I am skeptic of their reliability
You just need to look at the court case of Roman Sterlingov for proof of how completely unreliable they are. Chainalysis had to admit under oath that they have absolutely zero scientific process underlying any of their methods, that they have absolutely zero proof that any of their methods work as advertised, and they have no data at all on how many false positives they generate. In other words, the entire thing is little more than guesswork.
I know this goes against Bitcoin's censorship-resistant principles, but it's for the best if we want low fees again.
OFAC-sanctioned transactions, on the other hand, are another story. Miners shouldn't censor these transactions just because the US government wants to.
So in summary - censorship you agree with should be allowed, but censorship you don't agree with should be banned.
Can you not see how this is a problematic statement to make? Bitcoin is either censorship resistant, or it isn't. Allowing
some censorship that
some users think is ok opens the door to any and all censorship.