Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 07:37:54 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: is there another way to calc for S ?  (Read 123 times)
MikeJ_NpC (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10

if you want to lie *cough*use your data; not mine.


View Profile
November 14, 2023, 02:48:27 AM
 #1

Hey,

Just wondering if there is another way to calc for S and rewrite this and remove X if applicable

s1=(((x*rr)+z1)%N)

Thanks

If Karma is a bitch, then god is a woman. I ask to know, not to be screwed or hear trite excuses (after the fact) which a 3rd grader could do better on. If you give your word, keep it atleast..
stwenhao
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 86


View Profile
November 14, 2023, 05:58:59 AM
 #2

Quote
and remove X if applicable
Duh, you mean x=1? You want to remove it? Then, just do that. Which means, if you want to replace "x*rr" with "rr", then the conclusion is simply that "x=1".

Seriously: if there would be a way, that would mean ECDSA would be broken. So, your question could be simplified into "is there another way to break ECDSA?".

And the answer is also obvious: if there is no way, then nobody will tell you, how to do it. But if there is a way, then anyone, who will know the answer, will simply hide it. The incentive is just too big.

Which means, in both cases, the answer is "no, you cannot do that".
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!