🖤😏

[digaran]

🖤

[1714657499]

1714657499

[1714657499]

1714657499

[1714657499]

1714657499

[_act_]

@digaran, let me advice you. If you continue like this, you will have more DT members giving you negative trust and it is not just helping your account if reputed members on this forum are giving you negative trust. I will advise you to just mind your own business and not thinking that DT members are bad.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

When you are having a problem with about anyone in the community, then maybe you are the problem. Have you taken your time to think about that?
I won't blame you that much if you are still a teenager, perhaps the up bringing wasn't that good, but if you are in your mid-twenties and above, then you clearly have a big issue.

@digaran, let me advice you. If you continue like this, you will have more DT members giving you negative trust and it is not just helping your account if reputed members on this forum are giving you negative trust. I will advise you to just mind your own business and not thinking that DT members are bad.

Good luck advising him   

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Digaran, can you elaborate on what the issue is with NeuroticFish?  I've been off the forum more in the past week than I usually am so I think I've probably missed a few things.

@digaran, let me advice you. If you continue like this, you will have more DT members giving you negative trust and it is not just helping your account if reputed members on this forum are giving you negative trust. I will advise you to just mind your own business and not thinking that DT members are bad.

But now that I think about it, your tone is familiar, almost like someone trying to scare an unsuspected member to shut them up, like "DT will come for you if you don't stop it"

I'm gonna have to agree with you on that one.  I don't get the feeling that you're trolling with these threads (as provocative as they are), and even if you were you shouldn't get negative trust for it--and especially not from anyone on DT.  I thought we'd all gotten past that issue by now, or at least most of the senior members had.

Challenging the legitimacy of someone's standing on DT is fine, but you've got to make a solid argument.

[1miau]

It's a big surprise for me, why digaran is expecting on the one hand that people will forgive him, on the other hand, he's escalating his already excessive trolling once again with defamations and sowing discord. Like his "petition" to remove me as a Merit source.
While NeuroticFish is a big contributor, who's beneficial for the community, digaran is a big troll, who's exactly the opposite.
And then, he's crying that he's collecting more negative trusts. A bit delusional but what could we expect from such a proven troll. He's proving it again and again that his trusts are well deserved and is even begging for new ones.

[suchmoon]

I'm begging for it

Because you are. Like every dedicated troll you crave attention. Your response to every bad thing you're accused of is to do more of it. I get that you're likely a sad jobless clown with nothing else to do, but creating all these threads and attacking users who got sick of your trollfuckery is just going to make more people see your trollfuckery.

[BabyBandit]

@digaran, let me advice you. If you continue like this, you will have more DT members giving you negative trust and it is not just helping your account if reputed members on this forum are giving you negative trust. I will advise you to just mind your own business and not thinking that DT members are bad.

I think you didn't mean anything negative and just want to help Digaran, But I need to ask, if that's ok? But why would Digaran deserve negative trust when he want to make a review when a bunch of dDT-users do this on daily basis?? Should not them also be giving negative feedback then? This is double standards and this is his opinions and they are worth as much as anyone else's! I am not on anyone's side. I am all for justice.

I also use this post to say Thank you to JollyGood for giving me this feedback! Because of you left me this I did remove you from my distrust list. It's a fair and good feedback and I think it's fit on my profile for some time. Thanks!

Not a typical newbie behaviour that registered a few months ago because of the knowledge they have about the forum and the members.
Seems to be an alt-account but it remains unknown what the motive behind creating it is. They will not ask for a loan: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5463273.msg62696464#msg62696464

[suchmoon]

I'm begging for it

Because you are. Like every dedicated troll you crave attention. Your response to every bad thing you're accused of is to do more of it. I get that you're likely a sad jobless clown with nothing else to do, but creating all these threads and attacking users who got sick of your trollfuckery is just going to make more people see your trollfuckery.

Can we go back where it all started? Yeah it all started when I expressed my political opinion, so don't tell me I'm begging for it, so you think just because they ganged up on me, it's my fault? Show me where I am wrong exactly? If you are unable to read the whole story, keep your insults for yourself, I do not accept such attacks especially when they gang up on me. I opened 3 threads recently, what should I do, In your opinion?  Just shut my mouth?

No, you should open more threads and keep posting how it's about your political opinion, and definitely not about you being a deranged troll for many years. If you repeat it long enough it will come true.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

To be honest, I think a negative feedback for trolling does not justify the feedback system.

digaran, I don't understand why are you failing to understand your situation? You are not helping yourself in-fact you are upsetting many others which is making you look every bad.

The best suggestion I have for you is: Leave the reputation board for the next one or more years.

Go to this page: .../index.php?action=profile;u=[add your user id];sa=ignoreBoards
Check Reputation
Click the Change Profile button.

[JollyGood]

It is not only the attention that this troll craves for, he clearly feels his actions (past, present and future) are vindicated because for the fact he managed to get on to a signature campaign.

If it were not for hitting campaign quota targets, he would have faded away in to obscurity therefore the question is asked: why would a particular campaign manager enrol him and many others that have received negative tags to their campaigns when no other campaign manager would have enrolled any of them?

I'm begging for it

Because you are. Like every dedicated troll you crave attention. Your response to every bad thing you're accused of is to do more of it. I get that you're likely a sad jobless clown with nothing else to do, but creating all these threads and attacking users who got sick of your trollfuckery is just going to make more people see your trollfuckery.

[suchmoon]

~

This ain't gonna work, stop digging your hole unless you're planning to live there for the rest of your miserable forum existence.

[KaosanRoad]

All of you are way to addicted about Feedback... 
Try to think about something else for a week, or day or a hour atleast if you can

[suchmoon]

I meant what I said, SM, your actions helped me to realize this.

I don't think so. "A grown man, a mature person" wouldn't need to keep telling everyone how grown up and mature he is, while acting like an utter sig-spamming trollclown. He'd lock the threads and go on being all grown up and mature.  

[Poker Player]

For some reason I had missed this thread. Don't you get tired of making a fool of yourself? You have several tags for trolling, and you call yourself a troll so they are true to reality. You've even done a lot worse than trolling, so behaving like a little kid isn't going to get them removed.

[Poker Player]

Blah, blah, blah, bullshit, nonsense, and more blah, blah, blah.

Btw, is it not funny that you gave a neutral to me right after getting into DT?  

Yes, Pinocchio, it's funny because your nose has grown back. I didn't leave you a neutral tag after getting into DT, because I've been a Default Trust member for more than two years. You probably mean it was after entering DT1, but I guess you haven't figured out that correlation does not imply causation. If now you see a lightning strike and after a while I leave you a red feedback, you will surely deduce that I left you a feedback because of the lightning, right?

By the way, I have deleted the previous feedback and added a new one about what I actually think today.