Correct me if wrong. But Ratimov did not defend himself? Instead he remained mute about what is going on. Which likely means he does not care about what is going on about what people are discussing about him recently on this forum.
Because any objection to the centralized DT is taken as an act of disobedience and causes even more tags. Everyone sees everything and soon everyone will boycott your DT and will laugh at a bunch of idiots. This process has already begun. And no army of staff's DT-alts will help you
DT-system is designed so that every day someone inevitably betrays someone. You all constantly betray each other. What kind of trust can we talk about on the forum? Your DT-system and Loycev's trust-logs will break if at least one day someone does not betray someone
Also, Bitcoin SV is back? How long of a break did we get from his trolling?
Why trolling? I am an honest worker of my signature. And I'm not going to abandon my ship. Unlike all of you, I am not a traitor.
I'm probably the most honest person here, but the buggy trust system thinks differently
If you had even a shred of honesty about you, then you'd acknowledge your only interest in this discussion is about how you and your verminous cohorts are perceived. You've been making several posts lately about people who have left you negative feedback, so it's not difficult to determine your true angle here. It's no surprise you'd want to complain about a reputation system that actively hinders you from gaining influence and ripping off more people with your trashy forkcoin scam.
You are living testament to the fact that DT works exactly as intended. Scum gets tagged as scum, so everyone can see it.
So you admit that your DT-system creates evil?
I didn't rob anyone on the forum, but they redtagged me. What the heck I should respect these idiots? Nobody trusts your system. The main base of the system consists of a pocket DT-army of senior forum employees who form trust lists. There are also good users, but they don’t actually decide anything and are there only to maintain legitimacy of DT (to create the appearance of consensus in DT)