome are always unpredictable, unlike in the case of real-time live games, whereby if the match has gone far, you are likely to have a clue on which team likely to win and place a bet in their favour, and most times likely to win.

[ralle14]

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

I'll always pick live betting over virtual games because those simulated sports can't replicate the experience I get in actual sports betting. I do agree that live betting is unpredictable if you're going to bet on every live match. The same can be said with virtual games when they rely more on luck due to how it works, so you can't back your bets with information compared to live betting. Live betting doesn't give me constant wins but it's still worth using when it gives you the option to jump in on matches you've missed and sometimes you could get good value bets through live odds if you learn how to wait.

[Fundamentals Of]

This highly depends on your interest. There are those who are more inclined to virtual games rather than actual games. If they are to gamble, they will probably be betting on those virtual games rather than on actual matches. But for me, I'm not a fan of these virtual matches. So I prefer actual sports matches not just to bet on but also to watch.

The disadvantage of actual sports matches is that they are scheduled. Your favorite sports matches don't happen all the time. Virtual games can be more easily available, but I don't find it fun. There's no thrill involved. They're more random unlike actual sports games.

[alegotardo]

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

I certainly prefer sports betting, but I confess that this is each person's personal taste and can vary greatly from one to another.
My preference in sports games is because I know much more about football than any other virtual game, so I have more confidence when betting on them, in addition to being a sport that I follow daily, so sports betting ends up being a "complement" for me. of something that is pleasurable to me.

However, I see that betting on virtual games is growing a lot with each passing day and I respect anyone who bets on them, if it is a fair way of making money and enjoyable too, there is nothing fairer than betting on them.

[slapper]

In my case, I only place bets on games in which I can obtain information about the team, whether there are injured players in the team and who they are, whether the team coach is in good health or not, whether he will be present on the day of the game or not. . what were the results of the last 5 games of the two teams. how was the H2H between these two teams. When you have all this data and on the day of the game we see the squad that will play, then it becomes easier to decide who we will bet on. Now betting on games where you can't have all this data, I honestly don't see this as a good thing, on the contrary I see it as a clear way for people to lose money

It's important to analyze games and feel better about a team before staking money. But, deep down our mind, we are aware that our analysis ain't certain. Those criterion may not change the outcome of a match. Playing the best players or teams in the world, to win, doesn't define football gambling. In sports gambling we tend to win big. That's why people play games with good odd. If the lower team, as they may be called, eventually wins. People who gambled them to win would get much profits. Compared to the bettors of the high advantage team. Regarding virtual games, it's also common to lose games, like it's with real football. The difference is the time intervals. The real soccer games provides weekly interval, while the virtual game can consume a player's money everyday. Although, it's certain that a certain team would win a match, but things can change. That's why people still lose in the real event. Because it can't be predicted. The methods of predicting it is just based on probabilities. Betting companies make huge profits off these mistakes of football gamblers of going with the best analyzed team. Some weekends can be for the small teams to win. Imagine how profitable the week would be for betting companies. A lot of people would lose their money. Meaning that the betting companies are also aware of gamblers that follow analysis. They may also get prepared for such players in unique ways. Just to maximize profits. Appologies for your first surprise in e-sports, that would have felt like a warm hug that can't be forgotten. If they control the virtual game from their back end. What rumor says about betting companies controlling football teams, could be true.

You've covered a controversial issue. Game analysis is vital. It's important, but not everything. We analyze, predict, and stake, but it's all luck. Chance, chance, more. Best teams? They can fail. The underdogs? They rise occasionally, and the gains are huge

Speaking of betting companies, they make money. And they do want more money. The game, players, and gamblers are familiar to them. They constantly prepare and are ahead. Predictable and unpredictable. In cat-and-mouse, they're usually the cat. The virtual games? It is different from traditional. Faster, more frequent, and possibly depleting. Draining on the wallet, draining on the spirit

Your mention of rumors about betting companies controlling football teams... well, that's a rabbit hole. Deep, black rabbit hole. As with anything, smoke can lead to fire. Maybe, but who knows? Sports betting is big, complex, and unpredictable. Surprises that can feel like a slap or a long-lasting hug. Always gamble responsibly and never bet more than you can afford to lose. It's a game, after all

[CODE200]

I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

I think most of us would choose live sports betting than virtual games betting. First, the excitement and the thrill that lives sports betting is incomparable, because it makes us feel as if we are involved in the game. And you can clearly watch and observe the real action going on. Unlike in virtual games betting, the games are programmed, and we can say that it is somehow controlled and manipulated by the developers, thus making it less enjoyable. However, one of the advantages of virtual games is its accessibility. Because you can literally play anywhere and anytime without compromising your time for it is just one click away. Also, sometimes I feel like virtual games are becoming repetitive and there is nothing new about it. Unlike when you are watching it in live action, you cannot expect anything because everything can happen. But again, both are good. It's just a matter of which is more enjoyable, and which is more convenient.

[boty]

I've been hearing a lot of debates about this recently, both online and in my local area, and it got me thinking. When it comes to sports betting, do you prefer the thrill of live sports events or the calculated nature of virtual games?

Personally, I've realized that I have a higher success rate with virtual games, but live sports events offer that adrenaline rush that's hard to beat. It's a common dilemma for many bettors. I usually love betting on virtual games giving me this sure vibe that my odds might play out. Live sports can be unpredictable, and if you don't place the right bets, you might go home empty-handed.

So, I'm throwing the question out to all of you. Which type of sports betting gets your heart racing and your wallets fattening up? Do you have a preference, and if so, why?

None of these two is ever an easy kind of game to play, but for me, I always most times play live games more than virtual bets which is controlled by an algorithm, making virtual game betting not an easy kind of betting for anyone to go for since it's outcome are always unpredictable, unlike in the case of real-time live games, whereby if the match has gone far, you are likely to have a clue on which team likely to win and place a bet in their favour, and most times likely to win.

Playing a live game will really feel when we almost lose but luck comes to us so we can win the game we are playing, but it will be very different if we play virtual betting then what we are fighting against is an algorithm and it is very difficult to win except luck. on our side and we can win. However, each person certainly has a different way of enjoying the bets they play and if there is no place around them to be able to play live bets, of course they have to choose to bet virtually.